BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Blouin Vincent Y., Hunt Brian J., Wiecek Margaret W.
MCDM with Relative Importance of Criteria: Application to Configuration Design of Vehicles
Multiple Criteria Decision Making / University of Economics in Katowice, 2009, vol. 4, s. 11-39, bibliogr. 33 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Optimum Pareto, Podejmowanie decyzji, Proces projektowania, Algorytmy genetyczne, Samochody
Pareto optimality, Decision making, Design process, Genetic algorithms, Automobiles
summ., Korespondencja z redakcją: numeracja wpisana za zgodą redakcji (wynika z ciągłości wydawniczej serii MCDM) - brak numeracji na stronie tytułowej
In this article, a preference model of relative importance of criteria is presented and applied to a vehicle configuration design problem formulated as a multi-objective program. The model is based on convex cones and extends the classical notion of Pareto optimality. Preferences quantifies as allowable tradeoffs are elicited from the decision maker and used for the construction of a new preference. In effect, the Pareto set is reduced which facilitates the process of choosing a final preferred solution. Configuration design of mechanical systems corresponds to finding the placement of a set of components such that performance criteria are optimized while satisfying design constraints. The presented configuration design problem involves designing a midsize truck for optimum vehicle dynamic behavior, survivability, and maintainability in the presence of decision maker's preferences that are included a posteriori. A set of Pareto solutions is first generated with a multi-objective genetic algorithm, and the Pareto solutions are screened according to the preferences quantified as allowable tradeoffs. The model extracts preferred designs from the Pareto set producing a short list of "strong" or "privileged" designs, which is a useful feature when preferences are unknown.(original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Szkoły Głównej Handlowej w Warszawie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu
Pełny tekst
  1. Blouin V.Y., Miao Y., Fadel G.M.: An Assessment of Configuration Design Methodologies. 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Vol. 3, Paper # AIAA 2004-4430, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., Reston, VA, August 30-September 1, 2004, Albany, NY, pp. 1472-82.
  2. Cagan J., Shimada K., Yin S.: A Survey of Computational Approaches to Three--Dimensional Layout Problems. "Computer Aided Design" 2002, 34(8). pp. 597-611.
  3. Cvetkovic D., Parmee I.C.: Preferences and Their Application in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 2002, 6(1), pp. 42-57.
  4. Das I., Dennis J.E.: A Closer Look at Drawbacks of Minimizing Weighted Sums of Objectives for Pareto Set Generation in Multi-Criteria Optimization Problems. "Structural Optimization" 1997, 14, 63-69.
  5. Deb K., Agrawal S., Pratap A., Meyarivan T.: A Fast Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization: NSGA-II. "Parallel Problem Solving from Nature" September 16-20, 2002, pp. 849-858.
  6. Hunt B.J.: Multiobjective Programming with Convex Cones: Methodology and Applications. PhD Thesis, Clemson University, Clemson 2004.
  7. Hunt B.J.: Wiecek M.M.: Cones to Aid Decision-Making in Multi-Criteria Programming. In: Multi-Objective Programming and Goal Programming: Theory and Applications. T. Tanino, T. Tanaka, M. Inuiguchi (eds). Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 2003, pp. 153-158.
  8. Ignizio J.P.: Goal Programming and Extensions. Heath (Lexington Books), Lexington, Mass 1976.
  9. Kaliszewski I., Michalowski W.: Generation of Outcomes with Selectively Bounded Tradeoffs. "Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences" 1995, 20(2), pp. 113-122.
  10. Kaliszewski I., Michalowski W.: Efficient Solutions and Bounds on Tradeoffs. "Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications" 1997, 94(2), pp. 381-394.
  11. Kaliszewski I., Michalowski W.: Searching for Psychologically Stable Solutions of Multiple Criteria Decision Problems. "European Journal of Operational Research" 1999, 118, pp. 549-562.
  12. Koski J.: Defectiveness of Weighting Method in Multicriterion Optimization of Structures. "Communications in Applied Numerical Methods" 1985, 1, pp. 333-337.
  13. Messac A.: Physical Programming: Effective Optimization for Computational Design. "AIAA Journal" 1996, 34(1), pp. 149-158.
  14. Miao Y., Blouin V.Y., Fadel G.M.: Multi-Objective Configuration Optimization with Vehicle Dynamics Applied to Midsize Truck Design. 2003 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol. 2, 29th Design Automation Conference, September 2-6, Chicago 2003, IL, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, pp. 319-327.
  15. Miao Y., Blouin V.Y., Fadel G.M.: Design Configuration of Vehicle Components with Domain Knowledge Enhancement. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference 2004. Vol. 1. 30th Design Automation Conference, September 28-October 2, Salt Lake City 2004, UT, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, pp. 1077-1085.
  16. Nakayama H.: Some Remarks on Trade-Off Analysis in Multiobjective Programming. In: Multi-Criteria Analysis. J. Climaco. (ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1997, pp. 179-190.
  17. Narayanan S., Azarm S.: A Multiobjective Interactive Sequential Hybrid Optimization Technique for Design Decision Making. "Engineering Optimization" 2000, 32(4), pp. 485-500.
  18. Noghin V.D.: Relative Importance of Criteria: A Quantitative Approach. "Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis" 1997, 6, pp. 355-363.
  19. Noghin V.D., Tolstykh I.V.: Using Quantitative Information on the Relative Importance of Criteria for Decision Making. "USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics" 2000, 40(11), pp. 1529-1536.
  20. Papalambros P.Y., Wilde D.J.: Principles of Optimal Design: Modeling and Computation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1988.
  21. Park K.S., Koh H.M.: Preference-Based Optimum Design of an Integrated Structural Control System Using Genetic Algorithms. "Advances in Engineering Software" 2004, 35, pp. 85-94.
  22. Podinovskii V.V.: Importance Coefficients of Criteria in Decision-Making Problems: Serial or Ordinal Importance Coefficients. "Automation and Remote Control" 1978, 39 (10), pp. 1514-1524.
  23. Podinovskii V.V.: Criteria Importance Theory. "Mathematical Social Sciences" 1994, 7, pp. 237-252.
  24. Podinovskii V.V.: Quantitative Importance of Criteria. "Automation and Remote Control" 2000, 61 (5), pp. 817-828.
  25. Sayin S.: Measuring the Quality of Discrete Representations of Efficient Sets in Multiple Objective Mathematical Programming. "Mathematical Programming" 2000, 87, pp. 543-560.
  26. Sawaragi Y., Nakayama H., Tanino T.: Theory of Multiobjective Optimization. Academic Press, Orlando 1985.
  27. Wall M.: Galib: A C++ Library of Genetic Algorithm Components. Version 2.4. Doc.RevisionB, Mechanical Engineering Department, MIT, 1996, http://lancet
  28. Wan J., Krishnamurty S.: Learning-Based Preference Modeling in Engineering Design Decision-Making. "Journal of Mechanical Design" 2001, 123, pp. 191-198.
  29. Wiecek M.M.: Advances in Cone-Based Preference Modeling for Decision Making with Multiple Criteria. "Decision Making in Manufacturing and Services" 2007, 1(1-2), pp. 153-173.
  30. Wu J., Azarm S.: Metrics for Quality Assessment of a Multiobjective Design Optimization Solution Set. "Journal of Mechanical Design" 2001, 123, pp. 18-25.
  31. Yakowitz D.S., Lane L.J.: Multi-Attribute Decision Making: Dominance with Respect to an Importance Order of the Attributes. "Applied Mathematics and Computation" 1993, 54, pp. 167-181.
  32. Yu P.L.: Cone Convexity, Cone Extreme Points, and Nondominated Solutions in Decision Problems with Multiobjectives. "Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications" 1974, 14 (3), pp. 319-377.
  33. Xia X.: A Nonlinear Analysis of Closed Loop Driver Vehicle Performance with Four Wheel Steering Control. PhD Dissertation. Clemson University, Clemson 1990.
Cytowane przez
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu