BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Dziura Marek (Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie), Kotulska Katarzyna (Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie)
Tytuł
Knowledge as a Public Good and its Role in Development
Źródło
Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 2010, nr 26, s. 483-500, Bibliogr. poz. 50
Słowa kluczowe
Wiedza, Zarządzanie
Knowledge, Management
Uwagi
streszcz., summ..
Abstrakt
Economic and social development depends on the capacity to generate, absorb and diffuse knowledge and technology. Knowledge and technology have the potential to provide benefits to large numbers of users, and the benefit received by any one u ser does not reduce the benefits received by others. Knowledge is often considered a public good, but it is more complex. Several important quali fications must be considered. These qualifications are crucial to the design of appropriate policies to inerease the rate of innovation and to guide its direction, at botli the national and the international levels. Knowledge is seldom a pure international public good. But it might move close to becoming one if attempts to augment it are coupled with appropriate policies in developed and developing coun- tries. Developed countries should show their willingness to enlarge the research agenda by taking into account the priorities of developing countries and opening the gates of their innovation system to newcomers. Developing countries, rather than expecting to be handed knowledge from developed countries, should support resources to inerease their absorptive capacity.(original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Szkoły Głównej Handlowej w Warszawie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Abramovitz M. 1989:. Thinking about Growlh: And Other Essays on Economic Growth and Welfare,Rights' Is the Answer, What Is the Question? Revisiling the Patent Controversies, Economies ofInnovation and New Technology 13 (5): 417-42.
  2. Andersen li., ed. 2005: Intellectual Properly Rights: Innovation, Governance and the Institutional Environment, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  3. Arundel A. 2001: The Relative Effeetiveness of Patents and Secrecy for Appropriation, Research Policy 30 (4): 611-24.
  4. Batine R.G., Ihori T. 2005: Public Goods: Theories and Evidence, Springer
  5. Bell M., Pavitt K. 1997: Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts belween Developed and Developing Countries, [in:] Technology, Globalisation and Economic Performance, eds. D. Archibugi, J. Miehie, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Bergstrom T.C., Goodman R.P. 1973: Private Demand for Public Goods, American Economic Re- view 63: 280-96.
  7. Callon M. 1994: Is Science a Public Good?, Science, Technology and Humań Values 19 (4): 395- 424.
  8. Edquist C. ed. 1997: Systems of lnnovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, London: Pinter Publishers.
  9. Evangelista R. 1999: Knowledge andInvestment: The Sources ofInnovation in Industry, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  10. Falvey R., Fostcr N. 2005: Intellectual Property Rights, Economic Growth and Technology Transfer, Background paper prepared for the UNIDO Project on Global Public Good for Economic Development. United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna.
  11. Fcrroni M., Mody A. eds. 2002: International Public Goods: Incentives, Measurement and Financing, Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  12. Gerschenkron A. 1962: Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective, Belknap Press.
  13. Granstrand O. 1999: The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  14. Ilagedoorn J. 2002: Inter-firm R&D Partnerships: An Overview of Patterns and Trends since 1960. Research Policy 31: 477-92.
  15. Ilobday M. 2003: Innovation in Asian Industrialisation: A Get'schenkronian Perspective, Oxford Development Studies 31 (3): 293-314.
  16. Jaffe A.B., Lerner J. 2004: Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is En- dangering lnnovation and Progress, and What To Do about It, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  17. Kaplinsky R. 2005: For Whom Is a Level Playing Field a Global Public Good?, Background paper prepared for the UNIDO Project on Global Public Good for Economic Developmcnt. United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna.
  18. Kaul I. 2002: The Role of Global Public Goods in Inclusive Globalization, Prepared for the World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization, International Labor Organization. Knowledge Network Meeting on Governance for Better Globalization, 22 November, New York.
  19. Kaul I., Grunberg I., Stern M., eds. 1999: Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 2Ist Century, New York: Oxford University Press.
  20. Kaul I., Le Goulven K. 2003: Financing Global Public Goods: A New Frontier of Public Finance, [in:] Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization, eds. I. Kaul, P. Conceięao, K. Le Goulven, R. Mendoza, New York: Oxford University Press.
  21. Kaul P. Conceięao, K. Le Goulven, R. Mendoza eds.: Providihg Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization, New York: Oxford University Press.
  22. Lali S. 2001: Competitiveness, Technology andSkills, Cheltenham, UK.: Edward Elgar. Levin R., Klevorick A., Nelson R., Winter S. 1987: Appropriating ihe Returns from Industrial Re-search andDevelopment, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3
  23. Mansfield E., Schwartz M., Wagner S. 1981: Jmitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Siudy, Eco¬nomic Journal 91: 907-18.
  24. Maskus K., Wilson E., Otsuki T. 1999: Quantifying the Impacl of Technical Barriers to Trade: A Framework for Analysis, Policy Research Working Paper 2512. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
  25. Maskus K..E., Reichman J.H. 2005: International Public Goods and Transfer of Technologz Under a Globaliyed Intellectual Property Regitne, Cambridge Univcrsity Press.
  26. May C. 2000: A Global Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights: The New Enclosures? London: Routledge.
  27. May C. 2002: The Venetian Moment: New Technologies, Legał Innovation and the Institutional Ori- gins of Intellectual Property, Promctheus 20 (2): 159-79.
  28. Mazzoleni R., Nelson R. 1998: The Benefits and Costs of strong Patent Protection: A Contribution to the Current Debate, Research Policy 27 (3): 273-84.
  29. Memedovic O. 2005a: Inserting Local Industries into Global Value Chains: Prospectsfor Upgrading by Developing Countries, UNIDO, Vienna.
  30. Mcmedovic O. 2005b: Public Goods for Economic Development: With a Focus on Market Efficiency and Integration, Background Paper prepared for the UNIDO project Public Goods for Economic Developmcnt, UNIDO Vienna, UNIDO, Vienna.
  31. UNIDO. 2006: Environment as a Public Goodfor Economic Development, Background Paper prepared for the UNIDO project Public Goods for Economic Developmcnt, UNIDO Vienna.
  32. Morrisey O.D., te Velde W., Hewitt A. 2002: Defining Internationa! Public Goods: Conceptual Is- sues, [in:] International Public Goods: lncentives, Measurement and Financing, eds. M. ferro ni and A. Mody, Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  33. Nelson R.R. 1992: What Is 'Commercial' and What Is 'Public' about Technology, and What Should Be?, [in:] Technology and the Wealth ofNations, eds. N. Rosenberg, R. Landau, D.C. Mowery, Sanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
  34. Nelson R. R., Winter S. 1982: An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, Mass.: Belknapp Press. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), I996a, Shaping the 21st Cen- tury: The Contributions of Developmcnt Co-operation. Paris.
  35. OECD. 1996b, Tradc, Employment and Labour Standards: A Study of Core Workers' Rights and International Trade. Paris.
  36. Pavitt K. 1987: On the Naturę of Technology, Reprinted in K. Pavitt [1999] Technology, Management and Systems of Innovation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  37. Reisen H. 2004: Innovative Approaches to Funding the Millennium Development Goals, OECD De- velopment Centre Policy Brief 24. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
  38. Schmookler J. 1966: Invention and Economic Growth, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  39. Shiva V. 2001: Protect or Plunder? Understanding Intellectual Property Rights, London: Zed Books.
  40. Stiglitz J. 1999: Knowledge as a Global Public Good, [in:] Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century, eds. I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, M. Stern, New York: Oxford University Press.
  41. Stiglitz J. 2002: Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics, American Economic Review 92: 460-501.
  42. Te Vclde D.W., Hewitt A., Morrissey O. 2006: Aid Financing of International Public Goods: Recent Developments, Background paper prepared for the UNIDO Project on Global Public Good for Economic Development. United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna.
  43. Te Velde D.W., Morrissey O., Hewitt A. 2002: Allocating Aid to International Public Goods, [in:] International Public Goods: Incentives, Measurement and Financing, eds. M. Ferroni, A. Mody, Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  44. Tulkens H. 2009: Public Goods, Environmental Externalities andFiscal Competition, Springer.
  45. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), 2001, Humań Devclopment Report 2001: Making New Technologies Work for Humań Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
  46. UNIDO (United Nations Industrial Development Organization) 2002a, Corporate Social Responsi- bility: lmplications for Smali and Medium Enterprises in Developing Countries, UNIDO and the World Summit on Sustainablc Development, Vienna.
  47. UNIDO. 2002b, Industrial Development Report 2002-2003: Competing through Innovation and Learning, Vienna.
  48. UNIDO. 2002c: Manual on the Development of Cleaner Production Policies - Approaches and In¬struments, Vienna.
  49. US National Science Foundation, 2002, Science and Enginecring Indicators. Washington, D.C.: National Science Board.
  50. Viotti E.B. 2002: National Learning Systems: A New Approach on Technological Change in Late Industrializing Economies and Evidence from the Cases of Brazil and South Korea, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 69 (7): 653-80.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1640-6818
1733-2842
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu