BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Spiridonovs Jurijs (RISEBA University of Business, Arts and Technology, Latvia), Bogdanova Olga (Riga Technical University, Latvia)
Tytuł
EU Energy Union : Adjustment to the New Development Cycle
Źródło
Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 2017, vol. 6, nr 1, s. 89-101, rys., tab., bibliogr. 25 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Polityka energetyczna, Bezpieczeństwo energetyczne, Marketing wewnętrzny
Energy policy, Energy security, Internal marketing
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: F5, O1, O2
summ.
Firma/Organizacja
Unia Europejska (UE)
European Union (EU)
Abstrakt
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to reflect the results of the research on the recent EU European energy policy following the launch of the concept of the Energy Union in February 2015. The authors analyse the issue of interdependency of the dimensions of the EU Energy Union: energy security, solidarity, trust, internal market, moderation of demand, decarbonisation, research, innovation and competitiveness. Design/methodology/approach - The paper summarizes the analysis performed by the various professionals and scientists in order to propose new methodology in evaluation the status of implementation of the energy policy. For the study the authors have used generally accepted quantitative and qualitative methods of economic science, inter alia comparative analysis, parameter estimation, grouping, economically mathematical modelling, synthesis, inductive, deductive, logically constructive and expert evaluation methods. Findings - The next step for successful realization of the EU Energy Union strategy is thorough planning for implementation of each of the defined instruments. Taking into account that fact that usually competences for practical transposition of different actions (mostly in form of legal acts) falls under responsibility of different institutions (both - regional and national), it is important to ensure an excellent coordination and constant cross-checking to avoid decrease of potential synergies between the benefits provided by the five dimensions. Originality/value - The concept of the EU Energy Union in terms of planning the energy policy is relatively new, however energy is one of the fundamental sectors of economy having significant impact on the development of any country. The authors propose original methodology in measuring the correlation of different dimension of energy policy. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Austvik, O.G. (2016). The Energy Union and security-of-gas supply. Energy Policy, 96, pp. 372-382.
  2. Dusciac, D., Popescu, N., & Parlicov, V. (2016). EU-Russia and the Energy Dimension of the Eastern Partnership. CES Working Papers, 8(2), pp. 251-268.
  3. Ellenbeck, S., Beneking, A., Ceglarz, A., Schmidt, P., & Battaglini, A. (2015). Security of Supply in European Electricity Markets-Determinants of Investment Decisions and the European Energy Union. Energies, 8(6), pp. 5198-5216.
  4. European Commission (2015), EU Energy in figures. Statistical pocket book 2015. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  5. European Commission (2015). Baltic Energy Market Inteconnection Plan1 1 , https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/infrastructure/baltic-energy-market-interconnection-plan (accessed: 15.12.2016).
  6. European Commission (2015). Commission Staff Working Document. Country Factsheet Latvia. Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank: State of the Energy Union. SWD/2015/0230 final, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52015SC0230 (accessed: 15.12.2016).
  7. European Commission (2015). Commission staff working document. European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Action Plan. Brussels, 10.9.2015. SWD(2015) 177 final, COM(2009) 248.
  8. European Commission (2015). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank: A Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy. COM/2015/080 final, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2015%3A80%3AFIN (accessed: 15.12.2016).
  9. European Commission (2016). Commission staff working document. Review of available information. Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on an EU Strategy for Heating and Cooling. Brussels, 16.2.2016 SWD(2016) 24 final, https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/1_EN_autre_document_travail_service_part1_v6_0.pdf (accessed: 15.12.2016).
  10. European Commission (2016). Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing an information exchange mechanism with regard to intergovernmental agreements and non-binding instruments between Member States and third countries in the field of energy and repealing Decision No 994/2012/EU, COM(2016)54.
  11. European Commission (2016). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning measures to safeguard the security of gas supply and repealing Regulation (EU) No 994/2010, COM(2016)52.
  12. European Council (2014). 2014.gada 24.oktobra Eiropadomes secinājumi, http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-169-2014-INIT/lv/pdf (accessed: 15.12.2016).
  13. Eurostat data base, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (accessed: 15.12.2016).
  14. Feder, A.F. (2016). "Why can't we all get along?" A conceptual analysis and case study of contentious energy problems. Energy Policy, 96, pp. 711-716.
  15. Focken, H. (2015). Between National Interests and the Greater Good: Struggling towards a Common European Union Energy Policy in the Context of Climate Change. Journal of International Affairs, Fall/Winter 2015, 69 (1), pp. 179-191, 13, https://www.questia.com/library (accessed: 15.12.2016).
  16. Glachant, J. (2016). Tacking stock of the EU "Power Target Model"... and steering its future course. Energy Policy, 96, pp. 673-679.
  17. International Energy Agency (2015). What is Energy Security? https://www.iea.org/topics/energysecurity/subtopics/whatisenergysecurity/ (accessed: 15.12.2016).
  18. Yang, M., Blyth, W., Bradley, R., Bunn, D., Clarke, Ch., & Wilson, T. (2008). Evaluating the power investment options with uncertainty in climate policy. Energy Econ, 30, pp. 1933-1950.
  19. Jirusek, M., Vlcek, T., & Kodouskova, H. (2015). Energy Security in Central and Eastern Europe and the Operations of Russian State-Owned Energy Enterprises. Brno: Masaryk University, pp. 337-688. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-8048-2015.
  20. Newbery, M.D. (2016). Towards a green energy economy? The EU Energy Union's transition to a low-carbon zero subsidy electricity system - Lessons from the UK's Electricity Market Reform. Applied Energy, 179, pp. 1321-1330.
  21. Official Journal of the European Union (2013). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/89 amending Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the Union list of projects of common interest [2015] OJ L 19/1.
  22. Schmid, E., & Knopf, B. (2015). Quantifying the long-term economic benefits of European electricity system integration. Energy Policy, 87, pp. 260-269.
  23. Spiridonovs, J. (2014). Development of Latvian water management system in the context of European Union co-funding: summary of doctoral thesis sumbitted for the doctoral degree in economics, subfield of national economy / Jurijs Spiridonovs; [scientific supervisor: Grigorijs Oļevskis]; University of Latvia. Faculty of economics and management. - Rīga: [Latvijas Universitāte]. p. 86.
  24. Szulecki, K., Fischer, S., Gullberg, A.T., & Sartor, O. (2016). Shaping the 'Energy Union': between national positions and governance innovation in EU energy and climate policy. Published online on 1 March 2016 by Taylor & Francis. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1135100.
  25. Tuvikene, L., Bogdanova, O., & Skribans, V. (2015). Regional Cooperation Optimization Model: Addressing Energy Challenges in The Baltic Sea Region, Eastern European Business and Economics Journal. 1(1), pp. 2-11.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2300-1240
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2017.006
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu