BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Kudryavtsev Andrey (The Max Stern Academic College of Emek Yezreel, Israel), Cohen Gil (The Max Stern Academic College of Emek Yezreel, Israel), Hon-Snir Shlomit (The Max Stern Academic College of Emek Yezreel, Israel)
Tytuł
Rational or Intuitive : Are Behavioral Biases Correlated Across Stock Market Investors?
Źródło
Contemporary Economics, 2013, vol. 7, nr 2, s. 31-53, tab., bibliogr. 80 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Metody heurystyczne, Podejmowanie decyzji, Zachowania rynkowe, Inwestor giełdowy
Heuristics methods, Decision making, Market behaviour, Stock exchange investor
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
Human judgments are systematically affected by various biases and distortions. The main goal of our study is to analyze the effects of five well-documented behavioral biases - namely, the disposition effect, herd behavior, availability heuristic, gambler's fallacy and hot hand fallacy - on the mechanisms of stock market decision making and, in particular, the correlations between the magnitudes of the biases in the cross-section of market investors. Employing an extensive online survey, we demonstrate that, on average, active capital market investors exhibit moderate degrees of behavioral biases. We then calculate the cross-sectional correlation coefficients between the biases and find that all of them are positive and highly significant for both professional and non-professional investors and for all categories of investors, as classified by their experience levels, genders, and ages. This finding suggests that an investor who is more inclined to employ a certain intuitive decision-making technique will most likely accept other techniques as well. Furthermore, we determine that the correlation coefficients between the biases are higher for more experienced investors and male investors, indicating that these categories of investors are likely to behave more consistently, or, in other words, are more likely to decide for themselves whether to rely on simplifying decision-making techniques in general or to reject all of them. Alternatively, this finding may suggest that these investors develop more sophisticated "adaptive toolboxes", or collections of heuristics, and apply them more systematically. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Avery, C., & Zemsky, P. (1998). Multidimensional Un¬certainty and Herd Behavior in Financial Markets. American Economic Review, 88(4), 724-48.
  2. Ayton, P., & Fischer, I. (2004). The Hot Hand Fallacy and the Gambler's Fallacy: Two Faces of Subjective Randomness? Memory and Cognition, 32(8), 1369-1378.
  3. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2008). All that Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors. Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 785-818.
  4. Bremer, M., & Kato K. (1996). Trading Volume for Winners and Losers on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(1), 127-142.
  5. Camerer, C. (1989). Does the Basketball Market Believe in the 'Hot Hand'? "American Economic Review, 79(5), 1257-1261.
  6. Chau, A., & Phillips, J. (1995). Effects of Perceived Control upon Wagering and Attributions in Computer Blackjack. The Journal of General Psychology, 122(3), 253-269.
  7. Christie, W. G., & Huang, R. D. (1995). Following the Pied Piper: Do Individual Returns Herd Around the Market? Financial Analysts Journal, 51(4), 31-37.
  8. Cipriani, M., & Guarino, A. (2005). Herd Behavior in a Laboratory Financial Market. American Economic Review, 95(5), 1427-1443.
  9. Cipriani, M., & Guarino, A. (2008). Herd Behavior and Contagion in Financial Markets. The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics (Contributions), 8(1), Retrieved from: http://www.degruyter.com/ view/j/bejte.2008.8.1/bejte.2008.8.1.1390/bejte.2008.8.1.1390.xml
  10. Cipriani, M., & Guarino, A. (2009). Herd Behavior in Financial Markets: A Field Experiment with Financial Market Professionals. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(1), 206-233.
  11. Clotfelter, C. T., & Cook, P. J. (1989). Selling Hope: State Lotteries in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  12. Clotfelter, C. T., & Cook, P. J. (1991). Lotteries in the Real World. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4(3), 227-232.
  13. Clotfelter, C. T., & Cook, P. J. (1993). The 'Gambler's Fallacy' in Lottery Play. Management Science, 39(12), 1521-1525.
  14. Croson, R., & Sundali, J. (2005). The Gambler's Fallacy and the Hot Hand: Empirical Data from Casinos. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30(3), 195-209.
  15. Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D. &, Teoh, S. H. (2002). Investor Psychology in Capital Markets: Evidence and Policy Implications. Journal of Monetary Economics, 49(1), 139-209.
  16. Dhar, R., & Zhu, N. (2002). Up Close and Personal: An Individual Level Analysis of the Disposition Effect (ICF Working Paper No. 02-20). Yale School of Management.
  17. Drehmann, M., Oechssler, J., & Rider, A. (2005). Herding and Contrarian Behavior in Financial Markets - An Internet Experiment. American Economic Review, 95(5), 1403-1426.
  18. Estes, W. (1964). Probability Learning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.), Categories of Human Learning (pp. 89-128). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  19. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender Differences in Personality: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 429-456.
  20. Ferris, S. P, Haugen, R. A. & Makhija, A. K. (1988). Predicting Contemporary Volume with Historic Volume at Differential Price Levels: Evidence Supporting the Disposition Effect. Journal of Finance, 43(3), 677-697.
  21. Frazzini, A. (2006). The Disposition Effect and Underreaction to News. Journal of Finance, 61(4), 2017-2046.
  22. Frieder, L. (2004). Evidence on Behavioral Biases in Trading Activity (EFA 2004 Maastricht Meetings Paper No. 5085). Retrieved from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=479983
  23. Fritz, H. L. & Helgeson, V. S. (1998). Distinctions of Unmitigated Communion from Communion: Self- Neglect and Overinvolvement with Others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 121-140.
  24. Gal, I. & Baron, J. (1996). Understanding Repeated Simple Choices. Thinking and Reasoning, 2(1), 81-98.
  25. Ganzach, Y. (2001). Judging Risk and Return of Financial Assets. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(2), 353-370.
  26. Gigerenzer, G. & Selten, R. (Eds.). (2001). Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  27. Gilovich, T., Vallone, R. & Tversky, A. (1985). The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 295-314.
  28. Goetzmann, W. N., & Massa, M. (2003). Disposition Matters: Volume, Volatility and Price Impact of a Behavioral Bias (Working Paper, No. 9499). Retrieved from NBER website: http://www.nber.org/ papers/w9499.pdf
  29. Grinblatt, M. & Han, B. (2005). Prospect Theory, Mental Accounting and Momentum. Journal of Financial Economics, 78(2), 311-339.
  30. Hahn, U. & Warren, P. A. (2009). Perceptions of Randomness: Why Three Heads are Better than Four. Psychological Review, 116(2), 454-461.
  31. Hauser-Rethaller, U. & Konig, U. (2002). Parimutuel Lotteries: Gamblers' Behavior and the Demand for Tickets. German Economic Review, 3(2), 223-245.
  32. Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of Agency and Communion to Well-Being: Evidence and Potential Explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 412-428.
  33. Helgeson, V. S. (2003). Unmitigated Communion and Adjustment to Breast Cancer: Associations and Explanations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(8), 1643-1661.
  34. Hirshleifer D. & Teoh, S. H. (2003). Herd Behavior and Cascading in Capital Markets: A Review and Synthesis. European Financial Management, 9(1), 25-66.
  35. Hon-Snir, S., Kudryavtsev, A. & Cohen, G. (2012). Stock Market Investors: Who Is More Rational, and Who Relies on Intuition? International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(5), 56-72.
  36. Huddart, S., Lang, M. & Yetman, M. (2007). Psychological Factors, Stock Price Paths, and Trading Volume. (Unpublished Paper).
  37. Hwang, S. & Salmon, M. (2004). Market Stress and Herding. Journal of Empirical Finance, 11(4), 585-616.
  38. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The Gender Similarities Hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581-592.
  39. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430-454.
  40. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 46(2), 171-185.
  41. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  42. Kaustia, M. (2004). Market-Wide Impact of the Disposition Effect: Evidence from IPO Trading Volume. Journal of Financial Markets, 7(2), 207-235.
  43. Kliger, D. & Kudryavtsev, A. (2008). Reference Point Formation by Market Investors. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(9), 1782-1794.
  44. Kliger, D. & Kudryavtsev, A. (2010). The Availability Heu¬ristic and Investors' Reaction to Company-Specific Events. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 11(1), 50-65.
  45. Kudryavtsev, A. & Cohen, G. (2010). Anchoring and Pre-Existing Knowledge in Economic and Financial Settings. American Journal of Social and Management Sciences, 1(2), 164-180.
  46. Kudryavtsev, A. & Cohen, G. (2011a). The Less I Remember, the More Confident I Feel: Hindsight Bias in Economic and Financial Knowledge. International Research Journal of Applied Finance, 2(2), 50-81.
  47. Kudryavtsev, A. & Cohen, G. (2011b). Behavioral Biases in Economic and Financial Knowledge: Are They the Same for Men and Women? Advances in Management and Applied Economics, 1(1), 15-52.
  48. Lakonishok, J. & Smidt, S. (1986). Volume for Winners and Losers: Taxation and Other Motives for Stock Trading. Journal of Finance, 41(4), 951-974.
  49. Lakonishok, J. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1992). The Impact of Institutional Trading on Stock Prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(1), 23-43.
  50. Langer, E. J. (1975). The Illusion of Control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2), 311-328.
  51. Laplace, P. S. (1951). A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities. New York, NY: Dover
  52. Lee, W. (1971). Decision Theory and Human Behavior. New York, NY: Wiley.
  53. Lee, I. H. (1998). Market Crashes and Informational Avalanches. Review of Economic Studies, 65(4), 741-759.
  54. Lee, B., O'Brien, J., & Sivaramakrishnan, K. (2007). An Analysis of Financial Analysts' Optimism in Long-term Growth Forecasts. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 9(3), 171-184.
  55. Locke, P. R., & Mann, S. C. (2005). Professional Trader Discipline and Trade Disposition. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(2), 401-444.
  56. Metzger, M. (1984). Biases in Betting: An Application of Laboratory Findings. Psychological Reports, 56(3), 883-888.
  57. Odean, T. (1998). Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses? Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1775-1798.
  58. Oehler, A., Heilmann, K., Lager, V., & Oberlander, M. (2002). Dying Out or Dying Hard? Disposi¬tion Investors in Stock Markets EFA 2002 Berlin Meetings Presented Paper. Retrieved from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=314139 or http://dx.doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.314139
  59. Papachristou, G. (2004). The British Gambler's Fallacy. Applied economics, 36(18), 2073-2077.
  60. Papachristou, G., & Karamanis, D. (1998). Investigating Efficiency of Betting Markets: Evidence from the Greek 6/49 Lotto. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22(12), 1597-1615.
  61. Park, A., & Sabourian, H. (2011). Herding and Contrarian Behavior in Financial Markets. Econometrica, 79(4), 973-1026.
  62. Rabin, M., & Vayanos, D. (2010). The gambler's and hot-hand fallacies: Theory and applications. Review of Economic Studies, 77(2), 730-778.
  63. Roger, P., & Broihanne, M. H. (2007). Efficiency of Betting Markets and Rationality of Players: Evidence from the French 6/49 Lotto. Journal of Applied statistics, 34(6), 645-662.
  64. Shapira, Z., & Venezia, I. (2001). Patterns of Behavior of Professionally Managed and Independent Investors. Journal of Banking and Finance, 25(8), 1573-1587.
  65. Shefrin, H. & Statman, M. (1985). The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long. Journal of Finance, 40(3), 777-790.
  66. Shiller, R. J. (1998). Human Behavior and the Efficiency of the Financial System (NBER Working Paper No. 6375). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  67. Stracca, L. (2004). Behavioral Finance and Asset Prices: Where Do We Stand? Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(3), 373-405.
  68. Sun, Y. & Wang, H. (2010). Gambler's Fallacy, Hot Hand Belief, and the Time of Patterns. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(2), 124-132.
  69. Sundali, J. & Croson, R. (2006). Biases in Casino Betting: The Hot Hand and the Gambler's Fallacy. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 1-12.
  70. Terrell, D. (1994). A Test of the Gambler's Fallacy: Evidence from Pari-Mutuel Games. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8(3), 309-317.
  71. Terrell, D. (1998). Biases in Assessments of Probabilities: New Evidence from Greyhound Races. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 17(2), 151-166.
  72. Terrell, D., & Farmer, A. (1996). Optimal Betting and Efficiency in Parimutuel Betting Markets with Information Costs. The Economic Journal, 106(437), 846-868.
  73. Thaler, R. (1985). Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199-214.
  74. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the Law of Small Numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 105-110.
  75. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207-232.
  76. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
  77. Wang, D., & Canela, M. (2006). Herd Behavior towards the Market Index: Evidence from 21 Financial Markets (Working Paper No. 776). IESE Business School.
  78. Weber, M., & Camerer, C. F. (1998). The Disposition Effect in Securities Trading: An Experimental Analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 33(2), 167-184.
  79. Wermers, R. (1995). Herding, Trade Reversals, and Cascading by Institutional Investors. (Unpublished Paper), University of Colorado, Boulder.
  80. Zielonka, P. (2004). Technical Analysis as the Representation of Typical Cognitive Biases. International Review of Financial Analysis, 13(2), 217-225.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2084-0845
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.81
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu