BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Draskovic Mimo (University of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro), Jovovic Radislav (Mediteranean University, Podgorica, Montenegro), Draskovic Veselin (University of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro), Jovovic Nebojsa (International University of Travnik, Bosnia and Herzegovina)
Levels and Factors of Transitional Crisis in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Serbia
Economics & Sociology, 2017, vol. 10, nr 2, s. 21-32, rys., tab., bibliogr. 50 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Geoekonomia, Kryzys społeczno-gospodarczy, Sytuacja społeczno-ekonomiczna
Geoeconomic, Socio-economic crisis, Social and economic conditions
Klasyfikacja JEL: D02, O17, P31, P37
Bośnia i Hercegowina, Czarnogóra, Serbia
Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia
This paper analyzes and explores the perception of the relevant subjects on impact degree of the five negative factors: a) path dependence - inherited crisis factors in socialism, b) globalization of geopolitics and geo-economics, c) the responsibilities of governing structures, d) deficit of realistic and pluralistic institutional changes, and e) neoliberal economic policies at the level of the transition crisis in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Montenegro. The aim is to determine the perceptions of respondents about the individual and the overall impact of selected factors on the transitional crisis. It starts from the hypothesis that in the transitional period all these countries had an increased level of socio-economic turmoil with dominating negative impact of the above mentioned factors. The conclusion is that overcoming the crisis requires consistent implementation of many social changes and economic reforms, which will induce the reduction and/or neutralization of all explored negative factors of influence, regardless of the expressed perception of their importance. The starting hypothesis has been fully proven using the multi linear regression analysis and a multiple hierarchical regression analysis. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
  1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson. I., Thaicharoen, Y. (2004). Institutional Causes. Macroeconomic Simptoms: Volatility. Crises and Growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, 49-123.
  2. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth. In: P. Aghion and S. Durlauf (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 385-472.
  3. Androniceanu, A. (2017). The Three-Dimensional Approach of Total Quality Management, an Essential Strategic Option for Business Excellence. Amfiteatru Economic, 19(44), 61-78.
  4. Becerra-Alonso, D., Androniceanu, A., Georgescu, I. (2016). Sensitivity and vulnerability of European countries in time of crisis based on a new approach to data clustering and curvilinear analysis. Administratie si Management Public, 27, 46-61.
  5. Berkowitz, D. et al. (2003). Economic Development. Legality and the Transplant Effect. European Economic Review, 47(1), 165-195.
  6. Boas, T. C., Gans-Morse. J. (2009). Neoliberalism: From New Liberal Philosophy to AntiLiberal Slogan. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44, 137-161.
  7. Central Bank of Montenegro (2014). Macroeconomic Report of the Central Bank of Montenegro, (referred on 23/06/2016) (in Serbian).
  8. Clague, C. (ed.) (1997), Institutions and Economic Development. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London.
  9. Csaba, L. (1995). The Capitalist Revolution in Eastern Europe. A Contribution to the Economic Theory of Systemic Shange. Edward Elgar, Aldershot.
  10. Cvilikas, A., Jurkonyte-Dumbliauskiene E. (2016). Assessment of Risk Management Economic Efficiency Applying Economic Logistic Theory. Transformations in Business & Economics, 15(3/39), 207-219.
  11. Delibasic, M. (2016). Hypothetical Matrix for Institutional Modeling of the Basis for Economic Development in the Countries of Southeast Europe. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 12(2), 147-159. 10.14254/1800-5845.2016/12-1/9 Delibasic, M., Grgurevic, N. (2013). Framework for Researching the Modelling Possibilities of Institutional Behavior. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 9(4), 65-76.
  12. Denzau, A. T., North, D. C. (1994), Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions. Kyklos, 47(1), pp. 3-31.
  13. Domazet, T. (2010). Facing the Future of Economic Policy - Causes of the Crisis from the Political Economy Point of View. Proceedings of the Scientific Conference Facing the Future of South East Europe. Croatian Institute of Finance and Accounting, Zagreb, 770.
  14. Draskovic, M. (2016). Roots and Paradoxes of Neoliberal Apologetics. Economics and Sociology, 9(1), 209-219. DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-1/14
  15. Draskovic, V. (2006). Imitation of the Postsocialistics Institutionalization. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 2(4), 49-69.
  16. Draskovic, M., Draskovic, M., Bilan, Y, Delibasic M. (2016). Quasi-Neoliberalism as Quasi Institutional Monisms and Causes of the Crisis in South-Eastern Europe, Transformations in Business & Economics, 15(2B/38B), 755-765.
  17. Draskovic, V., Jovovic, R. (2006). Globalization in Economics Contects. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 2(3), 75-88.
  18. Draskovic, V., Delibasic, M. (2014). Neoliberal Rhetoric as a Metaphor For QuasiInstitutional Monism. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 10(2), 33-47.
  19. Draskovic, M., Bauk, S., Delibasic, M. (2016). Testing the Level and Factors of Institutional Rationality in Montenegro. Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Economics and Sociology, 9(2), 22-40. DOI: DOI:10.14254/2071789X.2016/9-2/2
  20. Drucker, F. P. (1999). Management Challenges for the 21st Century. Harper Busines, New York.
  21. EBRD (2012). Strategija za Crnu Goru, (referred on 26/06/2016).
  22. Hodgson, G. (2006). What are Institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 15(1), 1-25.
  23. Hodgson, G. M. (2006). Institutions. Recessions and Recovery in the Transitional Economies. Journal of Economic Issues, 15(4), 875-894.
  24. Jovovic, R., Draskovic, V., Jovovic, N. (2016). Quality of Knowledge in Higher Education in Montenegro. Transformations in Business & Economics, 15(3/39), 113-121.
  25. Infante, D., Smirnova, J. (2016). Environmental Technology Choice in the Presence of Corruption and the Rule of Law Enforcemen. Transformations in Business & Economics, 15(1/37), 214-227.
  26. Kovacevic, M. (2015), Catastrophic Economy and Social Consequences of the Application of the Neoliberal Ideology - are the Neoliberalists from Serbia Lost in Time and Space? Economic ideas and practice, 16/17, 279-312 (in Serbian).
  27. Lakic, S., Draskovic, M. (2015). Implications of Institutional Dispositions of Neoliberalism. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 11(2), 113-124.
  28. Lorot, P. (1999). Introduction a la Gśośconomie. Economica, Paris.
  29. Luttwak, E. (1990). From Geopolitics to Geo-Economics: Logic of Conflict: Grammar of Commerce. The National Interest, 20, 12-34.
  30. North, D. C. (1987). Institutions. Transaction Cost and Economic Growth. Economic Inquiry, 25(3), 418-432.
  31. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions. Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  32. Nort, D. C. (1997). Institutsional'nyye izmeneniya: ramki analiza. Voprosy ekonomiki, 3, 6-17 (in Russian).
  33. North, D. C., Walis, J. J., Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and Social Orders - A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. The Syndicate of the Pres of the Cambridge University, Cambridge.
  34. O'Hara, P. A. (2014). Political Economy of Love: Nurturance Gap. Disembedded Economy and Freedom Constraints within Neoliberal Capitalism. Panoeconomicus, 61(2), 161192.
  35. Ostrom, E. (2007). Challenges and Growth: The Development of the Interdisciplinary Field of Institutional Analysis. Journal of Institutional Economics, 5(3), 239-264.
  36. Palley, T. I. (2005). From Keynesianism to Neoliberalism: Shifting Paradigms. In: A. Saad-Filho, D. Johnston. Neoliberalism - A Critical Reader. Pluto Press, London, 20-29.
  37. Polterovich, V. (2012). Reform Design: How to Search for Interim Institutions. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 8(2), 25-44.
  38. Rodrik, D. (2000). Institutions for High Quality Growth: What They Are and How to Acquire Them. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(3), 3-31.
  39. Rodrik, D. (2007). One economics. many recipes: globalization. institutions. and economic growth. Prinston University Press, Prinston.
  40. Saad-Filho, A., Johnston, D. (2005). Introduction. In: A. Saad-Filho, D. Johnston. Neoliberalism - A Critical Reader. Pluto Press, London, 1-6.
  41. Scekic, R., Draskovic, M., Delibasic, M. (2016). Neoliberalism in a Function of Geoeconomics in the Case of Southeast Europe. Journal of International Studies, 9(1), 66-75. DOI: 10.14254/2071-8330.2016/91/5
  42. Saulius, T., Valanciene, D., Skurvydas A. (2016). Explanatory Value of the Culture Concept in the Contexts of International Business Communication. Transformations in Business & Economics, 15(2B/38B), 766-783.
  43. Skare, M., & Hasić, T. (2016). Corporate governance, firm performance, and economic growth-theoretical analysis. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(1), 35-51.
  44. Sueldo, M., Streimikiene D. (2016). Organizational Rituals as Tools of Organizational Culture Creation and Transformation: A Communicative Approach. Transformations in Business & Economics, 15(2/38), 89-110.
  45. Vitola, A., & Senfelde, M. (2015). The role of institutions in economic performance. Business: Theory and Practice/Verslas: Teorija ir Praktika, 16(3), 271-279.
  46. Vlada Crne Gore (2014). Strategija regionalnog razvoja Crne Gore za period 2014-2020. godina. Ministarstvo ekonomije, Podgorica.
  47. Vukotic, V. (2004). The political economy of economic freedom. In: Economic freedom and business associations. Faculty of Economics, Milocer, 9-29 (in Serbian).
  48. Williamson, O. E. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock. Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 595-613.
  49. Yerznkyan, B. H., Delibasic, M.. Grgurevic, N. (2014). Institutional Behavior: Theoretical Issues and Practical Realization. Economics of Contemporary Russia, 4(67), 19-30 (in Russian).
  50. Ząbkowicz, A. (2017). Economics and groups: methodological individualism and collective action. Oeconomia Copernicana, 5(1), 7-20.
Cytowane przez
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu