BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Draskovic Mimo (Maritime Faculty Kotor, University of Montenegro, Montenegro), Milica Delibasic (University of Business Engineering and Management, Bosnia and Herzegovina), Mladen Ivic (University of Business Engineering and Management, Bosnia and Herzegovina), Chigisheva Oksana (Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation)
Preference of institutional changes in social and economic development
Journal of International Studies, 2017, vol. 10, nr 2, s. 318-328, rys., bibliogr. 57 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Instytucje, Zmiany instytucjonalne, Rozwój gospodarczy, Wzrost gospodarczy
Institutions, Institutional changes, Economic development, Economic growth
Klasyfikacja JEL: D02, O10, O17, P37
S. Kuznets wrote that structural changes are the central element in the process of development and the most important part of the growth model. They can hinder the growth, if carried out too slowly or inefficiently, but they can also promote economic growth if the distribution of resources gets better. The article has presented the authors' attempts to present new approaches to modeling the institutional behavior of economic agents. Different approaches and views on economic growth and economic development in their application to institutional changes are considered. The descriptive method explains the hypothesis of the dominant role of social innovations (primarily institutional changes) in social and economic development. Significance of sociocultural capital in the context of contemporary knowledge economy is potentiated. The conclusion is that transition countries must use exemplary models and civilization achievements of institutional changes in developed countries. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
  1. Abramovitz, M. (1966). Readings in business cycles selected by a committee of the American economic association. London, George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
  2. Abramovitz, М. (1986). Simon Kuznets (1901-1985). The Journal of Economic History, 46(1), 241-246.
  3. Acemoglu, D. (2009). Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA, Princeton University Press,
  4. Acemoglu, D. et al. (2003). Institutional causes, macroeconomic simptoms: volatility, crises and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, 49-123.
  5. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. & Robinson, J. (2004). Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-run growth. Working Paper 10481, 385-472. NBER, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from
  6. Audretsch, D., Maryann, B. & Feldman, P. (2004). Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. Handbook of regional and urban economics, 4, 2713-2739.
  7. Barro, R. J. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 98/5(2), 103-125.
  8. Barro, R. J. & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1997). Economic Growth. Cambridge, Mass., MIT.
  9. Cornett, A. P. (2009). Aims and strategies in regional innovation and growth policy - A Danish perspective. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 21(4), 399-420.
  10. Chang Ha-Joon (2005). Globalization, global standards and the future of East Asia. Global Economic Review, 34(4), 363- 378.
  11. Chang Ha-Joon (2011). Institutions and economic development: theory, policy and history. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(4), 473-498.
  12. Čábelková, I., & Strielkowski, W. (2013). Is the level of taxation a product of culture? A cultural economics approach. Society and Economy, 35(4), 513-529. doi:
  13. Čábelková, I., Strielkowski, W., & Mirvald, M. (2015). Business influence on the mass media: a case study of 21 countries. Transformation in Business & Economics, 14(1), 65-75.
  14. Delibasic M. (2014). The post-socialist transition through the prism of O. Williamson's insight. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 10(1), 13-24.
  15. Delibasic, M. (2016). Hypothetical matrix for institutional modeling of the basis for economic development in the countries of Southeast Europe. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 12(2), 147-159.
  16. Delibashich, M. & Grgurevich N. (2014). K modelirovaniyu institutsional'nogo povedeniya. Teoriya i praktika institutsional'nykhpreobrazovaniy v Rossii, 28, 6-18 (in Russian).
  17. Denzau, A. T. & North, D. C. (1994). Shared mental models: ideologies and institutions. Kyklos, 47(1), 3-31.
  18. Draskovic, V., Jovovic, R., Draskovic, M. & Jereb, B. (2013). Knowledge - keystone of the modern economy. Celje, Osijek, Czestochowa & Kotor, SPH.
  19. Draskovic, M., Grgurevic, N., & Delibasic, M. (2015). Institutional properties of the Southeast European region. Economy of Region, 3(43), 17-24 (in Russian)
  20. Draskovic, M, Draskovic, V., Bilan, Y. & Delibasic, M. (2016). Quasi-Neoliberalism as quasi-institutional monisms and causes of the crisis in South-Eastern Europe. Transformations in Business & Economics, 15/3(39), 39-52.
  21. Draskovic, M., Bauk, S., & Delibasic, M. (2016а). Testing the level and factors of institutional rationality in Montenegro, Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Economics and Sociology, 9(2), 22-40.
  22. Draskovic, V. (2010). The real institutionalization as a condition of the efficient economic politics and economic development. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 7(1), 5-20.
  23. Draskovic, V. (2014). Neoliberal Metaphor. As a quasi-economic paradigm in function of vulgarized institutional monism and an experiment of interest. Celje, Osijek, Czestochowa & Kotor, SPH.
  24. Draskovic, V., Jovovic, R., & Draskovic, M. (2013). Depedence paradigmatic of 'knowledge economy' from level of institutional and economic development. Economics & Economy, 1(1), 7-30.
  25. Drashkovich, M. Drashkovich, V., & Bilan, Y. (2016). Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskiye faktory, tormozyashchiye razvitiye: opyt stran Yugo-Vostochnoy Evropy. Sotsis, 4(396), 103-111.
  26. Frydman, R., Rapaczynski, A., & Murphy, K (1998). Krade se država, pa i sve u njoj. Banka, 9(11), 63-67.
  27. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York, Free Press.
  28. Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social capital, civil society, and development. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 7-20.
  29. Fukuyama, F. (2004). Doveriye: sotsiallnyye dobrodeteli i put' kprotsvetaniyu. ACT Publ., Moscow: Yermak (in Russian).
  30. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2014 Global Report (2014). Retrieved from http: / / (21.01.2017)
  31. Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
  32. Hodgson, G. M. (2006). Institutions, Recessions and Recovery in the Transitional Economies. Journal of Economic Issues, 15(4), 875-894.
  33. Jovovic, R. (2012). Global financial crisis: role of international institutional framework, and lesson for transitional countries. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 8(3), 65-76.
  34. Koudelková, P., Strielkowski, W., & Hejlová, D. (2015). Corruption and System Change in the Czech Republic: Firm-level Evidence. DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, 6(1), 25-46. doi:
  35. Kuznetz, S. (1958). Long swings in the growth of population and in related economic variables. Proceedings of the American philosophical society, 102(1), 25-52.
  36. Kuznets, S. (1995). Economic growth and Income inequality. American Economic Review, March, 1-28.
  37. Kuznetz, S. (1996). Modern economic growth. rate, structure and spread. How Haven and London, Yale University Press.
  38. Landes, D. S. (1998). The wealth andpoverty of nations: why some countries are so rich and some so poor. New York, W. W. Norton.
  39. Laureaty Nobelevskoy premii po ekonomike: v 3 t. (2007). Nauch. red. V.V. Okrepilov, 1, 1969-1982. Moscow, SPb.: Nauka(in Russian).
  40. Lucas, R.E., Jr. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42.
  41. Mann, M. (2014). Vlast vXXI stoletii. Moskva, Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki (in Russian).
  42. Marcouiller, D., & Young, L. (1995). The Black hole of graft: the predatory state and the informal economy. American Economic Review, 3, 630-646.
  43. Naudé, W., Gries, T., Wood, E., & Meintjies, A. (2008). Regional determinants of entrepreneurial start-ups in a developing country. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 20(2), 111-124.
  44. Nawrot, K. (2015). Capabilities of leapfrogging and catching up of a developing country - policy implications from theory and practice, International Economics Letters, 4(4), 115-123
  45. Niňo-Amézquita, J., Dubrovsky, V., Jankurová, A. (2017). Innovations and competitiveness in regional development: a comparison of Latin America, Europe, and China. Czech Journal of Social Sciences, Business and Economics, 6(1), 2836. doi: 10.24984/cjssbe.2017.6.1.4
  46. North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. New York, W. W. Norton & Co.
  47. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York, Cambridge University Press.
  48. Nort, D. (1997). Instituty, institutsional'nyye izmeneniya i funktsionirovaniye ekonomiki. Moscow, Fond ekonomicheskoy knigi "Nachala" (in Russian).
  49. North, D.C. (2005). Understanding the Process of Institutional Change. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  50. North, D.C., Walis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and Social Orders - A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge, The Syndicate of the Press.
  51. Patnem, R.(1996). Chtoby demokratiya srabotala. Grazhdanskiye traditsii v sovremennoy Italii. Moscow, Ad Marginem (in Russian).
  52. Polterovich, V. (2012). Reform design: how to search for interim institutions. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 8(2), 2544.
  53. Reynolds, P. D. M., Hay, S. M. (1999). Global enterpreneurship, 1999 Executive Report.
  54. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71-102.
  55. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterlyjournal of economics, 70(1), 65-94.
  56. Strielkowski, W., & Čábelková, I. (2015). Religion, Culture, and Tax Evasion: Evidence from the Czech Republic. Religions, 6(2), 657-669. doi:
  57. Yerznkyan, B. A. (2013). Ekonomicheskaya teoriya i matematicheskaya nauka vs. praktika institutsional'nykh preobrazovaniy: istoki neudach i chto delat'? Teoriya i praktika institutsional'nykhpreobrazovaniy v Rossii, 27, 6-27 (in Russian).
Cytowane przez
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu