BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Motalebi Ghasem (Department of Law, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran), Jalalian Askar (Department of Law, Payame Noor University, PO BOX 19395 - 3697, Tehran, Iran), Modiri Atosa (Department of Law, Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran), Yazdani Zahra (Department of Law, Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Tytuł
Investigating the urban density on social relations
Źródło
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (ILSHS), 2015, vol. 6 (1), s. 36-45, bibliogr. 11 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Urbanistyka, Środowisko miejskie, Stosunki międzyludzkie, Procesy społeczne
Urban studies, Urban environment, Interpersonal relationship, Social process
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
In modern cities, with changes occurring in the urban environments the social behaviors of the residents have been affected. Some of the changes have weakened social behaviors, while others have reinforced them, such that they impose new social roles on their own residents. According to various perspectives in relation with the urban density (environmental factors), such factors have had an undeniable impact on social relations (social behavior). Also, distinguishing the urban density into two dimensions of constructional and demographic density, the question that arises is: what relation is there between the urban density and social relations?. In the present research, using the document and survey methods and also using a questionnaire for assessing the extent of social communications (residents of the Kashanak neighborhood) information needed was collected. Using the Pearson correlation tests method, data obtained were analyzed and in the end, the results indicated that the intensity of the correlation between the urban density and social relations was low and the type of impact of the constructional and demographic density on social relations was different, so that the impacts of the demographic density was consistent while that of the constructional density was inconsistent. In the end, given the fact the impact mentioned was low but it is non-negligible and it should be attended to in urban planning as an affective factor. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Ahmadi, M. (2012). Methodology (principles and concepts with the approach of the dissertation). Sari: Cultural Research publication.
  2. Altman, I. (2011). Environment and social behavior-privacy, personal space, realm, overcrowding (Translated by Ali Namazi). Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University publication.
  3. Azizi, M. M. (2009). Density in urban construction- principle and criteria for determining the urban density. Tehran: Tehran University publication.
  4. Biker, T. (1998). The social research. (Translated by Naeeni Hoshang). Tehran: procedures publication.
  5. Gel, J. (2008). Life in the spaces between buildings. (Translated by Shima Shasti). Tehran: Jihad Daneshgahi publication.
  6. Gel, J. (2013). Human city (Translated by Ali and Leila Ghafoori). Elm Me'mar institute Publication.
  7. Gerout, L., & Wank, D. (2009). Research Methods in Architecture. (Translated by Shima Shasti). Tehran: Tehran University publication.
  8. Karmona, M., Hitt, T., Tnrak, T., & Sytven, M. (2012). Public places, urban spaces. (Translated by Gharayi et al). Tehran: Tehran Art University publication.
  9. Lang, J. (2002). Creation of architecture art. (Translated by Alireza Eini far). Tehran: Tehran University publication.
  10. Mortazavi, Sh. (2001). Environment psychology and its application. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University publication.
  11. Tarantash, M. (2009). A comparative study of high density and vitality. Master's thesis, degree of urbanization, Science & Technology. Tehran, Islamic Azad University, Tehran. ( Received
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2300-2697
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu