BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Stępień Beata (Poznań University of Economics, Poland)
Tytuł
Host country effects in multinational companies' performance - empirical evidence from Polish subsidiaries
Źródło
The Poznań University of Economics Review, 2009, vol. 9, nr 2, s. 57-77, bibliogr. 29 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Korporacje międzynarodowe, Standaryzacja, Instytucje, Spółki
International corporation, Standardization, Institutions, Companies
Abstrakt
MNCs, perceived from the institutional and resource dependency perspective, are subject to various pressures that trigger their strategies and operations on a global scale. One of the important forces inclining MNCs to diversify their strategies and structures on the global scale is the impact from host countries. The strength of this impact on MNCs behaviour is discussed here both theoretically and empirically. The article also shows how MNCs actually behave on the Polish market and how and to what extent this host environment influences MNCs operations. The analysis is based on the empirical data derived from the author's research, which was carried out in 35 production subsidiaries of MNCs in 2006-2007. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Szkoły Głównej Handlowej
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Birkinshaw J., Hood N. (1998), Multinational Subsidiary Evolution: Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Companies, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4, pp. 773-795.
  2. Boyer R. (1998), Hybridization and Models of Production: Geography, History and Theory, in: R. Boyer, E. Charron, U. Jurgens, S. Tolliday (eds.), Between Imitation and Innovation. The Transfer and Hybridization of Productive Models in the International Automobile Industry, Oxford University Press, pp. 23-56.
  3. Brouthers K.D., Brouthers E.L. (2001), Explaining the National Culture Distance Paradox, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 32, I. 1, pp. 177-190.
  4. Christmann P., Day D., Yip G. (1999), The Relative Influence of Country Conditions, Industry Structure and Business Strategy on MNC Subsidiary Performance, Journal of International Management, vol. 5, pp. 241-265.
  5. Cusumano M. A. (1985), The Japanese Automobile Industry: Technology and Management at Nissan and Toyota,Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts.
  6. Dickmann M. (2003), Implementing German HRM Abroad: Desired, Feasible, Successful?, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, March, No. 14, pp. 265-283.
  7. Eden L., Miller S. R.(2004), Distance Matters: Liability of Foreigness, Institutional Distance and Ownership Strategy, in: Theories of the Multinational Enterprise: Diversity, Complexity and Relevance, Advances In International Management Vol. 16, Elsevier, pp. 187-221.
  8. Edwards T., Almond P., Clark I., Colling T., Ferner A. (2005), Riverse Diffusion in US Multinationals: Barriers from the American Business System, Journal of Management Studies, September, Vol. 42, No. 6, s. 1261-1286, pp. 1270-72.
  9. Elger T., Smith Ch. (2006), Theorizing the Role of International Subsidiary: Transplant, Hybrids and Branch - Plants Revisited, in: A. Ferner, J. Quintanilla, C. Sanchez-Runde (eds.), Multinationals, Institutions and the Construction of Transnational Practices, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp. 56-63.
  10. Ferner A., Quntanilla J., Varul M. (2001), Country-Origin Effects, Host Country Effects, and the Management of HR in Multinationals: German Companies in Britain and Spain, Journal of World Business, 36 (2), s. 107-127, pp. 107-127.
  11. Forsgren M. (1990), Managing the International Multi-Centre Firm, European Management Journal, 8(2) pp. 261-267.
  12. Geppert M., Williams K. (2006), Global, National and Local Practices in Multinational Corporations: Towards a Sociopolitical Framework, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 17/1, January, p. 64.
  13. Geppert M., Williams K., Matten D. (2003), The Social Construction of Contextual Rationalities in MNCs: An Anglo-German Comparison of Subsidiary Choice, Journal of Management Studies, May, No. 40, pp. 623-641.
  14. Goerzen A., Beamish P. (2003), Geographic Scope and Multinational Enterprise Performance, Strategic Management Journal Vol. 24, pp. 1289-1306.
  15. Gomez-Mejia L.R., Palich L.E. (1997), Cultural Diversity and the Performance of Multinational Firms, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 309-336.
  16. Kogut B., Singh H. (1988), The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode, Journal of International Business Studies, Fall, pp. 411-432.
  17. Kostova T., Zaheer S. (1999), Organizational Legitimacy under Conditions of Complexity: the Case of Multinational Enterprise,Academy of Management Review, 24, pp. 64-81.
  18. Liker J., Fruin W.M., Adler P. (1999), Remade in America. Transplanting & Transforming Japanese Management Systems,Oxford University Press, New York.
  19. Makino S., Isobe T., Chan C. (2004), Does Country Matter?, Strategic Management Journal Vol. 25, pp. 1027-1043.
  20. Meardi G., Toth (2006) A., Who is Hybrydizing What? Insights on MNCs' Employment Practices in Central Europe,in: A. Ferner, J. Quintanilla, C. Sanchez-Runde (eds.), Multinationals, Institutions and the Construction of Transnational Practices, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp. 155-183.
  21. Mezias J. (2002), Identifying Liability of Foreignness and Strategies to Minimize Their Effects: The Case of Labor Lawsuit Judgments in United States, Strategic Management Journal 23, pp. 229-244.
  22. Miller S.R., Parkhe A. (2002), Is There a Liability of Foreignness in Global Banking? An Empirical Test of Banks' X Efficiency, Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp. 555-567.
  23. Morgan G., Kelly B., Sharpe D., Whitley R. (2003), Global Managers and Japanese Multinationals: Internationalization and Management in Japanese Financial Institutions, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(3), pp. 389-407.
  24. Sharpe D.R. (2001), Globalization and change: Organizational Continuity and Change with-in a Japanese Multinational in the UK, in: G. Morgan, P. Kristensen, R. Whitley (eds.), The Multinational Firm: Organizing across Institutional and National Divides, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 196-224.
  25. Stępień B. (2007), Przedsiębiorstwa międzynarodowe - instytucjonalnie uwarunkowane systemy polityczne, in: J. Rymarczyk, B. Drelich-Skulska, W. Michalczyk (eds.), Regionalizacja a globalizacja, Akademia Ekonomiczna we Wrocławiu, Wrocław, pp. 430-440.
  26. Stępień B. (2007), Wpływ narodowego systemu gospodarowania na działalność przedsiębiorstw międzynarodowych, in: J. Schroeder, B. Stępień (eds.), Handel i finanse międzynarodowe w warunkach globalizacji, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Poznaniu, Poznań, pp. 361-373.
  27. Whitley R. (1999), Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  28. Whitley R., European Business Systems: Firms and Markets in Their National Contexts, Sage, Londyn 1992.
  29. Whitley R. (2001), How are International Firms Different, in: G. Morgan, P. Kristensen, R. Whitley (eds.), The Multinational Firm: Organizing across Institutional and National Divides, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 38-43.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1643-5877
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu