BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Özpinar Şansel (Adnan Menderes University, Turkey), Aldemir Necdet Coşkun (Adnan Menderes University, Turkey)
Tytuł
Inner Voice of Capitalism : "Everything is Temporary for the Sake of My Existence..."
Źródło
Economics & Sociology, 2012, vol. 5, nr 2, s. 93-102, tab., bibliogr. 33 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Przemiany społeczne, Ekonomika pracy, Zatrudnienie, Siła robocza, Relacje międzyludzkie, System wartości
Social change, Labour economics, Employment, Labour force, Interpersonal relations, Value system
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
The main purpose of this study[1] is to explain the parallelism of transformation in labour market and social transformation with the concept of "temporariness" which is frequently used both in society and in economy. The central argument it is put forward in this article is that in this stage of capitalism, every technical policy change in economy brings transformation of social structure and reshapes interpersonal relations and system of values. Consequently, the contemporary global economy which is significantly based on temporariness not only forces individuals and society as a whole to adapt to fundamental economic changes, but gives also rise to a considerable number of social and psychological troubles. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Bauman, Z. (1999), Çalışma, Tüketicilik ve Yeni Yoksullar (Work, Consumerism and the New Poor), İstanbul: Sarmal Yayınları.
  2. Bauman, Z. (2000), Liquid Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  3. Bauman, Z. (2005), Bireyselleşmiş Toplum (The Individualized Society), Istanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  4. Bell, D. (1973), The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting, New York: Basic Books.
  5. Bennis, W. G., Slater, P. E. (1968), The Temporary Society, New York: Harper and Row.
  6. Bourdieu, P. (2006), Karşı Ateşler (Acts of Resistance: Against the Tyranny of the Market). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  7. De Botton, A. (2010), Statü Endişesi (Status Anxiety), İstanbul: Sel Yayıncılık.
  8. Deleuze, G. (1992), Postscript on the Societies of Control, October, 59, pp. 3-7.
  9. Drucker, P. F. (1968), The Age of Discontinuity, New York: Harper Row.
  10. Dyer-Witheford, N. (1999), Cyber-Marx: Cycles and Circuits of Struggle in High Technology Capitalism, Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
  11. Farber, H. (1999), Alternative and Part-Time Employment Arrangements as a Response to Job Loss, Journal of Labour Economics, 17 (4), pp. 142-169.
  12. Funk, R. (2007), Ben ve Biz - Postmodern insanın Psikanalizi (I and We - Psychoanalysis of Postmodern Man), İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  13. Gartman, D. (1998), Postmodernism; or, the Cultural Logic of Post-Fordism?, The Sociological Quarterly, 39, pp. 119-137.
  14. Gorz, A. (1999), Reclaiming Work: Beyond the Wage-Based Society, Malden: Polity Press.
  15. Hall, S. (1996), The Meaning of New Times, in: Morley, D. and Chen, H. K. (eds), Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. London: Routledge, pp. 222-236.
  16. Hardt, M, Negri, A. (2003), Labor of Dionysus, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  17. İlhan, S. (2008), Yeni Kapitalizm ve Meslek Olgusunun Değişen Anlamları Üzerine (New Capitalism and on the Changing Meanings of the Phenomenon of Profession), Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21, pp. 313-328.
  18. Kashefi, M. (2007), Work Flexibility and Its Individual Consequences, The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 32 (3), pp. 341-369.
  19. Kissler, G. D. (1994), The New Employment Contract, Human Resource Management, 33, pp. 335-352.
  20. Kocabaş F (2004) Endüstri İlişkilerindeki Dönüşüm (Transformation in Industrial Relationships) Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10, pp. 33-55.
  21. Kumar, K. (2005), From Post-Industrial to Post-Modern Society: New Theories of the Contemporary World, 2nd edn. Malden, Oxford, Victoria: Blackwell Publishing.
  22. Marx, K, Engels, F. (2008), The Communist Manifesto, London: Pluto Press.
  23. Masuda, Y. (1981), The Information Society as Post-Industrial Society, Bethesda: World Future Society.
  24. McRobbie, A. (1996), Looking Back at New Times and Its Critics, in: Morley, D. and Chen, H. K. (eds) Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. London: Routledge, pp. 237-260.
  25. Mütevellioğlu, N., Işık, S. (2009), Türkiye Emek Piyasasında Neoliberal Dönüşüm (Neoliberal Transformation in Turkish Labour Market), in: Mütevellioğlu, N. and Sönmez, S. (eds) Küreselleşme, Kriz ve Türkiye'de Neoliberal Dönüşüm (Globalization, Crisis and Neoliberal Transformation in Turkey), İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, pp. 159-198.
  26. Rassool, N. (1993), Post-Fordizm? Technology and New Forms of Control: The Case of Technology in the Curriculum, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 14, pp. 227244.
  27. Rorty, R. (1989), Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  28. Sennett, R. (2008a), Karakter Aşınması (The Corrosion of Character), Istanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  29. Sennett, R. (2008b), The Craftsman, London and New Haven: Yale University Press.
  30. Toffler, A. (1980), The Third Wave, New York: Morrow.
  31. Vallas, S. P. (1999), Rethinking Post-Fordism: The Meaning of Workplace Flexibility, Sociological Theory, 17, pp. 68-101.
  32. Wenger, J. B., Kalleberg, A. L. (2006), Employers' Flexibility and Employment Volatility: An Analysis of the U.S. Personnel Supply Industry 1972-2000, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 65 (2), pp. 347-382.
  33. Yılmaz, G. (2009), istihdam Edilebilirlik: Değişim Kıskacında Birey (Employability: Individual in the Throes of Change), Bursa: Ekin Yayınevi.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2071-789X
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2012/5-2/7
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu