BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Zaremba Ulyana (University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, Poland)
Title
Strong ESG Risk Management as a Way to Improve Organisational Resilience in Times of Crisis: An Analysis of WIG-ESG Index Constituents
Mocne zarządzanie ryzykiem ESG jako sposób na zwiększenie odporności organizacji w czasach kryzysu: analiza składników indeksu WIG-ESG
Source
Nauki o Finansach / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu, 2023, vol. 28, nr 1, s. 1-15, rys.,tab., bibliogr. 35 poz.
Financial Sciences / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu
Keyword
Rating, Inwestowanie, Zarządzanie ryzykiem, Indeks giełdowy
Rating, Investing, Risk management, Stock market indexes
Note
JEL Classification: Q01, G32, D53, M14
streszcz., summ.
Abstract
W ciągu ostatniej dekady praktyki zrównoważonego inwestowania znacznie się rozwinęły. Raportowanie ESG płynnie przechodzi od dobrowolności do obowiązku. Inwestując w spółki, które osiągają wysokie wyniki w rankingach ESG, inwestorzy liczą na odporność organizacji na kryzysy i wyższe stopy zwrotu. W związku z dynamicznym rozwojem inwestowania społecznie odpowiedzialnego zarówno w Polsce, jak i na świecie tworzone są nowe indeksy wykorzystujące kryteria screeningu ESG, które z kolei stanowią instrument bazowy dla produktów strukturyzowanych. Celem pracy była analiza składników nowo utworzonego indeksu WIG-ESG oraz omówienie wyników i odporności organizacyjnej spółek w odniesieniu do ekspozycji i zarządzania ryzykiem ESG. Badania wykazały, że kryteria włączenia do indeksu WIG-ESG powinny zostać zmienione w taki sposób, aby wyróżnić spółki, które dbają o mocne zarządzanie ryzykiem ESG i wykluczyć te, których wysiłki w zakresie ESG są znikome. Drugą ważną kwestią jest kwalifikowalność do włączenia. Jeżeli wszystkie spółki będą kwalifikowały się do włączenia do indeksu (rating ESG jako warunek włączenia), ograniczy to rotację składników indeksu i pozwoli na zbadanie zależności pomiędzy ewaluacją oceny ESG spółki na przestrzeni lat a jej sytuacją finansową.(abstrakt oryginalny)

During the last decade sustainable investment practices have evolved significantly. ESG reporting is moving seamlessly from voluntary to mandatory. By investing in companies that score high in ESG rankings, investors hope for the organisation's resilience to the crisis and higher returns. Due to the dynamic development of socially responsible investing both in Poland and worldwide, new indices using ESG screening criteria are being designed, which in turn are the underlying instrument for structured products. The aim of the study was to analyse the constituents of the newly created WIG-ESG index and to discuss its performance and organisational resilience in relation to ESG risk exposure and management. The research showed that the criteria for inclusion in the WIG- -ESG index should be amended to recognise companies that care about strong ESG risk management and exclude those with negligible ESG efforts. The second important issue is eligibility for inclusion. If all companies are eligible to be included in the index (ESG testing as a condition for inclusion), this will reduce the rotation of the index's constituents and allow the relation between a company's ESG score after each update and its long-term performance to be explored.(original abstract)
Accessibility
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. ASBIS. (2021). ASBIS recognized by WSE as a socially responsible company. Retrieved July 20, 2022 fromhttps://inwestor.asbis. pl/ news/press /asbis - recognized-by-wse-as-a-social-responsible-company
  2. Bloomberg. (2022). ESG May surpass $41 trillion assets in 2022, but not without challenges, finds Bloomberg intelligence. Retrieved June 19, 2022 from https://www.bloomberg.com/company/press/esg-may-surpass-41-trillion-assets-in-2022- -but-not-without-challenges-finds-bloomberg-intelligence/
  3. Cegliński, P. (2015). 5 lat funkcjonowania Respect Index. Ocena i perspektywy. In M. Buszko, D. Krupa, A. Drews (Eds.), Perspektywa - wyzwania współczesnej gospodarki. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
  4. Coelho, R., Jayantilal, S., and Ferreira, J. (2023). The impact of social responsibility on corporate financial performance: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, https://doi.org/10.1002/ csr.2446
  5. Commission Delegated Regulation. (EU) 2022/1214 of 9 March 2022 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 as regards economic activities in certain energy sectors and Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 as regards specific public disclosures for those economic activities.
  6. Cheema-Fox, A., LaPerla, B. R., Wang, H., and Serafeim, G. (2021). Corporate resilience and response to COVID-19. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 33(2), 24-40.
  7. Dimson, E., Marsh, P., and Staunton, M. (2020). Divergent ESG ratings. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 47(1), 75-87.
  8. Diouf, D., and Boiral, O. (2017). The quality of sustainability reports and impression management: A stakeholder perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(3), 643-667.
  9. Erhart, S. (2022). Take it with a pinch of salt - ESG rating of stocks and stock indices. International Review of Financial Analysis, (83), 1-10.
  10. Euronext. (n.d.). Retrieved June 30, 2022 from https://live.euronext.com/en/product/indices/FR0014005WN0-XPAR, 30.06.2022.
  11. European Parliament Press Release, Sustainable economy: Parliament adopts new reporting rules for multinationals (2022, 10 November). Retrieved January 25, 2023 from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20221107IPR 49611/sustainable-economy-parliament-adopts-new-reporting-rules-for-multinationals
  12. Fafaliou, I., Giaka, M., Konstantios, D., and Polemis, M. (2022). Firms' ESG reputational risk and market longevity: A firm-level analysis for the United States. Journal of Business Research, 149, 161-177.
  13. Folger-Laronde, Z., Pashang, S., Feor, L., and ElAlfy, A. (2020). ESG ratings and financial performance of exchange-traded funds during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, (12:2), 490-496.
  14. FTSE Russel. (2022). FTSE4Good Index Series. Index overview. Retrieved July 15, 2022 from https://research.ftserussell.com/ products/ downloads/ FTSE4Good-brochure.pdf
  15. Galletta, S., Mazzù, S., and Naciti, V. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of ESG performance in the banking industry: From the current status to future directions. Research in International Business and Finance, 62, 1-27.
  16. Gallopin, G. C. (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 16, 293-303.
  17. Giese, G., Lee, L.-E., Melas, D., Nagy, Z., and Nishikawa, L. (2019). Foundations of ESG investing: How ESG affects equity valuation, risk, and performance. Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(5), 69-83.
  18. GrantThornton. (2022). Purpurowy informator. Informacja o obowiązkach raportowania niefinansowego. Retrieved July 15, 2022 from https://grantthornton.pl
  19. KGHM. (n.d.). Retrieved June 20, 2022 from https://kghm.com/pl/zrownowazony-rozwoj/inwestycja-godna-zaufania/wig-esg
  20. Khan, M. A. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of ESG performance in the banking industry: From the current status to future directions. Research in International Business and Finance, (62).
  21. Kotsantonis, S., and Serafeim, G. (2019). Four things no-one will tell you about ESG data. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31(2), 50-58.
  22. La Torre, M., Mango, F., Cafaro, A., and Leo, S. (2020). Does the ESG index affect stock return? Evidence from the Eurostoxx50. Sustainability, 12(16), 6387.
  23. Lexology. (2021). The evolution of ESG from CSR. Retrieved June 20, 2022 from https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx- ?g= 80bbe258-a1df-4d4c-88f0-6b7a2d2cbd6a
  24. Madison, N. and Schiehll, E. (2021). The effect of financial materiality on ESG performance assessment. Sustainability, 13(3652).
  25. Nasdaq 1. (n.d.). Index methodology - OMX Copenhagen 25 ESG responsible index. Retrieved June 14, 2022 from https:// indexes.nasdaqomx.com/docs/methodology_OMXC25ESG.pdf
  26. Nasdaq 2. (n.d.). Index methodology - OMX Helsinki 25 ESG responsible index. Retrieved June 14, 2022 from https https:// indexes.nasdaqomx.com/docs/methodology_OMXH25ESG.pdf
  27. Olszewska, I. (2019), Giełdowa ekstraklasa w jednym indeksie, czyli wszystko o WIG-ESG. Economic Forum in Krynica-Zdrój. Retrieved June 20, 2022 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5PtzsOcOgs (20.06.2022)
  28. Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment.
  29. Sabatino, M. (2016). Economic crisis and resilience: Resilient capacity and competitiveness of the enterprises. Journal of Business Research. 69(5), 1924-1927.
  30. Six. ESG indexes. Retrieved June 20, 2022 from https https://www.six-group.com
  31. Srivastava J., Sampath, A., and Gopalakrishnan, B. (2022). Is ESG the key to unlock debt financing during the COVID-19 pandemic? International evidence. Finance Research Letters, 49.
  32. SustainAbility. (2020). Rate the raters 2020: Investor survey and interview results. Retrieved June 13, 2022 from https https:// www.sustainability.com
  33. Torre, M., La Mango, F., Cafaro, A., and Leo, S. (2020). Does the ESG index affect stock return? Evidence from the Eurostoxx50. Sustainability, 12(16), 6387.
  34. Weber, O., Scholz, R. W., and Michalik, G. (2010). Incorporating sustainability criteria into credit risk management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(1), 39-50.
  35. Wong, W. C., Batten, J.A., Ahmad, A.H., Mohamed-Arshad, S. B., Nordin, S., and Adzis, A. A. (2021). Does ESG certification add firm value? Finance Research Letters, 39(101593),
Cited by
Show
ISSN
2080-5993
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.15611/fins.2023.1.02
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu