BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Rymarzak Małgorzata (University of Gdansk, Poland)
University Space Management Exemplified by Selected European Entities
Real Estate Management and Valuation, 2014, vol. 22, iss. 2, s. 22-29, wykr., tab., bibliogr. 42 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Zarządzanie nieruchomościami, Zarządzanie, Szkolnictwo wyższe, Planowanie przestrzenne
Real estate management, Management, Higher education, Spatial planning
In many renowned European universities, the strategic role of real estate as an asset creating the value of the entity has long been emphasized. This means that the effective use of space and implementation of a rational space management policy enable the entity to enhance its value and affect its economic condition (WOLSKI, ZAŁĘCZNA 2011; KONOWALCZUK, RAMIAN 2012). The existing space management expertise of foreign universities makes it possible to implement this knowledge in the process of university management in Poland. The basic goal of this paper is to present the nature of the space management process, as well as chief indicators that are used in selected European universities to assess the degree of estate utilization. In other words, space management solutions used outside of Poland will be sought, which can help to resolve the problems of many Polish tertiary institutions.(short original abstract)
Pełny tekst
  1. ABDULLAH S., ALI H. M., SIPAN I., 2012, Benchmarking Space Usage in Higher Education Institutes: Attaining Efficient Use, Journal of Techno-Social, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 11-20.
  2. AHMAD FAUZI A. WAHAB, 2005, Space Management: Physical Resources Management in Higher Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor. Dis, Technology Journal, 43(E).
  3. AHMADFAUZI A. WAHAB, 2000, The Impact of Corporate Facilities on Users' Interaction: University-Industry Interaction in Malaysia, PhD Thesis. Strathclyde.
  4. AMTHOR R. F., METZGER S. A., 2011, Neoliberalism, Globalization, and the American Universities in Eastern Europe: Tensions and Possibilities in 'Exported' Higher Education, Globalizations, Vol. 8, Is. 1, pp. 65-80.
  5. ANTONOWICZ D., 2005, Uniwersytet przyszłości. Wyzwania i modele polityki (University of the future. Challenges and models of politics), Instytut Spraw Publicznych, Warszawa.
  6. AUDE 2010, Space Assessment Models (SAMs) and Space Profiles, aude_toolkit_forsustainableestate (accessed 15.01.2014).
  7. AUDE 2013, Estates: The Foundation of Higher Education. Higher Education Estate Statistics 2011/2012, (accessed 15.01.2014).
  8. CLARYSSE B., MOSEY S., LAMBRECHT I., 2009, New Trends in Technology Management Education: A View From Europe, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 427-443.
  9. DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, annual-reports/ (accessed 15.01.2014).
  10. DEN HEIJER, A., 2011, Managing the university campus. Information to support real estate decisions, Eburon Academic Publishers.
  11. DICKESON R.C., 1999, Prioritizing Academic Programs and Services: Reallocating Resources to Achieve Strategic Balance, Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series, San Francisco.
  12. DU VALL (ED.) 2011, Modele zarządzania uczelniami w Polsce (Models of managing higher education estates in Poland), Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Centrum Badań nad Szkolnictwem Wyższym, Kraków.
  13. DURHAM UNIVERSITY 2013, Space Management Key Performance Indicator's 2013, (accessed 15.01.2014).
  14. ETZKOVITZ H., 2004, The Evolution of the Entrepreneurial University, International Journal of Technology and Globalization, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 64-77.
  15. ETZKOVITZ H., WEBSTER A., GEBHARDT C., CANTISANO B. R., 2000, The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm, Research Policy, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 313-330.
  16. FRIGA P. N., BETTIS R. A., SULLIVAN R. S., 2003, Changes in Graduate Management Education and New Business School Strategies for the 21st Century, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 233-249.
  17. HEFCE 2000, Estate strategies: a guide to good practice, e/2000/00_04.pdf (accessed 15.01.2014).
  18. HEFCE 2010, Performance in higher education estates. EMS Annual Report 2009, (accessed 15.01.2014).
  19. HEFCE 2011, Performance in higher education estates. EMS Annual Report 2010, (accessed 15.01.2014).
  20. JAJSZCZYK A., 2009, Polska w obliczu globalizacji szkolnictwa wyższego (Poland in the light of the globalization of higher education), Kultura i Polityka, No. 5, pp. 73-85.
  21. JONES K., WHITE A. D., 2008, RICS Public Sector Asset Management Guidelines: A guide to best practice, London, RICS.
  22. KEAST D., 1995, Entrepreneurship in Universities: Definitions, Practices and Implications, Higher Education Quarterly, Vol. 49 Issue 3, pp. 248-266.
  23. KEISER H.H., 1989, Planning and Managing Higher Education Facilities, Jossey Bass, San Francisco.
  24. KIRBY D. A., 2006, Creating Entrepreneurial Universities in the UK: Applying entrepreneurship theory to practice, Journal of Technology Transfer, No. 31 (5), pp. 599-603.
  25. KONOWALCZUK J., RAMIAN T., 2012, The Market Value of Operational Corporate Real Estate, in: Topical Issues in the Valuation and Application of Market Value, Towarzystwo Naukowe Nieruchomości, Olsztyn.
  26. LAW W.W., HO W.C., 2009, Globalization, values education, and school music education in China, Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol. 41, Issue 4, pp. 501-520.
  27. LAWRENCE P., 1989, Building Design: More Than Meets The Eye, The Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 10, pp. 15-19.
  28. LEJA K., 2013, Zarządzanie uczelnią - koncepcje i współczesne wyzwania (University management - concepts and current challenges), Oficyna Wolters Kluwer Business, Warszawa.
  29. LUTCHMAN R., 2006, Sustainable Asset Management. Linking assets, people and processes for results, DEStech Publications, Inc. Lancaster, Pennsylvania, USA.
  30. NAO 1996, Space Management in Higher Education: A Good Practice Guide, London, National Audit Office.
  31. NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY 2007, Report of Space Management in Highjer Education, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne: Newcastle University.
  32. RICS 2007, Code of Measuring Practice: A Guide for Property Professionals, (accessed 15.01.2014).
  33. ROBBINS J., 2008, Toward a Theory of the University: Mapping the American Research University in Space and Time, American Journal of Education, Vol. 114, No. 2, pp. 243-272.
  34. RYTKÖNEN E., 2012, Strategic campus development of Aalto University internal and international benchmarking of space resources, Aalto University, Espoo.
  35. SMG 2005, UK Higher Education Space Management Project. Review of Practice Report, (accessed 15.01.2014).
  36. SMG 2006, UK Higher Education space Management Project, Impact on space of future changes in higher education, (accessed 15.01.2014).
  37. SMG 2006b, UK Higher Education space Management Project, Space utilization: practice, performance and guidelines, (accessed 15.01.2014).
  38. TEFMA 2009, Space Planning Guidelines, Edition 3, TEFMA-SPACE-PLANNING-GUIDELINES-FINAL-ED3-28-AUGUST-09.pdf (accessed 15.01.2014).
  39. UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD 2012, Room Utilisation Survey 2012, (accessed 15.01.2014).
  40. VAN DER LEI T., HERDER P. & WIJNIA Y., 2012, Asset Management. The State of the Art in Europe from a Life Cycle Perspective, Springer, London.
  41. WILLIAMS B., 1994, Facilities Management in Building, UK: Economics Bureau Ltd.
  42. WOLSKI R., ZAŁĘCZNA M., 2011, Nieruchomość w zasobach przedsiębiorstwa - potencjał do wykorzystania (Real estate as a business resource - potential for use), Studia i Materiały Towarzystwa Naukowego Nieruchomości, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 131-141.
Cytowane przez
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu