BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Matysiak Anna (Warsaw School of Economics, Poland), Mynarska Monika (Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie)
Women's determination to combine childbearing and paid employment: How can a qualitative approach help us understand quantitative evidence?
ISiD Working Papers, 2010, nr 7, s. 31, wykr., bibliogr. 58 poz.
Zeszyty ISiD
Słowa kluczowe
Kobieta w rodzinie, Dzietność kobiet, Zatrudnienie kobiet
Women in family, Women's fertility, Women employment
This paper aims to provide deeper insight into women's fertility and employment decisions through the exploration of women's values and beliefs. For our research, we selected Poland, where quantitative studies continuously point to a strong determination among mothers to participate in employment, despite marked institutional obstacles to combining work with childrearing. We demonstrated that motherhood is one of the major goals in women's lives. Nevertheless, women seek to combine it with employment, and their ability to do so depends on the meaning attached to paid work. Using qualitative data, we identified three such meanings. "Work as an income source" and "work as an attractive activity" are considered desirable and compatible with motherhood, whereas "work as a professional career" precludes childrearing, and is rejected. In addition, our study illustrates how considering values and beliefs can contribute to our understanding of human behaviours, and demonstrates the usefulness of the qualitative approach for this purpose. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Szkoły Głównej Handlowej w Warszawie
Pełny tekst
  1. Ahn, Namkee and Pedro Mira. 2002. A note on the changing relationship between fertility and female employment rates in developed countries, "Journal of Population Economics", 15(4): 667-682.
  2. Ajzen, Icek. 1991. The Theory of Planned Behavior. "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes", 50: 179-211.
  3. Ajzen, Icek. 2002. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control and the theory of planned behavior. "Journal of Applied Social Psychology", 32(4): 665-683.
  4. Balcerzak-Paradowska, Bożena, Agnieszka Chłoń-Domińczak, Irena E. Kotowska, Anna Olejniczuk-Merta, Irena Topińska and Irena Wóycicka. 2003. The gender dimensions of social security reform in Poland. In: Elaine Fultz, Markus Ruck, and Silke Steinhilber (eds.), The gender dimensions of social security reform in Central and Eastern Europe: Case studies of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland (pp.187-313). Budapest: ILO Subregional Office for Central and Eastern Europe.
  5. Bandura, Albert. 1977. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, "Psychological Review", 84(2):191-215.
  6. Bandura, Albert. 1982. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency, "American Psychologist", 37(2)122-147.
  7. Barber, Jennifer S. 2001. Ideational influences on the transition to parenthood: Attitudes toward childbearing and competing alternatives, "Social Psychology Quarterly", 64(2): 101-127.
  8. Becker, Gary S. 1965. A theory of the allocation of time. "Economic Journal", 75: 493-517.
  9. Bernardi, Laura and Inge Hutter. 2007. The anthropological demography of Europe. "Demographic Research", 17, Article 18: 541-566.
  10. Billari, Francesco C., Dimiter Philipov, Maria Rita Testa. 2009. Attitudes, Norms and Perceived Behavioural Control: Explaining Fertility Intentions in Bulgaria. "European Journal of Population", 25(4): 439-465.
  11. Bryman, Alan. 1984. The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: a question of method or epistemology? "British Journal of Sociology", 35(1): 75-92.
  12. Bryman, Alan. 1988. Quantity and quality in social research. London, Boston: Unwin Hyman, Reprinted 2004: London, New York: Routledge.
  13. Caldwell, John C. 1985. Strengths and limitations of the survey approach for measuring and understanding fertility change: alternative possibilities, in: John Cleland, John Hobcraft, Betzy Dinesen (eds.) Reproductive Change in Developing Countries: insights from the World Fertility Survey, Oxford University Press.
  14. Denzin, Norman K., Yvonna S. Lincoln, 2000. Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research, in: Norman K. Denzin, Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  15. Easterlin, Richard A. 1980. Marriage and childbearing, in: Richard A. Easterlin, Birth and fortune: The impact of numbers on personal welfare (pp. 37-59). New York: Basic Books.
  16. Edwards, Ward. 1954. The theory of decision making, "Psychological Bulletin", 51(4): 380-417.
  17. Edwards, Ward. 1961. Behavioral decision theory, "Annual Review of Psychology", 12: 473-498.
  18. Engelhardt, Henriette, Tomas Kögel, Alexia Prskawetz. 2004. Fertility and women's employment reconsidered: A macro-level time-series analysis for developed countries, 1960-2000, "Population Studies", 58(1): 109-120.
  19. Engelhardt, Henriette, Alexia Prskawetz. 2004. On the Changing Correlation Between Fertility and Female Employment over Space and Time, "European Journal of Population" 20: 35-62.
  20. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1999. Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  21. Eurostat. 2007. Reconciliation between work and family life. Final report to the 2005 LFS ad hoc module. European Commission.
  22. Frejka, Tomas. 2008. Overview Chapter 5: Determinants of family formation and childbearing during the societal transition in Central and Eastern Europe, "Demographic Research", Special Collection 7,139-170.
  23. Giza-Poleszczuk, Anna and Jan Poleszczuk. 2004. Partnership, marriage, and children - cultural differentiation of attitudes, in: Aleksandra Jasińska-Kania and Mirosława Marody (eds.) Poles among Europeans. Warsaw: Scholar.
  24. Glaser, Barney G., Anselm Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
  25. Hakim, Catherine. 2000. Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st century: Preference theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  26. Hakim, Catherine. 2003. A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: Preference theory, "Population and Development Review", 29: 349-374.
  27. Knodel, John. 1997. A case for nonanthropological qualitative methods for demographers, "Population and Development Review", 23(4): 847-853.
  28. Kotowska, Irena E. 2004. Zmiany demograficzne a przyszły rynek pracy [Demographic changes and the future labour market], in: Stanisława Borkowska (ed.) Przyszłość rynku pracy w XXI wieku [Future of the labour market in the 21st century] (pp.115-138). Warsaw: Institute of Labour and Social Affairs and Central Statistical Office.
  29. Kotowska Irena E., Urszula Sztanderska. 2007. Zmiany demograficzne a zmiany na rynku pracy w Polsce (Population changes and labour market developments in Poland), in: Irena, E. Kotowska, Urszula Sztanderska, Irena Wóycicka (eds.) Aktywność zawodowa i edukacyjna a obowiązki rodzinne w świetle badań empirycznych (Economic and educational activity versus family obligations) (pp. 13-46). Warsaw: Scholar Publishing.
  30. Kotowska, Irena E., Janina Jóźwiak, Anna Matysiak and Anna Baranowska. 2008. Poland: Fertility decline - a response to profound societal change and transformations in the labour market? "Demographic Research", 19, Article 22: 795-854.
  31. Kreyenfeld, Michaela. 2004. Fertility decisions in the FRG and GDR: An analysis with data from the German Fertility and Family Survey, "Demographic Research", Special Collection 3: 275-318.
  32. Macunovich, Diane. 1996. Relative income and price of time: Exploring their effects on U.S. fertility and female labour force participation, "Population and Development Review" 22 (Supplement): 223-257.
  33. Matysiak, Anna. 2009. Employment first, then childbearing: women's strategies in post-socialist Poland. "Population Studies", 63(3): 253-276.
  34. Matysiak Anna and Stephanie Steinmetz. 2008. Finding their way? Female employment patterns in West Germany, East Germany, and Poland, "European Sociological Review", 24(3): 331-345.
  35. Matysiak Anna and Daniele Vignoli. 2010. Employment around the first birth in two adverse institutional settings: evidence from Italy and Poland. Stockholm University Linnaeus Center on Social Policy and Family Dynamics in Europe, SPaDE Working Paper No 3.
  36. Matysiak Anna and Daniele Vignoli. 2008. Fertility and women's employment: A meta-analysis, "European Journal of Population", 24(4): 363-384.
  37. Maxwell, Joseph. 1996. Qualitative research design. An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
  38. Mincer, Jacob. 1963. Market prices, opportunity costs and income effects. In Carl F. Christ (Ed.) Measurement in economics (pp. 63-97). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford U. Press.
  39. Mynarska, Monika. 2009a. Values of Children and the lowest-low Fertility: the Polish Case. Paper for the XXVI IUSSP Conference, Marrakech 27.09-02.10.2009.
  40. Mynarska, Monika. 2009b. Individual fertility choices in Poland. Warsaw: Publishing Company of the University of Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński.
  41. Obermeyer, Carla Makhlouf. 1997. Qualitative methods: a key to a better understanding of demographic behavior? "Population and Development Review", 23(4): 813-818.
  42. Philipov, Dimiter, Zsolt Speder and Billari, Francesco C. 2006. Soon, later, or ever? The impact of anomie and social capital on fertility intentions in Bulgaria (2002) and Hungary (2001). "Population Studies", 60(3): 289-308.
  43. Pollak, Robert A. and Susan Cotts Watkins 1993. Cultural and economic approaches to fertility: Proper marriage or misalliance? "Population and Development Review" 19: 467-496.
  44. Pongracz, Marietta, Zsolt Spèder. 2008. Attitudes towards forms of partnership, in: Charlotte Höhn, Dragana Avramov, Irena E. Kotowska (eds.), People, population change and policies: Lessons from the Population Policy Acceptance Study (pp. 105-205). Berlin: Springer.
  45. Randall Sara, Todd Koppenhaver. 2004. Qualitative data in demography: The sound of silence and other problems. "Demographic Research", 11, Article 3: 56-93.
  46. Rindfuss Ronald R., Karen B. Guzzo, S. Philip Morgan. 2003. The changing institutional context of low fertility. "Population Research and Policy Review", 22: 411-438.
  47. Róbert, Péter and Erzsébet Bukodi. 2005. The effects of the globalization process on the transition to adulthood in Hungary. In Hans-Peter Blossfeld, Erik Klijzing, Melinda Mills, Karin Kurz (eds.), Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society (pp. 176-214). London and New York: Routledge.
  48. Rogers, Everett M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations, 4e, New York, London, et al.: The Free Press.
  49. Sale Joanna E.M., Lynne H. Lohfeld, Kevin Brazil. 2002. Revisiting the quantitative - qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research, "Quality & Quantity", 36: 43-53.
  50. Siegers, Jacques J. 1991. Towards a better understanding of the relationship between female labour market behaviour and fertility, pp.265-274, in: Jacques J. Siegers, Jenny de Jong-Gierveld, Evert van Imhoff (eds.), Female labour market behaviour and fertility: A rational-choice approach, Berlin: Springer.
  51. Spèder Zsolt, Balazs Kapitany. 2009. How are Time-Dependent Childbearing Intentions Realized? Realization, Postponement, Abandonment, Bringing Forward, "European Journal of Population", 25(4): 503-523.
  52. Stankunienie Vlada, Ausra Mauslauskaite. 2008. Family transformations in the post-communist countries: attitudes toward changes, in: Charlotte Höhn, Dragana Avramov, and Irena. E. Kotowska (eds.), People, population change and policies: Lessons from the Population Policy Acceptance Study, (pp. 127-157). Berlin: Springer.
  53. Steckler Allan, Kenneth R. McLeory, Robert M. Goodman, Sheryl T. Bird, Lauri McCormick. 1992. Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: an introduction, "Health Education Quarterly", 19(1):1-8.
  54. Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of the Qualitative Research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  55. Stropnik Nada. 2003. Impact of transition on family policy, in: Irena E. Kotowska, Janina Jóźwiak (eds.). Population of Central and Eastern Europe. Challenges and Opportunities. Warsaw: Statistical Publishing Establishment.
  56. Sztanderska, Urszula. 2005. Aktywność zawodowa kobiet w Polsce. Jakie szanse? Jakie rezultaty? [Labour force participation of women in Poland? What opportunties? What outcomes?] pp.43-63, in: Szanse na wzrost dzietności - jaka polityka rodzinna? [Possibilities of increasing fertility: Which family policies?] Blue paper of the Polish Forum for Lisbon Strategy. Warsaw-Gdansk: Gdansk Institute on Market Economics.
  57. Willekens Frans J. 1991. Interdependence of Parallel Careers, in: Jacques J. Siegers, Jenny de Jong-Gierveld, Evert van Imhoff (eds.), Female Labour Market Behaviour and Fertility. A Rational-Choice Approach. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  58. Witzel, Andreas. 2000. The problem-centered interview. FQS Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 1(1): Article 22. Available from:
Cytowane przez
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu