BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Rzońca Andrzej
Tytuł
Niekeynesowskie skutki zacieśnienia polityki fiskalnej : Zmodyfikowany model Blancharda. Część 1
Non-Keynesian effects of tightening fiscal policy. Modified Blanchard's Model. Part 1
Źródło
Bank i Kredyt, 2004, nr 10, s. 41-54, bibliogr. 20 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Polityka podatkowa, Finanse publiczne, Deficyt budżetowy, Modele matematyczne
Tax policy, Public finance, Budget deficit, Mathematical models
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
Celem artykułu jest przybliżenie tematyki badań nad okolicznościami, w których ograniczenie wydatków publicznych lub podniesienie podatków mogłyby prowadzić do wzrostu łącznego popytu w krótkim okresie. Do prezentacji niekeynesowskich skutków zacieśnienia polityki fiskalnej wybrano model przedstawiony przez Oliviera J. Blancharda . Inne modele opisano skrótowo.

Out of all models known to the author, Blanchard's Model (1990) puts the strongest emphasis on the significance of the initial state of public finance to the occurrence of non-Keynesian effects along with tightening of the fiscal policy. The analysis performed by Blanchard covers only the results of fiscal adjustment by means of raising taxes. Without making any reference to the effects of reduction in public spending, he suggests that if the state of public finance is "bad enough", the method of balancing it is of little relevance to the trend in movements of the total demand. Thus, it has been examined whether the method of reining in deficit is really insignificant, under the assumption that Blanchard's model appropriately reflects relations ocurring in the economy. Such an examination is undertaken in the second part of the article. The first part serves as an introduction to the more complex analysis provided in the second part. The assumptions of the standard model are described and its solution is presented. The result obtained (change in total demand due to increase in taxes) serves as a benchmark for the effects of fiscal consolidation, as estimated in the following part of the paper, executed by constraining various types of public spending. An analysis of a thread of thoughts leading to certain results sometimes allows some additional conclusions, and this happens to be the case here. It has been demonstrated, for instance (Blanchard failed to explicitly indicate this in his article), that the tax rate range where the fiscal equilibrium restored via increased taxes could hike up private consumption is relatively narrow. The higher the taxes before the consolidation, the higher the risk that the critical point is reached by raising them. As a result, the levelling-off of public debt will involve a very high cost: decline in total demand sharper than that, which could stem from a possible short-sightedness of households, and - underlying
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Szkoły Głównej Handlowej w Warszawie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. R.J. Barro (1974): Are Government Bonds Net Wealth? .Journal of Political Economy", Vol. 82, November/December, s. 1095-1117.
  2. R.J. Barro (1988): The Ricardian Approach to Budget Deficits. NBER Working Paper, No. 2685, Cambridge National Bureau of Economic Research, August.
  3. R.J. Barro (1996): Reflections on Ricardian Equivalence. NBER Working Paper, No. 5502, Cambridge National Bureau of Economic Research, March.
  4. G. Bertola, A. Drazen (1993): Trigger Points and Budget Cuts: Explaining the Effects of Fiscal Austerity. ,,The American Economic Review", Vol. 83, No. 1, March.
  5. OJ. Blanchard (1985): Debt, Deficits, and Finite Horizons. ,,The Journal of Political Economy", Vol. 93, No. 2, April, s. 223-247.
  6. O.J. Blanchard (1990): Comment on Giavazzi and Pagano. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1990, Cambridge National Bureau of Economic Research.
  7. O.J. Blanchard, S. Fischer (1994): Lectures on Macroeconomics. The MIT Press, Cambridge-London.
  8. A.C. Chiang (1994): Podstawy Ekonomii Matematycznej. Warszawa Państwowe Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
  9. B. Dalamagas (1993): How Efficient Is the Substitution of Debt for Taxes in Influencing Demand? "Applied Economics", Vol. 25, No. 3, March.
  10. A. Drazen (1990): Comment on Giavazzi and Pagano. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1990, Cambridge National Bureau of Economic Research.
  11. F. Giavazzi, T. Jappelli, M. Pagano (1999): Searching for Non-Keynesian Effects of Fiscal Policy. CSEF Working Paper, No. 16, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance, February.
  12. F. Giavazzi, M. Pagano (1990): Can Severe Fiscal Contractions Be Expansionary? Tales of Two Small European Countries. Cambridge NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1990, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  13. F. Giavazzi, M. Pagano (1996): Non-Keynesian Effects of Fiscal Policy Changes: International Evidence and the Swedish Experience. Cambridge NBER Working Paper, No. 5332, National Bureau of Economic Research, October.
  14. U. Kosterna (1995): Deficyt budżetu państwa i jego skutki ekonomiczne. Warszawa Fundacja Naukowa Centrum Analiz Społeczno-Ekonomicznych oraz Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  15. P.R. Krugman, M. Obstfeld (1997): International Economics: Theory and Policy. Massachusetts Addison-Wesley.
  16. M. Miller, R. Skidelsky, P. Weller (1990): Fear of Deficit Financing: Is it Rational? W: R. Dornbusch, M. Draghi (red.): Public Debt Management: Theory and History. Cambridge University Press.
  17. A. Razin, E. Sadka (2004): A Brazilian-Type Debt Crisis: Simple Analytics. IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 51, No. 1, Washington D. C. International Monetary Fund.
  18. D. Romer (2000): Makroekonomia dla zaawansowanych. Warszawa Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  19. B. Snowdon, H. Vane (1999, 2003 - wydanie polskie): Conversations with Leading Economists. Interpreting Modern Macroeconomics. Cheltengham Edward Elgar.
  20. A. Sutherland (1995): Fiscal Crises and Aggregate Demand: Can High Public Debt Reverse the Effects of Fiscal Policy. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 1246, London, September.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
0137-5520
Język
pol
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu