BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Puślecki Łukasz (Poznan University of Economics)
Title
Forging Innovation Cooperation in Central and Eastern Europe : Unveiling the Location Role in Biopharmaceutical Industry
Source
Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 2023, vol. 11, nr 3, s. 123-142, tab., rys., bibliogr. 106 poz.
Keyword
Współpraca, Innowacyjność, Przemysł biofarmaceutyczny
Cooperation, Innovative character, Biopharma industry
Note
JEL Classification: F23, L25, M16, O32.
summ.
This paper includes findings from the research project financed by the research grant of the National Science Centre (Poland) awarded based on the decision no. DEC-2015/19/D/HS4/00414.
Country
Europa Środkowa, Europa Wschodnia
Central Europe, Eastern Europe
Abstract
Objective: The article aims to verify the development of innovation cooperation in the biopharmaceutical (biotech, pharma) industry in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) taking into account the directions of innovation cooperation. I will try to verify the importance of location in innovation cooperation in the biopharmaceutical industry in the CEE region, mainly if the frequency of cooperation within research and development (R&D) alliances with CEE partners is higher than with non-CEE partners.
Research Design & Methods: This is one of the first quantitative primary research articles in the world focused on innovation cooperation in the biopharmaceutical industry in the CEE region (covering 18 CEE countries), in the years 2015-2017. I conducted an online survey and collected data from January 2019 to March 2020 (a long-lasting process). The sampling procedure was non-random (purposeful selection with snowballing technique). To verify the directions of cooperation within R&D alliances in the biopharmaceutical industry, I investigated 241 R&D alliances conducted by 107 companies from the CEE region in the years 2015-2017.
Findings: The results show that the frequency of cooperation within R&D alliances with CEE partners was higher than with non-CEE partners (for selected partners and sectors). Moreover, according to the analysis of 241 R&D alliances, I observed the same results, i.e. companies from the CEE region - taking into account the direction of innovation cooperation - are more willing to develop R&D alliances with partners from the CEE region (including partners from the domestic market) than with partners outside the CEE region (North America, Western Europe, Asia) in the biopharmaceutical industry.
Implications & Recommendations: In the difficult times of the Covid-19 pandemic, companies should be more open to cooperation and use local potential and local partners to develop better therapies for patients. With more flexible modes of cooperation, it is possible to deliver new solutions and better patient treatment to the market faster, which is particularly germane to responses to the current Covid-19 pandemic, and potential future pandemics.
Contribution & Value Added: The involvement of all partners, both from the local and regional level, from business and academia, in the innovation cooperation positively impacts the innovation cooperation performance. The identified directions of innovation cooperation in CEE countries may contribute to the development of innovation cooperation in the CEE countries in the future and greater exploitation of the innovation and educational potential of the biopharmaceutical industry in the domestic market and the entire CEE region (clinical trials, clusters, science and technology parks, academia, institutions). (original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Alcácer, J. (2006). Location choices across the value chain: How activity and capability influence collocation. Management Science, 52(10), 1457-1471. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0658
  2. Alhajaj, K.E., & Moonesar, I.A. (2023). The power of big data mining to improve the health care system in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Big Data, 10(12), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-022-00681-5
  3. Androniceanu, A. (2023). The new trends of digital transformation and artificial intelligence in public administration. Administratie si Management Public, 40, 147-155. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2023.40-09
  4. Androniceanu, A., Georgescu, I., & Sabie, O.-M. (2022). The impact of digitalization on public administration, economic development, and well-being in the EU countries. Central European Public Administration Review, 20(1), 7-29.
  5. Awate, S., Larsen, M., & Mudambi, R. (2015). Accessing vs sourcing knowledge: a comparative study of R&D internationalization between emerging and advanced economy firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 46, 63-86. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.46
  6. Barłożewski, K., & Trąpczyński, P. (2021). Internationalisation motives and the multinationality-performance relationship: The case of Polish firms. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9(2), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2021.090206
  7. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  8. Bartolacci, F., Cardoni, A., Łasak, P., & Sadkowski, W. (2022). An analytical framework for strategic alliance formation between a cooperative bank and a fintech start-up: An Italian case study. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management, and Innovation, 18(4), 115-156. https://doi.org/10.7341/20221844
  9. Baum, J., Calabrese, T. & Silverman, B. (2000). Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology, Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 267-294. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3%3C267::AID-SMJ89%3E3.0.CO;2-8
  10. Bourla, A. (2022). Moonshot: Inside Pfizer's Nine-Month Race to Make the Impossible Possible. HarperCollins Publishers Ltd.
  11. Cantwell, J.A., & Santangelo, G.D. (1999). The frontier of international technology networks: sourcing abroad the most highly tacit capability. Information Economics and Policy, 11, 101-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167- 6245(99)00005-0
  12. Capaldo, A., & Petruzzelli, A.M. (2014). Partner geographic and organizational proximity and the innovative performance of knowledge-creating alliances. European Management Review, 11(1), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12024
  13. Casson, M. (1987). The Firm and the Market. Oxford: Blackwell.
  14. Chesbrough, H. (2020). To recover faster from Covid-19, open up: Managerial implications from an open innovation perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 410-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.04.010
  15. Contractor, F.J., & Lorange, P. (1988). Cooperative strategies in international business. Lexington Books.
  16. Das, T.K. (2005). Deceitful Behaviors of Alliance Partners: Potential and Prevention. Management Decision, 43(5), 706-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740510597725
  17. De Man, A.P., & Duysters, G. (2007). The Second Alliance Management Study 2007. Network Social Innovation (NSI). Masstricht University.
  18. De Man, A.P., Duysters, G., & Neyes, I. (2009). The Third Alliance Management Study 2009, Network Social Innovation (NSI), Masstricht University.
  19. De Man, A.P., Duysters, G., Luvison, D., & Krijnen, A. (2012). The Fourth State of Alliance Management Study 2011 - presentation at 2012 ASAP Global Alliance Summit in Las Vegas (USA), 5-8 March 2012, 1-14
  20. Drelich-Skulska, B., & Jankowiak, A.H. (2019). Clusters as an element of regional specialisation based on the ex ample of Lower Silesa. Biblioteka Regionalisty, 19, 37-49. https://doi.org/10.15611/br.2019.1.03
  21. Duysters, G., & Hagedoorn, J. (2000). A note on organizational modes of strategic technology partnering. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 58, 640-649.
  22. García-Canal, E., & Guillén, M.F. (2008). Risk and the strategy of foreign location choice in regulated industries. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1097-1115. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.692
  23. Gomes-Casseres, B. (1996). The Alliance Revolution: The New Shape of Business Rivalry. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
  24. Gomes-Casseres, B. (2014). Creating Joint Value: in Biopharma and Many Other Industries, "Not Invented Here" is SO Last Century. Strategic Alliance Magazine, Association of Strategic Alliance Professionals, Q3, 36-41.
  25. Gomes-Casseres, B., Hagedoorn, J., & Jaffe, A. B. (2006). Do alliances promote knowledge flows?. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(1), 5-33.
  26. Gorynia, M., & Trąpczyński, P. (2017). A double-edged sword? The moderating effects of control on firm capabilities and institutional distance in explaining foreign affiliate performance. International Business Review, 2017, 26(4), 697-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.12.009
  27. Gorynia, M., & Trąpczyński, P. (2022). Evolution of globalisation and firm internationalisation under crisis conditions - the perspective of Polish exporters amidst the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020-2021. Przegląd Europejski, 3, 25-40, https://doi.org/10.31338/1641-2478pe.3.22.2
  28. Gorynia, M., Nowak, J., Trąpczyński, P. & Wolniak, R. (2019). Friend or Foe? On the role of institutional reforms in the investment development path of Central and East European economies, International Business Review, 28(3), 575-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.12.003
  29. Gorynia, M., Nowak, J., Trąpczyński, P. & Wolniak, R. (2022). Integration and investment development paths of CEE countries. Does EU-membership make a difference?. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 63(1), 27-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2020.1828124
  30. Gorynia, M. (1995). Mezoekonomia - modele samoregulacji branży, Ekonomista, 5-6, 815-837.
  31. Gorynia, M. (Ed.). (2023). Pandemia, wojna, globalne przesilenie. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu.
  32. Granstrand, O., Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Multi-technology corporations: why they have 'distributed' rather than 'distinctive core' competencies. California Management Review, 39(Summer), 8-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165908
  33. Gulati, R. (1995). Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 85-112.
  34. Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 293-317. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.692
  35. Gulati, R., & Singh, H. (1998). The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination cost and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 781-814. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393616
  36. Hagedoorn, J. (1990). Organizational modes of inter-firm cooperation and technology transfer. Technovation, 10(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(90)90039-M
  37. Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371-385. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140505
  38. Hagedoorn, J. (2002). Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy, 31(4), 477-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00120-2
  39. Hagedoorn, J., Link, A., & Vonortas, N. (2000). Research partnerships. Research Policy, 29(4), 567-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00090-6
  40. Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83-103. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120908
  41. Henisz, W. (2000). The institutional environment for multinational investment. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 16(2), 334-364. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/16.2.334
  42. Hennart, F. (1988). A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 361- 374. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090406
  43. Hong, J.F.L., & Snell, R.S. (2013). Developing new capabilities across a supplier network through boundary crossing: a case study of a China-based MNC subsidiary and its local suppliers. Organization Studies, 34(3), 377- 406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612467154
  44. Howard, M., Steensma, H.K., Lyles, M., & Dhanaraj, C. (2016). Learning to collaborate through collaboration: how allying with expert firms influences collaborative innovation within novice firms. Strategic Management Journal, 37(10), 2092-2103. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2424
  45. Jaklič, A., Damijan, J.P., Rojec, M., & Kunčič, A. (2014). Relevance of innovation cooperation for firms' innovation activity: The case of Slovenia. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 27(1), 645-661. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2014.975513
  46. Jaklič, A., Obloj, K., Svetličič, M., & Kronegger, L. (2020). Evolution of Central and Eastern Europe related international business research. Journal of Business Research, 108, 421-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.046
  47. Jaklič, A., Puślecki, Ł., & Trąpczyński, P. (2023). The CEE region on a New Wave of Transition: Towards Value Chain Reconfiguration and Innovation Cooperation amidst Turbulent Times. Journal of East European Management Studies. Special Issue 2023.
  48. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 24, 625-646. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490248
  49. Kumar, M.V.M, Atalla, S., Almuraqab. N., & Moonesar, I.A. (2022). Detection of COVID-19 Using Deep Learning Techniques and Cost Effectiveness Evaluation: A Survey. Frontiers of Artificial Intelligence, 5, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.912022
  50. Kumar, MV. M., Patil, J., Shastry, K.A., Darshan., S., Sastry, N.K.B., Moonesar, I.A., Atalla, S., Almuraqab, N. & Rao, A. (2022). ICT Enabled Disease Diagnosis, Treatment and Management-A Holistic Cost-Effective Approach Through Data Management and Analysis in UAE and India. Frontiers of Artificial Intelligence, 5, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.909101
  51. Lai, W.H., & Chang, P.L. (2010). Corporate motivation and performance in R&D alliances. Journal of Business Research, 63(5), 490-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.04.007
  52. Leiblein, M.J., & Miller, D.J. (2003). An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of firms. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 839-859. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.340
  53. Li, D., Eden, L., Hitt, M., & Ireland, R.D. (2008). Friends, acquaintances, or strangers? Partner selection in R&D alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 315-334.
  54. Martínez-Noya, A., & Narula, R. (2018). What more can we learn from R&D alliances? A review and research agenda. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 21(3), 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.04.001
  55. Miłoś, C. (2021). Conditions and challenges for Polish-Chinese trade cooperation in high-tech goods. International Entrepreneurship Review, 7(3), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2021.0703.04
  56. Mol, M. (2005). Does being R&D intensive still discourage outsourcing? Evidence from Dutch firms. Research Policy, 34, 571-582.
  57. Moonesar, I.A., & Dass, R. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Health Policy - A Global Perspective. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology. 21 (H1), 1-7.
  58. Narula, R., & Martínez-Noya, A. (2015). International R&D alliances by firms: origins and development. In D., Archibugi, & A. Filippetti, (Eds.), The handbook of global science, technology, and innovation (pp. 148-173). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118739044.ch7
  59. Narula, R., & Dunning, J. (1998). Explaining international R&D alliances and the role of governments. International Business Review, 7(4), 377-397.
  60. Narula, R., & Hagedoorn, J. (1999). Innovating through strategic alliances: moving towards international partnerships and contractual agreements. Technovation, 19(6/7), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166- 4972(98)00127-8
  61. Narula, R., & Sadowski, B. (2002). Technological catch-up and strategic technology partnering in developing countries. International Journal of Technology Management, 23(5/6/7/8), 599-617. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2002.003028
  62. Narula, R., & Santangelo, G. (2009). Location, collocation and R&D alliances in the European ICT industry. Research Policy, 38, 393-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.005
  63. Narula, R., & Santangelo, G.D. (2012). Location and collocation advantages in international innovation. Multinational Business Review, 20(1), 6-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/15253831211217161
  64. Nicholls-Nixon, C., & Woo, C. (2003). Technology sourcing and output of established firms in a regime of encompassing technological change. Strategic Management Journal, 24(7), 651-666. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.329
  65. Nowak, P. (2021). Cooperation of enterprises in innovative activities on the example of Polish regions. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(4), 839-857. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.031.
  66. Nowiński, W., Rymarczyk, J., & Starzyk, K. (Eds.). (2022). COVID-19. Implications for the economy. WSB in Poznań University Press.
  67. Pisano, G., & Teece, D. (1989). Collaborative arrangements and global technology strategy: some evidence from the telecommunications equipment industry. In: R. Rosenblum (Ed.), Research on Technological Innovation, Management, and Policy (pp. 227-256), Vol. 4.
  68. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT. Piwowar-Sulej, K., & Podsiadły, K. (2022). Technological innovation and the labor market: The two-way non-reciprocal relationships with a focus on the confectionery industry in Poland. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management, and Innovation, 18(2), 135-171. https://doi.org/10.7341/20221835
  69. Powell, W.W., & Grodal, S. (2005). Networks of innovators. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 56-85). Oxford: Oxford University Press,
  70. Puślecki, Ł., & Trąpczyński, P. (2014). New Developments in International Business and Economics in CEECs. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review , 2(4), 7-8. http://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2014.020401
  71. Puślecki, Ł. (2010). Wpływ współpracy technologicznej krajów rozwiniętych gospodarczo na ich konkurencyjność międzynarodową. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe GRADO.
  72. Puślecki, Ł. (2012). Sectoral Analysis of Strategic Technology Alliances in years 1980-2006. Intercathedra, 28(4), 79-83.
  73. Puślecki, Ł. (2015). The development and management of alliance networks in the biopharmaceutical industry. In W. Sroka & Š. Hittmár (Eds.), Management of Network Organizations: Theoretical Problems and the Dilemmas in Practice (pp. 199-213). Springer International Publishing.
  74. Puślecki, Ł. (2016). Diversity of relationships and alliances in biopharmaceutical industry. In W. Sroka, S. Hittmar & J. Kurowska-Pysz (Eds.) New Trends in Management and Production Engineering. Regional, Cross-boarder and Global Perspectives (pp. 127-137). Aachen: Shaker Varlag.
  75. Puślecki, Ł. (2021). Challenges for innovation cooperation in the biopharmaceutical industry during the Covid-19 pandemic. In B. Jankowska & E. Mińska-Struzik (Eds.) Towards the "New Normal" after Covid-19: A posttransition economy perspective (pp. 201-213). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu. https://doi.org/10.18559/978-83-8211-061-6/II7
  76. Puślecki, Ł., & Staszków, M. (2015). New Cooperation Modes: An Opportunity for Polish Biotechnological Clusters. Managing Global Transitions: International Research Journal, 13(2), 171-188.
  77. Puślecki, Ł., Dąbrowski, M., Czekajlo, M., & Puślecki, M. (2022). Accelerating R&D with knowledge and new technological solutions - from Innovation Cooperation to Translational Innovation. In R. Śliwiński & Ł. Puślecki (Eds.), Competition, Strategy, and Innovation. The Impact of Trends in Business and the Consumer World (pp. 175-202). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003204343
  78. Puślecki, Ł., Trąpczyński, P. & Staszków, M. (2016). Emerging advanced topics in an advanced emerging market? International business research in Poland in the period 1990-2014. Journal of East European Management Studies, 21(2), 139-166. http://doi.org/10.1688/JEEMS-2016-Puslecki
  79. Reuer, J.J., & Lahiri, N. (2014). Searching for alliance partners: effects of geographic distance on the formation of R&D collaborations. Organization Science, 25(1), 283-298. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0805
  80. Sakakibara, M. (2002). Formation of R&D consortia: industry and company effects. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1033-1050. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.272
  81. Samoilikova, A., Korpysa, J., Vasylieva, T., & Filep, B. (2023). Business - education collaboration in R&D investment: Analysis of development gaps and critical points using MAR-splines. Journal of International Studies, 16(2), 57-71. https://dpi.prg/10.14254/2071-8330.2023/16-2/3
  82. Santangelo, G.D., Meyer, K., & Jindra, B. (2016). MNE subsidiaries' outsourcing and insourcing of R&D: the role of local institutions. Global Strategy Journal, 6(4), 247-268. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1137
  83. Schuh, A. (2012). Strategy Review for Central and Eastern Europe: Strategic Responses of Foreign Multinational Corporations to the Recent Economic and Financial Crisis, Journal of East-West Business, 18(3), 185-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669868.2012.709221
  84. Schuh, A. (2021). Investment attractiveness of Central and Eastern Europe for Western multi- national firms in the post-COVID-19 era. In M. Marinov & S. Marinova (Eds.), COVID-19 and International Business (pp.339- 348). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003108924
  85. Schuh, A., & Rossmann, A. (2009). Schwerpunkte und Trends in der betriebswirtschaftlichen Mittel- und Osteuropaforschung: Ein Literaturüberblick zum Zeitraum 1990-2005. In R. Moser (Ed.), Internationale Unternehmensführung - Entscheidungsfelder und politische Aspekte (pp.161-204). Wiesbaden: Gabler https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8431-9_8
  86. Schuh, A., Trąpczyński, P., & Puślecki, Ł. (2024). Multinational Companies in Central and Eastern Europe. In T. Steger, I., Rybnikova, & R. Lang (Eds.), Handbook of Central and East European Management and Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (In PRESS)
  87. Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  88. Schumpeter, J.A. (1939). Business Cycles, vol. 1, New York: McGraw-Hill, Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper & Bros.
  89. Śliwiński, R., & Puślecki, Ł. (2022). Competition, Strategy, and Innovation. The Impact of Trends in Business and the Consumer World. New York: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003204343
  90. Staszków, M., Puślecki, Ł., & Trąpczyński, P. (2017). Development of science and technology parks in Poland: Opportunities for new modes of cooperation in the biopharmaceutical industry. Managing Global Transitions: International Research Journal, 15(1), 23-41. http://doi.org/10.26493/1854-6935.15.23-41
  91. Świadek, A., Dzikowski, P., Gorączkowska , J., & Tomaszewski, M. (2022). The National Innovation System in a catching-up country: empirical evidence based on micro data of a Triple Helix in Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(2), 511-540. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.016.
  92. Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K. ., & Gatnar, S. . (2022). Key competences of research and development project man-agers in high technology sector. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 10(3), 107-130. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL10_NO3_6
  93. Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097- 0266(199708)18:7%3C509::AID-SMJ882%3E3.0.CO;2-Z
  94. Tomášková, E. ., & Kaňovská, L. (2022). Impact of cooperation flexibility on innovation flexibility in SMEs . Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 17(2), 533-566. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.019.
  95. Trąpczyński, P., Jankowska, B., Dzikowska, M., & Gorynia, M. (2016). Identification of Linkages between the Competitive Potential and Competitive Position of SMEs Related to their Internationalization Patterns Shortly after the Economic Crisis. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(4), 29-50, DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040403
  96. Trąpczyński, P., Puślecki, Ł., & Jarosiński, M. (Eds.) (2016). Competitiveness of CEE Economies and Businesses: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Challenges and Opportunities. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  97. Trąpczyński, P., Puślecki, Ł., & Staszków, M. (2018). Determinants of Innovation Cooperation Performance: What Do We Know and What Should We Know?. Sustainability, 10(12), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124517
  98. Tvaronaviciene, M., & Burinskas, A. (2021). Internal funding determinants of R&D expenditures for U.S. mature firms. Journal of International Studies, 14(1), 276- 284. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2021/14-1/19
  99. Wach, K. (Ed.). (2020). Internationalization of Firms in the Perspective of International Entrepreneurship. Warszawa: PWN.
  100. Weresa, M.A. (2022). Polityka innowacyjna. Nowe tendencje w teorii i praktyce, Warszawa: PWN.
  101. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
  102. Wilks, Ch., & Prothmann, Ch. (2012). Open Innovation Alliances, Novel alliance models accelerate the identification and advancement of breakthrough therapies. Strategic Alliance Magazine, Q4, 42-45.
  103. Williamson, O.E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.
  104. Wybieralski, P. (2015). Alianse technologiczne a strategiczne zachowania korporacji międzynarodowych na rynkach niedoskonałych, Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
  105. Zaheer, A., Hernandez, E., & Banerjee, S. (2010). Prior alliances with targets and acquisition performance in knowledgeintensive industries. Organization Science, 21(5), 1072-1091. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0528
  106. Zollo, M., & Winter, S.G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780
Cited by
Show
ISSN
2353-883X
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110308
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu