BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Challoumis Constantinos (National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece)
Title
Currency rate and the Cycle of Money theory
Source
Research Papers in Economics and Finance, 2023, vol. 7, nr 1, s. 48-66, tab., wykr., bibliogr. 95 poz.
Keyword
Waluta, Kurs walutowy, Inflacja
Currencies, Exchange rates, Inflation
Note
summ.
Abstract
The current paper explains the fundamental concepts of CM theory (Cycle of Money Theory or otherwise known as Cycle Money Theory). The theory of the Money Cycle examines an economy as a whole, therefore the structure of the economy and the distribution of money in the economy is evaluated in terms of how they interact. An economy with a high index of the money cycle indicates prosperity. The current paper demonstrates that tax evasion causes a delay in tax revenue. Tax evasion, on the other hand, has caused economic harm to the economy because money is stored for tax havens rather than the local banking system. Inflation is the economic disease of the inadequate structure of the economy, because of the not appropriate distribution and reuse of money. Functionality (economic activity) and structure of the economy are connected through the way that money moves in an economy or is lost from it. The currency rate in this paper is analyzed based on the theory of the Cycle of Money.(original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Adhikari, A., Derashid, C., & Zhang, H. (2006). Public policy, political connections, and effective tax rates: Longitudinal evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(5), 574-595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.07.001
  2. AICPA. (2017). Guiding principles of good tax policy: A framework for evaluating tax proposals. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
  3. Al-Ubaydli, O., Lee, M. S., List, J. A., Mackevicius, C. L., & Suskind, D. (2021). How can experiments play a greater role in public policy? Twelve proposals from an economic model of scaling. Behavioural Public Policy, 5(1), 2-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2020.17
  4. Altman, M. (2008). Behavioral economics, economic theory and public policy. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1152105
  5. Amanor-Boadu, V., Pfromm, P. H., & Nelson, R. (2014). Economic feasibility of algal biodiesel under alternative public policies. Renewable Energy, 67, 136-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.11.029
  6. Anderson, M., Mckee, M., & Mossialos, E. (2020). Developing a sustainable exit strategy for COVID-19: Health, economic and public policy implications. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 113(5), 176-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076820925229
  7. Andriansyah, A., Taufiqurokhman, T., & Wekke, I. S. (2019). Responsiveness of public policy and its impact on education management: An empirical assessment from Indonesia. Management Science Letters, 9(3), 413-424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2018.12.008
  8. Androniceanu, A., Gherghina, R., & Ciobănașu, M. (2019). The interdependence between fiscal public policies and tax evasion. Administratie Si Management Public, 32, 32-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2019.32-03
  9. Anguera-Torrell, O., Aznar-Alarcón, J. P., & Vives-Perez, J. (2020). COVID-19: Hotel industry response to the pandemic evolution and to the public sector economic measures. Tourism Recreation Research, 46(2), 148-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2020.1826225
  10. Baldwin, R., Forslid, R., Martin, P., Ottaviano, G., & Robert-Nicoud, F. (2011). Economic geography and public policy. Economic Geography and Public Policy, 4(5), 597-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlecg/lbh045
  11. Bartels, L. M. (2005). Homer gets a tax cut: Inequality and public policy in the American mind. Perspectives on Politics, 3(1), 15-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592705050036
  12. Béland, D. (2017). Identity, politics, and public policy. Critical Policy Studies, 11(1), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2016.1159140
  13. Bento, A. M. (2009). Biofuels: Economic and public policy considerations. In: R. W. Howarth & S. Bringezu (Eds.), Biofuels: Environmental consequences and implications of changing land use (pp. 195-203). Cornell University Library's Initiatives in Publishing.
  14. Berchin, I. I., Nunes, N. A., de Amorim, W. S., Alves Zimmer, G. A., da Silva, F. R., Fornasari, V. H., Sima, M., & de Andrade Guerra, J. B. S. O. (2019). The contributions of public policies for strengthening family farming and increasing food security: The case of Brazil. Land Use Policy, 82, 573-584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.043
  15. Berg, A., Markey-Towler, B., & Novak, M. (2020). Blockchains: Less government, more market. Journal of Private Enterprise, 35(2), 1-21.
  16. Bergquist, P., Mildenberger, M., & Stokes, L. C. (2020). Combining climate, economic, and social policy builds public support for climate action in the US. Environmental Research Letters, 15(5), 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab81c1
  17. Bernasconi, O., & Espinosa-Cristia, J. F. (2020). No politics, no society: Questioning the justification of entrepreneurship in chilean public policies. RAE Revista de Administracao de Empresas, 60(2), 131-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020200206
  18. Bhuiyan, S., & Farazmand, A. (2020). Society and public policy in the Middle East and North Africa. In International Journal of Public Administration, 43(5). 373-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1707353
  19. Biernaski, I., & Silva, C. L. (2018). Main variables of Brazilian public policies on biomass use and energy. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 61, 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-smart-2018000310
  20. Blekesaune, M. (2007). Economic conditions and public attitudes to welfare policies. European Sociological Review, 23(3), 393-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcm012
  21. Blundell, R., & Preston, I. (2019). Principles of tax design, public policy and beyond: The Ideas of James Mirrlees, 1936-2018. Fiscal Studies, 40(1), 5-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12183
  22. Bourdin, S., & Nadou, F. (2018). French tech: A new form of territorial mobilization to face up to global competition? Annales de géographie, 723-724(5-6), 612-634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/ag.723.0612
  23. Bowling, S. J., Boyland, L. G., & Kirkeby, K. M. (2019). Property tax cap policy in Indiana and implications for public school funding equity. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 15(9), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2019v15n9a881
  24. Brownell, K. D., & Frieden, T. R. (2009). Ounces of prevention - The public policy case for taxes on sugared beverages. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(18), 1805-1808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp0902392
  25. Burstein, P. (2020). The determinants of public policy: What matters and how much. Policy Studies Journal, 48(1), 87-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12243
  26. Cai, Y. (2017). Nonlinear analysis of economic growth, public debt and policy tools. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 7(1), 99-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr/2017.7.1/102.1.99.108
  27. Camous, A., & Gimber, A. R. (2018). Public debt and fiscal policy traps. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 93, 239-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2018.02.009
  28. Carattini, S., Carvalho, M., & Fankhauser, S. (2018). Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9(5), 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.531
  29. Carfora, A., Pansini, R. V., & Scandurra, G. (2021). The role of environmental taxes and public policies in supporting RES investments in EU countries: Barriers and mimicking effects. Energy Policy, 149, 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112044
  30. Cascajo, R., Diaz Olvera, L., Monzon, A., Plat, D., & Ray, J. B. (2018). Impacts of the economic crisis on household transport expenditure and public transport policy: Evidence from the Spanish case. Transport Policy, 65, 40-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.06.001
  31. Castaño, M. S., Méndez, M. T., & Galindo, M. Á. (2016). The effect of public policies on entrepreneurial activity and economic growth. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5280-5285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.125
  32. Challoumis, C. (2018a). Analysis of the velocities of escaped savings with that of financial liquidity. Ekonomski Signali, 13(2), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/ekonsig1802001C
  33. Challoumis, C. (2018b). Identification of significant economic risks to the international controlled transactions. Economics and Applied Informatics, 3, 148-153.
  34. Challoumis, C. (2018c). Methods of controlled transactions and the behavior of companies according to the public and tax policy. Economics, 6(1), 33-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2018-0003
  35. Challoumis, C. (2018d). The impact factor of health on the economy using the cycle of money. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, 11(60), 125-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3155246
  36. Challoumis, C. (2018e). The Keynesian theory and the theory of cycle of money. Hyperion Economic Journal, 6(3), 3-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3149156
  37. Challoumis, C. (2018f). The role of risk to the international controlled transactions. Economics and Applied Informatics, 2018(3), 57-64.
  38. Challoumis, C. (2019a). The issue of utility of cycle of money. Journal Association SEPIKE, 25, 12-21.
  39. Challoumis, C. (2019b). The arm's length principle and the fixed length principle economic analysis. World Scientific News, 115, 207-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3148276
  40. Challoumis, C. (2019c). The cycle of money with and without the escaped savings. Ekonomski Signali, 14(1), 89-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/ekonsig1901089X
  41. Challoumis, C. (2019d). The impact factor of education on the public sector and international controlled transactions. In: M. Stanković, & V. Nikolić, (Eds.), PaKSoM 2019, 1st Virtual International Conference Path to a Knowledge Society-Managing Risks and Innovation (pp. 151-160). Complex System Research Centre, Niš, Serbia.
  42. Challoumis, C. (2019e). The R.B.Q. (Rational, Behavioral and Quantified) Model. Ekonomika, 98(1), 6-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/Ekon.2019.1.1
  43. Challoumis, C. (2019f). Theoretical analysis of fuzzy logic and Q. E. method in economics. IKBFU's Vestnik, 1, 59-68.
  44. Challoumis, C. (2019g). Transfer pricing methods for services and the policy of fixed length principle. Economics and Business, 33(1), 222-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eb-2019-0016
  45. Challoumis, C. (2020a). Analysis of the theory of cycle of money. Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, 23(2), 13-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acta-2020-0004
  46. Challoumis, C. (2020b). Impact factor of capital to the economy and tax system. In: M. Stanković, & V. Nikolić, (Eds.), PaKSoM 2020, 2nd Virtual International Conference Path to a Knowledge Society-Managing Risks and Innovation (pp. 195-200). Complex System Research Centre, Niš, Serbia.
  47. Challoumis, C. (2020c). The impact factor of costs to the tax system. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics, 8(1), 1-14.
  48. Challoumis, C. (2020d). The impact factor of education on the public sector - The Case of the U.S. International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research, 13(1), 69-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25103/ijbesar.131.07
  49. Challoumis, C. (2021a). Chain of cycle of money. Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, 24(2), 49-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32725/acta.2021.007
  50. Challoumis, C. (2021b). Index of the cycle of money - The case of Greece. IJBESAR (International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research), 14(2), 58-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25103/ijbesar.142.05
  51. Challoumis, C. (2021c). Index of the cycle of money - The case of Latvia. Economics and Culture, 17(2), 5-12.
  52. Challoumis, C. (2021d). Index of the cycle of money - The case of Montenegro. Montenegrin Journal for Social Sciences, 5(1-2), 41-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jec-2020-0015
  53. Challoumis, C. (2021e). Index of the cycle of money - The case of Serbia. Open Journal for Research in Economics (OJRE), 4(1), 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojre.0401.01001c
  54. Challoumis, C. (2021f). Index of the cycle of money - The case of Thailand. Chiang Mai University Journal of Economics, 25(2), 1-14,
  55. Challoumis, C. (2021g). Index of the cycle of money - The case of Ukraine. Actual Problems of Economics, 243(9), 102-111.
  56. Challoumis, C. (2021h). Index of the cycle of money - The case of Bulgaria. Economic Alternatives, 27(2), 225-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37075/EA.2021.2.04
  57. Challoumis, C. (2022b). Index of the cycle of money - The case of Poland. Research Papers in Economics and Finance, 6(1), 72-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18559/ref.2022.1.5
  58. Challoumis, C. (2023a). Index of the cycle of money - The case of Canada. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics, 11(1), 102-133.
  59. Challoumis, C. (2023b). Index of the cycle of money - The case of England. British Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 26(1), 68-77.
  60. Cruz-Castro, L., & Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2016). The effects of the economic crisis on public research: Spanish budgetary policies and research organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113, 157-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.08.001
  61. Dancygier, R. M., & Laitin, D. D. (2014). Immigration into Europe: Economic discrimination, violence, and public policy. Annual Review of Political Science, 17, 43-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-082012-115925
  62. De A. Dantas, G., de Castro, N. J., Dias, L., Antunes, C. H., Vardiero, P., Brandão, R., Rosental, R., & Zamboni, L. (2018). Public policies for smart grids in Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 92, 501-512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.077
  63. De Queiroz, L. de F. N., & Capelari, M. G. M. (2020). Conditions for outcomes evaluation in public policies: A debate on the role of institutionality. Revista de Administracao Publica, 54(3), 433-447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220190258x
  64. Evans, W. N., Ringel, J. S., & Stech, D. (1999). Tobacco taxes and public policy to discourage smoking. Tax Policy and the Economy, 13, 1-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/tpe.13.20061866
  65. Forson, J. A. (2020). Innovation financing and public policy dilemmas in the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 12(1), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2019.1599575
  66. Ginsburgh, V., & Weber, S. (2020). The economics of language. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(2), 348-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191316
  67. Grove, A., Sanders, T., Salway, S., Goyder, E., & Hampshaw, S. (2020). A qualitative exploration of evidence-based decision making in public health practice and policy: The perceived usefulness of a diabetes economic model for decision makers. Evidence and Policy, 15(4), 461-487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/174426418X15245020185055
  68. Hartz, S., & John, J. (2009). Public health policy decisions on medical innovations: What role can early economic evaluation play? Health Policy, 89(2), 184-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.05.011
  69. Haskel, J., & Westlake, S. (2021). Kapitalizm bez kapitala: pod"yom nematerial'noy ekonomiki [Capitalism without capital: The rise of the intangible economy]. Ekonomicheskaya Sotsiologiya, 22(1), 61-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2021-1-61-70
  70. Hausman, D., McPherson, M., & Satz, D. (2016). Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316663011
  71. Jeon, J., Kim, S., & Kwon, S. M. (2020). The effects of urban containment policies on public health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093275
  72. Jia, M., Liu, Y., Lieske, S. N., & Chen, T. (2020). Public policy change and its impact on urban expansion: An evaluation of 265 cities in China. Land Use Policy, 97, 104754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104754
  73. Khan, S., & Liu, G. (2019). Socioeconomic and public policy impacts of China Pakistan Economic Corridor on Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, 8(1), 57-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/emsd.v8i1.13758
  74. Kiktenko, O. V. (2020). Economic features of public policy implementation in the education system. State and Regions. Series: Economics and Business, 2(113), 178-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32840/1814-1161/2020-2-30
  75. Kreft, S. F., & Sobel, R. S. (2005). Public policy, entrepreneurship, and economic freedom. Cato Journal, 25(3), 595-616.
  76. Limberg, J. (2020). What's fair? Preferences for tax progressivity in the wake of the financial crisis. Journal of Public Policy, 40(2), 171-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X18000430
  77. Maier, E. (2012). Smart mobility - Encouraging sustainable mobility behaviour by designing and implementing policies with citizen involvement. JeDEM - EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 4(1), 115-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v4i1.110
  78. Maxwell, J. A. (2020). The value of qualitative inquiry for public policy. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(2), 177-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419857093
  79. Miljand, M. (2020). Using systematic review methods to evaluate environmental public policy: methodological challenges and potential usefulness. Environmental Science and Policy, 105, 47-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.12.008
  80. Mohindra, K. S. (2007). Healthy public policy in poor countries: Tackling macro-economic policies. Health Promotion International, 22(2), 163-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dam008
  81. Muñoz, O. G., & Flores, M. C. (2020). Basic principles of economic policy and public decision in the 21st century. Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), 9(1), 21-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25255/jss.2020.9.1.21.31
  82. Naudé, W., & Dimitri, N. (2020). The race for an artificial general intelligence: implications for public policy. AI and Society, 35(2), 367-379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00887-x
  83. Ng, Y. K. (2018). Ten rules for public economic policy. Economic Analysis and Policy, 58, 32-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2018.01.002
  84. Nowlin, M. C., Gupta, K., & Ripberger, J. T. (2020). Revenue use and public support for a carbon tax. Environmental Research Letters, 15(8), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab92c3
  85. OECD. (2020). SME Policy Index - Eastern Partner Countries 2020. Assessing the implementation of the Small Business Act for Europe. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/8b45614b-en
  86. Porter, M. E. (2007). Clusters and economic policy: Aligning public policy with the new economics of competition. Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness White Paper.
  87. Rizzo, I., & Throsby, D. (2006). Cultural heritage: Economic analysis and public policy. In: V. A. Ginsburg, D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture (vol. 1, pp. 983-1016). North Holland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0676(06)01028-3
  88. Romme, A. G. L., & Meijer, A. (2020). Applying design science in public policy and administration research. Policy and Politics, 48(1), 149-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15613699981234
  89. Schram, A. (2018). When evidence isn't enough: Ideological, institutional, and interest-based constraints on achieving trade and health policy coherence. Global Social Policy, 18(1), 62-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018117744153
  90. Schwartz, M. (2019). Social and economic public policy goals and their impact on defense acquisition - A 2019 update. Defense Acquisition Research Journal, 26(3), 208-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22594/dau.19-827.26.03
  91. Sikka, P. (2018). Combating corporate tax avoidance by requiring large companies to file their tax returns. Journal of Capital Markets Studies, 2(1), 9-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCMS-01-2018-0005
  92. Van de Vijver, A., Cassimon, D., & Engelen, P. J. (2020). A real option approach to sustainable corporate tax behavior. Sustainability, 12(13), 2-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135406
  93. Waardenburg, M., Groenleer, M., & De Jong, J. (2020). Designing environments for experimentation, learning and innovation in public policy and governance. Policy and Politics, 48(1), 67-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15586040837640
  94. Wangsness, P. B., Proost, S., & Rødseth, K. L. (2020). Vehicle choices and urban transport externalities. Are Norwegian policy makers getting it right? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 86, 2-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102384
  95. Woody, W. D., & Viney, W. (2017). A history of psychology: The emergence of science and applications (6th ed). Routlege. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315544403
Cited by
Show
ISSN
2543-6430
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.18559/ref.2023.1.195
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu