BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Niedziółka Paweł (SGH Warsaw School of Economics), Bernardelli Michał (SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Poland), Korzeb Zbigniew (Bialystok University of Technology, Poland)
Title
Factors of ESG ratings assigned to commercial banks - the cultural and credit risk dimensions
Source
Argumenta Oeconomica, 2023, nr 2 (51), s. 33-63, rys., tab., bibliogr. 94 poz.
Keyword
Banki komercyjne, Rating, Ryzyko kredytowe
Commercial banks, Rating, Credit risk
Note
JEL Classification: G21, G30, Q56, Z10
summ.
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to examine the impact of cultural differences and credit ratings on the ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) scores assigned to commercial banks. The analysis was performed using ordered logistic regression. The Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the statistical significance of the explanatory variables were used as the method of comparing the models. Count R2 and adjusted count R2 were chosen as the measure of goodness of fit, but a non-diagonal element analysis of the contingency table was also performed. Based on the data of 330 banks from 50 countries the study proved that among all the clusters considered, the region with the highest ESG risk attributable to banks was the Arab countries, whereas regions with the lowest ESG risk were Western European and Nordic countries. Cultural variables found to influence ESG ratings were MAS (masculinity vs. femininity), PDI (power distance index), LTO (long-term orientation vs. short-term orientation), and UAI (uncertainty avoidance). In addition, a relationship between banks' ESG and credit ratings was observed, i.e. an increase in the average credit rating reduces the chance of classifying a bank as high or medium ESG risk vs. ESG low risk. This is the first study focused on binding the cultural characteristics of a given country with the results of ESG risk assessments of banks registered in this jurisdiction as well as assessing the relation between ESG and credit risks. This kind of clustering with the use of an econometric model allows for capturing the interrelationships of many factors simultaneously with full interpretability of the results. An added advantage was the excellent accuracy of the model, even though the maximisation of the predictive power was not the key aspect of the research.(original abstract)
Accessibility
The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics
The Main Library of the Wroclaw University of Economics
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Ahunov, M., & Van Hove, L. (2020). National culture and (dis)trust in banks: Cross-country evidence. Economic Notes, 49(3), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecno.12165 (accessed 22 July 2021).
  2. Ashraf, B. N., Zheng, C., & Arshad, S. (2016). Effects of national culture on bank risk-taking behaviour. Research in International Business and Finance, 37, 309-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.01.015 (accessed 10 April 2021).
  3. Aslan, A., Poppe, L., & Posch, P. (2021). Are sustainable companies more likely to default? Evidence from the dynamics between credit and ESG Ratings. Sustainability, 13(15), 8568.
  4. Berg, F., Kölbel, J., & Rigobon, R. (2020). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438533 (accessed 22 March 2021).
  5. Bernardelli, M., Korzeb, Z., & Niedziółka, P. (2021). The banking sector as the absorber of the COVID-19 crisis? The economic consequences: The perception of WSE investors. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(2), 335-374.
  6. Billio, M., Costola, M., Hristova, I., Latino, C., & Pelizzon, L. (2020). Inside the ESG ratings: (Dis) Agreement and performance. SAFE Working Paper, 284.
  7. Birindelli G., Dell'Atti S., Iannuzzi A.P., & Savioli, M. (2018). Composition and activity of the board of directors: Impact on ESG performance in the banking system. Sustainability, 10, 4699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124699 (accessed 30 May 2021).
  8. Breuer, W., Ghufran, B., & Salzmann, A. J. (2018). National culture, managerial preferences and takeover performance. International Business Review, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.05.008 (accessed 15 February 2021).
  9. Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L.T.W., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716.
  10. Buallay, A. (2019). Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector. Management of Environmental Quality, 30, 98-115. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2017-0149 (accessed 10 November 2021).
  11. Chih H. L, Chih, H. H., & Chen, T. H. (2010). On the determinants of corporate social responsibility: International evidence on the financial industry. Journal of Business & Ethics, 93, 115-135.
  12. Chwialkowska, A., Bhatti, W. A., & Glowik, M. (2020). The influence of cultural values on proenvironmentalbehaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, https://doi.org./10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122305 (accessed 23 August 2021).
  13. Ciciretti, R., Kobeissi, N., & Zhu, Y. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: An analysis of bank community responsibility. International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, 5, 342. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBAAF.2014.067026 (accessed 18 August 2021).
  14. Cornett, M. M., Erhemjamts, O., & Tehranian, H. (2016). Greed or good greeds: An examination of the relation between corporate social responsibility and the financial performance of U.S. commercial banks around the financial crisis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 70, 137-159.
  15. Cox, P. L., Friedman, B. A., & Tribunella, T. (2011). Relationships among cultural dimensions, national gross domestic product and environmental sustainability. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 12(6), 46-56.
  16. Crespi, F., & Migliavacca, M. (2020). The determinants of ESG rating in the financial industry: The same old story or a different tale? Sustainability, 12, 6398, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166398 (accessed 03 June 2021).
  17. Dangelico, R. M., Fraccascia, L., & Nastasi, A. (2020). National culture's influence on environmental performance of countries: A study of direct and indirect effects. Sustainable Development, 28(6), 1773-1786.
  18. Del Giudice, A., & Rigamonti, S. (2020), Does audit improve the quality of ESG scores? Evidence from corporate misconduct. Sustainability, 12, 5670, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145670 (accessed 20 March 2021).
  19. Deloitte (2021), Ratingi ESG - jaką dają wartość i jak się do nich dobrze przygotować?, https://www2.deloitte.com/pl/pl/pages/zarzadzania-procesami-i-strategiczne/articles/esg-ratingi-jak-sieprzygotowac-jaka-daja-wartosc.html (accessed 29 March 2022).
  20. Devalle, A., Fiandrino, S., & Cantino, V. (2017). The linkage between ESG performance and credit ratings: A firm-level perspective analysis. International Journal of Business and Management, 12(9), 53-65.
  21. Drempetic, S., Klein, Ch., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 333-360.
  22. Durach, C. F., & Wiengarten, F. (2017). Environmental management: The impact of national and organisational long-term orientation on plants' environmental practices and performance efficacy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 749-758.
  23. El Khoury, R., Nasrallah, N., & Alareeni, B. (2021). The determinants of ESG in the banking sector of MENA region: A trend or necessity? Competitiveness Review, Vol. ahead-of-print, https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-09-2021-0118.
  24. El-Zein, A., Jabbour, S., Tekce, B., Zurayk, H., Nuwayhid, I., Khawaja, M., Tell, T., Mooji, Y. A., De-Jong, J., Yassin, N., & Hogan, D. (2014). Health and ecological sustainability in the Arab world: A matter of survival, Lancet, 385(9915), 458-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62338-7 (accessed 11 November 2021).
  25. Elwell, N., & Williams, Y. (2016). If you care about the environment, you should care about gender, World Resources Institute, https://www.wri.org/insights/if-you-care-about-environment-youshould-care-about-gender (accessed 19 January 2021).
  26. Eringa, K., Caudron, L. N., Rieck, K., Xie, F., & Gerhardt, T. (2015). How relevant are Hofstede's dimensions for inter-cultural studies? A replication of Hofstede's research among current international business students. Research in Hospitality Management, 5(2), 187-198. https://10.1080/22243534.2015.11828344 (accessed 29 January 2021).
  27. Escrig-Olmedo, E., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á., Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Rivera-Lirio, J. M., & Muñoz-Torres, M. J. (2019). Rating the raters: Evaluating how ESG rating agencies integrate sustainability principles. Sustainability, 11, 915, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030915 (accessed 06 February 2021).
  28. Farrukh, K., Irshad, S., Shams Khakwani, M., Ishaque, S., Younus Ansari, N., & McMillan, D. (2017). Impact of dividend policy on shareholders wealth and firm performance in Pakistan. Cogent Business & Management, 4 (1), 1408208. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2017.1408208 (accessed 14 November 2021).
  29. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233, https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
  30. Halkos, G., & Skouloudis, A. (2016), Cultural dimensions and corporate social responsibility: A crosscountry analysis, MPRA Paper, No. 69222, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/69222/1/MPRA_paper_69222.pdf (accessed 15 November 2021).
  31. Hall, E. T. (1959). The Silent Language. Doubleday and Co.
  32. Hall, E. T. (1976), Beyond Culture. Doubleday Anchor Books.
  33. Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005), The impact of culture and corporate governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24, 391-430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001 (accessed 19 November 2021).
  34. Harrell, F. E. (2001). Regression Modeling Strategies. Springer-Verlag.
  35. Ho, F. N., Wang, H. M. D., & Vitell, S. J. (2012). A global analysis of corporate social performance: The effect of cultural and geographic environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 107 (4), 423-433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1047-y (accessed 18 November 2021).
  36. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. International differences in work-related values. Sage Publications.
  37. Hofstede, G. (1984), Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1, 81-99.
  38. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalising cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1-26, https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014 (accessed 22 February 2021).
  39. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5-21, https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5 (accessed 16 February 2021).
  40. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organisations: Software of the mind, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill.
  41. Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2014). Nations versus religions: Which has a stronger effect on societal values? Management International Review, 54, 801-824, https://doi.org./10.1007/s11575-014-0205-8 (accessed 27 January 2021).
  42. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organisations. The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Sage Publications.
  43. Hughes, A., Urban, M. A., & Wójcik, D. (2021). Alternative ESG ratings: How technological innovation is reshaping sustainable investment. Sustainability, 13, 3551, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063551 (accessed 02 June 2021).
  44. ICMA (2020), Sustainability-Linked Bond Principles. Voluntary Process Guidelines, ICMA, June, https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Regulatory/Green-Bonds/June-2020/Sustainability-Linked-Bond-Principles-June-2020-171120.pdf (accessed 21 June 2021).
  45. Jang, G.-Y., Kang, H.-G., Lee, J.-Y., & Bae, K. (2020). ESG scores and the credit market. Sustainability, 12, 3456, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083456 (accessed 10 March 2021).
  46. Khalid, F., Sun, J., Huang, G., & Su, Ch. (2021). Environmental, social and governance performance of Chinese multinationals: A comparison of state-and non-state-owned enterprises. Sustainability, 13, 4020, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13074020 (accessed 14 June 2021).
  47. Kiesel, F., & Lücke, F. (2019). ESG in credit ratings and the impact on financial markets. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 28, 3, 263-290.
  48. Koo, J. E., & Ki, E. S. (2020). Internal control personnel's experience, internal control weaknesses, and ESG rating. Sustainability, 12, 8645, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208645 (accessed 03 March 2021).
  49. Korzeb, Z. (2021). Cultural differences as a reason for failure of investment projects in the Polish banking sector. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 18(16), 152-162.
  50. Korzeb, Z., & Niedziółka, P. (2020). Resistance of commercial banks to the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic: the case of Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 15(2), 205-234, https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2020.010 (accessed 30 January 2021).
  51. Korzeb, Z., & Niedziółka, P. (2021). ESG ratings in Poland. Are they worth consideration by investors and banks? In K. S. Soliman (Ed.), Innovation Management and Information Technology Impact in Global Economy in the Era of Pandemic, 37th IBIMA Conference 1-2 April 2021 Cordoba, Spain, Conference proceedings, ISBN: 978-0-9998551-6-4.
  52. Korzeb Z., Niedziółka P., & Silva, A. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the Portuguese banking system. Linear ordering method. Estudios Gerenciales, 37(159), 226-241, https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2021.159.4414 (accessed 25 July 2021).
  53. KPMG (2020), Purpose and value take center stage, https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2020/07/banks-put-esg-at-the-heart-of-their-operations.html (accessed 25 January 2021).
  54. Krukowska, M. (2021). Oceny ESG wymagają ujednolicenia, https://www.obserwatorfinansowy.pl/bez-kategorii/rotator/oceny-esg-wymagaja-ujednolicenia-2/ (accessed 28 April 2021).
  55. Kumar, S., Vishlavath, G., & Sadarangani, P. (2019), A cross-national study of environmental performance and culture: Implications of the findings and strategies. Global Business Review, 20(4), 1051-1068.
  56. Laidlaw, J. (2018). More than 90% of ESG ratings actions on banks are negative: S&P Global Ratings, S&P Global, 26 October, https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latestnews-headlines/more-than-90-of-esg-ratings-actions-on-banks-are-negative-s-p-globalratings-47244014 (accessed 18 May 2021).
  57. Lahuerta-Otero, E., & González-Bravo, M. I. (2018). Can national culture affect the implementation of common sustainable policies? A European response. Cross-Cultural Research, 52(5), 468-495.
  58. Mallin, C., Farag, H., & Ow-Yong, K. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance in Islamic banks. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 103, S21-S38. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEBO.2014.03.001 (accessed 12 November 2021).
  59. McSweeney, B. (2002). The essentials of scholarship: A reply to Geert Hofstede. Human Relations, 55(11), 1363-1372, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00187267025511005 (accessed 29 May 2021).
  60. Mensah, Y. M., & Chen, H-Y. (2012). Global clustering of countries by culture - an extension of the GLOBE study, working paper, 2012 -4, Rutgers University, Center for Governmental Accounting Education and Research (CGAER), http://ssrn.com/abstract=2189904 (accessed 24 June 2021).
  61. Milfont, T. L., Wilson, J., & Diniz, P. (2012). Time perspective and environmental engagement: A metaanalysis. International Journal of Psychology, 47(5), 325-334.
  62. Miralles-Quirós, M. M., Miralles-Quirós, J. L. & Redondo H., J. (2019). ESG performance and shareholder value creation in the banking industry: International differences. Sustainability, 11, 1404, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051404 (accessed 20 March 2021).
  63. Morrow, D., & Burress, S. (2019). The ESG risk ratings, potential applications for investors, White paper, Vol. 3, https://odpowiedzialnybiznes.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/SustainalyticsESG RiskRatings_WhitePaperVolumeThree.pdf (accessed 15 June 2021).
  64. Mukherjee, P., & Roy, A. (2022). Does national culture influence corporate ESG disclosures? Evidence from cross-country study. Vision-The Journal of Business Perspective. https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629221074914.
  65. Nagy, S., & Molnárné, C. K. (2018). The effects of Hofstede's cultural dimensions on pro-environmental behaviour: How culture influences environmentally conscious behaviour. Theory Methodology Practice, 14, 27-36.
  66. OECD (2020). Gender and environmental statistics. Exploring available data and developing new evidence, https://www.oecd.org/environment/brochure-gender-and-environmental-statistics.pdf (accessed 19 August 2021).
  67. Onel, N., & Mukherjee, A. (2014). The effects of national culture and human development on environmental health. Environment Development and Sustainability, 16(1), 79-101.
  68. Paltrinieri, A., Dreassi, A., Migliavacca, M., & Piserà, S. (2020). Islamic finance development and banking ESG scores: Evidence from a cross-country analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 51, 101100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101100 (accessed 13 November 2021).
  69. Pan, F. (2021). ESG disclosure and performance in Southeast Asia, Sustainalytics, https://www.sustainalytics.com/esg-research/resource/investors-esg-blog/esg-disclosure-and-performance-insoutheast-asia (accessed 21 June 2021).
  70. Park, H., Russell, C., & Lee, J. (2007). National culture and environmental sustainability: A crossnational analysis. Journal of Economics and Finance, 31, 104-121.
  71. Peng, Y. S., Dashdeleg, A. U., & Chih, H. L. (2012). Does national culture influence firm's CSR engagement: A cross country study. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 58 (9), 40-44.
  72. Petruzzella, F., Salvi, A., & Giakoumelou, A. (2017). The impact of national culture on corporate environmental performance: How much does your origin say about how green you are? Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 5(1), 1-25.
  73. Pink, M. (2018). Cultural aspects of sustainable development. Economic and Environmental Studies Economics, 18(1), 323-339.
  74. Przychodzen, J., Gómez-Bezares, F., Przychodzen, W., & Larreina, M. (2016). ESG issues among fund managers - factors and motives. Sustainability, 8, 1078, https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101078 (accessed 09 April 2021).
  75. Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2020). Corporate environmental disclosure practices in different national contexts: The influence of cultural dimensions. Organization & Environment, 33, 597-623, https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619860263.
  76. Raimo, N., Zito, M., & Caragnano, A. (2019). Does national culture affect integrated reporting quality? A focus on Globe dimensions, 9th International Symposium on Natural Resources Management, May 31st, 2019, Zaječar, Serbia, ISBN 978-86-7747-606-9, pp. 383-392. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/199012/1/Does national culture affect integrated reporting quality? A focus on GLOBE dimensions .pdf (accessed 18 November 2021).
  77. Rico, M. N. (1998). Gender, the environment and the sustainability of development, https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/5886/1/S9800083_en.pdf (accessed 17 August 2021).
  78. Romano, M., Cirillo, A., Favino, C., & Netti, A. (2020). ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) Performance and Board Gender Diversity: The Moderating Role of CEO Duality. Sustainability, 12, 9298, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219298 (accessed 20 April 2021).
  79. Schwartz, S. H. (1992), Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6 (accessed 28 February 2021).
  80. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x (accessed 08 March 2021).
  81. Schwartz, S. H. (1999), A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology, 48(1), 23-47, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1999.tb00047.x (accessed 25 March 2021).
  82. Schwartz, S. H. (2004). Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world. In H. Vinken, J. Soeters, & P. Ester (Eds.), Comparing cultures, Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 43-73). Brill.
  83. Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2-3), 137-182, https://doi.org/10.1163/156913306778667357 (accessed 20 March 2021).
  84. Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., Ramos, A., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Demirutku, K., Dirilen-Gumus, O., & Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663-688, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029393 (accessed 22 April 2021).
  85. Shakil, M. H., Mahmood, N., Tasnia, M., & Munim, Z. H. (2019). Do environmental, social and governance performance affect the financial performance of banks? A cross-country study of emerging market banks, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30 (6), pp. 1331-1344. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-08-2018-0155 (accessed 9 November 2021).
  86. Singh, S., and Vanzellotti, T. (2021), Sustainability-Linked Loans 2021: The COVID-19 Effect, ESG Ratings & Continued Popularity, 15 April, https://www.sustainalytics.com/esg-research/resource/corporate-esg-blog/sustainability-linked-loans-2021-the-covid-19-effect-esg-ratings-continuedpopularity (accessed 21 June 2021).
  87. Subocz, D. (2012). Geert Hofstede - praktyczne zastosowanie wymiarów kultur narodowych, Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie - Skłodowska, Lublin - Polonia, Vol. XXV, 1-2 Sectio J, pp. 41-52.
  88. Sustainalytics (2021). ESG Risk Ratings. Get clear insights into corporate ESG risks, https://www.sustainalytics.com/corporate-solutions/esg-risk-ratings (accessed 02 June 2021).
  89. Tampakoudis, I., Noulas, A., Kiosses, N., & Drogalas, G. (2021). The effect of ESG on value creation from mergers and acquisitions. What changed during the COVID-19 pandemic? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society (ahead-of-print), https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-10-2020-0448 (accessed 21 June 2021).
  90. Tarmuji, I., Maelah, R., &Tarmuji, N. (2016). The impact of environmental, social and governance practices (ESG) on economic performance: Evidence from ESG score. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 7, 67-74.
  91. Trivedi, A., Walls, G. & Spiegel, R. (2019). Will women build the sustainable infrastructure of the future? World Resources Institute, https://www.wri.org/insights/will-women-build-sustainableinfrastructure-future (accessed 19 August 2021).
  92. Tsoy, D., & Yongqiang, G. (2016). A Cross-national study of the relationships between cultural determinants, sustainable governance and sustainable development. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 2(4), 28-43.
  93. Verga Matos, P., Barros, V., & Miranda Sarmento, J. (2020). Does ESG affect the stability of dividend policies in Europe? Sustainability, 12, 8804. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218804 (accessed 02 April 2021).
  94. Zhang, Y., Weng, Q. D., & Zhu, N. (2018). The relationships between electronic banking adoption and its antecedents: A meta-analytic study of the role of national culture. International Journal of Information Management, 40, 76-87, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.01.015 (accessed 25 July 2021).
Cited by
Show
ISSN
1233-5835
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.15611/aoe.2023.2.02
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu