BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Gallardo-Vazquez Dolores (University of Extremadura, Spain), Sanchez-Hernandez Isabel (University of Extremadura, Spain)
Isabel Sanchez-Hernandez, Information on Corporate Social Responsibility and SME´s Environmental Responsiveness : a Regional Study
Economics & Sociology, 2012, vol. 5, nr 2, s. 103-115, rys., tab., bibliogr. 66 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Małe i średnie przedsiębiorstwa, Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu, Polityka ekologiczna przedsiębiorstwa, Relacje organizacja-otoczenie
Small business, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Enterprises ecological politics, Organization-environment relations
Hiszpania, Region Estremadura
Spain, Region of Extremadura
The theoretical framework of market orientation from Kholi and Jaworski (1990), and the extended concept of market considering all agents of interest, has served as background for analysing the relationship between the three sub-dimensions of what we call orientation to environmental responsibility: information on CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility), the disclosure that the company itself makes of its CSR, and the organization´s environmental responsiveness. The analysis is based on the perceptions of managers of a large sample of small companies (758 in the Autonomous Community of Extremadura in Spain). It was empirically demonstrated with the methodology of structural equations, that the greater concern about the CSR issues corresponds to the higher engagement in the dissemination of CSR outcomes and consequently, managers increase their predisposition to respond favourably to environmental demands of society. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
  1. Adams, C.A., Frost, G.R. (2008), Integrating Sustainability reporting into management practices, Accounting Forum, 32, pp. 288-302.
  2. Albinger, H.S., Freeman, S.J. (2000), Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations, Journal of Business Ethics, 28 (3), pp. 243- 253.
  3. Atuahene-Gima, K. (1995), Involving Organizational Buyers in New Product Development, Industrial Marketing Management, 24, pp. 215-226.
  4. Bagnoli, M.; Watts, S. (2003), Selling to socially responsible consumers: competition and the private provision of public goods, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 12 (3), 419-445.
  5. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., Thomson, R. (1995), The partial least squares (PLS), approach to causal modelling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration, Technology Studies, 2(2), pp. 285-309.
  6. Bies, R.J., Bartunek, J.M., Fort, T.L., Zald, M.N. (2007), Corporations as Social Change Agents: Individual, Interpersonal, Institutional, and Environmental Dynamics. Academy of Management Review, 32 (3), pp. 788-793.
  7. Brown T.J., Dacin P.A. (1997), The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses, Journal of Marketing, 61 (1), pp. 68-84.
  8. Capriotti, P., Moreno, A. (2007), Communicating corporate responsibility through corporate web sites in Spain, Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 12, pp. 221-237.
  9. Carmines, E.G., Zeller, R.A. (1979), Reliability and validity assessment, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, N-07-017. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  10. Carroll, A. B. (1999), Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct, Business & Society, 38(3), pp. 268-295.
  11. Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995), A Stakeholder Framework for Analizing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance, The Academy of Management Review, 20 (1), pp. 92-117.
  12. European Commission (2001), Green Paper. Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility, Brussels: European Commission, July 18.
  13. European Commission (2002), European SMEs and social and environmental responsibility, Observatory of European SMEs, p. 4.
  14. Chin, W. (1998), Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling, MIS Quarterly, 2 (1), vii - xv.
  15. Deegan, C. (2000), Financial Accounting Theory, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Sydney.
  16. Deegan, C. (2002), The legitimizing effect of social and environmental disclosures: a theoretical foundation, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 15 (2), pp. 282-311.
  17. Elkington, J. (1994), Toward the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development, California Management Review, 36(2), pp. 90-100.
  18. Elkington, J. (1998), The Triple Bottom Line: Sustainability's Accountant, Chapter 4 of Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line in 21st Century Businesses, New Society Publishers.
  19. Falk, R.F., Miller, N.B. (1992), A primer for soft modelling, Akron, Ohio: The University of Arkon.
  20. Fenwick, T. (2007), Developing organizational practices of ecological sustainability. A learning perspective, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28 (7), pp. 632-645.
  21. Fernandez De Gatta Sanchez, D. (2004), La responsabilidad social corporativa en materia ambiental, Boletin Economico del ICE, n° 2824, pp. 27-43.
  22. Fernandez-Kranz, D., Santaló, J. (2010), When necessity becomes a virtue: The effect of product market competition on corporate social responsibility, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 19 (2), pp. 453-487.
  23. Fisher, K., Geenen, J., Jurcevic, M., Mcclintock, K., Davis, G. (2009), Applying asset- based community development as a strategy for CSR: a Canadian perspective on a win - win for stakeholders and SMEs, Business Ethic: A European Review, 18/ 1, pp. 66-82.
  24. Fornell, C., Larcker, D. F. (1981), Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, pp. 39-50.
  25. Freeman, R.E. (1984), Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publishing.
  26. Friedman, A. L., Miles, S. (2002), Developing Stakeholder Theory, Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), pp. 1-21.
  27. Galbreath, J. (2006), Corporate social responsibility strategy: strategic options, global considerations, Corporate Governance, 6 (2), pp. 175-187.
  28. Galetzka, M., Gelders, K., Verchens, J.P., Seydel, E. (2008), Transparency and performance communication: a case study of Dutch Railways, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 13 (4), pp. 433-447.
  29. Gray, E.R., Balmer, J.M.T. (1998), Managing corporate image and corporate reputation, Long Range Planning, 31 (5), pp. 695-702.
  30. Griffin, J.J., Mahon, J.F. (1997), The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate, Business and Society, 36 (1), pp. 5-31.
  31. Hammann, E.M., Habisch, A., Pechlaner, H. (2009), Values that create value: socially responsible business practices in SMEs - empirical evidence from German companies, Business Ethics: A European Review, 18/ 1, pp. 37-51.
  32. Holtzhausen, L., Fourie, L. (2008), Communicating to a diverse workfoce. Employees' perceptions of symbolic corporate identity elements, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 13 (1), pp. 80-94.
  33. Hooghiemstra, R. (2000), Corporate communication and impression management - new perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting, Journal of Business Ethics, 27, pp. 55-68.
  34. Institute Of Chartered Accountants In England And Wales (1975), The Corporate Report, ICAEW. London.
  35. Jenkins, H. (2004), A critique of conventional CSR theory: an SME perspective, Journal of General Management, 29(4), pp. 37-57.
  36. Jimenez-Jimenez, D., Cegarra-Navarro, J.G. (2007), The performance effect of organizational learning and market orientation, Industrial Marketing Management, 36, pp. 694-708.
  37. Johnson, G., Scholes, K. (2001), Dirección estrategica. Prentice Hall, Madrid.
  38. Kaler, J. (2004), Arriving at an Acceptable Formulation of Stakeholder Theory, Business Ethics: A European Review, 13(1), pp. 73-79.
  39. Kholi, A., Jaworski, B, (1989), Market Orientation: The Construct, Research propositions, and Managerial Implications, Research Program-Working Paper, Marketing Science Institute.
  40. Kholi, A., Jaworski, B., (1990), Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions and Marketing Management Implications, Journal 01 Marketing, (54), April, pp. 1-18.
  41. Lerner, L.D., Fryxell, G.E. (1994), CEO Stakeholder Attitudes and Corporate Social Activity in the Fortune 500, Business and Society, 33 (1), pp. 58-81.
  42. Ledwith, A., O'Dwyer, M. (2009), Market orientation, NPD Performance, and Organizational performance in small firms, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26 (6), pp. 652-661.
  43. Lukas, B.A., Ferrell, O.C. (2000), The Effect of Market Orientation On Product Innovation, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), pp. 239-247.
  44. Luo, W., Bhattacharya, C.B. (2006), Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value, Journal of Marketing, 70 (4), pp. 1-14.
  45. Mahoney, L.S., Thorne, L. (2005), Corporate Social Responsibility and Long-term Compensation: Evidence from Canada, Journal of Business Ethics, 57 (3), pp. 241-253.
  46. Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C. (2000), Measuring Corporate Citizenship in Two Countries: The Case of the United States and France, Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), pp. 283-297.
  47. Marwick, N., Fill, C. (1997), Towards a framework for managing corporate identity, European Journal of Marketing, 31 (5/6), pp. 396-409.
  48. Matsuno, K., Mentzer, J.T. , Ozsomer, A. (2002), The effects of entrepreneurial proclivity and market orientation on business performance, Journal of Marketing, 66 (2), pp. 18-32.
  49. Maxfield, S. (2008), Reconciling corporate citizenship and competitive strategy: Insighs from economic theory, Journal of Business Ethics, 80, pp. 367-377.
  50. Narver, J., Slater, S., (1990), The Effect of a Marketing Orientation on Business Profitability, Journal of Marketing, 54, October, pp. 20-35.
  51. Nielsen, A.E., Thomsen, CH. (2009), Investigation CSR communication in SMEs: a case study among Danish middle managers, Business Ethics: A European Review, 18/1, pp 83-93.
  52. Nunnally, J.C. (1978), Phychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  53. Olutayo Otubanjo, B., Melewar, T.C. (2007), Understanding the meaning of corporate identity: a conceptual and semiological approach, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12 (4), pp. 414-432.
  54. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., Rynes, S.L. (2003), Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis, Organization Studies, 24 (3), pp. 403-441.
  55. Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R. (2006), The link between competitive advantage and corporate responsibility, Harvard Business Review, 84(12), pp. 78-92.
  56. Preuss, L., Perschke, J. (2009), Slipstreaming the Larger Boats: Social Responsibility in Medium-Sized Businesses, Journal of Business Ethics, 92, pp. 531-551.
  57. Real Decreto 221 (2008), de 15 de febrero, por el que se crea y regula el Consejo Estatal de Responsabilidad Social de las Empresas. BOE de 29 de febrero de 2008.
  58. Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Will, S. (2005), SmartPLS 2.0 (M3), Beta. Hamburg, Available in (15/12/11).
  59. Roberts, R.W. (1998), A Stakeholder Approach to the Corporate Single Audit, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 9, pp. 227-232.
  60. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C.B. (2001), Does Doing Good Alwais Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (2), pp. 225-243.
  61. Siltaoja, M. (2009), On the discursive construction of a socially responsible organization, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25 (2), pp. 191-202.
  62. Turban, D.B., Greening, D.W. (1997), Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees, Academy of Management Journal, 40 (3), pp. 658-672.
  63. Turker, D. (2008), Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility: a scale development study, Journal of Business Ethics, 85 (4), pp. 411-427.
  64. United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), (2002), Corporate social responsibility: implications for small and medium enterprises in developing countries. Vienna.
  65. Weber, M. (2008), The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR", European Management Journal, 26, pp. 247-261.
  66. Wood, D. J., Jones, R. E. (1995), Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(3), pp. 229-267.
Cytowane przez
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu