BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Sławiński Andrzej (Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie)
Tytuł
Granice globalizacji: przypadek strefy euro
Boundaries of Globalization: the Case of the Euro Zone
Źródło
Ekonomista, 2014, nr 2, s. 301-320, bibliogr. 69 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Redystrybucja dochodów, Strefa euro, Kryzys bankowy, Globalizacja, Zarządzanie publiczne
Redistribution of income, Eurozone, Banking crisis, Globalization, Public governance
Uwagi
summ., rez.
Abstrakt
Celem artykułu jest uwypuklenie przyczyn braku dostatecznie efektywnych mechanizmów redystrybucji dochodów w strefie euro, które - gdyby istniały -mogłyby ochronić strefę euro przed kryzysem fiskalnym. W pierwszej części artykułu przypominam, że założenia, jakie przyjęto w okresie tworzenia strefy euro, pozwoliły uznać, iż unia monetarna może funkcjonować bez mechanizmu redystrybucji dochodów. W drugiej części podkreślam, że główną przyczyną kryzysu zadłużeniowego w strefie euro nie była polityka budżetowa państw członkowskich, lecz niestabilne boomy kredytowe, których załamanie się przyniosło recesję i skokowy wzrost wielkości deficytów budżetowych. W trzeciej części wskazuję, że jedyny mechanizm redystrybucji dochodów, na jaki na razie zdecydowano się w strefie euro, ma stanowić unia bankowa. Zdecydowano się jednak na taką konstrukcję unii bankowej, która w dużej mierze petryfikuje europejski system bankowy w jego dotychczasowej postaci, co tworzy ryzyko powtórzenia się kryzysów bankowych w przyszłości. W czwartej części piszę o konieczności uwzględniania przez reguły unijne specyfiki tworzących ją gospodarek. W zakończeniu formułuję wnioski końcowe. (fragment tekstu)

Intensification of globalization is achieved at the cost of limiting the scope of autonomy of economic policy at the national level. This produces a trade-off between the benefits derived from globalization and the costs caused by resigning from possibility to conduct autonomous policy to keep the economy on an equilibrium growth path. The costs of limited autonomy of domestic economic policy grow during a time of crisis. The possibility to reduce these costs depends on international political cooperation that would enable to create mechanisms of income distribution towards countries particularly hit by a crisis. The euro zone crisis illustrated this relationship in a spectacular way. Deficiency of political cooperation made it impossible to create an effective mechanism that would enable financial assistance to some euro-zone countries most hit by the crisis, which in effect have suffered considerable costs of their earlier resignation from possibility to conduct autonomous stabilization policy. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka SGH im. Profesora Andrzeja Grodka
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Admati A.R. i in., Debt Overhang and Capital Regulation, Rock Center for Corporate Governance, Working Paper nr 114, Max Planck Institute, Bonn 2012.
  2. Aizenman J., Reflections on the Euro Crisis: Prioritizing the Road Ahead, 2013, http://pa-pers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2286465
  3. Blanchard, Adjustment within the euro. The Difficult Case of Portugal, "Portuguese Economic Journal" 2007, nr 6.
  4. Blanchard O., Giavazzi F., Current Account Deficits in the Euro Area. The End of the Feldstein Horioka Puzzle?, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Economics, Working Paper, nr 03-05, 2002.
  5. Bloomberg, Why should Taxpayers Give Big Banks $83 Billion a Year?, 20 February 2013, http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2013-02-20
  6. Ca'Zorzi M., Rubaszek M., On the Intertemporal Current Account Model for the euro are Countries, "Review of Development Economics" 2012, nr 1.
  7. Cichocki M.A., Samotność hegemona, "Rzeczpospolita", 28-29.09.2013.
  8. Cichocki M.A., Zmiana niemieckiego paradygmatu w Europie, "Analizy natolińskie" 2012 nr 2.
  9. Commission of the European Communities, Stable Money - Sound Finances, "European Economy" 1993, nr 53.
  10. Commission of the European Communities, Report of the Study Group on the Role of Public Finance in European Integration, Bruksela 1977.
  11. Coricelli F., Wörgötter A., Structural Change and the Current Account: The Case of Germany, OECD Economic Department Working Paper, nr 940, 2012.
  12. Danielsson J., An Academic Response to Basel II, "Financial Markets Group Special Paper" nr 130, London School of Economics, London 2001.
  13. Dauderstädt M., Germany's Economy: Domestic Laggard and Export Miracle, International Policy Analysis, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, kwiecień 2012.
  14. De Grauwe P., Design Failures in the Eurozone - Can They Be Fixed?, "Economic Papers" 2013, nr 491, European Commission.
  15. De Grauwe P., In Search of Symmetry in the Eurozone, "CEPS Policy Brief" 2012, nr 268.
  16. De Grauwe P., The Governance of a Fragile Eurozone, "CEPS Working Document" 2011, nr 346.
  17. De Grauwe P., A Mechanism of Self-destruction of the Eurozone, "Intereconomics" 2010, nr 6.
  18. De Grauwe P., Some Thoughts on Monetary and Political Union, w: The Future of EMU, red. L.S. Talani, Palgrave, Macmillan, Londyn 2009.
  19. De Grauwe P., What Have we Learnt about Monetary Integration since the Maastricht Treaty?, "Journal of Common Market Studies" 2006, nr 4.
  20. De Grauwe P., On Monetary and Political Union, "CESifo Forum" 2006a, nr 4.
  21. De Grauwe P., Ji Y., Mispricing of Sovereign Risk and Multiple Equilibna in the Eurozone, CEPS Working Document nr 361, 2012.
  22. Delpla L., Weizsäcker J., Eurobonds: The Blue Bonds Concept and its Implications, European Parliament, Bruksela 2011.
  23. European Commission, Scoreboard for the Surveillance of Macroeconomic Imbalances: Envisaged Initial Design, Commission Staff Working Paper, 2011, http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/economic_governance/macroeconomic_imbalance_procedure/ index_en.htm
  24. European Commission, EMU@10: Successes and Challenges after 10 Years of Economic and Monetary Union, "European Economy" 2008, nr 2.
  25. Fitoussi J.-R, Diverging Tendencies of Competitiveness, Committee for Economic and Monetary Affairs, European Parliament, Bruksela 2006.
  26. Fitoussi J.-R, Saraceno F., European Economic Governance: the Berlin-Washington Consensus, "Cambridge Journal of Economics" 2013, nr 37.
  27. Fitoussi J.-R, Saraceno F, The Brussels-Frankfurt-Washington Consensus. Old and New Tradeoffs in Economics, OFCE Working Paper, nr 2004-02, 2004.
  28. Flassbeck H., The Heart of the Euro Problem, 2012, http://ineteconomics.org
  29. Flassbeck H., Lapavitsas C, The Systemic Crisis of the Euro - True Causes and Effective Therapies, "Studien" 2013, Rosa-Luksemburg-Stiftung.
  30. Flassbeck H., Spiecker F, The Euro - A Story of Misunderstanding, "Intereconomics" 2011, nr 4.
  31. Financial Services Authority, The Turner Review. A Regulatory Response to the Global Banking Crisis, 2009.
  32. Goodhart Ch., Europe After the Crisis, Institute for New Economic Thinking, Oxford Martin School, Oxford 2011.
  33. Goodhart Ch., Segoviano M., Basel and Procyclicality: A Comparison of the Standardised and IRB Approaches to an Improved Credit Risk Method, Financial Markets Group Discussion Paper, nr 524, London School of Economics, London 2004.
  34. Goodhart Ch., Financial Management in the Euro Zone, Eesti Pank, Tallinn, 2004.
  35. Goodhart Ch., Lessons for Monetary Policy from the Euro-area Crisis, "Special Conference Paper: The Crisis in the Euro Area" 2013, May 23-24.
  36. Green R.K., Wächter S.M., The Housing Finance Revolution, University of Pennsylvania Institute for Law and Economics, Research Paper Series, nr 09-37, 2007.
  37. Griffith-Jones S., Persaud A., The Political Economy of Basel II and Implications for Emerging Economies, Seminar on Management of Volatility, Financial Liberalization and Growth in Emerging Economies, ECLAC, Santiago de Chile 2003.
  38. Hassel A., The Paradox of Liberalization - Understanding Dualism and the Recovery of German Political Economy, LEQS Paper, nr 42, 2011.
  39. Horn G., Logeay C, Rietzler K., Much Ado About Nothing? Recent Labor Market Reforms in Germany - a Preliminary Assessment, "Management Revue" 2008, nr 19.
  40. Jabko N., Massoc E., French Capitalism Under Stress: How Nicolas Sarkozy Rescued the Banks, "Review of International Political Economy" 2012, nr 19.
  41. Jacobi L., Kluve J., Before and After the Hartz Reforms: The Performance of Active Labor Market Policy, "IZA Discussion Paper" 2006, nr 2100.
  42. Johnson S., The Myth of a Perfect Orderly Liquidation Authority for Big Banks, "The New York Times", 16.05.2013.
  43. Johnson S., Kwak J., 13 Bankers. Wall Street Takeover and the Next Financial Meltdown, Pantheon, New York 2010.
  44. Kenen P.B., Economic and Monetary Union in Europe: Moving beyond Maastricht, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1994.
  45. Kenen P.B., The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas: An Eclectic View, w: Monetary Problems of the World Economy, red. R. Mundel, A. Swoboda, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1969.
  46. King R.G., Plosser Ch., Money, Credit and Prices in Real Business Cycle, "American Economic Review" 1984, nr 74.
  47. Lall R., From Failure to Failure: The Politics of International Banking Regulation, "Review of International Political Economy" 2012, nr 19.
  48. Lall R., Reforming Global Banking Rules: Back to the Future?, DIIS Working Paper, nr 16, Danish Institute for International Studies, 2010.
  49. Lall R., Why Basel II Failed and Why Any Basel III is Doomed, GEG Working Paper, nr 52, Global Economic Governance, Oxford University 2009.
  50. Łaski K., Osiatyński J., Konsolidacja finansów publicznych a kryzys w strefie euro, "Ekonomista" 2013, nr 1.
  51. Mayer T., The Case for a European Monetary Fund, "Intereconomics" 2009, maj/czerwiec. Minford P., Why the United Kingdom Should Not Join the Eurozone, "International Finance" 2008, vol. II, nr3.
  52. Minsky H.P., Stabilizing an Unstable Economy, Yale University Press, New Haven-London 1986.
  53. Morris S., Shin H.S., Financial Regulation in a Systemic Context, Brookings Institution Papers on Economic Actrivity, jesień 2008.
  54. Mundell R., The Theory of Optimal Currency Areas, "American Economic Review" 1961 nr 51.
  55. Mooslechner P., Surprise, Surprise: Exchange Rates do Matter within a Monetary Union, "Focus. Economic Monitor", UniCredit Group 2006, nr 2.
  56. Rey H., Dilemma not Trilemma: The Global Financial Cycle and Monetary Policy Independence, referat na konferencję Global Dimensions of Unconventional Monetary Policy, 2013.
  57. Rodrik D., Who Needs the Nation State?, CEPR Discussion Paper, nr 9040, 2012.
  58. Rodrik D., The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy, WW Norton & Company 2011.
  59. Rodrik D., How to Save Globalization from Its Cheerleaders, "The Journal of International Trade and Diplomacy" 2007, jesień.
  60. Schularik M., "Public Debt and Financial Crises in the Twentieth Century", School Of Business and Economics Discussion Paper, nr 1, 2012.
  61. Shin H.S., Global Banking Glut and Loan Risk Premium, paper presented at 12th Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference Hosted by the International Monetary Fund, Waszyngton 2012.
  62. Sławiński A., Strefa euro: Scenariusz alternatywny, "Folia Oeconomica" 2012, nr 273.
  63. Sławiński, A., Tymoczko D., Polityka makroostrożnościowa jako instrument ograniczania wykorzystywania przez banki krótkoterminowego finansowania hurtowego, "Zarządzanie i Finanse" 2013, nr 2.
  64. Taleb N., Fooled by Randomness. The Hidden Role of Chance in the Markets and in Life, Texere, New York 2001.
  65. The Warwick Commission, The Warwick Commission on International Financial Reform: In Praise of Unleveled Playing Fields, University of Warwick, Coventry UK, 2009.
  66. Tumpel-Gugerell G., Single Market for Financial Services - Vision or Reality?, Financial Market Forum, Luksemburg 2005.
  67. Vestergaard J., Retana M., Behind Smoke and Mirrors, DIIS Report nr 10, Danish Institute for International Studies 2013.
  68. Williamson J., A Short History of the Washington Consensus, referat na konferencję "From the Washington Consensus Towards a New Global Governance", Barcelona 2004.
  69. Wilmarth A.E., The Transformation of the U.S. Financial Services Industry, 1975-2000: Competition, Consolidation and Increased Risks, "University of Illinois Law Review" 2002, nr 2.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
0013-3205
Język
pol
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu