BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Trudel Sylvie (Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Canada), Turcotte Alex (Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Canada)
Tytuł
Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Software Process Evaluation: A Proposed Approach
Źródło
Roczniki Kolegium Analiz Ekonomicznych / Szkoła Główna Handlowa, 2016, nr 43, s. 135-153, rts., wykr., bibliogr. 28 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Oprogramowanie, Norma ISO/IEC, Ocena jakości, Benchmarking
Software, ISO/IEC standard, Quality assessment, Benchmarking
Uwagi
sum.
Abstrakt
This paper presents a method that combines a qualitative assessment method based on CMMI to uncover improvement areas of an organization's software process, and a quantitative approach to measure the software process productivity rate. The evaluation scope is first established: a list of projects and a list of CMMI key process areas to assess. The measurement of the productivity rate is obtained by measuring the functional size of the software developed and/or enhanced through projects, and then compared with the recorded project effort. The main reason for combining the approaches is to gain a deeper understanding of the organization's software process by examining the software requirements artefacts, which reveals the weaknesses of the requirements engineering portion of the software process. As a proof of the concept, a field trial of the combined method has been applied successfully in an organization developing financial trading systems.(original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Szkoły Głównej Handlowej w Warszawie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Abran A., Software Metrics and Software Metrology, Wiley 2010.
  2. Abran A. et al., The COSMIC Functional Size Measurement Method, Version 4.0.1, Measurement Manual, The COSMIC Group 2015, http://www.cosmicon.com/dl_manager4.asp?id=532
  3. Abran A. et al., Guideline for Assuring the Accuracy of Measurements, Version 1.0, The COSMIC Group 2011, http://www.cosmicon.com
  4. Chrissis M. B., Konrad M., Shrum S., CMMI Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement, Addison-Wesley 2003.
  5. The CMMI Product Team, Capability Maturity Model Integration © for Development, Version 1.3, The CMMI Institute 2010, CMU/SEI-2010-TR-033.
  6. The CMMI Institute, Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI) Version 1.3b: Method Definition Document for SCAMPI A, B, and C, Technical Report, The CMMI Institute 2014.
  7. Desharnais J.-M., Abran A., Assessment of the Quality of Functional User Requirements Documentation Using Criteria Derived from a Measurement with COSMIC-ISO 19761, International Workshop on Software Measurement - IWSM 2010, Stuttgart, November 2010, pp. 481-496.
  8. Garcia-Miller S., Lessons Learned from Adopting CMMI in Small Organizations, Software Engineering Institute 2005, http://resources.sei.cmu.edu/library/asset-view. cfm?assetid=19950 International Software Benchmarking Standards Group (ISBSG), Development and Enhancement Data Set 2015, Release 13, Obtained from http://www.isbsg.org
  9. ISO/IEC 14598-5, Information Technology - Software Product Evaluation - Part 5: Process for Evaluators, ISO 1998.
  10. ISO/IEC 14143-1, Information Technology - Software Measurement - Functional Size Measurement - Part 1: Definition of Concepts, ISO 2007.
  11. ISO/IEC 20926, Software and Systems Engineering - Software Measurement - IFPUG Functional Size Measurement Method 2009, ISO 2009.
  12. ISO/IEC 24570, Software Engineering - NESMA Functional Size Measurement Method Version 2.1 - Definitions and Counting Guidelines for the Application of Function Point Analysis, ISO 2005.
  13. ISO/IEC 29881, Information Technology - Systems and Software Engineering - FiSMA 1.1 Functional Size Measurement Method, ISO 2010.
  14. ISO/IEC 20968, Software Engineering - Mk II Function Point Analysis - Counting Practices Manual, ISO 2002.
  15. ISO/IEC 19761, Software Engineering - COSMIC: A Functional Size Measurement Method, ISO 2011.
  16. ISO/IEC 29110-1, Software Engineering - Lifecycle Profiles for Very Small Entities (VSEs) - Part 1: Overview, ISO 2011.
  17. ISO/IEC 29110-2, Software Engineering - Lifecycle Profiles for Very Small Entities (VSEs) - Part 2: Framework and Taxonomy, ISO 2011.
  18. ISO/IEC 29110-3, Software Engineering - Lifecycle Profiles for Very Small Entities (VSEs) - Part 3: Assessment Guide, ISO 2011.
  19. ISO/IEC 15504-3, Information Technology - Process Assessment - Part 3: Guidance on Performing an Assessment, ISO 2004.
  20. ISO/IEC 25000, Systems and Software Engineering - Systems and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - Guide to SQuaRE, ISO 2014, http:// www.iso.org
  21. ISO/IEC 15504-4, Information Technology - Process Assessment - Part 4: Guidance on Use for Process Improvement and Process Capability Determination, ISO 2004, http://www.iso.org
  22. Marciniak J. J., Software Engineering. A Historical Perspective, Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, Wiley 2002.
  23. Nguyen F., Estimated Cost for SCAMPI Class A, B, or C Appraisal, 2010, http://cmmirocks. ning.com/forum/topics/estimated-cost-for-scampi (08/07/2015).
  24. Paulk M. C., SW-CMM V1.1, Software Engineering Institute 1992.
  25. Trudel S., Using the COSMIC Functional Size Measurement Method (ISO 19761) as a Software Requirements Improvement Mechanism, Thesis, École de Technologie Supérieure 2012.
  26. Trudel S., Abran A., Functional Size Measurement Quality Challenges for Inexperienced Measurer, in: Software Process and Product Measurement, International Conferences IWSM 2009 and Mensura 2009 Amsterdam, 4-6.11.2009, proceedings vol. 5891, Springer Science & Business Media, pp. 157-169.
  27. Trudel S., Lavoie J. M., Paré M. C., Suryn W., PEM: The Small Company-dedicated Software Process Quality Evaluation Method Combining CMMISM and ISO/IEC 14598,"Software Quality Journal" 2006, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 7-23.
  28. Ungan E., Demirörs O., Top Ö. Ö., Özkan B., An Experimental Study on the Reliability of COSMIC Measurement Results, in: Software Process and Product Measurement, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg 2009, pp. 321-336.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1232-4671
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu