BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Mazur Stanisław (Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie)
Tytuł
The Public Service Ethos Versus Public Management Models
Źródło
Warsaw Forum of Economic Sociology, 2013, vol. 4, nr 2 (8), s. 95-114, tab., bibliogr. poz. 36
Słowa kluczowe
Usługi publiczne, Zarządzanie publiczne, Biurokracja, Etos pracy
Public services, Public governance, Bureaucracy, Work ethos
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
The paper examines the issue of public service ethos and poses a question how that specific culture fits into the framework of public management. The author states that in the early 21st century, the Weberian model of bureaucracy is under increasing pressure of market-logic driven models of public management. On the other hand, an alternative to both classic bureaucracy and modern public management seems to have emerged in the form of public governance theory. In the context of contradictory influences, Poland 's administration finds itself at a crossroads nowadays, as it struggles with the bureaucratic legacy and underdeveloped public service ethos, while entering the foreign land shaped by not entirely compatible logics of the market and public governance. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka SGH im. Profesora Andrzeja Grodka
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Bresser-Pereira, L.C., (2004), Democracy and Public Management Reform, Building the Republican State, Oxford University Press Inc 2004.
  2. Bryner, G.C., (1987), Bureaucratic Discretion. Law and Policy in Federal Regulatory Agencies, Pergamon
  3. Chhotray, V., Stoker, G., (2009), Governance Theory and Practice. A Cross-Disciplinary Approach, Palgrave Macmillan
  4. Chhotray, V., Stoker G., (2009), Governance Theory and Practice. A Cross-Disciplinary Approach, Palgrave Macmillan.
  5. Dahl, R.A., (1961), Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City, Yale UP, New Haven
  6. Downs, A., (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, Harper and Rowe, New York
  7. Downs, A., (1967), Inside Bureaucracy, Little, Brown and Company, Boston
  8. Etzioni-Halevy, E., (1983), Bureaucracy and Democracy. A Political Dilemma, Boston: Routledge&Kegan Paul
  9. Finer, H., (1941), Administrative Responsibility in Democratic Government, "Public Administration Review" 1(4)
  10. Fox, C.J., Miller, H.T., (1995), Postmodern Public Administration. Toward Discourse, Sage, Thousand Oaks
  11. Frederickson, G., (1983), Ethics and Public Administration, Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
  12. Friedrich, C.J., (1940), Public Policy and the Nature of Administrative Responsibility, in: T. Miyakawa, (2000), The Science of Public Policy: Policy Process, Part III. Routledge
  13. Goodnow, F.J., (1900), Politics and Administration: A Study in Government, New York: Russell and Russell
  14. Hood, C., (1991), A Public Management for All Seasons, "Public Administration", 69: 3-19
  15. Hood, C., (1995), The "New Public Management" in the 1990s: Variations on a Theme, "Accounting Organizations and Society", 20(2/3)
  16. Kooiman, J. (red.), (1993), Modern governance, London: Sage
  17. Lipsky, M., (1980), Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, New York: Russell Sage
  18. Mazur, S., (2011), Władza dyskrecjonalną wysokich urzędników. Perspektywa nowego instytucjonalizmu, Kraków: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie
  19. Mazur, S. (red.), (2011), Państwo integrujące zasoby, Kraków: Małopolska Szkoła Administracji Publicznej Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
  20. McFarland, A.S., (2004), Neopluralism, The Evolution of Political Process Theory, Studies in Government and Public Policy, University Press of Kansas
  21. Niskanen, W., (1971), Bureaucracy and Representative Government, Chicago: Aldine Press
  22. Olson, M., (1965), The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Harvard University Press
  23. Osborne, D., Gaebler, T., (1994), Rządzić inaczej. Jak duch przedsiębiorczości przenika i przekształca administrację publiczną, Poznań: Media Rodzina
  24. Pinkele, C., Williams, C., (red.), (1985), The Politics of Police Discretion in Discretion, Justice, and Democracy: a Public Policy Perspective, Ames: The Iowa State University Press
  25. Polsby, N.W., (1963), Community Power and Political Theory, New Haven: Yale UP
  26. Rhodes, R., (1994), The Hollowing, Out of the State, "Political Quarterly", 65
  27. Rhodes R.A.W., (1997), Understanding Governance, OUP Buckingham
  28. Sartori, G., (2008), Teorie demokracji, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN
  29. Scott, P.G., (1997), Assessing Determinants of Bureaucratic Discretion: An Experiment in Streetlevel Decision Making, "Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory", 7(1)
  30. Sowa, J.E., Selden, S.C., (2003), Administrative Discretion and Active Representation: An Expansion of the Theory of Representative Bureaucracy, "Public Administration Review", 63(6), Washington: American Society for Public Administration
  31. Taylor, F.W., (1911), The Principles of Scientific Management, New York, NY, USA and London, UK: Harper & Brothers
  32. Thompson D.F., (1983), Bureaucracy and Democracy, in: D. Graeme (red.), Democratic Theory and Practice, New York: Cambridge University Press
  33. Tullock, G., (1965), The Politics of Bureaucracy, Washington: Public Affairs Press
  34. Willoughby, W.F., (1919), The Government of Modern States, New York: The Century Co.
  35. Weber, M., (2002), Gospodarka i społeczeństwo. Zarys socjologii rozumiejącej, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN
  36. Wilson, W., (1887), The Study of Administration, "The Academy of Political Science", 2, No. 2 (Jun.)
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2081-9633
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu