- Autor
- Subrt Tomas (Czech University of Life Science, Prague), Brozova Helena (Czech University of Life Science, Prague)
- Tytuł
- Multiple Criteria Evaluation of Project Goals
- Źródło
- Multiple Criteria Decision Making / University of Economics in Katowice, 2012, vol. 7, s. 179-188, bibliogr. 14
- Słowa kluczowe
- Zarządzanie projektem, Ocena projektu, Metody oceny projektu, Planowanie projektu
Project management, Project evaluation, Method of project evaluation, Project planning - Uwagi
- summ., Korespondencja z redakcją: numeracja wpisana za zgodą redakcji (wynika z ciągłości wydawniczej serii MCDM) - brak numeracji na stronie tytułowej
- Abstrakt
- This text is focussed on the quantitative evaluation of project SMART goals using the ANP method. This approach should be used in the project initiation phase. The very first step in all projects: business, home, or education, is to define goals and objectives. It is important to develop several goals that will enable us to be successful. Goals should be SMART - S - specific, significant, stretching, M - measurable, meaningful, motivational, manageable, A - agreed upon, attainable, achievable, acceptable, action-oriented, R - realistic, relevant, reasonable, rewarding, results-oriented, resourced, T - time-based, timely, tangible, trackable. In our paper we make complex decisions about satisfying project SMART goals based on the ANP method using Super Decisions Software. As criteria we used a general SMART (SMARTER) model, as sub-criteria we use S, M, A, R, T sub-goals and as alternatives different project schedules are applied. We experiment with their mutual dependencies and we try to propose the best methodology for evaluating projects using the Analytic Network Process. (original abstract)
- Dostępne w
- Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Szkoły Głównej Handlowej w Warszawie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu - Pełny tekst
- Pokaż
- Bibliografia
-
- Armstrong M. (2006), A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice (10th edition), Kogan Page, London.
- Clegg D., Barker, R. (2004), Case Method Fast-Track: A RAD Approach, Addison- -Wesley.
- Doran G.T. (1981), There's a S.M.A.R.T. Way to Write Management's Goals and Objectives, "Management Review", Vol. 70, Iss. 11, (AMA FORUM).
- Haughey D. (2011), BOSCARD (Terms of Reference), Project Smart 2000-2011, http://www.projectsmart.co.uk/boscard.html, (12.1.2011).
- Isik Z, Dikmen I., Birgonul M.T. (2007), Using Analytical Network Process (ANP) for Performance Measurement in Construction, "Proceedings of the COBRA 2007 Conference", Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
- RapidBI, How to write SMART objectives and SMARTer objectives, RapidBI - Rapid Business Improvement, http://rapidbi.com/created/WriteSMARTobjectives/# SMARTvariations, (10.1.2011).
- Saaty T.L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
- Saaty T.L. (1999), The Seven Pillars of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, "Proceedings of the AHPIC", Kobe.
- Saaty T.L. (2001), Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, The Analytic Hierarchy Process Series, IX, RWS Publications Pittsburgh.
- Saaty T.L. (2003), The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Decision Making and the Analytic Network Process (ANP) for Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback, Creative Decisions Foundation.
- Scheid J., SMART Goals in Project Management, http://www.brighthub.com/office/ project-management/articles/26374.aspx, (20.2.2011).
- Smith M. (2005), Role & Responsibility Charting (RACI), Project Management Forum.
- SuperDecisions - Software for decision-making, http://www.superdecisions.com/, (20.12.2009).
- White J.D. Fortune J. (2002), Current Practice in Project Management - an Empirical Study, "International Journal of Project Management", Vol. 20, No. 1.
- Cytowane przez
- ISSN
- 2084-1531
- Język
- eng
