BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Rasit Yurum Ozan (Informatics Institute, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey), Özcan-Top Özden (Informatics Institute, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey), Demirörs Onur (Informatics Institute, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey)
Tytuł
Assessing Software Processes over a New Generic Software Process Assessment Tool
Źródło
Roczniki Kolegium Analiz Ekonomicznych / Szkoła Główna Handlowa, 2016, nr 43, s. 7-29, tab., bibliogr. 34 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Oprogramowanie, Procesy technologiczne, Technologia informacyjna, Norma ISO/IEC
Software, Technological processes, Information Technology (IT), ISO/IEC standard
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
Performing process improvement to deliver qualified products with the expected cost on time has been a requirement for organizations targeting to be successful in the software market. Software organizations usually perform process improvement based on well-known process assessment frameworks such as CMMI and ISO/IEC 15504. A number of derivatives of CMMI and ISO/IEC 15504 have been developed and they are being updated. As a result of this, the software process assessment tool based on them needs to be updated. Process assessment requires judgment and there is an unavoidable manual work. However, there are also opportunities for assessment automation. Therefore, there is a need for a generic software process assessment tool to define process assessment models and facilitate assessment. The existing tools do not meet the expected features of a software process assessment tool completely, as they have generally been developed for single process assessment models. In this study, we present GSPA, a generic software process assessment tool, which has been developed to support all structured process assessment models with its generic framework, facilitate assessment, support parallel assessment and present the reports in a well-structured way to the assessors. A multiple case study has been conducted to measure the sufficiency and the contributions of the tool. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Szkoły Głównej Handlowej w Warszawie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Aysolmaz B., Yıldız A., Demirörs O., BG-SPI: Yinelemeli Yazılım Süreç İyileştirme Yöntemi, Yazılım Mühendisliği Sempozyumu, Ulus 2011, pp. 163-169.
  2. Bella F., Hoermann K., Vanamali B., From CMMI to SPICE - Experiences on How to Survive a SPICE Assessment Having Already Implemented CMMI, "Lecture Notes in Computer Science"2008, vol. 5089, pp. 133-142.
  3. Caffery F. M., Dorling A., Medi SPICE Development, "Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution Research and Practice", August 2009, pp. 255-268.
  4. CMMI Browser, https://www.wibas.com/en/turning-visions/publications/onlinetools/ cmmi-browser/
  5. CMMI Product Development Team, CMMI for Systems Engineering/Software Engineering,Version 1.02 (CMMI-SE/SW, V1.02), Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2000.
  6. CMMI Product Team, CMMI for Software Engineering, Version 1.1, Staged Representation (CMMI-SW, V1.1, Staged), Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, December 2001, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2002.
  7. CMMI Product Team, CMMI for Development, Version 1.2, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2006.
  8. CMMI Product Team, CMMI® for Development, Version 1.3 CMMI-DEV, V1.3, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2010.
  9. CMM Quest V1.3, http://www.cmm-quest.com/
  10. CMMiPal v1.0, http://www.chemuturi.com/cmmipaldtls.html
  11. CMMI v1.1 Self-Assessment Tool, http://www.spipartners.com/english/tools/index.html
  12. Çelik F., Bozlu B., Demirörs O., The Tool Coverage of Software Process Improvement Frameworks for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, 10th International Conference, PROFES 2009, pp. 290-302.
  13. Gazel S., Sezer E. A., Tarhan A., An Ontology Based Infrastructure to Support CMMIBased Software Process Assessment, "Gazi University Journal of Science" 2012,vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 155-164.
  14. Gonzalez-Perez C., Mcbride T., Henderson-Sellers B., A Meta-Model for Assessable Software Development Methodologies, "Software Quality Journal" 2005, vol. 13, issue 2, pp. 195-214.
  15. Homchuenchom D., Piyabunditkul C., Lichter H., Anwar T., SPIALS: A Light-Weight Software Process Improvement Self-assesment Tool, Malaysian Software Engineering Conference, December 2011, pp. 195-199.
  16. Hunter R., Street R., Glasgow G., Robinson G., Court R., Woodman I., Court M., Tool Support for Software Process Assessment and Improvement, "Software Process: Improvement and Practice" 1997, vol. 3, John Wiley and Sons.
  17. ISO 15504-5 Information Technology - Process Assessment - Part 5: An Exemplary Process Assessment Model, ISO/IEC 2006.
  18. ISO/IEC 12207 Systems and Software Engineering - Software Life Cycle Processes, ISO/IEC 2008.
  19. Jeners S., Lichter H., Dragomir A., Towards an Integration of Multiple Process Improvement Reference Models Based on Automated Concept Extraction, 19th European Conference, EuroSPI 2012, pp. 205-216.
  20. Lepasaar M., Mäkinen T., Integrating Software Process Assessment Models Using a Process Meta-Model, Engineering Management Conference 2002, vol. 1, pp. 224-229.
  21. Loon H. van, Process Assessment and ISO/IEC 15504: A Reference Book, 2nd ed., Springer, New York 2007, p. 279.
  22. Mitasiunas A., Novickis L., Enterprise SPICE Based Education Capability Maturity Model, in: Workshops on Business Informatics Research, eds. L. Niedrite, L. Strazdina, B. Wangler, vol. 106, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin 2012, pp. 102-116.
  23. Model Wizard, http://isdinc.com/tools.modelWizard
  24. SIG Automotive, Automotive SPICE ® Process Assessment Model, 2010, pp. 1-146, http://www.broadswordsolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/A-SPICE_REFERENCE_MODEL.pdf
  25. SPiCE - Lite Assessment Tool, available: http://www.spicelite.com
  26. SPiCE 1-2-1 for International Standard, available: http://www.spice121.com. SW-CMM v1.1 Interim Maturity Toolkit, http://www.spipartners.com/english/tools/index.html
  27. S. Q. I. Griffith University, Appraisal Assistant, http://www.sqi.gu.edu.au/AppraisalAssistant/about.html
  28. Top Ö. Ö., Demirörs O., Agility Assessment Model v1.0, 2014.
  29. Walker W., House A. J., Park W., SPICE Assessments Using the SEAL Assessment Tool,Conference ISCN 1996.
  30. Wangenheim C. G. von, Carlo J., Hauck R., Salviano C. F., Wangenheim A. von, Systematic Literature Review of Software Process Capability/Maturity Models, in "11 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Product Focused Software Development and Process Improvement", May 2010, pp. 2-5.
  31. Weber K. C., Araújo E. E. R., Regina A., Rocha C., Machado C. A. F., Scalet D., Salviano C. F., Brazilian Software Process Reference Model and Assessment Method, "Lecture Notes on Computer Science" 2005, vol. 3733, pp. 402-411.
  32. Yürüm O. R., GSPA: A Generic Software Process Assessment Tool, M. S. Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey 2014.
  33. Yürüm O. R., Top Ö. Ö., Ertuğrul A. M., Demirörs O., Yazılım Süreç Değerlendirme Araçlarının Karşılaştırılması: Bir Çoklu Durum Çalışması, 8. Ulusal Yazılım Mühendisliği Sempozyumu 2014.
  34. Zhang Y., Wildemuth B. M., Qualitative Analysis of Content, "Analysis" 2005, vol. 1 (2), pp. 1-12.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1232-4671
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu