BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Majda Aleksandra (Uniwersytet Łódzki), Socha Błażej (Uniwersytet Łódzki)
Tytuł
Relacja własność - zarządzanie i jej wpływ na wyniki finansowe polskich firm rodzinnych. Raport z badań własnych
Ownership - Management Relation and Its Influence on Financial Performance on the Basis of Polish Family Businesses. Empirical Studies
Źródło
Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, 2014, t. 15, z. 7, cz. 2, s. 93-109, bibliogr. 36 poz.
Entrepreneurship and Management
Tytuł własny numeru
Firmy Rodzinne - współczesne nurty badań i praktyki zarządzania
Słowa kluczowe
Przedsiębiorstwo rodzinne, Wynik finansowy, Ład korporacyjny, Badania empiryczne, Test Mann-Whitney
Family-owned business, Financial performance, Corporate governance, Empirical researches, Mann-Whitney test
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
Celem niniejszego artykułu jest zbadanie relacji pomiędzy zaangażowaniem menedżerów zewnętrznych a wynikami finansowymi osiąganymi przez firmy rodzinne. Artykuł składa się z trzech części. Część pierwsza poświęcona została analizie teorii ładu korporacyjnego wykorzystywanej w firmach rodzinnych i wpływowi powyższych teorii na funkcjonowanie tych podmiotów. Część druga zawiera opis próby badawczej i metodologię badawczą. W ostatniej części autorzy przedstawili wyniki empiryczne badań własnych oraz wypływające z nich wnioski. (fragment tekstu)

The main aim of the paper is to present the results from empirical study of the impact of employment external manager in family business included in the group of small and medium sized enterprises. The starting point for further discussion refer to theory of corporate governance and the scope of their influence on selected group of enterprises. On the theoretical basis of agency theory, stewardship theory and stagnation perspective authors presents the results of empirical study concerns U Mann-Whitney, Kołmogorow-Smirnow and median tests. The obtained results suggest that on selected group of enterprises the key factors which can improve firm performance are professionalization strategy family members who are involve in management process and implementation succession strategy. It is also important that including this research there is an opportunity to find out if and how the firm performance is connected to the scale of family engagement in management board. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Allio M. (2004), Family business. Their virtues, vices and strategy path, "Strategy and Leadership".
  2. Amadeus baza danych (b.r), Bureau Van Dijk, www. amadeus.bvdinfo.com, dostęp: 29.07.2013r.
  3. Anderson R.C., Reeb D.M. (2007), Founding family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500, "Journal of Finance", 58.
  4. Andre P., Ben-Amar W. (2008), Family Ownership, agency problems, Corporate Governance and Acquiring Firms Shareholder wealth: Evidence from Acquisitions of New Economy Firms, "European Financial Management Association Conference, European Financial Management", Athens.
  5. Arregle J.L., Hitt M., Simon D., Very P. (2007), The development of organizational social capital: attributes of family firms, "Journal of Management Studies", 44.
  6. Bertrand M., Schoar A. (2006), The Role of Family In Family Firms, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20 (2).
  7. Castillo J., Wakefield M.J. (2006), An exploration of firm performance factors in family business: Do families value only the "bottom line"?, "Journal of Small Business Strategy", 17 (2).
  8. Corbetta G., Salvato C. (2004), Self-serving or self-actualizing ? Model of man and agency cost in different types of family firms: a commentary on "comparing the agency costs of family and non- family firms: conceptual issues and exploratory evidence", "Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice", 28 (4).
  9. Daily C.M., Dolinger M.J. (1992), An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms, "Family Business Review", 5 (2).
  10. Davis P.S., Harverston P.D. (1999), In the founder's shadow: conflict in the family firm, "Family Business Review", 12 (4).
  11. De Massis A., Chua J.H., Chrisman J.J. (2008), Factors preventing intra-family succession, "Family Business Review", 21 (2).
  12. Eddleston K.A., Kellermanns F.W. (2007), Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective, "Journal of Business Venturing", 22.
  13. Eisenhardt K.M. (1989), Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review, "Academy of Management Review", 14 (1).
  14. Grassby R. (2000), Kinship of capitalism, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Greenwood R. (2003), Commentary on:"toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms", "Journal of Business Venturing", 18.
  16. Habbbershon T.G., Williams M.L, McMiilan I.C. (2003), A unified system perspective of family firm performance, "Journal of Business Venturing", 18.
  17. Hung H. (1998), A typology of the theories of the roles of governing boards, "Corporate Governance: An International Review", 6 (2).
  18. Jeżak J. (2010), Ład korporacyjny. Doświadczenia światowe oraz kierunki rozwoju, Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warszawa.
  19. Kang D. (2000), Family ownership and performance in public corporations: A study of the U.S. Fortune 500, Working Paper 000051, Harvard Business School.
  20. Karra N., Tracey P., Phillips N. (2006), Altruism and agency In the family firms: exploring the role of family, kinship and ethnicity, "Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice", 30 (6).
  21. Kellermanns F.W., Eddleston K. (2004), Feuding families: When conflict does a family firm good, "Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice", 28 (3).
  22. Le Breton Milller I., Miller D., Steier L. (2004), Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession, "Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice", 28 (4).
  23. Levinson H. (1971), Conflicts that plague family business, "Harvard Business Review", 49 (2).
  24. Lubatkin M.H, Ling Y., Schulze W.S. (2007), An organizational justice - based view of self-control and agency costs in family firms, "Journal of Management Studies", 44 (6).
  25. Mazzola P., Sciascia S., Kellermanns F.W. (2013), Non-linear effects of family sources of power on performance, "Journal of Business Research", 66.
  26. Miller D., Le Breton-Miller I., Scholnick B. (2008), Stewardship vs. Stagnation: An Empirical Comparison of Small Family and Non-Family Businesses, "Journal of Management Studies", 45 (1).
  27. Miller E, A.K. Rice A.K. (1967), Systems of Organizations, Tavistock Publications, Londyn.
  28. Minichilli A., Corbetta G., MacMillan I.C. (2010), Top Management Teams in Family-Controlled Companies: 'Familiness', 'Faultlines', and Their Impact on Financial Performance, "Journal of Management Studies", 47 (2).
  29. Morck R., Yeung B. (2003), Agency problems in large business group, "Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice", 27 (4).
  30. Poza E.F., Alfred T., Maheshawi A., Stakeholders perception of culture and management practice in family and family firms - A preliminary report, "Family Business Review", 10 (2).
  31. Schulze W.S., Lubatkin M.H., Dino R.N., Buchholtz A.K. (2001), Agency relationships in family firms: theory and evidence, "Organization Science". 12 (2).
  32. Sharma P. (2004), An overview of the field of family business studies, "Family Business Review", 17 (1).
  33. Stradomski M. (2010), Finansowanie obce firm rodzinnych na rynku niedoskonałym, PWE, Warszawa.
  34. Tsui-Auch L.S. (2004), The professionally managed family -ruled enterprise: ethnic Chinese business in Singapore, "Journal of Management Studies", 41.
  35. Weber J., Lavelle L., Lowry T., Zellner W., Barrett A. (2003), Family Inc, "Business Week", 3857, November.
  36. Westhead P., Howorth C. (2006), Ownership and Management Issues Associated With Family Firm Performance and Company Objectives, "Family Business Review", 19 (4).
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1733-2486
Język
pol
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu