BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Bartkowiak Grażyna (Gniezno College Millenium), Krugiełka Agnieszka (Poznań University of Technology, Poland)
Improving the Creative Thinking of Talented Knowledge Workers and Managers in Polish and French Enterprises
Journal of Intercultural Management, 2016, vol. 8, nr 2, s. 7-27, tab., bibliogr. 42 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Myślenie twórcze, Zarządzanie talentami, Pracownicy wiedzy, Wyniki badań
Creative thinking, Talent management, Knowledge workers, Research results
Francja, Polska
France, Poland
The study considers the issue of creative and participatory activities of employees in the organization in the context of the changing socio-economic expectations, forcing employees, teams and executives to innovative activities. The planned research seeks an answer to the question: What factors attributable to the organization can help to improve the working conditions of knowledge workers classified as "talent", teams of such employees and managers in charge of the work of outstanding employee teams in Poland and France? In order to answer such a question a questionnaire was developed (and subsequently validated) adjusted for purposes of the research and questionnaire research was conducted on a sample of 142 Polish workers in 23 medium-small enterprises, 84 employees from 10 companies in France. Workers considered to be particularly talented in both in Poland and France stressed in the first place the need of approval of deviating from accepted standards of work style by the entrepreneurs and board members. Members of the outstanding teams in somewhat greater number in France than in Poland (the variance obtained a criterion for statistical significance) pointed to the "favorable personnel policy" and the ability to obtain additional compensation for an above-average job. In the group of Polish managers "more autonomy" was clearly accentuated in the workplace (the French differed significantly from the Poles in terms of statistics) and already cited "favorable personnel policy". The latter category was also nominated by the bulk of the French managers. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
  1. Adamiec M. (2000) Human Resource Management. Warsaw: Arkade.
  2. Adamiec M (2010) Dynamics (of) knowledge, Chaos, Culture [in:] B. Kożusznik (Eds.), Psychological aspects of innovation. Chowanna, Volume 2 (35 ), published by the University of Silesia, Katowice.
  3. Altszuller H (1972) Algorithm inventions. Warsaw: Omega.
  4. Altszuller G.S. (1983) Elements of the theory of creative engineering. Warsaw: WNT.
  5. Avolio B.J., Gardner W.L. (2005) Authentic leadership development: getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, No.15.
  6. Avolio B.J., Gardner W.L., Walumbwa F.O. & Luthans F., May R.D. (2004) Preface [in:] Authentic leadership theory and practice: Origins, effects and development. San Francisco.
  7. Bubble A. (2007) Psychological counseling careers. Poznań: Print-B.
  8. Bakker A.B., Albrecht S.L. & Leiter M.P. (2011) Key questions work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20 (1).
  9. Bartkowiak G. (2010) Psychology in Management, New look. Poznań: Ed. University of Economics.
  10. Bartkowiak G. (2009) Man at work. From stress to success in the organization. Warsaw: PWE.
  11. Bartkowiak G., Krugiełka A. (2009) The team-work as a background of modern management concepts activity. Management, Vol. 13, no 2, pp. 52-65.
  12. Bartkowiak G. (2011) Corporate social responsibility in terms of theoretical and empirical. Warsaw: Difin.
  13. Brav A., Andersson K. & Lantz A. (2009) Group initiative and self-organizational activities in industrial work performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18, (3).
  14. Brilman J. (2002) Modern management concepts and methods. Warsaw: PWE.
  15. Drucker P. (1985) The discipline of innovation. The innovative enterprise, August edition.
  16. Carver C.S., (2001) Affect and the Functional Bases of Behavior, the Dimensional Structure and Effective Experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5.
  17. Heatherton T.E., Krendl A.C., Macrae C.N. & Kelly W.M. (2007) A social brain sciences approach is understanding the self [in:] C. Sedikides, S.J. Spencer (ed.), The self. New York: New York Psychology Press.
  18. Higgins E.T. (1987) Self - discrepancy: a Theory Relating Self and Affect. Psychological Review, 94.
  19. Higgins E.T. (1996) The "Self-digest": Self-knowledge serving self-regulatory functions, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71.
  20. Katz D. & Kahn R.L. (1979) The social psychology of organizations. Warsaw: PWN.
  21. Konradt L., Andersen P. & Ellwart T. (2009) Self-leadership in organizational teams: a multilevel analysis of moderators and mediators. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20 (3).
  22. Kozielecki J. (1992) Creativity and problem solving [in:] M. Materska, T. Tyszka, Psychology and cognition. Wrasaw: PWN.
  23. Kożusznik B. & Jezierski T. (1994) Psychology improvement teams. Katowice: University of Silesia.
  24. Kożusznik B. (2010) The key role of psychology in supporting and stimulating innovation [in:] B. Kożusznik (Eds.), Psychological aspects of innovation. Chowanna, vol.2 (35), Katowice: University of Silesia.
  25. Lewicka M. (1993) The actor and the observer: psychological mechanisms of deviations from rationality in thinking every day. Polish Psychological Association, Laboratory Publishing, Warsaw, Olsztyn.
  26. Lewicki A. (2002) Some of the problem behavior theory in: A. Lewicki (Eds.), Clinical Psychology. Warsaw: PWN.
  27. Listwan T. (ed.) (2004) Talent Management. ed. 2, Warsaw: CH Beck.
  28. Nęcka E. (1987) The creative process and its limitations. Cracow: Eds. Jagiellonian University
  29. Obuchowski K. (2000) By the galaxy needs. PWN: Warsaw.
  30. Obuchowski K. (2003) Man intentional. Warsaw: PWN.
  31. Oles P. & Drat-Ruszczak K. (2010) Personality [in:] J Strelau, D. Dolinski (Eds.), Psychology of academics, Volume 1. Gdańsk: GWP.
  32. Parker S.K. & Griffin M.A. (2011) Understanding active psychological states: Embedding engagement in a wider normological net and closer attention to performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20 (1).
  33. Pink D. (2005) A Whole New Mind: Moving from the Information Age to the Conceptual Age. New York: Penguin Group.
  34. Porter M. (2003) Attitudes, values and beliefs and macroeconomics prosperity [in:] Harrison L. & Huntington S. (eds.), Culture Matters, Poznan: Profit and S-ka.
  35. Schumpeter J. (1960) The theory of economic development. Warsaw: PWN.
  36. Sennett R. (2006)Corrosion of character: personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. Warsaw: Publisher Literary Muse.
  37. Simbuli S., Guglielmi D. & Schaufeli W.B. (2011) A three -wave study of job resources, self- efficacy and work engagement among Italian schoolteachers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(3).
  38. Strelau J. & Dolinski D. (eds) (2010) Psychology of academics, Volume 1. Gdańsk: GWP.
  39. Toffler A (1981) The Third Wave. New York: Bantam Books.
  40. Toffler A. (1990) Powershift : Knowledge, Wealth and Violence at the Edge of the 21st Century. New York: Bantam Books.
  41. Trzebiński J. (1976) Personality and conditions of creativity [in:] J. Reykowski (Eds.), Personality and pro-social behavior of people. Warsaw: PWN.
  42. Zgorzalski M. (2002) Hamburgers with sacred cows. Sketches of American Management Theory and Practice. Cracow: Walters Kluver Publishing House.
Cytowane przez
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu