BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Tyshchenko Maria (Kyiv National Economic University After Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine)
Tytuł
Methodological Problems of Modern Political Economy Subject
Źródło
Equilibrium, 2014, vol. 9, nr 4, s. 103-110, bibliogr. 8 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Ekonomia polityczna, Wyniki badań, Ekonomia, Polityka
Political economy, Research results, Economics, Politics
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
The article addresses the problem of new political economy as grand (if imperfect) synthesis of various strands. Exploring different approaches reveals a set of the problems concerning the rise of economic society. We show in the article through the classical approach that political economy responds to and contributes to economics, so far as the older sense of politics is concerned. Most approaches to political economy treat the private sector as the primary arena. It sets agendas and ultimately governs outcomes. The idea of a collective or public reality different in nature from the system of private interests holds little appeal for political economy. In our view, the main difficulty of political economy, common to different approaches, lies in the tendency to gloss over the separateness of the two spheres, the economic and the political one, absorbing one into the other. The main topic of our survey is the importance of understanding and appreciating the categorical distinction between politics and economics, and the dangers of making one or the other dominant in both realms.(original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Alt, J. E. (1985). Political parties, world demand, and unemployment: domestic and international sources of economic activity. American Political Science Review, 79.
  2. Besley, T. (2007). The new political economy. Economic Journal, 117.
  3. Etzioni, E. (2010). A New Political Economics - and Political Economy. Critiques of Economics Challenge, 53(3).
  4. Martins, N. (2011). The Revival of Classical Political Economy and the Cambridge Tradition: From Scarcity Theory to Surplus Theory. Review of Political Economy, 23(1).
  5. May, C. (2010). John Ruskin's Political Economy: 'There is No Wealth but Life'. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 12.
  6. Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2000). Political economics: Explaining economic policy. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  7. Polanyi, K. (1944). The transformation. New York: Rinehart.
  8. Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Information and the Change in the paradigm in economics. American Economic Review. 92.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1689-765X
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/EQUIL.2014.027
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu