BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Klich Jacek (Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie / Kolegium Gospodarki i Administracji Publicznej)
Tytuł
Koncepcja open innovation i perspektywy jej wykorzystania przez polskie szkoły wyższe
The concept of open innovation and its prospects Use by Polish universities
Źródło
Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług, 2012, nr 93, s. 43-67, tab., bibliogr.57 poz.
Tytuł własny numeru
Otoczenie instytucjonalne jako stymulator procesów B+R i innowacji w gospodarce : SOOIPP Annual 2012
Słowa kluczowe
Otwarte innowacje, Nakłady na szkolnictwo wyższe, Szkolnictwo wyższe
Open innovation, Expenditures on higher education, Higher education
Uwagi
summ.
Kraj/Region
Województwo zachodniopomorskie
West Pomeranian Voivodeship
Abstrakt
Tradycyjny model, według którego przedsiębiorstwa inwestowały w działy badawczo-rozwojowe, by sprostać wymogom wzrostu innowacyjności i zapewnić rozwój organizacji, podlega intensywnej erozji. Jest wiele przyczyn tego zjawiska, z których w tym miejscu można wskazać tylko na postępującą globalizację oraz rozwój technik komunikowania się i wymiany informacji. (fragment tekstu)

The goal of the paper is to make a review of the literature on open innovation and to compare strategic goals formulated for the Polish higher education organizations with the open innovation paradigm. In the first part of the paper a review of the literature is presented with a special emphasis on determinants of a successful open innovation implementation, economic benefits for corporations and challenges the open innovation paradigm formulates for corporations and other social partners. Then basic provisions from the strategy for the Polish higher education organizations are presented followed by an assessment of the prospects to implement open innovation paradigm in the Polish universities. It is argued here that in the strategy for Polish universities until 2020, open innovation issues are not adequately addressed. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Analiza zadań i celów strategicznych szkolnictwa wyższego wynikających z zagranicznych dokumentów strategicznych, Raport cząstkowy przygotowany przez konsorcjum: Ernst & Young Business Advisory i Instytut Badań nad Gospodarką Rynkową, listopad 2009.
  2. Analiza zadań i celów strategicznych szkolnictwa wyższego wynikających z krajowych dokumentów strategicznych, Raport cząstkowy przygotowany przez konsorcjum: Ernst & Young Business Advisory i Instytut Badań nad Gospodarką Rynkową, listopad 2009.
  3. Antikainen M., Mäkipää M., Ahonen M., Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation, "European Journal of Innovation Management" 2010, Vol. 13, No. 1.
  4. Asakawa K., Nakamura H., Sawada N., Firms' open innovation policies, laboratories' external collaborations, and laboratories' R&D performance, "R&D Management" 2010, Vol. 40, No. 2.
  5. ' Badawy M.K., Is open innovation a field of study or a communication barrier to theory development?: A perspective, "Technovation" 2011, Vol. 31.
  6. Benedetto A. di, Comment on 'Is open innovation a field of study or a communication barrier to theory development?, "Technovation" 2010, Vol. 30.
  7. Bianchi M., Cavaliere A., Chiaroni D., Frattini F., Chiesa V., Organisational modes for Open Innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: An exploratory analysis, "Technovation" 2011, Vol. 31.
  8. Bierly P.E., Damanpour F., Santoro M.D., The application of external knowledge: organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation, "Journal of Management Studies" 2009, Vol. 46.
  9. Chatenier E. du, Verstegen J.A.A.M., Biemans H.J.A., Mulder M., Omta O.S.W.F., Identification of competencies for professionals in open innovation teams, "R&D Management" 2010, Vol. 40, No. 3.
  10. Chesbrough H., Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape, Harvard Business School Press, Boston 2006.
  11. Chesbrough H., Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston 2003.
  12. Chesbrough H., Crowther A.K., Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries, "R&D Management" 2006, Vol. 36, No. 3.
  13. Chesbrough H., Vanhaverbeke W., West J., Open Innovation: Researching a N ew Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2006.
  14. Chiaroni D., Chiesa V., Frattini F., The Open Innovation Journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm, "Technovation" 2011, Vol. 31.
  15. Chiaroni D., Chiesa V., Frattini F., Unravelling the process from Closed to Open Innovation: evidence from mature, asset-intensive industries, "R&D Management" 2010, Vol. 40, No. 3.
  16. Cohen W.M., Nelson R.R., Walsh J.P., Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D, "Management Science" 2002, Vol. 48, No. 1.
  17. Dahlander L., Gann D.M., How open is innovation?, "Research Policy" 2010, Vol. 39.
  18. Enkel E., Gassmann O., Chesbrough H., Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon, "R&D Management" 2009, Vol. 39.
  19. Fagerberg J., Innovation: a guide to the literature, w: Oxford Handbook of Innovation, eds. J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2004.
  20. Fagerberg J., Verspagen B., Innovation studies - The emerging structure of a new scientific field, "Research Policy" 2009, Vol. 38.
  21. Fasnacht D., Open Innovation in the Financial Services. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 2009.
  22. Fetterhoff T.J., Voelkel D., Managing Open Innovation in biotechnology, "Research -Technology Management" 2006, Vol. 49, No. 3.
  23. Fichter K., Innovation communities: the role of networks of promotors in Open Innovation, "R&D Management" 2009, Vol. 39, No. 4.
  24. Gassmann O., Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda, "R&D Management" 2006, Vol. 36.
  25. Grönlund J., Sjödin D.R., Frishammar J., Open innovation and the stage-gate process: a revised model for new product development, "California Management Review" 2010, Vol. 52.
  26. Hall B.H., University-industry partnerships in the United States, w: Rethinking Science Systems and Innovation Policies. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Technology Policy and Innovation, eds. J-P. Contzen, D. Gibson, M.V. Heitor, Purdue University Press, Ashland 2004.
  27. Holmes S., Smart P., Exploring open innovation practice in firm-nonprofit engagements: a corporate social responsibility perspective, "R&D Management"2009, Vol. 39, No. 4.
  28. Huizingh E.K.R.E., Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives, "Technovation" 2011, Vol. 31.
  29. Huston L., Sakkab N., Connect and develop: inside Procter & Gamble's new model for innovation, "Harvard Business Review" 2006, Vol. 84.
  30. Ili S., Albers A., Miller S., Open innovation in the automotive industry, "R&D Management" 2010, Vol. 40, No. 3.
  31. Jeppesen L.B., Lakhani K.R., Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search, "Organization Science" 2010, Vol. 21.
  32. Kafouros M.I., Forsans N., The role of open innovation in emerging economies: Do companies profit from the scientific knowledge of others?, "Journal of World Business" 2011, doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2011.05.004.
  33. Katila R., Ahuja G., Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction, "Academy of Management Journal" 2002, Vol. 45, No. 8.
  34. Knudsen M.P., Mortensen T.B., Some immediate-but negative effects of openness on product development performance, "Technovation" 2011, Vol. 31.
  35. Krogh G. von, Is open innovation a field of study or a communication barrier to theory development? A commentary, "Technovation" 2011, Vol. 31.
  36. Laursen K., Salter A., Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms, "Strategic Management Journal" 2006, Vol. 27.
  37. Lichtenthaler U., Is open innovation a field of study or a communication barrier to theory development? A contribution to the current debate, "Technovation" 2011, Vol. 31.
  38. Lichtenthaler U., Open innovation in practice: an analysis of strategic approaches to technology transactions, "IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management" 2008, Vol. 55.
  39. Lichtenthaler U., Outbound open innovation and its effect on firm performance: examining environmental influences, "R&D Management" 2009, Vol. 39, No. 4.
  40. Meer H. van der, Open Innovation - The Dutch Treat: Challenges in Thinking in Business Models, "Creativity and Innovation Management" 2007, Vol. 16, No. 2.
  41. Mortara L., Minshall T., How do large multinational companies implement open innovation?, "Technovation" 2011 doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2011.05.002.
  42. Mowery D.C., Plus ca change: industrial R&D in the "third industrial revolution", "Industrial and Corporate Change" 2009, Vol. 18.
  43. Nelson R.R., Observations on the post-Bayh-Dole rise of patenting at American universities, "Journal of Technology Transfer" 2001, Vol. 26, No. 1-2.
  44. Perkmann M., Walsh K., University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda, "International Journal of Management Reviews"2007, Vol. 9, Iss. 4.
  45. Rohrbeck R., Hölzle K., Gemünden H.G., Opening up for competitive advantage - How Deutsche Telekom creates an open innovation ecosystem, "R&D Management" 2009, Vol. 39, No. 4.
  46. Sarkar S., Costa A.I.A., Dynamics of open innovation in the food industry, "Trends in Food Science and Technology" 2008, Vol. 19.
  47. Schartinger D., Rammer C., Fischer M.M., Fröhlich J., Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants, "Research Policy" 2002, Vol. 31.
  48. Shafer S.M., Smith H.J., Linder J.C., The power of business models, "Business Horizons" 2005, Vol. 48.
  49. Shane S.A., Economic Development Through Entrepreneurship: Government, University and Business Linkages, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2005.
  50. Siegel D.S., Waldman D., Link A., Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study, "Research Policy" 2003, Vol. 32.
  51. Thursby J.G.A., Jensen R.A., Thursby M.C.A., Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: a survey of major us universities, "Journal of Technology Transfer" 2001, Vol. 26, No. 1.
  52. Traitler H., Watzke H.J., Saguy I.S., Reinventing R&D in an Open Innovation Ecosystem, "Journal of Food Science" 2011, Vol. 76, No. 2.
  53. Wallin M.W., Krogh G. von, Organizing for open innovation: Focus on the integration of knowledge, "Organizational Dynamics" 2010, Vol. 39, No. 2.
  54. Wissema J.G., Technostarterzy - dlaczego i jak ?, Warszawa 2005.
  55. Wissema J.G., Technostarterzy - dlaczego i jak ?, Warszawa 2005. Vanhaverbeke W., Vrande V. van de, Chesbrough H., Understanding the Advantages of Open Innovation Practices in Corporate Venturing in Terms Of Real Options, "Creativity and Innovation Management" 2008, Vol. 17, No. 4.
  56. Vanhaverbeke W., The interorganizational context of Open Innovation, w: Open Innovation: Researching a N ew Paradigm, eds. H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, J. West, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2006.
  57. Vrande V. van de, Jong J.P.J. de, Vanhaverbeke W., Rochemont M. de, Open innovation in SMEs: trends, motives and management challenges, "Technovation" 2009, Vol. 29.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1640-6818
1896-382X
Język
pol
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu