BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Lityński Piotr (Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie / Wydział Gospodarki i Administracji Publicznej)
Tytuł
Ekonomiczne konsekwencje przestrzennej decentralizacji i centralizacji miasta na podstawie literatury zagranicznej
The Economic Consequences of Urban Decentralisation and Centralisation in the Light of Foreign Literature
Źródło
Zeszyty Naukowe / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, 2014, nr 12 (936), s. 45-61, tab., bibliogr. 56 poz.
Cracow Review of Economics and Management
Słowa kluczowe
Planowanie przestrzenne miasta, Zagospodarowanie przestrzenne, Miasto, Przegląd literatury, Centrum miasta, Decentralizacja
Town spatial planning, Spatial development, City, Literature review, Centre of urban, Decentralization
Uwagi
streszcz., summ.
Abstrakt
Artykuł ma charakter teoretyczny i opiera się na przeglądzie literatury zagranicznej - anglojęzycznej - dotyczącej ekonomicznych kosztów i korzyści przestrzennej centralizacji i decentralizacji miasta. Przedstawiono definicje istoty koncepcji przestrzennej centralizacji miasta, jak i jego decentralizacji. Wskazano metodyczne podstawy oceny ekonomicznej efektywności obu wymienionych koncepcji. Skatalogowano ekonomiczne koszty oraz korzyści wynikające z procesów decentralizacyjnych jak i wdrażania koncepcji centralizacyjnych. Jako przykład określania kosztów i korzyści posłużono się koncepcjami urban sprawl i miasta kompaktowego. (abstrakt oryginalny)

The paper looks at theory covered in the foreign literature in English on the economic costs and benefits of urban centralisation and decentralisation. A definitional approach to these two concepts is presented, as is the methodological basis for assessing their economic efficiency. The economic costs and benefits of decentralisation processes and the implementation of centralisation are catalogued. The concepts of urban sprawl and the compact city were used as examples of the determination of the costs and benefits. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Szkoły Głównej Handlowej
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Anas A. [2012], Discovering the Efficiency of Urban Sprawl [w:] Urban Economics and Planning, red. N. Brooks, K. Donaghy, G.J. Knaap, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  2. Anas A., Rhee H.J. [2006], Curbing Excess Sprawl with Congestion Tolls and Urban Boundaries, "Regional Science and Urban Economics", nr 4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.03.003.
  3. Baker K. [2004], Review of Housing Supply, Delivering Stability: Securing Our Future Housing Needs, Final Report - Recommendations, HM Treasury, London.
  4. Beyond Sprawl: New Patterns of Growth to Fit the New California [1995], Bank of America, San Francisco.
  5. Bhatta B. [2010], Analysis of Urban Growth and Sprawl from Remote Sensing Data, Advances in Geographic Information Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg.
  6. Bouwman M.E. [2002], Changing Mobility Patterns in a Compact City: Environmental Impacts [w:] Compact Cities and Sustainable Urban Development: A Critical Assessment of Policies and Plans from an International Perspective, red. G. de Roo, D. Miller, Aldershot, United Kingdom, Ashgate.
  7. Breheny M. [1992], Sustainable Development and Urban Form, Pion, London.
  8. Breheny M. [1996], Centrists, Decentrists and Compromisers: Viewson the Future of Urban Form [w:] The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form?, red. M. Jenks, E. Burton, K. Williams, E&FN Spoon, London.
  9. Breheny M. [1997], Urban Compaction: Feasible and Acceptable?, "Cities", nr 14(4), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0264-2751(97)00005-x.
  10. Breheny M., Gordon I., Archer S. [1998], Building Densities and Sustainable Cities, Project Outline 5, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Sustainable Cities Programme, United Kingdom, Swindon.
  11. Brueckner J.K. [2000], Urban Sprawl: Diagnosis and Remedies, "International Regional Science Review", nr 23, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016001700761012710.
  12. Burchell R.W., Lowenstein G., Dolphin W.R., Galley C.C., Downs A., Seskin S., Still K.G., Moore T. [2002], The Costs of Sprawl. TCRP Report 74, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
  13. Burton E. [2000], The Compact City: Just or Just Compact? A Preliminary Analysis, "Urban Studies", vol. 37(11), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00420980050162184.
  14. Calthorpe P. [1993], The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community and the American Dream, Princeton Architectural Press, New York.
  15. Cervero R. [2001], Efficient Urbanization: Economic Performance and the Shape of the Metropolis, "Urban Studies", vol. 38(10), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00420980120084804.
  16. Cheshire P., Sheppard S. [2002], The Welfare Economics of Land Use Planning, "Journal of Urban Economics", vol. 52(2), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0094-1190(02)00003-7.
  17. Ciccone A., Hall R.E. [1996], Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity, "American Economic Review", vol. 86(1).
  18. Compact City Policies: A Comparative Assessment [2012], OECD Green Growth Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  19. Costs of Sprawl: 2000, TCRP Report No. 74 [2002], Transportation Research Board and National Research Council, National Academies Press, Washington D.C.
  20. Costs of Sprawl: Environmental and Economic Costs of Alternative Residential Development Patterns at the Urban Fringe [1974], Real Estate Research Corporation, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.
  21. Daneshopur A., Shakibamanesh A. [2011], Compact City: Dose It Create an Obligatory Context for Urban Sustainability?, "International Journal of Architectural Engineering & Urban Planning", vol. 21, nr 1.
  22. Downs A. [1994], New Visions for Metropolitan America, The Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.
  23. Elkin T., McLaren D., Hillman M. [1991], Reviving the City: Towards Sustainable Urban Development, Friends of the Earth, London.
  24. Ewing R. [1997], Is Los Angeles-Style Sprawl Desirable?, "Journal of the American Planning Association", vol. 63(1), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944369708975728.
  25. Fulton W., Pendall R., Nguyen M., Harrison A. [2002], Who Sprawls Most? How Growth Patterns Differ Across the U.S., Brookings, Washington D.C.
  26. Future Forms and Design for Sustainable Cities [2005], red. N. Dempsey, M. Jenks, Architectural Press, Oxford.
  27. Gordon P., Richardson H.W. [1997], Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal?, "Journal of the American Planning Association", vol. 63(1), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944369708975727.
  28. Gordon P., Richardson H.W. [1996], Employment Decentralization in U.S. Metropolitan Areas: Is Los Angeles an Outlier or the Norm?, "Environment and Planning A", vol. 28, http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a281727.
  29. Green Paper on the Urban Environment [1990], Commission of the European Communities (CEC), EUR 12902 EN, CEC, Brussels.
  30. Guy S., Marvin S. [2000], Models and Pathways: The Diversity of Sustainable Urban Futures [w:] Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, red. K. Williams, E. Burton, M. Jenks, E&FN Spoon, London.
  31. Hall P. [2001], Sustainable Cities or Town Cramming? [w:] Planning for a Sustainable Future, red. A. Layard, S. Davoudi, S. Batty, Spon, London.
  32. Haughton G., Hunter C. [1994], Sustainable Cities, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London.
  33. Heimlich E., Anderson W.D. [2001], Development at the Urban Fringe and Beyond. Impacts on Agriculture and Rural Land. Agricultural Economic Report No. 803, "Economic Research Service", U.S. Department of Agricultural, Washington D.C.
  34. Jackson K. [1985], The Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  35. Jenks M. [2000], Compact Cities: Sustainable Urban Forms for Developing Countries, E&FN Spon, London.
  36. Jenks M., Burton E., Williams K. [1996], Compact Cities and Sustainability: an Introduction [w:] The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form?, red. M. Jenks, E. Burton, K. Williams, E&FN Spoon, London.
  37. Jones C., Leishman C., MacDonald C., Orr A., Watkins D. [2010], Economic Viability [w:] Dimensions of the Sustainable City, red. M. Jenks, C. Jones, Springer, Oxford.
  38. Litman T. [2004], Understanding Smart Growth Savings, Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
  39. Lucas R.E., Rossi-Hansberg E. [2002], On the Internal Structure of Cities, "Econometrica", vol. 70(4), Wiley-Blackwell, Cambridge.
  40. McHarg I.L. [1969], Design with Nature. Garden City, Natural History Press, New York.
  41. Mills E.S. [1999], The Brawl Over So-Called Sprawl, "Illinois Real Estate Letter", Summer.
  42. Morikawa M. [2011], Economies of Density and Productivity in Service Industries: An Analysis of Personal-Service Industries Based on Establishment-Level Data, "The Review of Economics & Statistics", vol. 93(1), http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00065.
  43. Mumford L. [1961], The City in History: Its Origins, its Transformations, and its Prospects, Harcourt Brace, New York.
  44. Neuman M. [2005], The Compact City Fallacy, "Journal of Planning Education and Research (JPER)", vol. 25(1), http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456x04270466.
  45. Newman P., Kenworthy J. [1989], Cities and Automobile Dependence: An International Sourcebook, Gower, England.
  46. O'Neil D. [2000], The Smart Growth Tool Kit. Community Profiles and Case Studies to Advance Smart Growth Practices, Urban Land Institute, Washington D.C.
  47. Perrsky J., Wiewel J. [2012], Urban Decentralization, Suburbanization, and Sprawl: an Equity Perspective [w:] Urban Economics and Planning, red. N. Brooks, K. Donaghy, G.J. Knaap, Oxford University Press, New York.
  48. Porter D. [2002], Making Smart Growth Work, Urban Land Institute, Washington D.C.
  49. Prud'homme R., Lee C.W. [1999], Size, Sprawl, Speed and Efficiency of Cities, "Urban Studies", vol. 36(11), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0042098992638.
  50. A Study on Regional Infrastructure Management in a De-populating Region, PRI Report No. 86 [2009], Policy Research Institute of Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism of Japan, Japan.
  51. Tabuchi T. [1986], Urban Aglomeration, Capital Augmenting Technology, and Labor Market Equilibrium, "Journal of Urban Economics", vol. 20(2), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(86)90008-2.
  52. Thomas L., Cousins W. [2000], The Compact City: A Successful, Desirable and Achievable Urban Form? [w:] Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, red. K. Williams, E. Burton, M. Jenks, E&FN Spoon, London.
  53. Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication: a Synthesis for Policy Makers [2011], UNEP, www.unep.org/greeneconomy (dostęp: 17.10.2013).
  54. Troy P.N. [1992], The Evolution of Government Housing Policy: The Case of New South Wales 1901-41, "Housing Studies", vol. 7(3), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02673039208720737.
  55. Wassmer R.W. [2002], An Economic Perspective on Urban Sprawl: With an Application to the American West and a Test of the Efficacy of Urban Growth Boundaries, California State University, Sacramento.
  56. Williams K. [1999], Urban Intensification Policies in England: Problems and Contradictions, "Land Use Policy", vol. 16(3), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0264-8377(99)00010-1.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1898-6447
Język
pol
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.15678/ZNUEK.2014.0936.1204
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu