BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Cieślik Andrzej (University of Warsaw, Poland), Ghodsi Mohammad Mahdi (Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Poland; Medical University of Warsaw, Poland)
Regional Growth of High-tech Industries in the European Economic Area: Policy Implications for Central and Eastern European Countries
Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej, 2013, R. 11, z. 6, s. 35-50, tab., bibliogr. 23 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Europejski Obszar Gospodarczy, Zatrudnienie, Lokalny rynek pracy, Przemysł wysokich technologii, Rozwój regionalny
European Economic Area, Employment, Local labour market, High-tech industry, Regional development
Europa Środkowo-Wschodnia
Central and Eastern Europe
This paper investigates the impact of specialization, diversifi cation, and competition externalities on the regional growth of employment in the high-tech industries of the European Economic Area (EEA). A dynamic panel dataset of twodigit NACE rev 1.1. industries in the EEA regions is used in this analysis. It is found that regional growth is positively related to specialization externalities and negatively to local competition, while diversifi cation has no impact on growth. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
  1. Arellano, M. and Bond, S.R. 1988. Dynamic panel data estimation using DPD: A guide for users. IFS WP 88/15, London.
  2. ____ 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58, pp. 227-297.
  3. Blien, U., Suedekum, J., and Wolf, K. 2006. Local employment growth in West Germany: A dynamic panel approach. Labour Economics 13, pp. 445-458.
  4. Cingano, F. and Schivardi, F. 2004. Identifying the sources of local productivity growth. Journal of the European Economic Association 2, pp. 720-742.
  5. Combes, P.-P. 2000. Economic Structure and Local Growth: France, 1984- 1993, Journal of Urban Economics 47(3), pp. 329-355.
  6. De Lucio, J., Herce, J. and Goicolea, A. 2002. The effects of externalities on productivity growth in Spanish industry. Regional Science and Urban Economics 32, pp. 241-258.
  7. Duranton, G. and Puga, D. 2000. Diversity and specialisation in cities why, where and when does it matter? Urban studies 37, pp. 533-555.
  8. Eurostat Statistical Database:
  9. Eurostat. Eurostat yearbook. 2009. Europe in fi gures. ISSN 1681-4789.
  10. Glaeser, E.L., Kallal, H.D. and Scheinkman, J.A. 1992. Growth in Cities. The Journal of Political Economy 100, pp. 1126-1152.
  11. Greunz, L. 2004. Industrial structure and innovation - evidence from European regions. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14, pp. 563-592.
  12. Henderson, V., Kuncoro, A. and Turner,M. 1995. Industrial development in cities. Journal of Political Economy 103, pp. 1067-1085.
  13. Jacobs, J. 1969. Th e Economies of Cities. Random House, New York.
  14. Lucas, R. Jr. 1988. On the mechanics of economic development, Journal of Monetary Economics 22(1), pp. 3-42.
  15. Mukkala, K. 2004. Agglomeration economies in the Finnish manufacturing sector. Applied Economics 36, pp. 2419-2427.
  16. OECD, OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. 2011.
  17. ISIC Rev. 3 Technology Intensity Definition, Classification of manufacturing industries into categories based on R&D intensities. OECD Publishing.
  18. Porter, M. 1990. Th e Competitive Advantage of Nations. Macmillan, London.
  19. Romer, P.M. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94, pp. 1002-1037.
  20. Roodman, D. (2006). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Center for Global Development working paper, (103).
  21. Theil, H. 1967. Economics and Information Theory. Amsterdam: North Holland.
  22. van der Panne, G. 2004. Agglomeration externalities: Marshall versus Jacobs. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14, pp. 593-604.
  23. van der Panne, G. and van Beers, C. 2006. On the Marshall-Jacobs controversy: it takes two to tango. Industrial and Corporate Change 15, pp. 877-890.
Cytowane przez
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu