BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Ekung Samuel (University of Salford, United Kingdom), Effiong James (CRUTECH, Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria)
Tytuł
Scaffolding: Using Social Impact Assessment to Map Framework for Construction Stakeholders' Engagement
Źródło
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (ILSHS), 2014, vol. 21 (3), s. 154-165, rys., tab., bibliogr. 34 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Interesariusze, Społeczeństwo
Stakeholders, Society
Uwagi
summ.
Kraj/Region
Nigeria
Nigeria
Abstrakt
Strategy to construction stakeholders' engagement in Nigeria is anchored on environmental impact assessment (EIA) law. While EIA is conducted only in large projects, every project continues to witness one form of opposition or another from the community stakeholders. This study examined social impact assessment's (SIA) procedures as a scaffold to mapping framework for construction stakeholders' engagement. The objectives were to examine problems associated with the implementation of EIA which hitherto ought to address the social risk triggers in project delivery and to develop a framework embedded in SIA for construction stakeholders' engagement in Nigeria. The study engaged a sample of 46 respondents comprising project managers, environmental management experts and community stakeholders in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria in a qualitative structured interviewing. Collected data were sorted and analysed. The study reveals extant approach to stakeholders' management failed as a result of low social context and impact mitigation are based on monetary incentives whereas there are relevant urgent needs to be satisfied. A framework integrating SIA procedures and construction stakeholder engagement strategy was also developed based on the peculiarity of the industry needs. The implication is that construction stakeholders' management must be structured on satisfying real needs of the citizenry. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Andersson P., Johansson A. (2012). Disturbances of the Surrounding in an Urban Infrastructure Project, MSc Dissertation submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden, Arbor: University of Michigan Press
  2. Becker D. R, Harris C. C, Nielsen E. A., McLaughlin W. J., Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 22(3) (2004) 177-189.
  3. Blood A. (2013). Stakeholders Engagement: Reclaiming the Balance when Economics Dominate, IAIA Conference Proceeding of ''Impact Assessment: The Next Generation'' 33rd Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment 13 - 16th May, Calgary Stampede BMO Centre Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  4. Buchan D., Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 21(3) (2003) 168-172.
  5. Burdge R. J., Taylor C. N. (2012). When and where is Social Impact Assessment Required? Paper presented to the International Association for Impact Assessment Annual Conference, Porto, Portugal.
  6. Dada M. O., Journal of Building Performance 4(1) (2013) 1-12
  7. DITR. (2006) Community Engagement and Development, October 2006, part of the Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry, Department of Industry Tourism and Resources, Commonwealth of Australia.
  8. Echefu N., Akpofure E. (1999). Environmental Impact Assessment in Nigeria: Regulatory Background and Procedural Framework, UNEP EIA Training Resource Manual, Law, Policy and Institutional Arrangement
  9. Ekung S., Ogboji M., Okonkwo E. (2013a). Extenuating Community Protest in Controversial Projects Scenarios in the Niger Delta- a Case for CSR, in Ibrahim, A.D. (ed) (2013). Proceeding of the 1st NIQS Research Conference, Innovative and Sustainable Management of Building and Infrastructure Projects, International Conference Centre, Abuja, September 2-5th
  10. Ekung S. B. (2013b). An Investigation into the Cost of Stakeholders' Engagement in Conflicts Zones, MSc Dissertation Submitted to the School of Built Environment, University of Salford, UK.
  11. Esteves A. M., Barclay M. A., Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal 29(3) (2011) 205-215.
  12. Esteves A. M., Franks D., Vanclay F., Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 30(1) (2012) 34-42.
  13. Etuonovbe K. A. (2011), Devastating effects of Flooding in NigeriaTS06J Hydrography and the Environment, TS06J - Hydrography and the Environment Innocent Chirisa, Zimbabwe, p. 15.
  14. Franks D. M. (2012). Social impact assessment of Resource Projects, Mining for Development: Guide to Australian Practice, Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining, International Mining for Development Centre.
  15. Glass J., Simmonds M., Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 14(2) (2007) 131-149.
  16. IAIA (2013b). Best Practice Stakeholder Engagement begins at Day 1. Paper for the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA) Conference in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 13-16th May 2013.
  17. IAIA (2013c). Beyond regulatory Guidelines: developing a 'Best Practice' SIA Process. Paper for the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA) Conference in Calgary, Alberta, Canada - 13-16 May 2013.
  18. IAIA (2013d). Eliminating Conflicts State by Pro-active Planning. Paper for the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA) Conference in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 13-16th May 2013.
  19. IAIA (2013e). Environmental and Social Impact Assessment in Countries with Limited Regulatory Frameworks: Lessons from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Paper for the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA) Conference in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 13-16th May.
  20. IAIA (2013g). Socio-Economic Impact Study as a Tool for Non-Technical Risk Management: Lessons from the Offshore Oil and Gas Sector in the Falkland Islands. Paper for the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA) Conference in Calgary, Alberta, Canada - 13-16 May 2013.
  21. IAIA (2013a). Applying Interdisciplinary ESHIA in the Artic. Paper for the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA) Conference in Calgary, Alberta, Canada - 13-16 May 2013.
  22. IFC (2000). Investing in People: Sustaining Communities through Improved Business Practice, a Community Development Resource for Companies, IFC Environment Division.
  23. International Finance Corporation (IFC). 2012. IFC Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability. International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC.
  24. Keftin N. A., Anigbogu A. N., Yusufu M. I., FUTY Journal of Environmental Studies 4(1) (2009) 56-67.
  25. Li B., Akintoye A., Edwards P. J., Hardcastle C., Construction Management and Economics 23 (2005) 459-471.
  26. Loosemore M., Phua F. T. T. (2010). Stakeholder Engagement in Managing Risk, in Barrett, P.;Amarantunga, D., Haigh, R. Keraminiyage, K & Pathiage, C. (Eds). Proceedings of the 18th CIB World Building Congress '' Proceedings of the 18th CIB World Building Congress.
  27. Loosemore M. (2000). Crisis Management in Construction Projects, Virginia: ASCE Press.
  28. Momtaz S., Int. J Environ Cult Econ Soc Sustain 2(4) (2009) 89-97.
  29. Ojesina A. O. (1999). The role of the Public in the Environmental Impact Assessment Process. In Adewoye, R.O. and Adegoke, O.S. (eds) Capacity Building for Environmental Impact Assessment in the Benue Trough Federal Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA), Abuja, pp. 156-160.
  30. Olander S., Landin A., Construction Management and Economics 26(6) (2008) 553.
  31. Owoyemi O., Bamigboye O. (2013). Contemporary Environmental Impact Assessment Issues in Nigeria, RMZ-M&G, 60: 219-224
  32. Teo M. M. M., Loosemore M. (2012). A New Research Agenda into Community-based Protest in Construction In: Smith, S.D (Ed) Procs 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012, Edinburgh, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 1135-1143.
  33. Wheeler D., Boele R., Fabig H. (2001). Paradoxes and Dilemmas for Stakeholder Responsive Firms in the Extractive Sector - Lessons from the Case of Shell and Ogoni. Manuscript submitted to the Journal of Business Ethics.
  34. World Bank (2012). Operational Policy 4.01 Environmental Assessment. World Bank, Washington, DC.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2300-2697
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu