BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Krakowiak-Bal Anna (University of Agriculture in Krakow), Burg Patrik (Mendel University in Brno), Ziemiańczyk Urszula (University of Agriculture in Krakow), Trávníček Petr (Mendel University in Brno), Junga Petr (Mendel University in Brno), Vítěz Tomáš (Mendel University in Brno)
Tytuł
Innovativeness : does the Territorial Typology Matters?
Źródło
Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich, 2016, nr IV/4, s. 1937-1945, rys., tab., bibliogr. 16 poz.
Infrastructure and Ecology of Rural Areas
Słowa kluczowe
Obszary wiejskie, Innowacje, Patenty, Typologia
Rural areas, Innovations, Patent, Typology
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
National and regional strategies and policies on innovation have been prioritized and innovation is now core to most EU funds and strategies. However, regions are not (should not be) alike in terms of innovation and innovation policy. The development strategies based on innovativeness ideas must include specific local conditions. Effective actions and efforts, to create good environment for innovativeness must bring tangible results. The aim of the paper is comparison of innovativeness on different regions types according to territorial typology: rural, intermediate and urban. The research questions are: Does innovativeness depends on regional typology: urban-rural? Do remote, less developed rural areas have also low achievements (poor performance) in this regard? Innovation output is measured using its hard result, which is number of patent application per capita. To examine group differences according to the innovativeness, the Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted. The test statistic showed, that there is no statistically significant difference between patent applications on different regions types. It has been found that the highest variable value in the whole sample has been calculated in rural group, for rural regions in Switzerland.(original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Balkyte, A., Tvaronavičiene, M. (2010). Perception of competitiveness in the context of sustainable development: Facets of "sustainable competitiveness." Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 341-365. http://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.17
  2. Cannarella, C., Piccioni, V. (2011). Traditiovations: Creating innovation from the past and antique techniques for rural areas. Technovation, 31(12), 689-699. http://doi. org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.07.005
  3. Ciocanel, A. B., Pavelescu, F. M. (2015). Innovation and Competitiveness in European Context. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 728-737. http://doi.org/10.1016/S2212- 5671(15)01455-0
  4. Di Iacovo, F., Moruzzo, R., Rossignoli, C., Scarpellini, P. (2014). Transition Management and Social Innovation in Rural Areas: Lessons from Social Farming. Agricultural Education and Extension, 20(3), 327-347. http://doi.org/10.1080/138922 4X.2014.887761
  5. Doina, D., Sandu, C. (2014). The Impact of Regional Innovative Clusters on Competitiveness. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 405-414. http://doi. org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.502
  6. Doloreux, D., Dionne, S. (2008). Is regional innovation system possible in peripheral regions? Some evidence from La Pocatiere, Canada. Entrepreneurship Regional Development, 20(3), 259-283.
  7. Esparcia, J. (2014). Innovation and networks in rural areas. An analysis from European innovative projects. Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 1-14. http://doi.org/10.1016/j. jrurstud.2013.12.004
  8. Feher, A. A., Handaric, A. G. (2016). Competitiveness, innovation and rural areas development under the European funds. Journal of Biotechnology, 231(2016), S75. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.05.272
  9. Kolarska-Bobińska. L., Rosner, A., Wilkin, J. (2001). Przyszłość wsi polskiej. Wizje strategie, koncepcje. Instytut Spraw Publicznych, Warszawa
  10. Kolehmainen, J., Irvine, J., Stewart, L., Karacsonyi, Z., Szabó, T., Alarinta, J., Norberg, A. (2016). Quadruple Helix, Innovation and the Knowledge-Based Development: Lessons from Remote, Rural and Less-Favoured Regions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(1), 23-42. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0289-9
  11. Kumar, V., Mudambi, R., Gray, S. (2013). Journal of International Management Internationalization, Innovation and Institutions : The 3 I's Underpinning the Competitiveness of Emerging Market Firms. Journal of International Management, 19(3), 203-206. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2013.03.005
  12. Pelkonen, A., Nieminen, M. (2015). How beneficial is a knowledge-based development strategy for peripheral regions? A case study. European Planning Studies. doi:10.1080/0 9654313.2015.1047740.
  13. Provenzano, V., Arnone, M., Seminara, M. R. (2016). Innovation in the Rural Areas and the Linkage with the Quintuple Helix Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 442-447. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.269
  14. Ramstad, E., Chao, L., 2011. Out of the factory. The Wall Street Journal http://online. wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204485304576643330517247412.html
  15. Wójcik, G. (2011). Znaczenie i uwarunkowania innowacyjności obszarów wiejskich w Polsce. Wiadomości Zootechniczne, R. XLIX, 1, 161-168.
  16. Ziemiańczyk, U., Krakowiak-Bal, A., Mikuła, B., Woźniak, A. (2013). Zarządzanie wiedzą w procesie rozwoju obszarów wiejskich. Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich. 2013/ 04 (3 (Dec 2013)), 353-369
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1732-5587
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.medra.org/10.14597/infraeco.2016.4.4.146
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu