BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Broll Udo (Technische Universität Dresden, Germany), Roldan-Ponce Antonio (Technische Universität Dresden, Germany)
Tytuł
Cluster approach and policymaking : clustering in Dresden
Źródło
The Poznań University of Economics Review, 2009, vol. 9, nr 1, s. 25-43, rys., tab., bibliogr. 31 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Klastry, Rozwój gospodarczy, Polityka
Business cluster, Economic development, Politics
Kraj/Region
Niemcy
Germany
Abstrakt
The cluster approach could be understood both as analytical method and economic development policy. Dresden would be an interesting study case for identifying the main operative elements of the term. The reason is the existing concentration of activities related to the so- called high-tech sector. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Szkoły Głównej Handlowej
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Bakkevig M. K. (2003), The Facilitator of Regional Competitiveness, Paper at The Regional Studies Association conference Reinventing Regions in the Global Economy, Pisa 12th - 15th April.
  2. Bundesverband Informationswirtschaft, Telekommunikation und neue Medien (BITKOM) (2008), BITKOM-Ranking: Welche Regionen die meisten Hightech-Jobs haben, BITKOM, Berlin.
  3. Burant S. R. (ed.) (1988), East Germany: a Country Study, Federal Research Division Library of Congress, 1987.
  4. Edler D. (2002), Gesamtwirtschaftliche und regionale Bedeutung der Entwicklung des Halbleiterstandorts Dresden. Eine aktualisierte und erweiterte Untersuchung, Deutsche Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin.
  5. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (1998), The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies, (Conference Report), Science & Public Policy, vol. 25 (3), pp. 195-203.
  6. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (eds.) (1997), Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy, Printer, London.
  7. European Commission (2004), European Structural Funds in Germany (2000-2006): Sachsen (Saxony), European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy.
  8. Flume Ch., Türpe H., Finkous S. (eds.) (2004), Saxony. The Facts, Freistaat Sachsen, State Chancellery of Saxony.
  9. Gorynia M., Jankowska B., Owczarzak R. (2007), Clusters an Attempt to Respond to the Globalisation Challenge? The Case of Furniture Cluster in Wielkopolska, Poznań University of Economics Review, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 5-28.
  10. Gross R. (2001), Geschichte Sachsens, Dornier, Berlin.
  11. Hunt J. (2000), Why Do People Still Live in East Germany?, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 7564, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, February.
  12. IW Consult GmbH (2006), Deutsche Grosstädte im Vergleich, Studie der im Auftrag der Initiative Neue Soziale Marktwirtschaft(INSM) und der Wirtschaftswoche, Köln, 30 June.
  13. Jacobs D. (1997), Wissensintensive Innovation: Das Potential des Cluster-Ansatzes, in: ITPS Report, Ausgabe 16, July.
  14. Ketels Ch. H. M. (eds.) (2007), The European Cluster Memorandum: Promoting European Innovation through Clusters, Centre for Strategy and Competitiveness (CSC), Europe Cluster Observatory, Stockholm School of Economics, 12 July.
  15. Kronthaler F. (2005), Economic Capability of East German Regions: Results of a Cluster Analysis, Regional Studies, vol. 39.6, August, pp. 739-750.
  16. Krugman P. (1998), The Role of Geography in Development, Paper prepared for the Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, D. C., April 20-21.
  17. Landeshauptstadt Dresden (2005a), Living Science: Biotechnology in Dresden, Landeshauptstadt Dresden, Department of Economic Development, Dresden.
  18. Landeshauptstadt Dresden (2005b), Dimension of the Future: Nanotechnology in Dresden, Landeshauptstadt Dresden, Department of Economic Development, Dresden.
  19. Organisation for Economic Development (OECD) (2005), Regions at a glance 2005, OECD, Paris.
  20. Pontes J. P. (2003), Industrial Clusters and Peripheral Areas, Environment and Planning, pp. 2053-2068.
  21. Porter M. E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Free Pres, New York.
  22. Porter M. E. (1998), On Competition, Harvard Business School, Boston.
  23. Raines Ph., The Cluster Approach and the Dynamics of Regional Policy-Making, European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, September 2001.
  24. Roldán-Ponce A. (2008), Modelling the Cluster Approach: Complex Systems, Berichte Forschungsinstitut der Internationale Wissenschaftliche Vereinigung Weltwirtschaft und Weltpolitik (IWVWW) e.V., Januar/Februar, Nr. 178/179, pp. 119-125.
  25. Saxony State Ministry for Economic Affairs and labour (SMWA) (2005), Economic Report for the Free State of Saxony, Basic Questions of Economic Policy, SMWA, Dresden.
  26. Silicon Saxony e. V. (2006), Silicon Saxony: Die Story, Silicon Saxony e. V., Komunikation Schnell GmbH, Dresden.
  27. Silicon Saxony e. V. (2007), Silicon Saxony e. V., European Network of Microelectronics, Silicon Saxony e. V., Dresden.
  28. Stuchtey M. R. (2000), Can Firms Build Clusters? Appropriation of Localized Externalities and Rational Behaviour of Firms, Eul, Köln.
  29. Turocy Th. L., von Stengel B. (2001), Game Theory, CDAM Research Report, October 8.
  30. Varian H. R. (2006), Intermediate Micro Economics: a Modern Approach,Norton & Company, New York.
  31. Waits M. J. (2000), The Added Value of the Industry Cluster Approach to Economic Analysis, Strategy Development and Service Delivery, Economic Development Quarterly, vol. 14 no. 1, February, pp. 35-50.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1643-5877
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu