BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Sarrión Joaquín (Universidad de Valencia, Spain)
Tytuł
Constitutional limits to European integration in the New Member States after the biggest enlargement
Źródło
The Poznań University of Economics Review, 2014, vol. 14, nr 3, s. 58-72, bibliogr. 22 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Konstytucja, Prawodawstwo, Sądownictwo
Constitution, Legislation, Judicature
Uwagi
summ.
Firma/Organizacja
Unia Europejska (UE)
European Union (EU)
Abstrakt
We live in the Europe Union (EU) in a context of relations between legal systems of different levels. Therefore the positions of EU New Member States Constitutional or Supreme Courts are analysed in the paper with the use of the multilevel constitutionalism theoretical approach and focus on changes introduced by the Lisbon Treaty, that opened a new constitutional horizon in the EU integration process. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) defined relations between EU law and national law thanks to the primacy principle of EU law. Nevertheless the EU law's formal authority does not depend exclusively on ECJ position. It is conditioned largely by characteristics of each national legal system and national supreme or constitutional court case law. In fact, in most of EU Member States, certain constitutional reserves or constitutional limits to the primacy of EU law in the constitutional and supreme court case law with regard to (constitutional) fundamental rights and principles, can be found. The paper analyses the origin and development of those limits in the case law doctrine of Constitutional Courts in two old and three new EU Member States and concludes with the identification of the consequences and perspectives of EU integration with regard to the coherent protection of fundamental (constitutional) rights and principles across the EU. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Szkoły Głównej Handlowej w Warszawie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Biondi, A., 2004, Free Trade, a Mountain Road and the Right to Protest: European Economic Freedoms and Fundamental Individual Rights, European Human Rights Law Review, no. 1, pp. 51-61.
  2. Dauses, M.A., 1985, The Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Community Legal Order, European Law Review, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 398-419.
  3. De Hert, R, Korenica, E, 2012, The Doctrine of Equivalent Protection: Its Life and Legitimacy before and after the European Unions Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights, German Law Journal, vol. 13, no.7, pp. 874-895.
  4. Diez Picazo, L.M., 2005, Sistema de Derechos Fundamentales, Civitas, Madrid.
  5. Fudge, J., 2007, The New Discourse ofLavour Rights: from Social to Fundamental Rights?, Comparative Lavor Law Policy Journal, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 29-66.
  6. Giubboni, S., 2003, Fundamental Social Rights in the European Union: Problems of Protection and Enforcement, Second Expert Workshop Co-operation or Confrontation? Toward the Effectiveness of International Law, Conference Centre of the Catholic Academy, Berlin, http://www.sef-bonn.org/download/veranstaltungen/2003/2003_fachws_referat-giubboni_en.pdf [access: 8.02.2014].
  7. Gómez Sánchez, Y., 2011, Constitucionalismo multinivel. Derechos fundamentales, Madrid, Sanz y Torres.
  8. Komarek, J., 2009, The Czech Constitutional Courts Second Decision on the Lisbon Treaty of 3 November 2009, European Constitutional Law Review, no. 5, pp. 345-352.
  9. Komarek, J., 2012, Czech Constitutional Court Playing with Matches: the Czech Constitutional Court Declares a Judgement of the Court of Justice of the EU Ultra Vires Judgement of 31 January 2012, PI. Ú.s 5/12, Slovak Pensions XVII, European Constitutional Law Review, no. 8(2), pp. 323-337.
  10. Krzeminska-Vamvaka, J., 2005, Free Speech Meets Free Movement: How Fundamental really Is 'Fundamental'?, ZERP-Diskussionspapier, no. 3, http://ssrn.com/abstract 1134809 [access: 10.03.2014].
  11. Lindfeit, M., 2007, Fundamental Rights in the European Union - Towards Higher Law of the Land? A Study of the Status of Fundamental Rights in a Broader Constitutional Setting, Àbo Akademi University, Àbo.
  12. Mangas Martin, A., 2008, Artículo 52. Alcance e interpretación de los derechos y principios", in: Mangas Martin, A. (ed.), Carta de los Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea. Comentario artículo por artículo, Fundación BBVA, Bilbao.
  13. Menéndez, J.A., 2003, Rights to Solidarity'Balancing Solidarity and Economic Freedoms, in: Eriksen,E., Fossum, J., Menéndez, J.A. (eds.), Chartering of Europe, the European Charter of Fundamental Rights and Its Constitutional Implications, Nomos, BadenBaden.
  14. Pérez de las Heras, M., 2008, El mercado interior europeo. Las libertades económicas comunitarias: mercancías, personas, servicios y capitales, Deusto, Universidad de Deusto.
  15. Poiares Maduro, M., 1999, Striking the Elusive Balance between Economic Freedom and Social Rights in the European Union, in: Alston, P, Cassese, A., Lalumière, C. (eds.), The EU and Human Rights, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  16. Ridola, 2002, La Carta dei Diritti Fondamentail dell'Unione Europea e la "tradizioni costituzionali comuni" degli Sati membri, in: Panunzio, S.P., Sciso, El (eds.), Le rifarme istituzionali e lapartecipazione dell'Italia all'Unione Europea, Giuffrè, Milan.
  17. Rossi, L.S., 2008, How Fundamental are Fundamental Principles? Primacy and Fundamental Rights after Lisbon, Yearbook of European Law, pp. 295-309.
  18. Rossi, L.S., 2009, Recent Pro-European Trends of the Italian Constitutional Court, Common Market Law Review, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 319-331.
  19. Sarmiento, D., 2013, Who's Afraid of the Charter? The Court of Justice, National Courts and the New Framework of Fundamental Rights Protection in Europe, Common Market Law Review, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1267-1304.
  20. Sarrión Esteve, J., 2013, El Tribunal de Justicia de Luxemburgo como garante de los derechos fundamentales, Dykinson, Madrid.
  21. Sarrión Esteve, J., 2014, Sobre la necesidad de buscar el estándar o nivel más alto de protección de los derechos fundamentales en el sistema de tutela multinivel en la Unión Europea, CEFLegal: Revista Práctica del Derecho, no. 162, pp. 155-184.
  22. Tenorio Sánchez, P.J., 2014, Diálogo entre tribunales y protección de los derechos fundamentales en el ámbito europeo, Revista General de Derecho Europeo, no. 31, pp. 123-167.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1643-5877
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu