BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Erdal İbrahim (University of Suleyman Demirel, Isparta, Turkey), Demircan Vecdi (University of Suleyman Demirel, Isparta, Turkey), Aynaci Dervis (University of Suleyman Demirel, Isparta, Turkey), Ekinci Kamil (University of Suleyman Demirel, Isparta, Turkey)
Tytuł
Agro-Economic Analysis of Compost Derived from Organic Kitchen Wastes
Źródło
Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich, 2017, nr II/2, s. 747-755, tab., bibliogr. 19 poz.
Infrastructure and Ecology of Rural Areas
Słowa kluczowe
Gospodarstwa domowe, Utylizacja odpadów, Straty gospodarcze
Households, Waste utilization, Economic losses
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
In this research, it was aimed to determine the amount of compost obtained from organic kitchen waste in Isparta province and the resulting economic loss when these wastes were not recycled as compost. Composting of organic kitchen wastes collected from the selected households was carried out in a home composter in the Laboratory of Composting and Biogas, Department of Agricultural Machinery and Technology Engineering, Süleyman Demirel University. The results showed that the concentrations of N, P2 O5 , K2 O, MgO, and CaO of the finished compost were determined as 1.73%, 1.00%, 1.91%, 1.00%, and 3.72%, respectively. Results revealed that kitchen organic waste corresponding to 0.66 kg N, 0.38 kg P2 O5 , 0.73 kg K2 O, 0.38 kg MgO, and 1.41 kg CaO kitchen waste per household per year was wasted without utilization. In the study, the economic value of the wastes when not recycled as compost was determined as 54658$, 29389$, and 111237$ per year corresponding urea, triple superphosphate, and potassium sulphate, respectively based on the commercial fertilizer price. It was determined that compost obtained from organic kitchen wastes was found to be 386164$ per year when economic value was calculated directly as compost rather than as equivalent commercial fertilizer. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Adediran J A., Taiwo L B., Sobulo R A. (2003). Effect of organic wastes and method of composting on compost maturity, nutrient composition of compost and yields of two vegetable crops. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 22(4): 95-109.
  2. Alburquerque J A., Gonzálvez J., García D., Cegarra J. (2007). Effects of a compost made from the solid by-product ("alperujo") of the two-phase centrifugation system for olive oil extraction and cotton gin waste on growth and nutrient content of ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Bioresource Technology, 98(4): 940-945.
  3. Anonymous: http://www.cygm.gov.tr/cygm/files/eylemplan/atikeylemplani.pdf (Access date: 14.3.2017)
  4. Aynacı D., Erdal İ. (2016). Effect of home-originated waste compost on growth and nutrient concentration of corn and pepper. Suleyman Demirel University, Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences. 20 (1), 123-128
  5. Baldi E., Marcolini G., Quartieri M., Sorrenti G., Toselli M. (2014). Effect of organic fertilization on nutrient concentration and accumulation in nectarine (Prunus persica var. nucipersica) trees: The effect of rate of application. Scientia Horticulturae. 179: 174-179.
  6. Doan T T., Jusselme DM., Lata JC., Nguyen BV:, Jouquet P. (2013). The earthworm species Metaphire posthuma modulates the effect of organic amendments (compost vs. vermicompost from buffalo manure) on soil microbial properties: A laboratory experiment. European Journal of Soil Biology, 59:15-21.
  7. Doan T T., Bouvier C., Bettarel Y., Bouvier T., Henry-des-Tureaux T., Janeau J L., Lamballe P., Nguyen B V., Jouquet P. (2014). Influence of buffalo manure, compost, vermicompost and biochar amendments on bacterial and viral communities in soil and adjacent aquatic systems. Applied Soil Ecology, 73:78-86.
  8. Ekinci K., Kumbul B S., Akbolat D., Erdal I., Bitrak B. (2016). Composting of municipal open market wastes with different materials. Feb-Fresenıus Environmental Bulletin, 4026.
  9. Güler S. (2001). Kompostlaştırılmış materyallerin tarımda kullanımı. Türkiye II. Ekolojik Tarım Sempozyumu 14-16 Kasım. Antalya. 353-362 s. (in Turkish).
  10. Havlin J L., Beaton J D., Nelson WL., Tisdale S L. (2005). Soil fertility and fertilizers: An introduction to nutrient management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  11. Haydar S., Masood J. (2011). Evaluation of kitchen waste composting and its comparison with compost prepared from municipal solid waste. Pakistan Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 8: 26-33.
  12. Jaya N., Sekiozoic V., Anda M. (2006). Effect of pre-composting on vermicomposting of kitchen waste. Bioresource Technology, 97(16): 2091-2095.
  13. Keener H M., Marugg C., Hansen R C.,Hoitink H A J. (1993). Optimizing the efficiency of the composting process. In: Hoitink, H.A.J., Keener, H.M. (Eds.), Science and Engineering of Composting: Design, Environmental, Microbiological and Utilization Aspects. Renaissance Publications, Ohio, pp. 59-94.
  14. Kibria M G., Hossain N., Ahammad M J., Osman K T. (2013). Effects of poultry manure, kitchen waste compost and NPK fertilizer on growth and yield of ladies finger. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology, 2 (6): 55-60.
  15. Marschner H. (2011). Marschner's mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press. 889 s.
  16. Mousavi S A., Faraji M. (2016). The influence of exploited compounds type in the vermicompost medium on the quality of produced compost from kitchen waste, garden waste and cow dung by Eisenia fetida. Journal of Health in the Field, 4(2). 1-13
  17. Nair J., Sekiozoic V., Anda M. (2006). Effect of pre-composting on vermicomposting of kitchen waste. Bioresource Technology, 97(16): 2091-2095.
  18. Skadborg M M., Nielsen M E H., Kirkelund G M., Scheutz C. (2016). Assessment of kitchen waste compost from Sisimiut for use as plant growth medium or landfill biocover. In ARTEK Event. International Conference Sanitation in Cold Climate Regions (p. 102).
  19. Yaman K. (2012). Recycling of vegetative wastes and their economic value. Kastamonu Univ., Journal of Forestry Faculty. 12 (2): 339-348.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1732-5587
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.medra.org/10.14597/infraeco.2017.2.2.057
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu