BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Klimczak Katarzyna (Warsaw School of Economics, Poland)
Cross-country Differences in Reporting Practices - the Case of Provisions for Liabilities
Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 2017, vol. 25, nr 3, s. 20-33, rys., tab., bibliogr. 32 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Sprawozdawczość, Sprawozdawczość finansowa, Pasywa, Regulacje prawne
Reporting, Financial reporting, Liabilities, Legal regulations
Klasyfikacja JEL: M41, M40
Purpose: The aim of the study was to explore and compare reporting practices on provisions for liabilities in different countries.

Methodology: The research was limited to the types of provisions that are addressed in the International Accounting Standard 37 - Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets. For the purpose of the study, fnancial statements of the biggest public companies in Great Britain, Germany and Poland have been chosen to be taken into consideration. The following detailed issues have been explored: - Presentation of the types of provisions in a statement of fnancial position and additional notes to a fnancial statement, - Presentation of the amounts of provisions made, used, and reversed during a given period and the effects of changes in the discount rate, - Scope and quality of descriptions of the nature of obligations presented by entities. The results of the analysis have been viewed from two perspectives - the areas of compliance and non-compliance of reporting on provisions with IFRS have been identifed and a comparison of the extent of compliance with particular requirements between companies from different countries has been developed.

Findings: The results of the analysis have revealed that companies from selected countries demonstrate different levels of compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Substantial differences in the scope and the quality of descriptive disclosures on provisions have been also identifed.

Originality/value: The study contributes to the research on cross-country differences in reporting practices and indicates the need for a further analysis of the underlying determinants. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
  1. Alexander, D., Archer, S., Delvaille, P. and Taupin, V. (1996). Provisions and contingencies: an Anglo-French investigation. The European Accounting Review, 5(2): 271-298,
  2. Amiraslani, H., Iatridis, G.E. and Pope, P.F. (2013). Accounting for Asset Impairment: A Test for IFRS Compliance across Europe. London: Cass Business School, assets/pdf_fle/0019/160075/CeFARR-Impairment-Research-Report.pdf
  3. Ballwieser, W. (2001). Germany - individual accounts. In: D. Ordelheide (ed.), Transnational Accounting. New York: Palgrave Publishers.
  4. Barbu, E.M., Dumontier, P., Feleagă, N. and Feleagă, L. (2012). Mandatory environmental disclosures by companies complying with IAS/IFRS: The case of France, Germany and the UK: 1-28, DOI=
  5. Bischof, J. (2009). The effects of IFRS 7 adoption on bank disclosure in Europe. Accounting in Europe, 6: 167-194,
  6. Chand, P., Patel, C. and Day, R. (2008). Factors causing differences in the fnancial reporting practices in selected south pacifc countries in the post-convergence period. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 13(2): 111-129.
  7. Cole, V., Branson, J. and Breesch, D. (2011). Determinants influencing the de facto comparability of European IFRS fnancial statements,
  8. Cooke, T.E., Choudhury, M., Olusequn and Wallace, R.S. (2001). United Kingdom - individual accounts. In: D. Ordelheide (eds.), Transnational Accounting. New York: Palgrave Publishers.
  9. Glaum, M., Schmidt, P., Street, D.L. and Vogel, L. (2013). Compliance with IFRS 3 - and IAS 36-required disclosures across 17 European countries: company- and country-level determinants. Accounting and Business Research, 43: 163-204,
  10. Haller, A. and Wehrfritz, M. (2013). The impact of national GAAP and accounting traditions on IFRS policy selection: Evidence from Germany and the UK. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation, 22(1): 39-56,
  11. Hatfeld, H.R. (1911). Some Variations in Accounting Practices in England, France, Germany and the U.S. Journal of Accounting Research, 4: 162-189.
  12. Holthausen, R.W. (2009). Accounting Standards, Financial Reporting Outcomes, and Enforcement. Journal of Accounting Research, 47(2): 447-458,
  13. Joos, P. and Lang, M. (1994). The Effects of Accounting Diversity: Evidence from the European Union, Journal of Accounting Research, 32, Supplement: 141-168,
  14. Klimczak, K. (2013). Reserves in traditional and contemporary accounting. European Journal of Business and Economics, 8(2).
  15. Kvaal, E. and Nobes, C.W. (2010). International differences in IFRS policy choice. Accounting and Business Research, 40(2): 173-187,
  16. Kvaal, E. and Nobes, C.W. (2012). IFRS policy changes and the continuation of national patterns of IFRS practices. European Accounting Review, 21(2): 343-371,
  17. Kvaal, E. and Nobes, C.W. (2013). International Variations in Tax Disclosures. Accounting in Europe, 10(2): 241-273,
  18. Nair, R.D. and Frank, W.G. (1980). The Impact of Disclosure and Measurement Practices on International Accounting Classifcations. The Accounting Review, July: 426-450.
  19. Nobes, C.W. (1983). A Judgmental International Classifcation of Financial Reporting Practices, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 10(1): 1-19,
  20. Nobes, C.W. (2006), The survival of international differences under IFRS: towards a research agenda, Accounting and Business Research, 36(3): 233-245,
  21. Nobes, C.W. (2011). IFRS practices and the persistence of accounting system classifcation. Abacus, 47: 267-283,
  22. Nobes, C.W. and Parker, R. (2012). Comparative International Accounting. Financial Times, Prentice Hall.
  23. Nobes, C.W. and Perramon, J. (2013). Firm size and national profles of IFRS policy choice. Australian Accounting Review, 23: 208-215,
  24. Mueller, G.G., Gernon, H. and Meek, G. (1994). Accounting: an international perspective. New York: Irwin.
  25. Mueller, G.G. (1967). International Accounting. Part I. Macmillan.
  26. Schultz, J.J. and Lopez, T.J. (2001). The impact of national influence on accounting estimates: Implications for international accounting standard-setters. The International Journal of Accounting, 36(3): 271-290,
  27. Seckler, G. and Voss, Ch. (2003). Germany. In: D. Alexander and D. Archer (eds.), European Accounting Guide. New York: Aspen Publishers.
  28. Seidler, L.J. (1967). International Accounting - the Ultimate Theory Course. The Accounting Review, 42(4): 775-781.
  29. Stadler, C. and Nobes, C.W. (2014). The Influence of Country, Industry, and Topic Factors on IFRS Policy. ABACUS, 50(4): 386-421,
  30. Sundgren, S., Mäki, J. and Somoza-Lopez, A. (2013). Cross-Country Differences in Disclosure Quality: a Study of Fair Value Disclosures by European Real Estate Companies: 1-37,
  31. Wehrfritz, M. and Haller, A. (2014), National influence on the application of IFRS: Interpretations and accounting estimates by German and British accountants, Advances in Accounting, 30(1): 196-208,
  32. Zeff, A.S. (2007). Some obstacles to global fnancial reporting comparability and convergence at a high level of quality. The British Accounting Review, 39: 290-302,
Cytowane przez
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu