BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Sułkowski Łukasz (Społeczna Akademia Nauk w Łodzi)
Tytuł
Human Resource Management - Paradigms and Basic Cognitive Orientations
Źródło
Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, 2013, t. 14, z. 9, s. 9-24, tab., bibliogr. 55 poz.
Entrepreneurship and Management
Tytuł własny numeru
Zarządzanie zasobami ludzkimi
Słowa kluczowe
Zarządzanie zasobami ludzkimi, Paradygmaty zarządzania, Funkcjonalizm
Human Resources Management (HRM), Management paradigms, Functionalism
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
The study area of HRM is very wide and interdisciplinary, it covers the problems of organization and management theory as well as: social psychology, sociology and education. The emergence of the subdiscipline of HRM, however, puts the cognitive challenges associated with the adoption of the basic methodological assumptions. How to classify the theories and research methods drawn from different disciplines? There are many accepted typologies of human resource management concepts that refer to the history and practice of this subdiscipline. This article presents a proposition of understanding human resources management in the organizational discourse from the different point of reference in the form of paradigms of social sciences.(original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Alston M. (2003), Breaking Through the Glass Ceiling, Routledge, London.
  2. Bauman Z. (1998), Globalizacja, PIW, Warszawa.
  3. Bauman Z. (2006), Płynna nowoczesność, Wydawnictwo Literackie.
  4. Benhabib S. (1986), Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory, Columbia University Press.
  5. Berger P.L., Luckmann T. (1966), The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Doubleday, Garden City.
  6. Beyond Method. Strategies for Social Research (1983), ed. G. Morgan, Sage, Beverly Hills, London, New Delhi.
  7. Blumer H. (1969), Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  8. Boulding K.E. (1956), General Systems Theory, The Sceleton of the Science, "Management Science", no. 8.
  9. Bourdieu P. (1990), Animaadversiones in Mertonem [in:] R.K. Merton, Consensus and Controversy, ed. J. Clark, C. Modgil, S. Modgil, The Falmer Press, London- New York.
  10. Brewis J., Linstead S. (2000), Sex, Work and Sex Work: Eroticizing Organization, Routledge, London.
  11. Burrell G. (1990), Fragmented Labours [in:] Latour Process Theory, ed. D. Knights, H. Willmott, Macmillan, Basingstoke.
  12. Calás M.B. (1993), Deconstructing Charismatic Leadership: Re-reading Weber from Darker Side, "Leadership Quarterly", 4 (3-4).
  13. Chomsky N. (1993), Language and Thought, Mayer Bell, Wakefield, Rhod Island, London.
  14. Clegg S. (1981), Organisation and Control, "Administrative Science Quarterly", nr 26.
  15. Czarniawska-Joerges B. (2004), Narratives of Individual and Organisational Identities [in:] Organisational Identity. A Reader, ed. M.J. Hatch, M. Schultz, Oxford University Press, Oxford-New York.
  16. Davis K. (1959), The Myth of Functional Analysis as a Special Method in Sociology and Anthropology, "American Sociological Review", 24(6),
  17. Deetz S. (1995), Transforming Communication, Transforming Business: Building Responsive and Responsible Workplaces, Cresskill, Hapton.
  18. Elster J. (1990), Merton's Functionalism and the Unintended Consequences of Action [in:] J. Clark, C. Modgil, S. Modgil, R. Merton (eds.), Consensus and Controversy, Falmer Press, London.
  19. Gersick C.J.G. (1991), Revolutionary Change Theories: A Multilevel Exploration of the Punctuated Equilibrium Paradigm, "The Academy of Management Review", Vol. 16, No. 1.
  20. Gioia D.A., Schultz M., Corley K. (2004), Organisational Identity, Image and Adaptive Instability [in:] Organisational Identity. A Reader, ed. M.J. Hatch, M. Schultz, Oxford University Press, Oxford-New York.
  21. Glennon L.M. (1983), Synthesism. A Case of Feminist Methodology [in:] Beyond Method. Strategies for Social Research, ed. G. Morgan, Sage, Beverly Hills, London, New Delhi.
  22. Goldman P., van Houten D. (1977), Managerial Strategies and the Worker, "The Sociological Quarterly", nr 18.
  23. Habermas J. (1985), The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Translated by Thomas McCarthy, Beacon Press.
  24. Hatch M.J. (1997), Irony and the Social Construction of Contradiction in the Humor of a Management Team, "Organization Studies".
  25. Hatch M.J. (2002), Teoria organizacji, PWN.
  26. Hogg M.A., Terry D.J. (2000), Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts, "The Academy of Management Review", Vol. 25, No. 1.
  27. Holmwood J. (2005), Functionalism and its Critics [in:] A. Harrington, (ed.) Modern Social Theory: an introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  28. Hopfl H. (2005), The Making of the Corporate Acolyte: Some Thoughts on Charismatic Leadership and the Reality of Organizational Commitment [in:] Critical Management Studies. A Reader, ed. Ch. Grey, H. Willmott, Oxford University Press, New York.
  29. Layton R. (1997), An Introduction to Theory in Anthropology, Cambridge: CUP.
  30. Merton R. (1982), On Social Structure and Science, ed. P. Sztompka, Chicago- London.
  31. Michel F. (1976), Histoire de la sexualité, volume 1: La volonté de savoir, Paris, Gallimard.
  32. Micklethwait J., Wooldrige A. (2000), Szamani zarządzania, Zysk i s-ka, Poznań.
  33. Neurath M., Sarkar S., Shlick M., Carnap R. (1996), Logical Empiricism at its Peak: Schlick, Carnap, and Neurath. New York: Garland.
  34. Oakley A. (2000), Experiments in Knowing. Gender and Method in the Social Sciences, The New Press, New York.
  35. Parrini P., Salmon W.C., Salmon M.H. (ed.) (2003), Logical Empiricism - Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  36. Pfeffer J., Salancik G.R. (1978), The External Control of Organisations: a Resources Dependence Perspective, Harper and Row, New York.
  37. Quinn J.B. (1978), Strategic Change: Logical Incrementalism, "Sloan Managemant Review", no 20.
  38. Radcliffe-Brown A.R. (1952), On the Concept of Function in Social Science [in:] Structure and Function in Primitive Society, The Free Press of Glencoe, Glencoe.
  39. Rosen M. (1991), Coming to the Terms with the field: Understanding and doing organisational ethnography, "Journal of Management Studies", nr 28.
  40. Scheurich J.J. (1997), Research method in the postmodern, Falmer Press, London, Washington, DC.
  41. Sköldberg K. (2002), The Poetica Logic of Administration, Routledge, London and New York.
  42. Smircich L. (1983), Organisations as Shared Meaning [in:] Organisational Symbolism, JAI Press, Greenwich.
  43. Smircich L. (1983), Studing Organizations as Cultures [in:] Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research, G. Morgan (ed.), Beverly Hills-London-New Delhi.
  44. Sułkowski Ł. (2002), Czy kultury organizacyjne zmierzają do unifikacji?, "Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi", Instytut Pracy i Spraw Socjalnych, 3-4.
  45. Sułkowski Ł (2008), Czy warto zajmować się kulturą organizacyjną?, "Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi", nr 6.
  46. Sułkowski Ł. (2012), Epistemologia i metodologia zarządzenia, PWE, Warszawa.
  47. Sułkowski Ł. (2009), Interpretative Approach in Management Sciences, "Argumenta Oeconomica", no. 2.
  48. Sułkowski Ł. (2004), Neopozytywistyczna mitologia w nauce o zarządzaniu, "Organizacja i kierowanie", nr 1 (115).
  49. Sułkowski Ł. (2009), Paradygmaty nauk społecznych w zarządzaniu zasobami ludzkimi, "Zarządzanie zasobami ludzkimi", nr 6 (71)..
  50. Sułkowski Ł. (2001), Zarządzanie zasobami ludzkimi, Absolwent, Łódź. The Sexuality of Organization (1989), ed. J. Hearn, D. Sheppard, P. Tancred- Sheriff, G. Burrell, Sage, London.
  51. Thomas S. (1979), The Multi-National Companies, Wayland Publishers, Hove. Virtual Culture. Identity & Communication in Cybersociety (2002), ed. S.G. Jones, Sage, London.
  52. Weick K. (2001), Making Sense of the Organization, Blackwell, Malden.
  53. Weick K. (1979), The Social Psychology of Organising, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
  54. Wray-Bliss E. (2005), Abstract Ethics, Embodied Ethics: The Strange Marriage of Foucault and Positivism in Labour Process Theory [in:] Critical Management Studies. A Reader, ed. Ch. Grey, H. Willmott, Oxford University Press, New York.
  55. www.trinity.edu/~mkearl/knowledg.html, 2004.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1733-2486
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu