BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Canarella Giorgio (University of Nevada, Las Vegas - Lee Business School, USA), Nourayi Mahmoud (Loyola Marymount University, United States), Sullivan Michael J. (University of Nevada, Las Vegas - Lee Business School, USA)
An Alternative Test of the Trade-off Theory of Capital Structure
Contemporary Economics, 2014, vol. 8, nr 4, s. 365-386, tab., bibliogr. 78 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Wskaźnik zadłużenia
Debt ratio
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the stochastic behavior of corporate debt ratios utilizing a balanced panel of 2,556 publicly traded U.S. firms during the period 1997-2010. We partition the panel into ten economic sectors and perform panel unit root tests on each sector employing book value and market value measures of debt ratio. First-generation panel unit root tests provide consistent evidence that debt ratios are mean reverting, which supports the trade-off theory. However, these tests rely on the assumption that the debt ratios are cross-sectionally independent, but tests of cross-sectional independence fail to uphold this assumption. Thus, utilizing a second-generation panel unit root test that controls for cross-sectional dependence, we uncover evidence showing that debt ratios are not mean reverting, which contradicts the trade-off hypothesis. We find that the recent macroeconomic developments triggered by the financial crisis and the Great Recession have considerable explanatory power over the dynamics of the debt ratios. In fact, when we exclude the years of the recent global financial crisis, the unit root hypothesis is rejected in one half of the sectors. We interpret these results as indicative that the recent global events may have produced in these sectors a structural change in the underlying data generation process (DGP). Overall, then, we find mixed evidence on the stationarity of debt ratios.(original abstract)
Pełny tekst
  1. Andrews, D. W. K. (1993). Exactly Median-Unbiased Estimation of First Order Autoregressive/Unit Root Models. Econometrica, 61 (1), 139-165.
  2. Almeida, H., & Philippon, T. (2007). The Risk-adjusted Cost of Financial Distress. Journal of Finance, 62 (6), 2557-2586.
  3. Antoniou, A., Guney, Y., & Paudyal, K. (2008). The Determinants of Capital Structure: Capital Market Oriented versus Bank Oriented Institutions. Journal of Financial and Quantitative, Analysis, 43 (1), 59-92.
  4. Baker, H. K., & Martin, G. S. (Eds.) (2011). Capital Structure and Corporate Financing Decisions: Theory, Evidence, and Practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  5. Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2002). Market Timing and Capital Structure. Journal of Finance, 57 (1), 1-32.
  6. Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (3rd ed.). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Banerjee, A. (1999). Panel Data Unit Roots and Cointegration: an Overview. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61 (S1), 607-629.
  8. Banerjee, S., Heshmati, A., & Wihlborg, C. (2004). The Dynamics of Capital Structure. Research in Banking and Finance, 4 (1), 275-297.
  9. Barclay, M. J., Morellec, E. (2006). On the Debt Capacity of Growth Options. Journal of Business, 79 (1), 37-60.
  10. Bayless, M., & Chaplinsky, S. (1991). Expectations of Security Type and the Information Content of Debt and Equity Offers. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 1 (3), 195-214.
  11. Bernier, G., & Mouelhi, C. (2012). Dynamic Linkages between MVA and Internal Performance Measures: A Panel Cointegration Analysis of the U.S. Insurance Industry. Insurance and Risk Management, 79 (3-4), 223-250.
  12. Bontempi, M. E., & Golinelli, R. (2001). Is Financial Leverage Mean-Reverting? Unit Root Tests and Corporate Financing Models (Working Papers No. 422). Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
  13. Bokpin, G.A. (2009). Macroeconomic Development and Capital Structure Decisions of Firms: Evidence from Emerging Markets Economies. Studies in Economics and Finance, 26 (2), 129-142.
  14. Bradley, M, Jarrell, G., & Kim, E. H. (1984). On the Existence of an Optimal Capital Structure: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Finance, 39 (3), 857-878.
  15. Breitung, J., & Das, S. (2005). Panel Unit root Tests under Cross-Sectional Dependence. Statistica Neerlandica, 59 (4), 414-433.
  16. Breitung, J., & Pesaran, H. H. (2008). Unit Roots and Cointegration in Panels. The Econometrics of Panel Data. Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics, 46, 279-322.
  17. Breuer, J. B., McNown, R., & Wallace, M.S. (2001). Misleading Inferences from Panel unit root Tests with an Illustration from Purchasing Power Parity. Review of International Economics, 9 (3), 482-493.
  18. Campello, M., Giambona, E., Graham, J., & Harvey, C. (2011). Liquidity Management and Corporate Investment during a Financial Crisis. Review of Financial Studies, 24 (6), 1944-1979.
  19. Campello, M., Graham, J., & Harvey, C. (2010). The Real Effects of Financial Constraints: Evidence from a Financial Crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 97 (3), 470-487.
  20. Chan, L. K. C., Lakonishok, J., & Sougiannis, T. (2001). The Stock Market Valuation of Research and Development Expenditures. Journal of Finance, 56 (6), 2431-2456.
  21. Chang, C., Lee, A. C., & Lee, C. F. (2009). Determinants of Capital Structure Choice: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49 (2), 197-213.
  22. Chang, H. L., Liang, H. Y., Su, C. W., & Zhu, M. N. (2010). The Choices of Capital Structure. African Journal of Business Management, 4 (15), 3332-3336.
  23. Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20 (2), 249-272.
  24. Dang, V. A., Kim, M., & Shin, Y. (2012). Asymmetric Capital Structure Adjustments: New Evidence from Dynamic Panel Threshold Models. Journal of Empirical Finance, 19 (4), 465-482.
  25. Dang, V. A., Kim, M., & Shin, Y. (2014). Asymmetric Adjustment toward Optimal Capital Structure: Evidence from a Crisis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 33, 226-242.
  26. Drobetz, W., Pensa, P., & Wanzenried, G. (2007). Firm Characteristics, Economic Conditions and Capital Structure Adjustments. Available at SSRN: or
  27. Duchin, R., Ozbas, O., & Sensoy, B. (2010). Costly External Finance, Corporate Investment, and the Subprime Mortgage Credit Crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 97 (3), 418-435.
  28. Elsas, R., & Florysiak, D. (2011). Heterogeneity in the Speed of Adjustment toward Target Leverage. International Review of Finance, 11 (2), 181-211.
  29. Fama, E. F., & French, K. (2002). Testing Trade-off and Pecking Order Predictions about Dividends and Debt. Review of Financial Studies, 15 (1), 1-33.
  30. Faulkender, M., Flannery, M., Hankins, K., & Smith, J. (2012). Cash flows and leverage adjustments. Journal of Financial Economics, 103 (3), 632-646.
  31. Fisher, R. A. (1932). Statistical Methods for Research Workers (4th Ed.). Edinburgh, UK: Oliver and Boyd.
  32. Flannery, M., & Rangan, K. (2006). Partial Adjustment Toward Target Capital Structures. Journal of Financial Economics, 79 (3), 469-506.
  33. Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2003). Testing the Pecking Order Theory of Capital Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 67 (2), 217-248.
  34. Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2007). Trade-off and Pecking Order Theories of Debt. In B.E. Eckbo (Ed.), Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance (pp. 135-202) (Vol. 2). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  35. Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2009). Capital Structure Decisions: Which Factors Are Reliably Important? Financial Management, 38 (1), 1-37.
  36. Frees, E. W. (1995). Assessing Cross-Sectional Correlation in Panel Data. Journal of Econometrics, 69 (2), 393-414.
  37. Frees, E. W. (2004). Longitudinal and Panel Data: Analysis and Applications in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2001). The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Financial Economics, 60 (2-3), 187-243.
  39. Granger, C. W. J. (1981). Some Properties of Time Series Data and Their Use in Econometric Model Specification. Journal of Econometrics, 16 (1), 121-130.
  40. Granger, C. W. J., & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious Regression in Econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2 (2), 111-120.
  41. Gutierrez, L. (2006). Panel unit roots Tests for Cross- Sectionally Correlated Panels: A Monte Carlo Comparison. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 68 (4), 519-540.
  42. Hadri, K. (2000).Testing for Stationarity in Heterogeneous Panel Data. Econometrics Journal 3 (2), 148-161.
  43. Hanousek, J., & Shamshur, A. ( 2011). A Stubborn Persistence: Is the Stability of Leverage Ratios Determined by the Stability of the Economy?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17 (5), 1360 - 1376.
  44. Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (1991). The Theory of Capital Structure. Journal of Finance, 46 (1), 297-355.
  45. Harris, R. D. F., & Tzavalis, E. (1999). Inference for Unit Roots in Dynamic Panels Where the Time Dimension is Fixed. Journal of Econometrics, 91 (2), 201-226.
  46. Helwege, J., & Liang, N. (1996). Is There a Pecking Order? Evidence from a Panel of IPO Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 40 (3), 429-458.
  47. Hovakimian, A., & Li, G. (2011). In Search of Conclusive Evidence: How to Test for Adjustment to Target Capital Structure. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17 (1), 33-44.
  48. Hovakimian, A., Opler, T., & Titman, S. (2001). The Debt-Equity Choice. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36 (1), 1-24.
  49. Hovakimian, A., Kayan, A., & Titman, S. (2012). Are Corporate Default Probabilities Consistent with the Static Trade-off Theory?. Review of Financial Studies, 25 (2), 315-340.
  50. Huang, R., & Ritter, J. R. (2009). Testing Theories of Capital Structure and Estimating the Speed of Adjustment. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44 (2), 237-271.
  51. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115 (1), 53-74.
  52. Ivashina, V., & Scharfstein, D. (2010). Bank Lending During the Financial Crisis of 2008. Journal of Financial Economics, 97 (3), 319-338.
  53. Jang, M. J., & Shin, D. W. (2005). Comparison of Panel Unit Root Tests under Cross-Sectional Dependence. Economics Letters, 89 (1), 12-17.
  54. Kraus, A., & Litzenberger, R. H. (1973). A State-Preference Model of Optimal Financial Leverage. Journal of Finance, 28 (4), 911-922.
  55. Lau, E., Baharumshah, A.Z., & Soon, S.V. (2013). The Behavior of External Debt in Asian Countries: Evidence Based on Panel Unit Root Tests. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 14 (Supp 1), S377-S394.
  56. Leary, M. T., & Roberts, M. R. (2005). Do Firms Rebalance their Capital Structures?. Journal of Finance, 60 (6), 2575-2619.
  57. Lemmon, M. L., Roberts, M. R., & Zender, J. F. (2008). Back to the Beginning: Persistence and the Cross- Section of Corporate Capital Structure. Journal of Finance, 63 (4), 1575-1608.
  58. Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & James Chu, C. S. (2002). Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108 (1), 1-24.
  59. Maddala, G. S., & S. Wu, S. (1999). A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and A New Simple Test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61 (S1), 631-652.
  60. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The Cost of Capital, Corporate Finance, and the Theory of Investment. American Economic Review, 48 (3), 261-297.
  61. Myers, S. C. (1984). The Capital Structure Puzzle. Journal of Finance, 39 (3), 574-592.
  62. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13 (2), 187-221.
  63. O'Connell, P. (1998). The Overvaluation of Purchasing Power Parity. Journal of International Economics, 44 (1), 1-19.
  64. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels (CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1229; IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240). The CESifo Group & Institute for the Study of Labor. Available at SSRN:
  65. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit root Test in the Presence of Cross-Section Dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22 (2), 265-312.
  66. Phillips, P. C. B. & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika, 75 (2), 335-346.
  67. Phillips, P. C. B., & Sul, D. (2003). Dynamic Panel Estimation and Homogeneity Testing under Cross Section Dependence. The Econometrics Journal, 6 (1), 217-259.
  68. Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (1995). What Do We Know about Capital Structure? Some Evidence from International Data. Journal of Finance, 50 (5), 1421-1460.
  69. Said, S. E., & Dickey, D. A. (1984). Testing for Unit Roots in Autoregressive-Moving Average Models of Unknown Order. Biometrika 71 (3), 599-607.
  70. Shyam-Sunder, L., & Myers, S. C. (1999). Testing Static Tradeoff Against Pecking Order Models of Capital Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 51 (2), 219-244.
  71. Tasseven, O., & Teker, D. (2009). Is Financial Leverage Mean-Reverting: Evidence from Turkey With Unit Root Tests. Middle Eastern Finance and Economics, 4, 82-87.
  72. Tippett, M. (1990). An Induced Theory of Financial Ratios. Accounting and Business Research, 21 (81), 77-85.
  73. Tippet, M., & Whittington, G. (1995). An Empirical Evaluation of an Induced Theory of Financial Ratios. Accounting and Business Research, 25 (99), 208-218.
  74. Titman, S., & Wessels, R. (1988). The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice. Journal of Finance, 43 (1), 1-19.
  75. Vilasuso, J., & Minkler, A. (2001). Agency Costs, Assets Specificity, and the Capital Structure of the Firm. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, 44 (1), 55-69.
  76. Welch, I. (2004). Capital Structure and Stock Returns. Journal of Political Economy, 112 (1), 106-131.
  77. Whittington, G., & Tippett, M. (1999). The Components of Accounting Ratios as Co-Integrated Variables. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 26 (9-10), 1245-1273.
  78. Zhao, T., & Susmel, R. (2008). Testing the Trade-Off Theory of Capital Structure: A Kalman Filter Approach. Available at SSRN:
Cytowane przez
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu