BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Kostecki Michał M. (Universite de Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Tytuł
The Business of Intellectual Property and Economic Development : Did the WTO Get it Right?
Źródło
Argumenta Oeconomica, 2009, nr 2 (23), s. 151-175, rys., bibliogr. 43 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Ochrona własności intelektualnej, Rozwój gospodarczy, Prawo własności intelektualnej, Organizacja handlu
Intellectual property protection, Economic development, Intellectual property law, Trade organization
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
Lobbies of the so-called knowledge industry and brand-based business succeeded in introducing strict protection of intellectual property rights (IPRs) into the World Trade Organization (WTO). However, it is often questioned whether the resulting WTO Agreement on Trade-related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), as it stands, may serve development objectives. This article (i) presents the interplay of business and pro-development forces during the multilateral trade negotiations, (ii) evaluates the impact of the TRIPS agreement, (iii) reports on the current South-North conflicts of interest in the trading system and (iv) suggests that the positive business incentives for companies in low-income economies – rather than stricter rules and policies based on threats – might constitute a more effective users in developing nations. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Szkoły Głównej Handlowej w Warszawie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Abbott, F., Carlos C., World Trade Organization Accession Agreements: Intellectual Property Issues, Geneva, Quaker United Nations Office 2007 (May).
  2. Abbott, F., Compulsory Licensing for Public Health Needs: the Doha Round Declaration on Public Health, Quaker United Nations Office, 2002. Geneva, Occasional paper 9, February.
  3. Baroncelli, E., Fink, C., Smarzynska-Javorcik, B., The Global Distribution of Trademarks: Some Stylized Facts, “The World Economy”, 28 (6), 2005.
  4. Blakeney M., International Intellectual Property Jurisprudence after TRIPs, in: D. Vaver and L. Bently (eds.), Intellectual Property in the New Millennium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.
  5. Blili, S., Sermet, F., Being in the World. Swiss Academic Associated Publishers, Geneva, 2006.
  6. Braga, C., Trade-related Intellectual Property Issues: the Uruguay Round Agreement and its Economic Implications, in: K. Maskus (ed.), The WTO, Intellectual Property Rights and the Knowledge Economy. Cheltenham and Northampton, 2004.
  7. Branstetter, L., Fisman R., Foley, F., Saggi, K., Intellectual Property Rights, Imitation, and Foreign Direct Investment: Theory and Evidence. NBER Working paper 13033, 2007.
  8. Caenegem, Van W., Registered Geographical Indications. Between Intellectual Property and Rural Policy, “The Journal of World Intellectual Property”, 5, pp. 699-719, 2003.
  9. Chaudhari, S., Goldberg, P., Jia, P., Estimating the Effects of Global Patent Protection in Pharmaceuticals: A Case Study of Quinolones in India, “American Economic Review” 96(5), pp. 1477-1514, 2006.
  10. Correa, C., Access to Drugs under TRIPS: A Not So Expeditious Solution. Bridges, Geneva, ICTSD, January, 2004.
  11. Deardorff, A., Welfare Effects of Global Patent Protection, “Economica” 59, 233, pp. 35-51, 1992.
  12. Diwan, I., Rodrik, D., Patents, Appropriate Technology, and North-South Trade, “Journal of International Economics” 30, pp. 27-47, 1991.
  13. Drahos, P., Braithwaite, J., Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy?. The New Press, New York, 2006.
  14. Finger, J., Schuler, P., Implementation of Uruguay Round Commitments: The Development Challenge, “The World Economy” 23, pp. 511-525, 2000.
  15. Finger, M., Schuler P., (eds.), Poor People’s Knowledge: Promoting Intellectual Property in Developing Countries. World Bank, Washington D.C., 2004.
  16. Fink, C., Maskus, K., The Debate on Geographical Indications in the WTO, in: R. Newfarmer (ed.), Trade, Doha, and Development: A Window into the Issues. World Bank, Washington DC, 2006.
  17. Falvey, R., Foster, N., Greenaway, D., Trade, Imitative Ability and Intellectual Property, Social Science Research Network, September, 2006.
  18. Ginarte, J., Park, W., Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth, “Contemporary Economic Policy” 15 (July), 3, pp. 51-61, 1997.
  19. Glass, A., Saggi, K,. Intellectual Property Rights and Foreign Direct Investments, “Journal of International Economics” 56, pp.387-410, 2002.
  20. Grossman, G., Lai, E., International Protection of Intellectual Property, “American Economic Review” 94 (December), 5: pp. 1635-1653, 2004.
  21. Harrison, G. W., Rutherford, T. F., Tarr, D. G., Quantifying the Uruguay Round, “Economic Journal”, 107: pp. 1405-30, 1997.
  22. Hoekman, B., Javorcik, B. (eds.), Global Integration and Technology Transfer. Palgrave/McMilllan& World Bank, Washington DC, 2006.
  23. Hoekman, B., Kostecki M., The Political Economy of the World Trading System: From GATT to WTO. Oxford University Press, 2009.
  24. Kapferer, Jean-Noel, Les marques capital de l’entreprise [The brand equity of the enterprise]. Les Editions d’Organisation, Paris, 1991, (in French).
  25. Konan, D., La Croix S., Have Developing Countries Gained From the Marriage Between Trade Agreements and Intellectual Property Rights?. University of Hawaii-ManoaEconomics Working Paper No. 06-5, 2006.
  26. Kostecki, M., Export Restraint Agreements and Trade Liberalization, “World Economy”; 10, pp. 425-53, 1987.
  27. Kostecki, M., Sharing Intellectual Property Between the Rich and the Poor, “The European Intellectual Property Review”, Vol. 13, Issue 8, August, pp. 1-25, 1991.
  28. Kostecki, M., International Marketing and the Trading System. International Trade Centre UNCTAD/WTO, Geneva, 2001.
  29. Kostecki, M., Intellectual Property and Economic Development. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), Geneva 2005.
  30. Kostecki, M., Brossard, H., Furrer, O., Gramigna, M., L’image des services suisses: Enjeux et proposition d’action [The image of the Swiss services: issues and proposals for action], ‘Die Unternehmung’, Nr. 1, pp. 35-50, Zurich, 1994, (in French).
  31. Lanjouw, J., The Introduction of Pharmaceutical Product Patents in India: ‘Heartless Exploitation of the Poor and Suffering’?, NBER Working Paper 6366, 1998.
  32. Leduc, R., La publicité, Paris, Dunod, 1990.
  33. Llewelyn, M., Which Rules in World Trade Law – Patents or Plant Variety Protection? in: Th. Cottier and P. Mavroidis (eds.), Intellectual Property, Trade, Competition and Sustainable Development, Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press, 2003.
  34. Maskus, K., Penubarti, M., How Trade-related are Intellectual Property Rights?, “Journal of International Economics” 39, pp. 227-48, 1995.
  35. Maskus, K., Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy. Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C., 2000.
  36. Maskus, K., Observations on the Development Potential of Geographical Indications, Yale University, mimeo, 2003.
  37. Maskus, K., Regulatory Standards in the WTO: Comparing Intellectual Property Rights with Competition Policy, Environmental Protection, and Core Labor Standards, “World Trade Review” 1(2), pp. 135-52, 2002.
  38. Maskus, K., Chen, Y., Vertical Price Control and Parallel Imports: Theory and Evidence, “Review of International Economics” 12(4), pp. 551-70, 2004.
  39. McCalman, P., Reaping What You Sow: an Empirical Analysis of International Patent Harmonization, “Journal of International Economics”, 55 (1) pp. 161-186, 2001.
  40. Sherwood, R., Intellectual Property and Economic Development. Boulder, Westview Press, 1990.
  41. Smith, P., How Do Foreign Patent Rights Affect U.S. Exports, Affiliate Sales, and Licenses? “Journal of International Economics” 55 (December), 2, pp. 411-439, 2001.
  42. UNCTAD, World Investment Report: The Shift towards Services. Geneva: United Nations, 2005.
  43. Watal, J., Intellectual Property Rights in the World Trade Organization: The Way Forward for Developing Countries. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, India, and London: Kluwer Law International, 2000.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1233-5835
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu