BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Krawiec Alexandra E. (Polish Connector for RSA, Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce, Great Britain)
Tytuł
Socio-Economic Implications of Female Inclusion in Organizational Structures and in Leadership Positions
Źródło
International Journal of Management and Economics, 2016, nr 49, s. 106-134, bibliogr. 119 poz.
Zeszyty Naukowe / Szkoła Główna Handlowa. Kolegium Gospodarki Światowej
Słowa kluczowe
Nierówność płci, Płeć, Przywództwo, Kobieta w biznesie, Dyskryminacja kobiet, Równość pracowników
Gender inequality, Gender, Leadership, Women in business, Women's discrimination, Equality of employees
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
The perception of women's statutory place within organizations has been influenced by gender bias, which has led to discrimination. Lowering barriers related to gender inequality and introducing constructive changes takes a surprisingly long time. This procrastination can, to some extent, be attributed to the fear of potential economic costs, which is a misconception. A deeper understanding of the interplay between socio-economic factors and gender inequality within organizations can result in designing better, less biased, more merit-based structures and provide women with better career opportunities. Countries and organizations promoting gender equality practices prove that women's inclusion in the labor market can be 'cost-effective' and beneficial in socio-economic terms. This article analyzes selected determinants of female underrepresentation in organizations, and in leadership positions in particular. The author points out to the rich body of research and to the multiple implications of gender inequality. Among the change resistant, deeply rooted factors, those originating in culture have a significant impact on women's inclusion in organizations. This paper focuses on macro problems, and explains why some determinants are more persistent than others, and still influence gender equality at all levels of organizational structures. The determinants are systematized, analyzed using statistical data, and rooted in a wide body of research. The article also presents potential future developments and available tools that can be employed to speed up changes leading to gender equality in organizational structures, particularly in leadership positions. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Szkoły Głównej Handlowej w Warszawie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Acker, J. (1990), Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations, Gender & Society, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 139-158.
  2. Adams, L., Winterbotham, M., Oldfield, K., Large, A., Stuart, A., Murphy, L., Rossiter, H., Selner, S. (2015), Pregnancy and Maternity Related Discrimination and Disadvantage First findings: Surveys of Employers and Mothers, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, BIS Research Paper, No. 235, IFF Research.
  3. Auer, J. J. (1979), The image of the right honorable Margaret Thatcher, Communication Studies, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 289-310.
  4. Bandura, A., Wood, R. (1989), Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making, Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 56, No. 5, pp. 805-814.
  5. Baker, M., Milligan, K. (2008), How Does Job-Protected Maternity Leave Affect Mothers' Employment?, Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 655-691. [CrossRef]
  6. Berger, L. M., Hill, J., Waldfogel, J. (2005), Maternity leave, early maternal employment and child health and development in the US, The Economic Journal, Vol. 115, No. 501, pp. F29-F47. [CrossRef]
  7. Biddle, B. J. (1986), Recent Developments in Role Theory, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 12, pp. 67-92. [CrossRef]
  8. Blum, T. C., Fields, D. L., Goodman, J. S. (1994), Organization-level determinants of women in management. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37, No. 2. [CrossRef]
  9. Bolzendahl, C. I., Myers, D. J. (2004), Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974-1998, Social Forces, Vol. 83, No. 2, pp. 759-789. [CrossRef]
  10. Bowcott, O. (2014), Twitter intimidation not taken seriously enough by police, says Stella Creasy, The Guardian, Sept. 29, 2014.
  11. Branch, K. (1994), Are Women Worth as Much as Men: Employment Inequities, Gender Roles, and Public Policy, Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy, Vol. 1, No. 119.
  12. Britton, D. M. (2000), The epistemology of the gendered organization, Gender & Society, 4.3, pp. 418-434.
  13. Brzezinski, M. (2011), Knowing Your Value: Women, Money and Getting What You're Worth, Weinstein Books.
  14. Business dictionary (2015), http://businessdictionary.com
  15. Byerly, C. M., Ross, K. (2008), Women and media: A critical introduction, John Wiley & Sons. Cambridge International Dictionary of English (1995), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  16. Carter, N. M., Wagner, H. M. (2011), The Bottom Line: Corporate Performance and Women's Representation on Boards (2004-2008), Catalyst Report, March 2011, available at:http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/bottom-line-corporate-performance-and-womens-representation-boards-20042008, accessed: retrieved in August, 2015.
  17. Catalyst (2014),Catalyst Census: Women Board Directors, New York: Catalyst.
  18. Catalyst (2015),Pyramid: Women in S&P 500 Companies, New York: Catalyst, April 3, 2015.
  19. Chickering, A. W. (1969), Education and identity, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
  20. Corning, P. A. (1995), Synergy and self-organization in the evolution of complex systems, Systems Research, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 89-122. [CrossRef]
  21. Datta Gupta, N., Smith, N., Verner, M. (2008), The impact of Nordic countries' family friendly policies on employment, wages, and children, Rev Econ Household, Vol. 6, pp. 65-89. [CrossRef]
  22. Donald, D. A. (2015), 67% of Europeans don't believe women have the skills to be scientists, Women in Leadership, The Guardian, September 24, 2015.
  23. DiMaggio, P. (1994), Culture and Economy, in: Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg (eds.), The Handbook of Economic Sociology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 27-57.
  24. Dollar, D., Gatti R., (1999), Gender inequality, income, and growth: are good times good for women?. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Development Research Group, The World Bank.
  25. Drucker, P. F. (1995), People and performance: The best of Peter Drucker on management, Routledge.
  26. Drucker, P. F. (2011), The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society, Transaction Publishers.
  27. Eagly, A. H., Kite, M. E. (1987), Are stereotypes of nationalities applied to both women and men?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 451. [CrossRef]
  28. Eagly, A. H. (1987), Reporting sex differences, American Psychologist, Vol. 42, No. 7, pp. 756-757. [CrossRef]
  29. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J. (1991), Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 60, No. 5, pp. 685-710. [CrossRef]
  30. Eagly, A. H. (1997), Sex differences in social behavior: comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology, American Psychologist, Vol. 52, No. 12, pp. 1380-1383. [CrossRef]
  31. Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2001), The leadership styles of women and men, Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 781-797. [CrossRef]
  32. Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., Van Engen, M. L. (2003), Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 129, No. 4, pp. 569-591. [CrossRef]
  33. Eagly, A. H., Carli, L. L. (2003), The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 807-834. [CrossRef]
  34. Eagly, A. H. (2004), Few women at the top: How role incongruity produces prejudice and the glass ceiling, in: D. van Knippenberg,, M. A. Hogg. (eds.), Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organizations, Sage Publications, London, pp. 79-93.
  35. Eagly, A. H., Carli, L. L. (2007), Women and the labyrinth of leadership, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 85, No. 9, pp. 62-82.
  36. Eagly, A. H. (2009), The his and hers of prosocial behavior: an examination of the social psychology of gender, American Psychologist, Vol. 64, No. 8, pp. 644-658. [CrossRef]
  37. Eccles, J. S. (1994), Understanding women's educational and occupational choices, Psychology of Women Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 585-609. [CrossRef]
  38. Ely, R. J. (1994), The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 203-238. [CrossRef]
  39. Ely, R. J. (1995), The power in demography: Women's social constructions of gender identity at work", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 589-634. [CrossRef]
  40. Ely, R. J., Meyerson, D. E. (2000), Advancing gender equity in organizations: The challenge and importance of maintaining a gender narrative, Organization, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 589-608. [CrossRef]
  41. Ely, R. J., Ibarra, H., Kolb, D. M. (2011), Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women's leadership development programs, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 474-493.
  42. Ely, R. J., Thomas, D. A. (2001), Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 229-273. [CrossRef]
  43. Ely, R., Padavic, I. (2007), A feminist analysis of organizational research on sex differences, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 1121-1143. [CrossRef]
  44. Ely, R., Ibarra, H., Kolb, D. (2011), Taking Gender Into Account. Theory and Design for Women's Leadership Development Programs, Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 474-493.
  45. Eurostat (2014), Statistics Explained, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php
  46. Fausto-Sterling, A. (2008), Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men, Basic Books.
  47. Fortune (2014), The Most Powerful Women in Business, available at: http://fortune.com/most-powerful-women/, accessed: August 2015.
  48. Giddens, A. (1971), Capitalism and modern social theory: An analysis of the writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  49. Garcia-Retamero, R., López-Zafra, E. (2006), Prejudice against women in male-congenial environments: Perceptions of gender role congruity in leadership, Sex roles, Vol. 55, No. 1-2, pp. 51-61.
  50. Giddens, A. (1984), The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
  51. Giddens, A. (1991),Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age, Stanford University Press.
  52. Giddens, A., Duneier, M., Appelbaum, R. P., et al. (2000), Introduction to sociology, New York, WW Norton.
  53. Giddens, A. (2002). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives, Profile Books.
  54. Giddens, A. (2004), Beneath the hijab: A woman, New Perspectives Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 9-11.
  55. Giddens, A. (2013), The consequences of modernity, John Wiley & Sons.
  56. Goldschmidt-Clermont, L. (1982), Unpaid work in the household: a review of economic evaluation methods, International Labour Office, Geneva, Switzerland.
  57. Grampp, W. D. (2000), What did Smith mean by the invisible hand?, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 108, No. 3, pp. 441-465. [CrossRef]
  58. Gratton, L., Erickson, T. J. (2007), Eight ways to build collaborative teams, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 85, No. 11, pp. 100-109.
  59. Humbert, A. L., Ivaškaitė-Tamošiūnė, V., Oetke, N., Paats, M. (2015), Gender Equality Index 2015 - Measuring gender equality in the European Union 2005-2012, European Institute for Gender Equality.
  60. Humphries, J. (1995) Economics, Gender and Equal Opportunities, in: J. Humphries, J. Rubery (eds.), Economics of Equality, Equality Commission, Manchester, UK.
  61. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., Minkov, M. (1997), Cultures and organizations, McGraw Hill, New York, NY.
  62. Hymowitz, C., Schellhardt, T. D. (1986), The Glass Ceiling: Why Women Can't Seem to Break The InvisibleBarrier That Blocks Them From the Top Jobs, Wall Street Journal, March 1986.
  63. Ibarra, H. (1993), Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 56-87.
  64. Ibarra, H. (1995), Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 673-703. [CrossRef]
  65. Ibarra, H. (2005), Identity transitions: possible selves, liminality and the dynamics of career change, INSEAD Working Paper.
  66. Ibarra, H., Wittman, S., Petriglieri, G., Day, D. V. (2014), Leadership and Identity: An Examination of ThreeTheories and New Research Directions, in: D. V. Day (ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations, Oxford Library of Psychology, Oxford University Press, USA, pp. 285-300.
  67. ILO International Labour Organization (2014), Global Employment Trends 2014: Risk of a jobless recovery? accessed: in January 2015.
  68. Kelly, E., Dobbin, F. (1999), Civil rights law at work: Sex discrimination and the rise of maternity leave policies, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 105, No. 2, pp. 455-92. [CrossRef]
  69. Kim, D. H., Senge, P. M. (1994), Putting systems thinking into practice, System Dynamics Review, Vol. 10, No. 2-3, pp. 277-290. [CrossRef]
  70. Komives, S. R., et al. (2005), Developing a leadership identity: A grounded theory, Journal of College Student Development, Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 593-611. [CrossRef]
  71. Lerner, M. J., Miller, D. T. (1978), Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 85, No. 5, pp. 1030. [CrossRef]
  72. Lewis, J. E. (1993), Women and social policies in Europe: work, family and the state, Edward Elgar Pub.
  73. L'Oreal Foundation (2015), Women in Science Report 2015, available at: http://www.loreal.com/media/press-releases/2015/sep/the-loreal-foundation-unveils-the-results-of-its-exclusive-international-study
  74. Lyness, K. S., et al. (1999), Work and pregnancy: Individual and organizational factors influencing organizational commitment, timing of maternity leave, and return to work, Sex Roles, Vol. 41, No. 7-8, pp. 485-508. [CrossRef]
  75. Marx, K., McLellan, D. (2000), Karl Marx: Selected Writings, Oxford University Press.
  76. Mead, G. H. (1934), Mind, Self, and Society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  77. McKinsey and Company (2007), Women Matter: Gender Diversity, a corporate performance driver, McKinsey and Company - France, available at: http://www.mckinsey.com/features/women_matter
  78. Miller, A. S., Hoffmann, J. P. (1995), Risk and religion: An explanation of gender differences in religiosity, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 63-75.
  79. Morgan, N. (2015), Speech at UN Women UK and Government Equalities Office Conference, 27 February 2015 (speech transcript), available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/un-women-uk-and-government-equalities-office-conference
  80. Myers, L. W. (2002), A broken silence: Voices of African American women in the academy, Greenwood Publishing Group.
  81. Mitchell, M. (2009), Complexity: A Guided Tour, Oxford University Press: New York, NY.
  82. OECD (2012), Gender Equality in Education, Employment and Entrepreneurship: Final Report to the MCM 2012, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), available at: http://www.oecd.org/employment/50423364.pdf
  83. O'Neill, J., Polachek, S. (1993), Why the gender gap in wages narrowed in the 1980 s, Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 205-228. [CrossRef]
  84. Oxford (2015) Oxford University Press, Online Dictionary.
  85. Ozorak, E. W. (1996), The power, but not the glory: How women empower themselves through religion, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 35, pp. 17-29.
  86. Pettigrew, T. F. (1979), The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport's cognitive analysis of prejudice, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 461-476. [CrossRef]
  87. Pinker, S. (2011), The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined, Viking, New York, NY.
  88. Plantenga, J., Remery, R. (2008), The provision of childcare services: a comparative review of thirty European countries, Co-ordinators' synthesis report prepared for the Equality Unit, European Commission.
  89. Rubery, J., Figueiredo, H., Smith, M., Grimshaw, D., Fagan, C. (2004), The ups and downs of European gender equality policy, Industrial Relations Journal, Vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 603-628. [CrossRef]
  90. Samans, R., Blanke, J., Corrigan, G., Drzeniek, M. (2015), The Inclusive Growth and Development Report, World Economic Forum, available at: http://reports.weforum.org/inclusive-growth-report-2015
  91. Sandberg, S. (2013), Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead, Random House.
  92. Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., Guiso, L. (2006), Does culture affect economic outcomes?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 23-48. [CrossRef]
  93. Schwab, S. (1986), Is Statistical Discrimination Efficient?, The American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 228-234.
  94. Schwartz, F. N. (1989), Management women and the new facts of life, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 89, pp. 65-76.
  95. Senge, P. M. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization, Doubleday/Currency.
  96. Senge, P. M. (1994), Learning to Alter Mental Models: Learning accelerates as managers change their mental models. Executive Excellence, Vol. 11, pp. 16-17.
  97. Senge, P. M. (1999), Leadership in living organizations, in: F. Hesselbein, et al., (eds.), Leading Beyond the Walls. Jossey-Bass, New York.
  98. Senge, P. M. (2002), The Leader's New Work: Building Learning Organizations, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 7-23.
  99. Senge, P. M. (2014), The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization, Currency/Doubleday, New York.
  100. Sherif, M., Hovland, C. I. (1961), Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change, Greenwood, Westport.
  101. Sherif, C. W. (1982), Needed concepts in the study of gender identity, Psychology of Women Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 375-398. [CrossRef]
  102. Smith, A. (2010), The theory of moral sentiments, Penguin, New York.
  103. Smith, E. (2007), Social Psychology, Third Edition, Psychology Press, New York.
  104. Smith, M., Bettio, F. (2008), Analysis note: the economic case for gender equality, European Commission's Network of Experts on Employment and Gender Equality issues (EGGE) report, European Union, available at: http://eurogender.eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ECO-CASE-final-1.pdf
  105. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., Quinn, D. M. (1999), Stereotype threat and women's math performance, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 4-28. [CrossRef]
  106. Tajfel, H. (1974), Social identity and intergroup behaviour, Social Science Information, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 65-93. [CrossRef]
  107. Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C. (1979), An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict, in: W. G. Austin, S. Worchel (eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Brooks-Cole, Monterey, CA.
  108. Tajfel, H. (1982), Social psychology of intergroup relations, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 1-39. [CrossRef]
  109. Tajfel, H. (2010), Social identity and intergroup relations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  110. The World Bank (2012), World Development Report: Gender Equality and Development, 2012, available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDR2012/Resources/7778105-1299699968583/7786210-1315936222006/Complete-Report.pdf
  111. The World Bank (2015), World Development Indicators, available at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL.FE.ZS, accessed: September 2015.
  112. UN (1995), Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, The Fourth World Conference on Women, Beijing, China, September 1995, available at: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/pdf/BDPfA E.pdf
  113. UNW (2015), Progress of the World's Women 2015-2016: Transforming economies, realizing rights, United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women, available at: http://progress.unwomen.org/en/2015/pdf/UNW_progressreport.pdf
  114. World Bank Gender Data Portal (2015), available at: http://datatopics.worldbank.org/gender/key gender employment indicators, accessed: September, 2015.
  115. United States Census Bureau (2015), World Population, accessed: September 2015, available at: http://www.census.gov/population/international/data/worldpop/table_population.php
  116. Waldfogel, J. (1997), The effect of children on women's wages, American Sociological Review, Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 209-217. [CrossRef]
  117. Worldometers (2015), available at: http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/
  118. Weber, M., Gerth, H. H., Mills, C. W. (1946), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology, Oxford University Press, New York.
  119. Wiesner, Merry E. (2000), Women and gender in early modern Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2299-9701
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu