BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Pan Ching-Heng (National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan), Chiang Lichun (National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan)
Tytuł
The Utilization of Web 2.0 Applications for Public Participation: Acceptance Factors of Bureaucrats' Attitudes
Źródło
Scientific Publications / University of Economics in Katowice. Internet Communication Management International Week, 2012, s. 116-129, rys., tab., bibliogr. 37 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Internet, Web 2.0, Usługi internetowe, Serwisy społecznościowe, Portale internetowe
Internet, Web 2.0, Internet services, Social networking, Web portals
Abstrakt
In the first decade of the 21st century, one of the most phenomenal trends in the internet world has been the growth of Web 2,0, a conceptual umbrella that describes the recent development of internet technologies and applications. The potential benefits of Web 2,0 are multifaceted. One key aspect is the remarkable networking capability that may pool people from around the globe to be "on the same page". Private firms are seeking business opportunities by incorporate wikis, blogs, Facebook, Twitter, and other social networking services into their marketing strategy. The Web has become an indispensible platform for many firms to maintain good relationship with their customers. Governments are also aware that Web technologies can be of use to improve citizen engagement. Ever since the New Public Management era, concurrent with the take-off of internet usage, democratic governments around the globe have turned to utilizing internet technology to make the policy process more deliberative, transparent and citizen-centric. The positive experience of Web 2.0 applications that facilitate participation in the marketing context and political campaigns has drawn the attention of e-government reformers, who have been searching for ideas to improve public governance so it can be more responsive to the needs of diverse policy stakeholders. (...) This study specifically examines people's perceptions of trust and their attitudes toward using Web 2.0 for public consultation. (fragment of text)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Agarwal R., Prasad J.: Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies? "Decision Sciences", 30(2), 1999.
  2. Al-Gahtani S.S., King M.: Attitudes, Satisfaction and Usage; Factors Contributing to Each in the Acceptance of Information Technology. "Behaviour & Information Technology", 18(4), 1999.
  3. Alvarez R.M., Hall T.E.: Controlling Democracy: the Principal-Agent Problems in Election Administration. "Policy Studies Journal", 34(4), 2006.
  4. Bagozzi R.P., Yi Y.: On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. "Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science", 16, 1988.
  5. Barber B.R.: Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkley University of California Press, Berkley, CA. 1984.
  6. Bentler P.M.: Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models. "Psychological Bulletin", 107, 1990.
  7. Cain J.: Online Social Networking Issues within Academia and Pharmacy Education. "American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education", 72(1), 2008.pp. 1-7. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2254235/pdf/ajpel0.pdf (30.08.2011).
  8. Carter L., Bélanger F.: The Utilization of e-government Services: Citizen Trust, Innovation and Acceptance Factors. "Information Systems Journal", 5, 2005.
  9. Chang M.K., Cheung W.: Determinants of the Intention to Use Internet/WWW at Work: A Confirmatory Study. "Information & Management", 39, 2001.
  10. Davis F.D.: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease-of-Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. "MIS Quarterly", 13(3), 1989.
  11. Davis F.D.: User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts. "International Journal of Man Machine Studies", No. 38, 1993.
  12. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., Warshaw P.R.: User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. "Management Science", 35, 1989.
  13. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., Warshaw P.R.: Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace. "Journal of Applied Social Psychology", 22, 1992.
  14. Fountain J.: Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C. 2001.
  15. Gefen D.: E-Commerce: The Role of Familiarity and Trust. "Omega: The International Journal of Management Science", 28(6), 2000.
  16. Govani T., Pashley H.: Student Awareness of the Privacy Implications when Using Facebook. Student Poster. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh. 2005.
  17. Hair Jr. F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Black W.C.: Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed., Macmillan, Basingstoke Hampshire, England. 1998.
  18. Hu L., Bentler P.M.: Evaluating Model Fit. In: R.H. Hoyle, (Ed.), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA., Sage, 1995.
  19. Jöreskog K.G., Sörbom D.: LISREL 7, SPSS Inc., Chicago. 1989.
  20. Koufaris M., Hampton-Sosa W.: The Development of Initial Trust in an Online Company by New Customers. "Information and Management", 41(3), 2004.
  21. Kramer R.M.: Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions. "Annual Reviews Psychology", 50, 1999.
  22. Lee M., Turban E.: A Trust Model for Internet Shopping. "International Journal of Electronic Commerce", 6, 2001.
  23. Li X., Valacich J.S., Hess T.J.: Predicting User Trust in Information Systems: a Comparison of Competing Trust Models. Paper read in The 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. University of Hawaii, Manoa, Hawaii, January. 2004.
  24. Ma Q., Liu L.: The Technology Acceptance Model: a Meta-Analysis of Empirical Findings. "Journal of Organizational and End User Computing", 16(1), 2004.
  25. McKnight D.H., Chervany N.L.: Conceptualizing Trust: a Typology and E-commerce Customer Relationships Model. Paper read at The 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Outrigger Wailea Resort, Maui, Hawaii. 2001.
  26. McKnight H., Choudhury V., Kacmar C.: Developing and Validating Trust Measures for E-commerce: an Integrative Typology. "Information Systems Research", 13, 2002.
  27. Misra D.C.: Ten Guiding Principles for e-civil Service, viewed 14 June 2009, http://egov-india.blogspot.com/2008/12/ten-guiding-principles-for-e-civil.html. 2008.
  28. Norris P.: Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge University Press, New York. 2001.
  29. O'Reilly T,E.: What is Web 2.0? viewed 18 December 2010, http://www.oreillynet.com/ pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html. 2005.
  30. Oostveen A.M., Besselaar P.V.D.: Trust, Identity, and the Effects of Voting Technologies on Voting Behavior. "Social Science Computer Review", 23(3), 2005.
  31. Sanchez-Franco M.J.: Exploring the Influence of Gender on the Web Usage Via Partial Least Squares. "Behaviour & Information Technology", 25(1), 2006.
  32. Sheppard B., Hartwick J., Warshaw P.: The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research. "Journal of Consumer Research", 15, 1988.
  33. Susanto T.D., Goodwin R.: Factors Influencing Citizen Adoption of SMS-Based e-Government Services. "Electronic Journal of e-Goverament", 8(1), 2010.
  34. Tan C.W., Benbasat R.T., Cenfetelli: Building Citizen Trust Towards e-Government Services: Do High Quality Websites Matter? Paper read at the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society Conference Publishing Services, 2008.
  35. Tapscott D., Williams A.D.: Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. Penguin Books Ltd., London. 2006.
  36. Warkentin M., Gefen D., Pavlou P.A., Rose G.M.: Encouraging Citizen Adoption of e-Government by Building Trust. "Electronic Markets", 12(3), 2002.
  37. Xenakis A., Macintosh A.: Trust Analysis of the U.K. e-Voting Pilots. "Social Science Computer Review", 23(3), 2005.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu