BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Kuchta Dorota (Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland)
Project Implementation Scenario Selection for Sustainable Project and Product Lifecycle Management. Application of network data envelopment analysis
Operations Research and Decisions, 2023, vol. 33, no. 4, s. 133-154, rys., tab., bibliogr. 75 poz.
Badania operacyjne, Zarządzanie projektem, Cykle projektu inwestycyjnego
Operations research, Project management, Investment project cycle
A method has been proposed to select one of several project implementation variants in the context of sustainable project management. The method should be applied in the phase of the project definition. The projects are viewed across the entire lifecycle of the project and its product. In all the phases, the sustainability aspects should be addressed in a balanced way. The sustainability context implies that different stakeholders will have conflicting opinions on the weights of different variables. The proposed approach is based on network Data Envelopment Analysis that does not require the weights of individual variables as input. Consequently, the proposed method is the first approach allowing users to select a project implementation variant in the context of sustainability and the entire project and product lifecycle, without imposing the weights of individual variables. The proposal is designed for organisations using project sustainable management. (original abstract)
The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics
Full text
  1. Akbari, N., Jones, D., and Arabikhan, F. Goal programming models with interval coefficients for the sustainable selection of marine renewable energy projects in the UK. European Journal of Operational Research 293, 2 (2021), 748-760.
  2. Awasthi, A., and Omrani, H. A goaloriented approach based on fuzzy axiomatic design for sustainable mobility project selection. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics 6, 1 (2019), 86-98.
  3. Brent, A. C., and Labuschagne, C. Sustainable life cycle management: Indicators to assess the sustainability of engineering projects and technologies. In IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, (Singapore, 2004), vol. 1, IEEE, pp. 99-103.
  4. Carboni, J., Duncan, W., Gonzalez,M., Milsom, P., and Young, M. Sustainable Project Management. The GPM Reference Guide. GPM Global, 2018.
  5. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L., and Stutz, J. A multiplicative model for efficiency analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 16, 5 (1982), 223-224.
  6. Cook, W. D., Zhu, J., Bi, G., and Yang, F. Network DEA: Additive efficiency decomposition. European Journal of Operational Research 207, 2 (2010), 1122-1129.
  7. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., and Tone, K. Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses: With DEA-Solver Software and References. Springer & Business Media, 2006.
  8. Ćwiąkała-Małys, A., and Nowak, W. Classification of Data Envelopment Analysis models. Operations Research and Decisions 19, 3 (2009), 5-18 (in Polish).
  9. Davis, K. A method to measure success dimensions relating to individual stakeholder groups. International Journal of Project Management 34, 3 (2016), 480-493.
  10. Despotis, D. K., Koronakos, G., and Sotiros, D. Composition versus decomposition in two-stage network DEA: a reverse approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis 1 (2016), 71-87.
  11. Despotis, D., and Kuchta, D. Fuzzy weak link approach to the two stage DEA. RAIRO-Operations Research 55 (2021), S385-S399.
  12. Despotis, D. K., Sotiros, D., and Koronakos, G. A network DEA approach for series multi-stage processes. Omega 61 (2016), 35-48.
  13. Diez-Cañamero, B., Bishara, T., Otegi-Olaso, J. R., Minguez, R., and Fernández, J. M. Measurement of corporate social responsibility: A review of corporate sustainability indexes, rankings and ratings. Sustainability 12, 5 (2020), 2153.
  14. Dinu, F. A. The Architecture of a Decision Support Software System for Sustainable Projects Selection. Global Economic Observer 5, 1 (2017), 224-233.
  15. Eckersten, S., Gunnarsson-Östling, U., and Balfors, B. Inclusion and exclusion of environmental aspects in earlystage planning of transport infrastructure projects: A Swedish case study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 17, 4 (2023), 369-381.
  16. Eilat, H., Golany, B., and Shtub, A. R&D project evaluation: An integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach. Omega 36, 5 (2008), 895-912.
  17. Esfandiari, M., Saati, S., Navabakhsh, M., and Khalili-Damghani, K. A novel Data Envelopment Analysis model with complex numbers: measuring the efficiency of electric generators in steam power plants. Operations Research and Decisions 29, 4 (2019), 41-52.
  18. Galán-Martín, Á., Guillén-Gosálbez, G., Stamford, L., and Azapagic, A. Enhanced data envelopment analysis for sustainability assessment: A novel methodology and application to electricity technologies. Computers and Chemical Engineering 90 (2016), 188-200.
  19. Guzik, B. Basic analytical capabilities of the CCR-DEA model. Operations Research and Decisions 19, 1 (2009), 55-75, (in Polish).
  20. Halkos, G., and Petrou, K. N. Treating undesirable outputs in DEA: A critical review. Economic Analysis and Policy 62 (2019), 97-104.
  21. Heravi, G., Fathi, M., and Faeghi, S. Multi-criteria group decision-making method for optimal selection of sustainable industrial building options focused on petrochemical projects. Journal of Cleaner Production 142, Part 4 (2017), 2999-3013.
  22. Hua, Z., and Bian, Y. Performance measurement for network DEA with undesirable factors. International Journal of Manage- ment and Decision Making 9, 2 (2008), 141-153.
  23. Huang, R., and Li, Y. Undesirable input output two-phase DEA model in an environmental performance audit. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 58, 5-6 (2013), 971-979.
  24. Ilie, M., and Constantin, I. Product lifecycle management and poject life cycle management. Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series 10, 1 (2010), 1073-1076.
  25. Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi, F. H., Shoja, N., Tohidi, G., and Razavyan, S. Undesirable inputs and outputs in DEA models. Applied Mathematics and Computation 169, 2 (2005), 917-925.
  26. Joro, T., and Viitala, E.-J. Weight-restricted DEA in action: From expert opinions to mathematical models. Journal of the Operational Research Society 55, 8 (2004), 814-821.
  27. Jurík, L., Hor ˘náková, N., ˘Santavá, E., Cagá ˘nová, D., and Sablik, J. Application of AHP method for project selection in the context of sustainable development. Wireless Networks 28, 2 (2022), 893-902.
  28. Khalili-Damghani, K., and Tavana, M. A comprehensive framework for sustainable project portfolio selection based on structural equation modeling. Project Management Journal 45, 2 (2014), 83-97.
  29. Koronakos, G., Sotiros, D., Despotis, D. K., and Kritikos, M. N. Fair efficiency decomposition in network DEA: A compromise programming approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 79 (2022), 101100.
  30. Kuchta, D., Despotis, D., Fra¸ czkowski, K., and Stanek, S. Applications of data envelopment analysis for the evaluation of IT project success. Operations Research and Decisions 29, 3 (2019), 17-36.
  31. Kuchta, D., and Klaus-Rosińska, A. Fuzzy network Data Envelopment Analysis in the evaluation of project success across the project life cycle. In Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. Digital Acceleration and The New Normal - Proceedings of the INFUS 2022 Conference, vol. 1, (Ismir, 2022), C. Kahraman, A. C. Tolga, S. C. Onar, S. Cebi, B. Oztaysi and I. U. Sari, Eds., Springer. pp. 319-327.
  32. Kuchta, D., Ryńca, R., Skorupka, D., and Duchaczek, A. The use of the multiple knapsack problem in strategic management of a private Polish university: Case study. International Journal of Educational Management 33, 2 (2019), 335-358.
  33. Kuchta, D., Skorupka, D., Duchaczek, A., and Kowacka, M. Modified, stakeholders perspective based DEA approach in IT and R&D project ranking. In ICEIS 2016: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 2, (Rome, 2016), S. Hammoudi, L. A. Maciaszek, M. M. Missikoff, O. Camp, and J. Cordeiro, Eds., SciTePress, pp. 158-165.
  34. Kudratova, S., Huang, X., and Zhou, X. Sustainable project selection: Optimal project selection considering sustainability under reinvestment strategy. Journal of Cleaner Production 203 (2018), 469-481.
  35. Labuschagne, C., and Brent, A. C. Sustainable project life cycle management: The need to integrate life cycles in the manufacturing sector. International Journal of Project Management 23, 2 (2005), 159-168.
  36. Lall, V., Lumb, R., and Moreno, A. Selection and prioritization of projects: A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach. Indian Journal of Economics and Business 11, 2 (2012), 359-372.
  37. Larson, E. W., and Gray, C. F. Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill Education, New York 2016.
  38. Li, X. Efficiency measures of the Chinese biogas project subsidy policy using an additive two stage DEA. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy 10, 1 (2018), 015907.
  39. Li, Z., and Dai, X. Optimization of insuring critical path problem with uncertain activity duration times. Journal of Uncertain Systems 7, 1 (2013), 72-80.
  40. Lozano, S., and Moreno, P. Network fuzzy data envelopment analysis. In Performance Measurement with Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis, A. Emrouznejad and M. Tavana, Eds., vol. 309 of Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Springer, 2014, pp. 207-230.
  41. Lu, C., and Cheng, H. Alternative secondary goals in multiplicative two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2021 (2021), 9931796.
  42. Mahmoudi, R., Shetab-Boushehri, S.-N., Hejazi, S. R., Emrouznejad, A., and Rajabi, P. A hybrid egalitarian bargaining game-DEA and sustainable network design approach for evaluating, selecting and scheduling urban road construction projects. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 130 (2019), 161-183.
  43. Mehdiloo, M., and Podinovski, V. V. Selective strong and weak disposability in efficiency analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 276, 3 (2019), 1154-1169.
  44. Mrzygłocka-Chojnacka, J., Stanek, S., and Kuchta, D. Defining a successful project in sustainable project management through simulation-A case study. Sustainability 13, 15 (2021), 8556.
  45. Muñiz, M., Paradi, J., Ruggiero, J., and Yang, Z. Evaluating alternative DEA models used to control for non-discretionary inputs. Computers and Operations Research 33, 5 (2006), 1173-1183.
  46. Nichols, C. A., and Laros, J. A. Inside the Civano Project: A Case Study of Large-Scale Sustainable Neighborhood Development, McGraw-Hill Education, New York, 2010.
  47. Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., and Rangaswami, M. R. Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. IEEE Engineering Management Review 41, 2 (2013), 30-37.
  48. Our Common Future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Report). Oxford University Press, 1987.
  49. Podinovski, V. V.Optimal weights in DEA models with weight restrictions. European Journal of Operational Research 254, 3 (2016), 916-924.
  50. Purvis, B., Mao, Y., and Robinson, D. Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science 14, 3 (2019), 681-695.
  51. Ramedani, A. M., Mehrabian, A., and Didehkhani, H. Sustainable project portfolio selection under uncertainty with consider conflicting projects, 2022, preprint version available from Research Square Platform: 2128708/v1.
  52. RezaHoseini, A., Rahmani, Z., and BagherPour, M. Performance evaluation of sustainable projects: a possibilistic inte- grated novel analytic hierarchy process-data envelopment analysis approach using Z-Number information. Environment, Development and Sustainability 24, 3 (2022), 3198-3257.
  53. Schoper, Y.-G., Wald, A., Ingason, H. T., and Fridgeirsson, T. V. Projectification in Western economies: A com- parative study of Germany, Norway and Iceland. International Journal of Project Management 36, 1 (2018), 71-82.
  54. Shenhar, A. J., Dvir, D., Levy, O., and Maltz, A. C. Project success: A multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Planning 34, 6 (2001), 699-725.
  55. Shuaib, M., Seevers, D., Zhang, X., Badurdeen, F., Rouch, K. E., and Jawahir, I. S. Product Sustainability Index (ProdSI). Journal of Industrial Ecology 18,4 (2014), 491-507.
  56. Silvius, G., Schipper, R., Planko, J., van den Brink, J., and Köhler, A. Sustainability in Project Management. Gower Publishing, Ltd., 2012.
  57. Silvius, G., and Tharp, J. Sustainability Integration for Effective Project Management. IGI Global, 2013.
  58. Snegirjovs, A., Shipkovs, P., Lebedeva, K., Kashkarova, G., and Sergeev, D. Methodology of solar project managing through all stages of development. In Sustainable Building for a Cleaner Environment. Innovative Renewable Energy, A. Sayigh, Ed., Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. 131-139.
  59. Sonnemann, G., Gemechu, E. D., Remmen, A., Frydendal, J., and Jensen, A. A. Life cycle management: Implementing sustainability in business practice. In Life Cycle Management, G. Sonnemann and M. Margni, Eds., Springer, Dordrecht, 2015, pp. 7-21.
  60. Tambulasi, R. I. C., and Kayuni, H. M. An analysis of the sustainability of the third phase of Blantyre City Fuelwood Project in Malawi using the sustainability matrix. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 14, 3 (2007), 235-242.
  61. Tang, B. B., Liu, B. C., and Deng, Z. H. A study on economic post project evaluation of cascade hydropower stations based on Data Envelopment Analysis. Applied Mechanics and Materials 438-439 (2013), 839-844.
  62. Thabrew, L., and Ries, R. Application of life cycle thinking in multidisciplinary multistakeholder contexts for cross-sectoral planning and implementation of sustainable development projects. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 5, 3 (2009), 445-460.
  63. Tharp, J. Sustainability in project management: Practical applications. In Sustainability Integration for Effective Project Management, G. Silvius and J. Tharp, Eds., IGI Global, 2013, pp. 182-193.
  64. Tone, K., Tsutsui M. Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research 197, 1, (2009), 243-252.
  65. Tone, K. Dealing with desirable inputs in Data Envelopment Analysis: A slacks-based measure approach. American Journal of Operations Management and Information Systems 6, 4 (2021), 67-74.
  66. Tongo, S. O., Adeboye, A. B., and Oluwatayo, A. A. Life cycle assessment of material waste generation from building construction projects in southwest Nigeria. In International Conference on Energy and Sustainable Environment, 23-25 June 2020, Covenant University, Nigeria, vol. 665 of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, (2021), 012061.
  67. Tsolas, I. E. Benchmarking wind farm projects by means of series two-stage DEA. Clean Technologies 2, 3 (2020), 365-376. [68] Wang, N., Chen, J., Yao, S., and Chang, Y.-C. A meta-frontier DEA approach to efficiency comparison of carbon reduction technologies on project level. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82, Part 3, (2018), 2606-2612.
  68. Wang, Z., Liu, Q., and Zhang, B. What kinds of building energy-saving retrofit projects should be preferred? Efficiency evaluation with three-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 161 (2022), 112392.
  69. Williams, C. C., and Millington, A. C. The diverse and contested meanings of sustainable development. The Geographical Journal 170, 2 (2004), 99-104.
  70. Wojcik, V., Dyckhoff, H., and Gutgesell, S. The desirable input of undesirable factors in data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research 259, 1-2 (2017), 461-484.
  71. Wu, J., Yin, P., Sun, J., Chu, J., and Liang, L. Evaluating the environmental efficiency of a two-stage system with undesired outputs by a DEA approach: An interest preference perspective. European Journal of Operational Research 254, 3 (2016), 1047-1062.
  72. Yang, Z., and Paradi, J. C. A DEA evaluation of software project efficiency. In 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (Hong Kong, China, 2009), IEEE, pp. 1723-1727.
  73. Zhang, C., Dai, S., and Xia, H. Reuse of abandoned railways leads to urban regeneration: A tale from a rust track to a Green Corridor in Zhangjiakou. Urban Rail Transit 6, 2 (2020), 104-115.
  74. Zhou, H., Yang, Y., Chen, Y., and Zhu, J. Data envelopment analysis application in sustainability: The origins, development and future directions. European Journal of Operational Research 264, 1 (2018), 1-16.
Cited by
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu