BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Novák Petr (Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Czech Republic), Dvorský Ján (Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Czech Republic), Popesko Boris (Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Czech Republic), Strouhal Jiří (Škoda Auto University, Czech Republic)
Tytuł
Analysis of Overhead Cost Behavior : Case Study on Decision-making Approach
Źródło
Journal of International Studies, 2017, vol. 10, nr 1, s. 74-91, rys., tab., bibliogr. 31 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Zarządzanie kosztami, Proces podejmowania decyzji, Analiza regresji
Costs management, Decision making process, Regression analysis
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: D70
summ., This paper is one of the research outputs of the project GA 14-21654P/P403 "Variability of Cost Groups and Its Projection in the Costing Systems of Manufacturing Enterprises" registered at the Czech Science Foundation
Abstrakt
Cost management is one of the most significant issues in company performance and company financial management which any enterprise has to solve as in the periods of declines of sales revenues, as well as during their growth. In this study we designed and tested several regression models that could be suitable for cost behavior prediction and subsequent decision-making based on these predictions. We used multiple linear regression models with a point estimate and with interval estimate of the model parameters. Comparison of regression models of cost behavior and their reliability was carried out due to the quality of the data collected for the case of basic and adjusted data. The overheads were divided into several groups of relevant costs and their dependences were examined on different factors other than only the production volume using the correlation matrix. From the results of the transformed model we believe that asymmetric cost behavior is affected by asymmetric behavior of the chosen factors. As the final one was intended the model representing the change in costs in time shifting about one-month period. This model can be used for examining costs in time shift by a short period (e.g., months) and thus it is possible to prove cost asymmetric behavior called "sticky costs". We used the model adjusted in accordance with Anderson et al. (2003). and we kept the model clearly transformed and assembled so that there remained only those variables that had a statistically significant effect on the dependent variable. The limitations of these models were also defined. Finally, graphical analyses of deviations were performed to find similarities in cost through cost centres and through the examined periods. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Abu-Serdaneh, J. (2014). The asymmetrical behavior of cost: evidence from Jordan. International Business Research, 7(8), 113.
  2. Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are selling, general, and administrative costs "sticky"?. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 47-63.
  3. Anderson, M., Banker, R., Chen, L., & Janakiraman, S. (2004). Sticky costs at service firms. Working Paper, University of Texas at Dallas.
  4. Anderson, S. W., & Lanen, W. N. (2009). Understanding cost management: What can we learn from the empirical evidence on sticky costs? Working paper, Rice University and University of Michigan.
  5. Balakrishnan, R., & Gruca. T. (2008). Cost stickiness and core competency: A Note. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25, 993-1006.
  6. Banker, R. D., & Byzalov, D. (2014). Asymmetric cost behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 43-79.
  7. Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., Ciftci, M., & Mashruwala, R. (2014). The moderating effect of prior sales changes on asymmetric cost behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 221-242.
  8. Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., & Plehn-Dujowich, J. M. (2013). Demand uncertainty and cost behavior. The Accounting Review, 89(3), 839-865.
  9. Bozkurt, O., Dokur, Ş., & Yildirim, A. (2014). The Importance of Cost Calculation Method in the Accounting and Management of Turkish Operating Costs. A Research within the Scope of TAS-2. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 4(2), 38-46.
  10. Brüggen, A., & Zehnder, J. O. (2014). SG&A cost stickiness and equity-based executive compensation: does empire building matter?. Journal of Management Control, 25(3-4), 169-192.
  11. Calleja, K., Steliaros, M., & Thomas, D. C. (2006). A note on cost stickiness: Some international comparisons. Management Accounting Research, 17(2), 127-140.
  12. Chen, C. X., Gores, T., & Nasev, J. (2013). Managerial overconfidence and cost stickiness. Retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2208622.
  13. Drury, C. (2012). Management and Cost Accounting, Eighth Edition. Thomson Learning.
  14. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol. 7). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  15. Hansen, Don R., Mowen, M. M., & Guan, L. Cost management: accounting & control, 6th ed. Mason: South-Western, 2009.
  16. Hansen, Don R., & Mowen, M. M. (2015). Cornerstones of Cost Management, 3th ed. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
  17. Hilton, R. W., Maher, M. W., Selto, F. H. (2008). Cost Management: Strategies for Business Decisions (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
  18. Nimocks, S. P., Rosiello, R. L., & Wright, O. (2005). Managing overhead costs. McKinsey Quarterly, 41 (2), 106-117.
  19. Noreen, E., & Soderstrom, N. (1997). The accuracy of proportional cost models: evidence from hospital service departments. Review of accounting Studies, 2(1), 89-114.
  20. Novák, P., & Popesko, B. (2014). Cost variability and cost behaviour in manufacturing enterprises. Economics & Sociology, 7(4), 89-103, 2014.
  21. Okunbor, J. A. (2013). The application of cost behaviour and estimation in organisational decision making process. Journal of Research in National Development, 11(1), 217-227.
  22. Oluwagbemiga, O. E., Olugbenga, O. M., & Zaccheaus, S. A. (2014). Cost Management Practices and Firm's Performance of Manufacturing Organizations. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(6), 234.
  23. Pichetkun, N., & Panmanee, P. (2014). The Determinants of Sticky Cost Behavior: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Retrieved from: http://www.jap.tbs.tu.ac.th/files/Article/Jap23/Full/Jap23NuchPana.pdf (2015-10-21), 2014.
  24. Popesko, B., & Socova, V. (2016). Current trends in budgeting and planning: Czech survey initial results. International Advances in Economic Research, 22(1), 99-101.
  25. Sharman, P. A. (2003). The case for management accounting. Strategic Finance, 85(4), 42-47.
  26. Slavik, S., & Bednár, R. (2014). Analysis of Business Models. Journal of competitiveness, 6(4), 19-40.
  27. Uy, A. O. O. (2011). Modeling cost behavior: linear models for cost stickiness. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 15(1), 25-34.
  28. Uy, A. O. O. (2014). The dynamics of firm competitiveness: evidence from cost behavior of Filipino firms. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 18(4), 84-95.
  29. Dalla Via, N., & Perego, P. (2014). Sticky cost behaviour: evidence from small and medium sized companies. Accounting & Finance, 54(3), 753-778.
  30. Weiss, D. (2010). Cost behavior and analysts' earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1441-1471.
  31. Yasukata, K. (2011). Are 'Sticky Costs' the Result of Deliberate Decision of Managers?. Retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1444746.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2071-8330
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-1/5
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu