BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Kostecki Michał M. (Universite de Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Vested Interests and Trade Policy-Making : the Influence of Business and NGOs in Transition and Developing Economies
Argumenta Oeconomica, 2007, nr 1-2 (19), s. 97-124, tab., wykr., aneks, bibliogr. 33 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Lobbing, Zarządzanie, Polityka handlowa, Rozwój gospodarczy, Organizacje pozarządowe
Lobbying, Management, Trade policy, Economic development, Non-governmental organisation
It is often claimed that globalization suffers from a deficit of democracy. What is the place of advocacy by various interest groups in the process of trade policy-making and international trade negotiations which shape transition economy and developing country participation in the global trading system? What is and what should be the role of companies and business organizations in these processes? How to encourage government responsiveness to trade-related concerns of the business community? How to promote the interest of the private sector and civil society in international trade negotiations, such as the Doha Round? This study provides an overview of the issue, discusses the results of a behaviourist study conducted in the milieu of business, civil society and government, and offers suggestions on how to improve business-government interactions in trade policy-making of the countries concerned. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Szkoły Głównej Handlowej w Warszawie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
  1. Bronckers, M., Private Participation in the Enforcement of WTO Law: The New EC Trade Barriers Regulation, “Common Market Law Review”, 33:299-318, 1996.
  2. Cohen, J., Arato, A., Civil Society and Political Theory, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1992.
  3. Corden, W. M., Trade Policy and Economic Welfare, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1997.
  4. Downs, A., An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York, Harper & Row, 1954.
  5. Dymond, B., Hocking, B. (2004) Changing the Terms of Trade Policy-making: from the “Club” to the “Multistakeholder” Model,
  6. Esty, C., Non-governmental Organizations at the World Trade Organization: Co-operation, Competition or Exclusion, “Journal of International Economic Law”, 1: 1 (March), 1998.
  7. Finger, J. M., Trade Liberalization: A Public Choice Perspective in: R. Amacher, G. Haberler, and T. Willett (eds.) Challenges to a Liberal International Economic Order, Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1979.
  8. Finger, J. M., The GATT as International Discipline Over Trade Restrictions: A Public Choice Approach in: R. Vaubel and T. Willett (eds.) The Political Economy of International Organizations: A Public Choice Approach, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1991.
  9. Goldstein, J., Ideas, Interests and American Trade Liberalization and American Trade Policy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.
  10. Grether, J-M., de Melo, J., Olarreaga, M., Who Determines Mexican Trade Policy? “Journal of Development Economics”, Vol. 64, 32 – 37, 2001.
  11. Hillman, A., Declining Industries and Political-support Protectionist Motives, “American Economic Review” No 72, 1180 – 1187, 1982.
  12. Hillman, A., The Political Economy of Protection, New York, Harwood Academic Publishers, 1989.
  13. Hocking, B., Trade Politics: Environments, Agenda and Processes in: B. Hocking and S. McGuire (eds.) Trade Politics, London and new York: Routledge, 1 – 19, 1999.
  14. Hoekman, B., Kostecki, M., The Political Economy of the World Trading System. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001.
  15. Kostecki, M., (2005) Business Advocacy in the Global Trading System: How Business Organizations May Shape Trade Policy? Geneva, International Trade Centre (UNCTAD/WTO).
  16. Kress, G., Marketing Research, Englewood Cliffs, prentice Hall, 1988.
  17. Kval, S., InterView: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Methodology, Newcastle, Sage Publications, 1996.
  18. Lanzalaco, L., Interest Groups in Italy in: Richardson, Jeremy (ed.) From Pressure Activity to Policy Network, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
  19. Manning, P., Foster, B., The Privatization of Policing: Two Views, Washington D.C., Georgetown University Press, 1999.
  20. McMenamin, I., Polish Business Associations: Flattened Civil Society or Super Lobbies ? Business and Politics, The Berkeley Electronic Press, Vol. 4, Issue 3, 2002.
  21. Olson, M., Power and Prosperity, New York, Basic Books, 2000.
  22. Petersman, U., How to Constitutionalize International Law and Foreign Policy for the Benefit of Civil Society, “Michigan Journal of International Law”, 20: 1 –30, 1998.
  23. Ray, E. J., Empirical Research on the Political Economy of Trade in: Carter , C. A. (ed.) Imperfect Competition and Political Economy, Boulder, Colorado, Westview Press, 1990.
  24. Rodrik, D., The Political Economy of Trade Policy in: Grossman, G. Rogoff, K. (eds.) Handbook of International Economics, Vol. II, Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1995.
  25. Roessler, F., The Scope, Limits and Function of the GATT Legal System, The World Economy, 8: 289 – 98, 1985.
  26. Rugman, A., Verbeke, A., Strategic Management and Trade Policy, “Journal of International Economic Studies”, No. 3, March, 1989.
  27. Rugman, A., Verbeke, A., Strategic Trade Policy Is Not Good Strategy, “Hitotsubashi Journal of Commerce and Management”, 25 (1), December, 1990.
  28. Rugman, A., Verbeke, A., Minzberg’s Intended and Emergent Corporate Strategies and Trade Policy, “Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences”, 8 (3), September, 1991.
  29. Schmitter, P., What’s All This Nonsense About Civil Society? Paper presented at Nuffield College, Oxford, 1996.
  30. Stiglitz, J., Globalization and Its Discontents, New York, W.W. Norton, 2002.
  31. Tullock, G., The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies and Theft, “Western Economic Journal”, 5: 224-32, 1967.
  32. Tumlir, J., Protection: Trade Policy in Democratic Societies, Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1985.
  33. Winham, G. R., The Pre-negotiation Phase of the Uruguay Round in: J. Stein (ed.) Getting to the Table: The Process of International Pre-negotiation, Baltimore: John Hopkins, 1989.
Cytowane przez
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu