BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Vlahinic Nela (University of Rijeka, Croatia), Jakovac Pavle (University of Rijeka, Croatia)
Tytuł
Revisiting the Energy Consumption-Growth Nexus for Croatia: New Evidence from a Multivariate Framework Analysis
Źródło
Contemporary Economics, 2014, vol. 8, nr 4, s. 435-452, tab., rys., bibliogr. 81 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Zużycie energii, Rozwój gospodarczy, Studium przypadku
Energy consumption, Economic development, Case study
Uwagi
summ.
Kraj/Region
Chorwacja
Croatia
Abstrakt
This paper applies the most recently developed autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) co-integration procedure to re-investigate co-integration and the causal relationship between energy consumption and real GDP within a multivariate framework that includes capital stock and labor input for Croatia during the 1952-2011 period. The empirical results fully support a positive longrun co-integrated relationship between production inputs and real GDP and the important role of energy in economic growth. It is found that a unidirectional causality runs from total final energy consumption to real GDP in the long run and that a bidirectional causality in the short run, which means that energy is a necessary requirement for economic growth. Additionally, the reduction in energy consumption could adversely affect GDP in the short and long run. Therefore, Croatia should adopt a more vigorous economic policy aimed toward increasing investments in installed energy capacities and reforming the economic structure towards reindustrialization and more energy-efficient industries.(original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Acaravci, A. (2010). The causal relationship between electricity consumption and GDP in Turkey: Evidence from ARDL bounds testing approach. Economic Research, 23 (2), 34-43.
  2. Akarca, A. T., Long, T. V. (1980). On the relationship between energy and GNP: a re-examination. Journal of Energy and Development, 5 (2), 326-331.
  3. Apostolakis, B. E. (1990). Energy-capital substitutability/complementarity: The dichotomy. Energy Economics, 12 (1), 48-58.
  4. Asafu-Adjaye, J. (2000). The relationship between energy consumption, energy prices and economic growth: time series evidence from Asian developing countries. Energy Economics, 22 (6), 615-625.
  5. Ayres, R. U., Warr, B. (2009). The economic growth engine. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  6. Bahovec, V., Erjavec, N. (2009). Uvod u ekonometrijsku analizu [Introduction to econometric analysis]. Zagreb: Element.
  7. Bartleet, M., Gounder, R. (2010): Energy consumption and economic growth in New Zealand: Results of trivariate and multivariate models. Energy Policy, 38 (7), 3508-3517.
  8. Berndt E. R. (1978). Aggregate energy, efficiency, and productivity measurement. Annual Review of Energy, 3, 225-273.
  9. Berndt, E. R., Wood, D. O. (1979). Engineering and econometric interpretations of energy-capital complementarity. American Economic Review, 69 (3), 342-354.
  10. Binh, P. T. (2011). Energy consumption and economic growth in Vietnam: Threshold co-integration and causality analysis. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 1 (1), 1-17.
  11. Borozan, D. (2013). Exploring the relationship between energy consumption and GDP: Evidence from Croatia. Energy Policy, 59, 373-381.
  12. Chandran, V. G. R., Sharma, S., Madhavan, K. (2010). Electricity consumption-growth nexus: The case of Malaysia. Energy Policy, 38 (1), 606-612.
  13. Chang, T., Fang, W., Wen, L. F. (2001). Energy consumption, employment, output and temporal causality: Evidence from Taiwan based on co-integration and error-correction modeling techniques. Applied Economics, 33 (8), 1045-1056.
  14. Chontanawat, J., Hunt, L. C., Pierse, R. (2008). Does energy consumption cause economic growth? Evidence from a systematic study of over 100 countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 30 (2), 209-220.
  15. Chow, G. C. (1960). Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica, 28 (3), 591-605.
  16. Croatian Bureau of Statistics (2012). Statistical yearbook of Croatia. Retrieved from http://www.dzs.hr/Hrv_Eng/ljetopis/2012/sljh2012.pdf.
  17. Dantama, Y. U., Abdullahi, Y. Z., Inuwa, N. (2012). Energy consumption-economic growth nexus in Nigeria: An empirical assessment based on ARDL bound test approach. European Scientific Journal, 8 (12), 141-157.
  18. Dergiades, T., Tsoulfidis, L. (2011). Revisiting residential demand for electricity in Greece: New evidence from the ARDL approach to co-integration analysis. Empirical Economics 41 (2), 511-531.
  19. Dickey, D. A., Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Society, 74, 427-431.
  20. Doornik, J.A., Hansen, H. (1994). An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70, 927-939.
  21. Druzic, I., Tica, J. (2002). Dinamika i kontroverze gospodarskog razvitka Hrvatske [Dynamics and controversy of Croatia's economic development]. In I. Druzic (Ed.), Stabilizacija-participacija-razvoj, Zbornik radova znanstvenog skupa povodom 80. obljetnice rodjenja akademika Jakova Sirotkovica [Scientific conference proceedings in the occasion of the 80th birth anniversary of the academician Jakov Sirotkovic]. (pp. 107-125). Zagreb: Faculty of Economics, University of Zagreb.
  22. Elliott, G., Rothenberg T. J., Stock, J. H. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica, 64 (4), 813-836.
  23. Energy Institute Hrvoje Pozar (December 2012). Energy in Croatia 1945-2011. Zagreb. Available at http://www.eihp.hr/.
  24. Engle, R. F., Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing. Econometrica, 55 (2), 251-276.
  25. Erol, U., Yu, E. S. H. (1987). Time series analysis of the causal relationships between US energy and employment. Resources Energy, 9, 75-89.
  26. Esso, L. J. (2009). Co-integration and causality between financial development and economic growth: evidence from ECOWAS countries. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 16, 112-122.
  27. Fatai, K., Oxley, L., Scrimgeour, F. (2004). Modeling the causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP in New Zealand, Australia, India, Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand. Mathematics and Computer in Simulation, 64 (3), 431-445.
  28. Gelo, T. (2009). Causality between economic growth and energy consumption in Croatia. Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics - Journal of Economics and Business, 27 (2), 327-348.
  29. Ghali, K. H., El-Sakka, M. I. T. (2004). Energy use and output growth in Canada: A multivariate cointegration analysis. Energy Economics, 26 (2), 225-238.
  30. Glasure, Y. U. (2002). Energy and national income in Korea: Further evidence on the role of omitted variables. Energy Economics, 24 (4), 355-365.
  31. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relationship by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37 (3), 424-438.
  32. Gujarati, D. N., Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
  33. Hall, R. E., Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (1), 83-116.
  34. Hannon, B. M., Joyce, J. (1981). Energy and technical progress. Energy 6, 187-195.
  35. Hondroyiannis, G., Lolos, S., Papapetrou, E. (2002). Energy consumption and economic growth: Assessing the evidence from Greece. Energy Economics, 24 (4), 319-336.
  36. Howarth, R. B. (1997). Energy efficiency and economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 15 (4), 1-9.
  37. Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of co-integration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics Control, 12 (2-3), 231-254.
  38. Johansen, S., Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on co-integration-with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52 (2), 169-210.
  39. Kamps, C. (2004). New estimates of government net capital stocks for 22 OECD countries 1960-2001 (Working paper No. 67). International Monetary Fund.
  40. Kouakou, A.K. (2011). Economic growth and electricity consumption in Cote d'Ivoire: Evidence from time series analysis. Energy Policy, 39 (6), 3638-3644.
  41. Kraft, J., Kraft, A. (1978). On the relationship between energy and GNP. Journal of Energy and Development, 3 (2), 401-403.
  42. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P., Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity Against the Alternative of a Unit Root: How Sure Are We That Economic Time Series Have a Unit Root? Journal of Econometrics, 54 (1-3), 159-178.
  43. Kyriacou, G.A. (1991). Level and growth effects of human capital: a cross-country study of the convergence hypothesis (Working Papers No. 91-26).
  44. C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics. Lee, C. C. (2005). Energy consumption and GDP in developing countries: A cointegrated panel analysis. Energy Economics, 27 (3), 415-427.
  45. Lütkepohl, H. (2005). New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  46. Ljung, L. (1999). System identification - theory for the user (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  47. MacKinnon, J. G. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and co-integration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11 (6), 601-618.
  48. MacKinnon, J. G., Haug, A. A., Michelis, L. (1999). Numerical distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for co-integration. Journal of Applied Econometrics 14 (5), 563-577.
  49. Maddala, G. S., Kim, I. M. (1998). Unit roots, co-integration and structural change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  50. Masih, A. M. M., Masih, R. (1996). Energy consumption, real income and temporal causality: results from a multi-country study based on co-integration and error-correction modeling techniques. Energy Economics, 18 (3), 165-183.
  51. Masih, A. M. M., & Masih, R. (1997). On the temporal causal relationship between energy consumption, real income, and prices: Some new evidence from Asian-energy dependent NICs based on a multivariate cointegration/vector error-correction approach. Journal of Policy Modeling, 19 (4), 417-440.
  52. Narayan, P. K. (2005). The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37 (17), 1979-1990.
  53. Nelson, C. R., Plosser, C. I. (1982). Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series - some evidence and implications. Journal of Monetary Economics, 10 (2), 139-162.
  54. Ng, S., Perron, P. (2001). Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica, 69 (6), 1519-1554.
  55. Oh, W., Lee, K. (2004). Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP revisited: the case of Korea 1970-1999, Energy Economics, 26 (1), 51-59.
  56. Ouédraogo, I. M. (2010). Electricity consumption and economic growth in Burkina Faso: A co-integration analysis. Energy Economics, 32 (3), 524-531.
  57. Ozturk, I., Acaravci, A. (2010). The causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP in Albania, Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania: Evidence from ARDL bound testing approach. Applied Energy, 87 (6), 1938-1943.
  58. Ozturk, I., Acaravci, A. (2011). Electricity consumption and real GDP causality nexus: Evidence from ARDL bounds testing approach for 11 MENA countries. Applied Energy 88 (8), 2885-2892.
  59. Pasalic, Z. (1999). Osnove hrvatske gospodarstvene infrastructure [Basics of Croatian economic infrastructure]. Split:Univeristy of Split, Faculty of Economics.
  60. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., Smith, R. J. (2001),Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16 (3), 289-326.
  61. Phillips, P. C. B., Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regressions. Biometrica, 75 (2), 335-346.
  62. Raguz, I., Druzic, I., Tica, J. (2011). Human capital in growth accounting: The case of Croatia. Journal of International Scientific Publications: Educational Alternatives, 9, 185-198.
  63. Sari, R., Ewing, B. T., Soytas, U. (2008). The relationship between disaggregate energy consumption and industrial production in the United States: An ARDL approach. Energy Economics, 30 (5), 2302-2313.
  64. Shahbaz, M., Tang, C.F., Shahbaz Shabbir, M. (2011). Electricity consumption and economic growth nexus in Portugal using cointegration and causality approaches. Energy Policy, 39 (6), 3529-3536.
  65. Soytas, U., Sari, R. (2006). Energy consumption and income in G-7 countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 28 (7), 739-750.
  66. Soytas, U., Sari, R. (2007). The relationship between energy and production: Evidence from Turkish manufacturing industry. Energy Economics, 29 (6), 1151-1165.
  67. Stern D. I. (1997). Limits to substitution and irreversibility in production and consumption: a neoclassical interpretation of ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 21 (3), 197-215.
  68. Stern, D. I. (1999). Is energy cost and accurate indicator of natural resource quality? Ecological Economics, 31 (3), 381-394.
  69. Stern, D. I. (2000). A multivariate cointegration analysis of the role of energy in the US macroeconomy. Energy Economics, 22 (2), 267-283.
  70. Stresing, R., Lindenberger, D., Kümmel, R. (2008). Cointegration of output, capital, labor and energy (Working Paper, No. 08.04). Institute of Energy Economics at the University of Cologne. Retrieved from http://www.ewi.unikoeln.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Publikationen/Working_Paper/EWI_WP_08-04_Cointegration-of-Output.pdf.
  71. Tang, C. F., Shahbaz, M. (2011). Revisiting the electricity consumption-growth nexus for Portugal: Evidence from a multivariate framework analysis (Paper No. 28393). Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/28393.
  72. Tintner, G., Deutsch, E., Rieder, R., Rosner, P. (1977). A production function for Austria emphasizing energy. De Economist, 125 (1), 75-94.
  73. Toda, H. Y. (1994). Finite sample properties of likelihood ratio tests for co-integration ranks when linear trends are present. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76 (1), 66-79.
  74. Vlahinic-Dizdarevic, N., Zikovic, S. (2010). The role of energy in economic growth: the case of Croatia. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci, 28 (1), 35-60.
  75. Winters, P. R. (1960). Forecasting sales by exponentially weighted moving averages. Management Science, 6 (3), 324-342.
  76. World Bank (2012). World development indicators 2012. Washington, D.C., World Bank.
  77. Yang, H. Y. (2000). A note on the causal relationship between energy and GDP in Taiwan. Energy Economics 22 (3), 309-317.
  78. Yu, E. S. H., Hwang, B. K. (1984). The relationship between energy and economic growth in Korea. Applied Energy, 83, 1181-1189.
  79. Yu, E. S. H., Choi, J. Y. (1985). The causal relationship between energy and GNP: an international comparison. Journal of Energy and Development, 10 (2), 249-272.
  80. Zachariadis, T. (2007). Exploring the relationship between energy use and economic growth with bivariate models: New evidence from G-7 countries. Energy Economics, 29 (6), 1233-1253.
  81. Zikovic, S., Vlahinic-Dizdarevic, N. (2011). Oil Consumption and Economic Growth Interdependence in Small European Countries. Economic research 24 (3), 15-32.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2084-0845
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.155
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu