BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Michalik Piotr (Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie)
Tytuł
Chwalebna rewolucja a struktura prawna Dominium korony angielskiej w Ameryce
The Glorious Revolution and the Legal Structure of the English Crown Dominion in America
Źródło
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne, 2014, t. 91, cz. 1, s. 103-122, bibliogr. 27 poz.
Studies in Law and Economics
Słowa kluczowe
Historia prawa, Ustrój państwa
Legal history, Political system of the state
Uwagi
summ.
Kraj/Region
Anglia
England
Abstrakt
According to the "ancient constitution" of the Kingdom of England, the overseas dominions fully belonged to the king's prerogative (dominium regale). For that reason, the legal structure of the seventeenth century American colonies was shaped independently by the Crown. The first Stuarts limited themselves only to establish the legal frames of the private colonies, making them nearly sovereign entities. In order to strengthen the navigation system, introduced by the republican government (1651), Charles II created the base for the centralized royal Dominion in America. Subsequent Crown's endeavors managed by the Committee of Privy Council for Trade and Plantations (Lords of Trade), which was organized in 1675, brought to the settlement of James's II Dominion of New England (1686-89). This process was suddenly broken by the events of the Glorious Revolution of 1688/89, which led to the fall of the Dominion of New England and significantly diminished the Crown oversight of the colonies. As far as this paper is concerned, in opposition to the situation in England, the constitutional effects of the Glorious Revolution in America were not longstanding. Because the victorious Parliament was aware mainly for maintenance of the navigation system, the colonies were left under the king's prerogative. Owing to that, in 1696 William III nominated royal Commissioners for Trade and Plantations (Board of Trade) to govern the overseas dominions. In that way, Parliament consented for the exclusion of the American colonists from the privileges guaranteed by the new constitutional rules. Such a policy occurred to be the cause for their future mutiny, which led to the fall of the First British Empire.(original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Firth C.H., Rait R.S. (red.), Acts and Ordinances of the Interregnum, 1642-1660, H.M. Stationery Office, London 1911.
  2. Grant W.L., Munro J. (red.), Acts of Privy Council of England, Colonial Series, 6 vols, Anthony Brothers, Hereford 1908-1912.
  3. Noël Sainsbury W. et al. (red.), Calendar of the State Papers, Colonial Series. America and West Indies, 45 vols, London 1860-1994.
  4. Raithby J. (red.), Statutes of the Realm, vol. 5: 1628-80, London 1819.
  5. Raithby J. (red.), Statutes of the Realm, vol. 6: 1685-94, London 1819.
  6. Raithby J. (red.), Statutes of the Realm, vol. 7: 1695-1701, London 1820.
  7. Thorpe F.N. (red.), The Federal and State Constitutions Colonial Charters, and Other Organic Laws of the States, Territories, and Colonies Now or Heretofore Forming the United States of America, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington 1909.
  8. Andrews Ch.M., The Colonial Period of American History, 4 t., Yale University Press, New Haven 1936.
  9. Bilder M. S., The transatlantic constitution: colonial legal culture and the empire, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2008.
  10. Bradley C. (red.), The Revolutionary Writings of John Adams, Liberty Fund, Thompson, Indianapolis 2000.
  11. J. Fortescue, The Governance of England, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1885.
  12. Goldsworthy J.D., Parliamentary Sovereignty: History and Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2001.
  13. Greene J.P., The constitutional origins of the American Revolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2011.
  14. Greene J.P., Transatlantic Colonization and the Redefinition of Empire in the Early Modern Era: The British-American Experience, [w:] Ch. Daniels, M.V. Kennedy (red.), Negotiated Empires: Centers and Peripheries in the Americas, 1500-1820, Routledge, New York 2002, s. 267-282.
  15. Hall M.G., The House of Lords, Edward Randolph, and the Navigation Act of 1696, The William and Mary Quarterly 1957/14.4,s. 494-515.
  16. Hulsebosh D.J., The Ancient Constitution and the Expanding Empire: Sir Edward Coke's British Jurisprudence, Law and History Review 2003/21, s. 439-482.
  17. Kinvin Wroth L., The Massachusetts Vice-Admiralty Court, [w:] G.A. Billias (red.), Law and Authority in Colonial America, Barre (Mass.) 1965, s. 32-73.
  18. Koenigsberger H.G., Monarchies and Parliaments in Early Modern Europe. Dominium Regale or Dominium Politicum et Regale, Theory and Society 1978/5/2, s. 191-217.
  19. Maciejewski T., Roda M., Angielskie akty nawigacyjne, Prawo Morskie 1995/8.
  20. MacMillan K., Sovereignty and Possession in the English New World: The Legal Foundations of Empire, 1576-1640, Cambridge University Press 2006.
  21. Maitland F.W., The Constitutional History of England, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1965.
  22. Marzec Ł., Czy prawo rzymskie pokonało kanał La Manche?, Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa 2008/2, s. 43-52.
  23. Michalik P., Charter of Maryland as an Example of Proprietary Colonial Charter, Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe 2008/5/1, s. 339-360.
  24. Michalik P., Stosunki polityczno-wyznaniowe w XVII-wiecznym Marylandzie na tle kształtowania się ustroju tej kolonii, Semper, Warszawa 2012.
  25. Russell E.B., The Review of American Colonial Legislation by the King in Council, Appleton Century Crofts, New York 1976.
  26. Stanwood O., The Empire Reformed. English America in the Age of Glorious Revolution, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia 2011.
  27. Yirush C., Settlers, Liberty, and Empire. The Roots of Early American Political Theory, 1675-1775, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2011.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
0081-6841
Język
pol
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu