BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Klich Jacek (Cracow University of Economics, Poland / Wydział Gospodarki i Administracji Publicznej)
Tytuł
Foreign Direct Investment in the Visegrad Countries after 2004 : Have the Visegrad Countries' Membership in the European Union Changed Something?
Źródło
Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 2014, vol. 2, nr 3, s. 19-32, rys., tab., bibliogr. 24 poz.
Tytuł własny numeru
FDI in Central Europe
Słowa kluczowe
Inwestycje bezpośrednie, Inwestycje zagraniczne, Międzynarodowe przepływy kapitałowe
Direct investments, Foreign investment, International capital flows
Uwagi
summ.
Firma/Organizacja
Grupa Wyszehradzka
Visegrad Group
Abstrakt
Objective: The purpose of the paper is to identify the volume and dynamics of FDI in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia (V4) after their full accession to the European Union.

Research Design & Methods: The following hypothesis is tested: the Visegrad countries' membership in the European Union has not resulted in higher increases of FDI in these countries. The methodology is based on the concept of Investment Development Path (IDP) and Net Outward Investment position (NOI) of a country. The most current data (as of 2012) on FDI is derived from UNCTAD. The literature available in ScienceDirect and EBSCO has been reviewed.

Findings: The whole concept of IDP should be revisited. Possible changes should lead toward adopting a broader perspective encompassing the idiosyncratic economic structure of countries, as well as the heterogenous nature of FDI.

Implications & Recommendations: It seems to be necessary to redefine a fourth stage of IDP and to revise the criteria for classification into certain stages to avoid discrepancies in attributing particular countries to certain stages. Further conceptual work is needed with respect to the whole IDP model. Contribution & Value Added: The paper extends Gorynia's, Nowak's & Wolniak's analysis on IDP in V4 countries by six years (i.e. from 2007 till 2012) and allows a preliminary assessment of IDP to V4 countries after their full membership to EU to be made. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Szkoły Głównej Handlowej w Warszawie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Ambroziak, L. (2012). FDI and Intra-industry trade: theory and empirical evidence from the Visegrad countries. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 4(1-2), 180-198.
  2. Boudier-Bensebaa, F. (2008). FDI - assisted development in the light of the investment development path paradigm: evidence from Central and Eastern European countries. Transnational Corporations, 17(1), 37-67.
  3. Durán, J.J., & Úbeda, F. (2001). The investment development path: a new empirical approach and some theoretical issues. Transnational Corporations, 10(2), 1-34.
  4. Durán, J.J., & Úbeda, F. (2005). The investment development path of newly developed countries. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 12(1), 123-137.
  5. Fonseca, M., Mendonça, A., & Passos, J. (2007). The Investment Development Path Hypothesis: Evidence from the Portuguese Case - A Panel Data Analysis, School of Economics and Management, Technical University of Lisbon, Working Papers 021/2007/DE. Retrieved on December 18, 2013, from https://www.repository.utl.pt/bitstream/10400.5/814/1/wp21-2007-%20de.pdf
  6. Gorynia, M., Nowak, J., & Wolniak, R. (2007). Poland and its investment development path. Eastern European Economics, 45(2), 52-74.
  7. Gorynia, M., Nowak, J., & Wolniak, R. (2010). Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe: The IDP trajectories of selected countries. Poznań University of Economics Review,10(1),5-26.
  8. Herrmann, S., & Jochem, A. (2005). Trade balance of the Central and East European EU member states and the role of foreign direct investment. Deutsche Bundesbank, Research Centre, Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies, no. 41. Retrieved on December 18, 2013,Available from http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/19626/1/200541dkp.pdf
  9. Kayam, S.S., & Hisarciklilar, M. (2009). Revisiting the investment development path (IDP): a non linear fluctuation approach. International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, 6(2), 63-82.
  10. Kornecki, L. (2008). Foreign direct investment and macroeconomic changes in CEE Integrating into the global market. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 5(4), 124-132.
  11. Kravtsova, V. (2014). Productivity change and externalities: empirical evidence from hungary. International Review of Applied Economics, 28(1), 102-125.
  12. Kuti, M. (2005). The role of FDI in the external financing of the national economy. Development and Finance/Fejlesztes es Finanszirozas: Quarterly Hungarian Economic Review, 2, 54-65.
  13. Mutascu, M., Hetes, R., & Miru, O. (2010). The general framework for foreign direct investments attraction in Central and Eastern European Countries. Review of Economic and Business Studies, 3(2), 65-87.
  14. Narula, R., & Guimón, J. (2010). The investment development path in a globalised world: implications for Eastern Europe. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 1(2), 5-19.
  15. Nowak, A.Z., & Steagall, J.W. (2002). Foreign direct investment patterns and consequences in Central and Eastern Europe, 1990-2000. Transformations in Business and Economics, 1(1-2), 132-151.
  16. Nucu, A.E. (2011). The Dynamics of Foreign Direct Investments in Central and Eastern Europe under the Impact of International Crisis of 2007. Centre for European Studies Working Papers, III, (1), 81-91. Retrieved on December 18, 2013, from http://www.cse.uaic.ro/WorkingPapers/article/CESWP2011_III1_NUC.pdf
  17. Onaran, Ö. (2008). Jobless Growth in the Central and Eastern European Countries. Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Working Paper Series, no. 165. Retrieved on December 18, 2013, from http://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1136&context=peri_workingpapers
  18. Onaran, Ö., & Stockhammer, E. (2008). The effect of FDI and foreign trade on wages in the Central and Eastern European Countries in the post-transition era: a sectoral analysis for the manufacturing industry. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 19, 66-80.
  19. Pelinescu, E., & Radulescu, M. (2009). Impact of foreign direct investment on the economic growth and countries' export potential. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 12(4), 153-169.
  20. Rugraff, E. (2008). Are the FDI policies of the Central European countries efficient?. Post-Communist Economies, 20(3), 303-316.
  21. Sass, M. (2004). FDI in Hungary - EIB Papers, 9(2), 62-90.
  22. Stoian, C. (2013). Extending Dunning's Investment Development Path: The role of home country institutional determinants in explaining outward foreign direct investment. International Business Review, 22, 615-637.
  23. UNCTAD (2013). World Investment Report 2013.Global Value Chains: Investment and Trade for Development.
  24. Zámborský, P. (2012). Competitiveness gap and host country effects of FDI in the new OECD. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 5(3-4), 336-354.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2353-883X
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2014.020303
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu