BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Kordos Jan (Warsaw Management University)
Tytuł
The Challenges of the Population Census Round of 2020 : Outline of the Methods of Quality Assessment of Population Census Data
Źródło
Statistics in Transition, 2017, vol. 18, nr 1, s. 115-138, bibliogr. s. 136-138
Słowa kluczowe
Spis ludności, Analiza demograficzna, Ocena jakości, Gospodarstwa domowe
Census, Demographic analysis, Quality assessment, Households
Uwagi
summ.
Firma/Organizacja

Abstrakt
The author begins with the challenges of the population census round of 2020 and gives an outline of the methods of quality assessment of population census data. Next, the synthesis of two Eurostat documents (2007, 2009) and UN Statistics Division (2010) monograph relating to census data quality assessment are considered. Special attention is paid to three methods of census quality assessment: (i) demographic method, (ii) post-enumeration survey, and (iii) comparison with existing household surveys. Census quality assessment methods are discussed in the context of the international recommendations and experience of selected countries. Some Polish experience in these fields is also discussed, and some suggestions to the 2021 Polish Census of Population and Housing preparations are given. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. BARTOSIŃSKA, D., (2006). Attempts at Applying Small Area Estimation Methods in Agricultural Sample Surveys in Poland, Statistics in Transition, Vol. 7, No. 6, December 2006, pp. 1203-1218.
  2. DAUPHIN, M., CANAMUCIO, A., (1993). Design and implementation of post-enumeration survey: developing country example. Washington: International Statistical Programs Center, US Bureau of the Census.
  3. EUROSTAT, (2007). Handbook on Data Quality Assessment: Methods and Tools.
  4. EUROSTAT, (2009). Handbook on Quality Reports.
  5. GOŁATA, E., (2009). Economic activity in population census 2011 and administration resources. In: Gołata, E. (Ed.), Methods and Sources of Obtaining Information in Public Statistics, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu. Poznań.
  6. GOŁATA, E., (2010). Indirect Estimation of Economic Activity for the Register-based Census. In: Gołata, E. (Ed.), Measurement and Information in Economy, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu, Poznań, pp. 85-104 (in Polish).
  7. GOŁATA, E., (2012). Population Census and Truth, Studia Demograficzne, No.1, 161, pp. 23-55 (in Polish).
  8. GOŁATA, E., (2014). Census quality of the new generation, Wiadomości Statystyczne, No. 5, pp. 26-53. (in Polish).
  9. GOŁATA, E., (2016). Shift in Methodology and Population Census Quality, Statistics in Transition-new series, December 2016, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 1-14.
  10. HOGAN, H., (1992). The 1990 Post-Enumeration Survey: An Overview, The American Statistician, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 261-269.
  11. HOGAN, H., (2003). The Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Theory and Design. Survey Methodology, 29 (2): 129-138.
  12. HOGAN, H., WOLTER, K. (1988). Measuring Accuracy in a Post- Enumeration Survey, Survey Methodology, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 99-116.
  13. KORDOS, J., (1987). Data Accuracy in Social Surveys (in Polish). BWS, GUS, t. 35, Warszawa.
  14. KORDOS, J., (1988). Quality of Statistical Data (in Polish), PWE, Warsaw , pp.244.
  15. KORDOS, J., (2007). Some Aspects of Post-Enumeration Surveys in Poland, Statistics in Transition-new series, December 2007, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp.563-576.
  16. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL, (2009). Coverage Measurement in the 2010 Census. Panel on Correlation Bias and Coverage Measurement in the 2010 Decennial Census, Robert M. Bell and Michael L. Cohen (Eds.). Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12524/coverage- measurement-in-the-2010-census.
  17. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL, (2010). Envisioning the 2020 Census, 2010. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12865/envisioning-the-2020-census.
  18. NOWAK, L., (1998). Quality of Census Data, In: Tendencies of Changes in Structure of Population, Households and Families in 1998-1995 GUS, Warsaw, pp. 22-31 (in Polish).
  19. NOWAK, L., (2008). The 2011 Census of Population and Housing -Methodology and Topics, the Committee of Demographic Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences (in Polish). http://www.knd.pan.pl/images/stories/pliki/pdf/Nowak_28_luty_2008.pdf
  20. ONS, (2005). One Number Census: Evaluation Report, Census 2001 Review and Evaluation, http: //www .ons.gov .uk/ons/guide-method/census/census - 2001/index.html.
  21. PARADYSZ, J., (1989). On non-sampling errors in women's fertility survey in the 1970 National Population Census. In: Problems of Statistical Surveys by Sampling. GUS, Warszawa, BWS, Vol. 36, pp. 154-159 (in Polish).
  22. PARADYSZ, J., (2010). Necessity of Indirect Estimation in National Census. In: Gołata, E. (Ed.); Measurement and Information in Economy, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu. Poznań, pp. 45 - 66 (in Polish).
  23. STATISTICS CANADA, (2009), Quality Guidelines, Fifth Edition -October 2009; http://unstats.un.org/unsd/dnss/docs-nqaf/Canada-12-539-x2009001-eng.pdf.
  24. STATISTICS FINLAND, (2004). Use of Registers and Administrative Data Sources for Statistical Purposes. Best Practices of Statistics Finland, Tilastokeskus, Statistikcentralen, Statistics Finland, Helsinki.
  25. SZABŁOWSKI, J., WESOŁOWSKI, J., WIECZORKOWSKI, R., (1996). Index of Fitting as a Measure of Data Quality - on basis of the Post-enumeration Survey of Micro-census 1995, Wiadomości Statystyczne, No. 4. pp. 43-49 (in Polish).
  26. UN, (2007). UN Principles and Recommendations for Population and Housing Censuses: http: //unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sources/census/docs/P&R2_February %2012%202007.pdf
  27. UN, (2010). Post Enumeration Surveys Operational Guidelines. Technical Report. United Nations Statistics Division New York. Available at: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/standmeth/handbooks/.
  28. UN, Economic Commission for Europe, (2011). Using Administrative and Secondary Sources for Official Statistic, A  Handbook of Principles and Practices, New York and Geneva. http://www.bing.com/search?ei=UTF&pc=AV01&q=UN+Economic +Commissio n+for+Europe+%282011%29+%2CUsing+Administrative+and+Secondary+S ources+for+Official+Statistic%2C+A +Handbook+of+Principles+and+Practic es%2C+New+York+and+Geneva.+&FROM=AVASDF.
  29. UN, Economic Commission for Europe, (2015). Recommendations for the 2020 Censuses of Population and Housing, New York, Geneva. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sources/census/census3.htm.
  30. WHITFORD, D. C., BANDA, J., (2001). Post- enumeration Surveys: are they worth it? Symposium on Global Review of 2000 Round of Population and Housing Censuses: Mid-Decade Assessment and Future Prospects, UN Statistics Division, New York, 7-10 August 2001.
  31. WOLTMAN, H., ALBERTTI, N., MORIARITY, C., (1988). Sample Design for the 1990 Census Post-Enumeration Survey, Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, pp. 529-533.
  32. ZASEPA, R., (1993). Use of Sampling Methods in Population Censuses in Poland, Statistics in Transition, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 69-78.
  33. ZHANG, L.- C, (2011). A Unit-Error Theory for Register-Based Household Statistics, "Journal of Official Statistics", 27 (3), pp. 415-432.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1234-7655
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu