BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Żmuda Małgorzata (Cologne Business School, Germany)
Towards a Taxonomy of International Competitiveness
Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 2017, vol. 25, nr 3, s. 97-116, rys., tab., bibliogr. 121 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Konkurencyjność międzynarodowa, Konkurencyjność, Analiza konkurencyjności
International competitiveness, Competitiveness, Competitive Intelligence (CI)
Klasyfikacja JEL: F23, F43, F60, L21, L52
summ., This project is funded by the National Science Centre, Poland (project: 2015/17/B/HS4/02075)
Purpose: A wide range of approaches to defning, modelling, and measuring international competitiveness can be found in the scholarly literature across various felds of management and economics. Such number of perspectives enhances scientifc research, but confuses public debate. Despite certain defnitional ambiguities, there is a consensus that international competitiveness is a multi faceted concept that should be analysed at different levels of aggregation: company level (micro), industry/cluster level (mezzo) and national level (macro). This paper addresses international competitiveness at all three levels and tracks the interlinkages between them with the aim to fnd a common ground for understanding this economic phenomenon in a systemic perspective: as a complex whole.

Methodology: The paper constitutes an indepth literature review, forming a basis for a new approach to categorizing the main perspectives on international competitiveness. A synthesis of the latest international competitiveness literature sources has been performed in order to categorize the existing approaches to defning, modelling, and measuring international competitiveness. Following Chandhuri's and Ray's (1997) twodimensional classifcation approach (the level of analysis and the variable), the paper introduces new insights into the existing taxonomy of international competitiveness.

Findings: Based upon the developed taxonomy, the paper offers an interdisciplinary, multilayered model of international competitiveness.

Originality: The offered fndings enhance the active shaping of modern competitiveness research directions to support the competitiveness policy on the regional and national level. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
  1. Atkinson, R.D. and Ezell, S.J. (2012). Innovation Economics: The Race for Global Advantage. Yale University Press.
  2. AuzinaEmsina, A. (2014). Labour Productivity, Economic Growth and Global Competitiveness in Postcrisis Period. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156: 317-321,
  3. Baily, M.N. (1993). Made in the U.S.A.: Productivity and Competitiveness in American Manufacturing. The Brookings Review, 11(1): 36-39,
  4. Barney, J.B. (1986). Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? Academy of Management Review, 11(3): 656-665,
  5. Barry, F., Panizza, A., de and Bogdanowicz, M. (2013). The knowledge economy, economic transformations and ICT in the EU25+: regional dynamics in the deployment phase. Case study: Southern and Eastern Ireland. Luxembourg: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
  6. Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. and Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1): 31-56,
  7. Bellak, C.J. and Weiss, A. (1993). A Note on the Austrian 'Diamond'. MIR: Management International Review, 33: 109-118.
  8. Berger, T. (2008). Concepts on National Competitiveness. Journal of International Business and Economy, 9(1): 3-17.
  9. Berger, T. and Bristow, G. (2009). Competitiveness and the Benchmarking of Nations - A Critical Reflection. International Advances in Economic Research, 15(4): 378-392,
  10. Bieńkowski, W. (2005). Instytucje jako czynnik konkurencyjności krajów postkomunistycznych: kilka uwag ogólnych dotyczących Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej. Warszawa.
  11. Boschma, R.A. and Lambooy, J.G. (1999). Evolutionary economics and economic geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9(4): 411-429,
  12. Bowen, H.P. and Moesen, W. (2007). Benchmarking the competitiveness of nations: benevolence versus equal treatment. MIT Press Scholarschip Online,
  13. Buckley, P.J. and Ghauri, P.N. (2004). Globalisation, economic geography and the strategy of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2): 81-98,
  14. Bujancă, G.V. and Ulman, S.R. (2015). The Impact of the Economic Freedom on National Competitiveness in the Main Economic Power Centres in the World. Procedia Economics and Finance, 20: 94-103,
  15. Caldentey, E.P. (2008). The Concept and Evolution of the Developmental State. International Journal of Political Economy, 37(3): 27-53.
  16. Cartwright, W.R. (1993). Multiple Linked 'Diamonds' and the International Competitiveness of ExportDependent Industries: The New Zealand Experience. MIR: Management International Review, 33: 55-70.
  17. Castellacci, F. (2008). Innovation and the competitiveness of industries: Comparing the mainstream and the evolutionary approaches. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(7): 984-1006,
  18. Chaudhuri, S. and Ray, S. (1997). The competitiveness conundrum: literature review and reflections. Economic and Political Weekly, M83-M91
  19. Chesnais, F. (1986). Science, technology and competitiveness. STI Review, 1.
  20. Chesnais, F. (1991). Technological Competitiveness Considered as a Form of Structural Competitiveness. In: Technology and National Competitiveness. McGillQueen's University Press.
  21. Cho, D.S. (1998). From National Competitiveness to Bloc and Global Competitiveness. Competitiveness Review, 8(1): 11-23.
  22. Cho, D.S. and Moon, H.C. (2008). From Adam Smith to Michael Porter: evolution of competitiveness theory (Reprinted). New Jersey: World Scientific.
  23. Chong, A. (2007). Singapore's Political Economy, 1997-2007: Strategizing Economic Assurance for Globalization. Asian Survey, 47(6): 952-976,
  24. Cohen, S.S. and Zysman, J. (1988). Manufacturing Innovation and American Industrial Competitiveness. Science, 239(4844): 1110-1115.
  25. Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152,
  26. Conner, K.R. (1991). A Historical Comparison of ResourceBased Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? Journal of Management, 17(1): 121-154,
  27. Daszkiewicz, N. (ed.) (2008). Konkurencyjność. Poziom makro, mezo, mikro. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  28. D'aveni, R.A. (2010). Hypercompetition. Simon and Schuster.
  29. Delgado, M., Porter, M.E. and Stern, S. (2014). Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. Research Policy, 43(10): 1785-1799.
  30. Dess, G.G., Ireland, R.D. and Hitt, M.A. (1990). Industry Effects and Strategic Management Research. Journal of Management, 16(1): 7-27,
  31. Doryan, E.A. (1993). An institutional perspective of competitiveness and industrial restructuring policies in developing countries. Journal of Economic Issues, 27(2): 451.
  32. Dosi, G. and Soete, L. (1991). Technological Innovation and International Competitiveness. In: Technology and National Competitiveness. McGillQueen's University Press.
  33. Dunning, J.H. (1993). Internationalizing Porter's Diamond. MIR: Management International Review, 33, 7-15.
  34. Dunning, J.H. (1998). Location and the Multinational Enterprise: A Neglected Factor? Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 45-66,
  35. Dunning, J.H. and Lundan, S.M. (2008). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  36. Dunn, M. (1994). Do Nations Compete Economically. Intereconomics, November: 303-308.
  37. Fagerberg, J. (1988). International Competitiveness. The Economic Journal, 98(391): 355-374,
  38. Faucher, P. (1991). The State and International Trade: Technology and Competitiveness. In: Technology and National Competitiveness. McGillQueen's University Press.
  39. Flint, G.D. (2000). What is the Meaning of Competitive Advantage? Advances in Competitiveness Research, 8(1): 121-129.
  40. Fundeanu, D.D. and Badele, C.S. (2014). The Impact of Regional Innovative Clusters on Competitiveness. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124: 405-414,
  41. Gleeson, A.M., Ruane, F. and Sutherland, J. (2005). Promoting Industrial Clusters: Evidence from Ireland, Multinationals, Clusters and Innovation, 89: 107-119.
  42. Green, R. (2000). Irish ICT cluster. In: Paper delivered to the OECD Cluster Focus Group Workshop, Utrecht.
  43. Gugler, P., Keller, M. and Tinguely, X. (2015). The role of clusters in the global innovation strategy of MNEs: Theoretical foundations and evidence from the Basel pharmaceutical cluster. Competitiveness Review, 25(3): 324-340,
  44. Hodgetts, R.M. (1993). Porter's Diamond Framework in a Mexican Context. MIR: Management International Review, 33: 41-54.
  45. Huemer, S., Scheubel, B. and Walch, F. (2013). Measuring institutional competitiveness in Europe, CESifo Economic Studies, 59(3): 576-608.
  46. Huff, W. G. (1999). Turning the Corner in Singapore's Developmental State? Asian Survey, 39(2): 214-242,
  47. Huggins, R. and Izushi, H. (2015). The Competitive Advantage of Nations: origins and journey. Competitiveness Review, 25(5): 458-470,
  48. Jagiełło, E. (2008). Strategiczne budowanie konkurencyjności gospodarki. Warszawa: Poltext. Johnston, L.D. and Chinn, M.D. (1996). How well is the United States competing? A comment on Papadakis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15(1): 68-81,<68::AIDPAM4>3.0.CO;2H
  49. Karodia, A.M., Soni, D. and David, J.E. (2014). International Competitiveness, Globalization and Technology for Developing Countries: Some Reflections from Previous Research. Singaporean Journal of Business, Economics and Management Studies, 2(9): 25-34.
  50. Ketels, C. (2016). Review of Competitiveness Frameworks,
  51. Khondker, H.H. (2008). Globalization and State Autonomy in Singapore. Asian Journal of Social Science, 36(1): 35-56.
  52. Kojima, K. and Ozawa, T. (1985). Toward a Theory of Industrial Restructuring and Dynamic Comparative Advantage. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 26(2): 135-145.
  53. Kolasiński, T. (2012). Devious Competitiveness Paths of SMEs in subSaharan Africa: Selected Issues. Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 5(118): 83-99,
  54. Krugman, P. (1991a). Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3): 483-499.
  55. Krugman, P. (1991b). Myths and Realities of U.S. Competitiveness. Science, 254(5033): 811-815.
  56. Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73(2): 28-44.
  57. Krugman, P. (1996). Making sense of the competitiveness debate. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12(3): 17-25.
  58. Landau, R. (1990). Capital Investment: Key to Competitiveness and Growth. The Brookings Review, 8(3): 52-56,
  59. Lewin, A.Y. and Volberda, H.W. (1999). Prolegomena on Coevolution: A Framework for Research on Strategy and New Organizational Forms. Organization Science, 10(5): 519-534, https://doi. org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.519
  60. Liu, D. and Hsu, H. (2009). An international comparison of empirical generalized double diamond model approaches to Taiwan and Korea. Competitiveness Review, 19(3): 160-174,
  61. Mahoney, J.T. and Pandian, J.R. (1992). The resourcebased view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5): 363-380,
  62. Martin, R. (2005). A Study on the Factors of Regional Competitiveness. Final Report for the European Commission.
  63. McGahan, A.M. and Porter, M.E. (1997). How Much Does Industry Matter, Really? Strategic Management Journal, 18: 15-30.
  64. Misala, J. (2011). Międzynarodowa konkurencyjność gospodarki narodowej. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
  65. Molendowski, E. and Żmuda, M. (2013). Changes In Competitiveness Among The Visegrad Countries After Accession To The European Union: A Comparative Analysis Based On A Generalized Double Diamond Model. Comparative Economic Research, 16(4): 121-153,
  66. North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.
  67. O'Clery, N. (2016). A Tale of Two Clusters: The Evolution of Ireland's Economic Complexity since 1995. Science, 317: 482-487.
  68. Olczyk, M. (2008). Konkurencyjność. Teoria i praktyka. Warszawa: CeDeWu.
  69. O Riain, S. (2000). The flexible developmental state: globalization, information technology and the 'Celtic Tiger'. Politics and Society, 28(2): 157-193.
  70. Ottaviano, G.I.P. and Puga, D. (1998). Agglomeration in the Global Economy: A Survey of the 'New Economic Geography'. World Economy, 21(6): 707-731,
  71. Papadakis, M. (1994). Did (Or Does) the United States Have a Competitiveness Crisis? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 13(1): 1-20,
  72. Papadakis, M. (1996). Confounding Productivity and Competitiveness: A Rejoinder to the Comment, 'How Well Is the United States Competing?' Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15(1): 82-88.
  73. Pelagidis, T. and Mitsopoulos, M. (eds.) (2014). Unlocking Growth: Innovation as a Driver of Competitiveness and Prosperity. In: Greece. Brookings Institution Press.
  74. Pereira, A.A. (2006). Biotechnology foreign direct investment in Singapore. Transnational Corporations, 15(2): 99-123.
  75. Porter, M. (2013). The Irish Internet Cluster: Helping a Tiger Regain Its Stripes. Harvard Business School.
  76. Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press.
  77. Porter, M.E. (1981). The Contributions of Industrial Organization to Strategic Management. Academy of Management Review, 6: 609-620.
  78. Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive.Advantage. New York: The Free Press.
  79. Porter, M.E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.
  80. Porter, M.E. (1990). What Is National Competitiveness? Harvard Business Review, 68(2): 84-85.
  81. Porter, M.E. and Rivkin, J.W. (2012). The Looming Challenge to U.S. Competitiveness. Harvard Business Review, 90(3): 54-62.
  82. Postelnicu, C. and Ban, I.M. (2010). Some Empirical Approaches of the Competitiveness' Diamond - The Case of Romanian Economy. Romanian Economic Journal, 13(36): 53-77.
  83. Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review,
  84. Radło, M.J. (2008). Międzynarodowa konkurencyjność gospodarki. Uwagi na temat definicji, czynników i miar. Czynniki i miary międzynarodowej konkurencyjności gospodarek w kontekście globalizacji - wstępne wyniki badań. Prace i Materiały, 284: 3-15.
  85. Redding, S.J. (2010). The Empirics of New Economic Geography. Journal of Regional Science, 50(1): 297-311,
  86. Reiljan, J., Hinrikus, M. and Ivanov, A. (2000). Key issues in defning and analysing the competitiveness of a country. Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Working Papers, 1.
  87. Reinert, E. (1995). Competitiveness and its predecessors - a 500year crossnational perspective. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 6: 23-42.
  88. Roper, S. and HewittDundas, N. (2015). Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and innovation: Evidence from matched patents and innovation panel data. Research Policy, 44(7): 1327-1340,
  89. Rugman, A.M. and Verbeke, A. (1993). Foreign Subsidiaries and Multinational Strategic Management: An Extension and Correction of Porter's Single Diamond Framework. MIR: Management International Review, 33: 71-84.
  90. Rumelt, R.P. (1997). Towards a Strategic Theory of a Firm. In: N.J. Foss (ed.), Resources, Firms, and Strategies: A Reader in the Resource-based Perspective. Oxford University Press.
  91. Runiewicz-Wardyn, M. (2012). Tworzenie i upowszechnianie wiedzy w branży biotechnologicznej na przykładzie regionów Flandrii i Walonii w Belgii. Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 5(118): 100-113,
  92. Samans, R., Blanke, J., Corrigan, G. and Drzeniek, M. (2015). The Inclusive Growth and Development Report 2015. Geneva: World Economic Forum,
  93. Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum.
  94. Sharp, B.M., Bergh, D.D. and Li, M. (2013). Measuring and Testing Industry Effects in Strategic Management Research: An Update, Assessment, and Demonstration. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1): 43-66,
  95. Siebert, H. (2000). Zum Paradigma des Standortwettbewerbs. Mohr Siebeck.
  96. Siggel, E. (2010). Concepts and Measurements of Competitiveness: Toward an Integrated Approach. Dimensions of Competitiveness, 95.
  97. The Heritage Foundation (2008). Index of Economic Freedom 2008. Washington.
  98. The Heritage Foundation (2016). Index of Economic Freedom 2016. Washington.
  99. The Heritage Foundation (2017). Index of Economic Freedom 2017. Washington.
  100. Thompson, E.R. (2004). National Competitiveness: A Question of Cost Conditions or Institutional Circumstances? British Journal of Management, 15(3): 197-218,
  101. Thore, S. and Tarverdyan, R. (2016). The Sustainable Competitiveness of nations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 106: 108-114.
  102. Tingvall, P.G. (2004). The Dynamics of European Industrial Structure. Review of World Economics / Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 140(4): 665-687.
  103. Trabold, H. (1995). Die internationale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit einer Volkswirtschaft. Vierteljahresheft,
  104. Van den Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W. and de Boer, M. (1999). Coevolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities. Organization Science, 10(5): 551-568,
  105. Van Egeraat, C. (2006). Spatial concentration in the Irish pharmaceutical industry: the role of government intervention and agglomeration economies. (NIRSA) Working Paper Series, 28.
  106. Van Egeraat, C. and Barry, F. (2009). The Irish pharmaceutical industry over the boom period and beyond. Irish Geography, 42(1): 23-44.
  107. Waheeduzzaman, A.N.M. (2011). Competitiveness and convergence in G7 and emerging markets. Competitiveness Review, 21(2): 110-128,
  108. Waheeduzzaman, A.N.M. and Ryans, J. (1996). Defnition, Perspectives and Understanding of International Competitiveness: a Quest for Common Ground. Competitiveness Review, 6(2): 7-26.
  109. Waldby, C. (2009). Singapore Biopolis: Bare life in the citystate. East Asian Science, Technology and Society, 3(2-3): 367-383.
  110. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resourcebased view of the frm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171-180,
  111. Wernerfelt, B. (1995). The resourcebased view of the frm: Ten years after. Strategic Management Journal, 16(3): 171-174,
  112. Williamson, O.E. (1981). The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3): 548-577,
  113. Winsor, R.D. (1998). Regional Integration and Competition from a Biogeographic Perspective: An Extension and Elaboration of Organization Ecology. Journal of Competitiveness Studies, 6(1): 30.
  114. Winsor, R., Sibeck, G. and Rody, R. (1996). Regional integration agreements and the borderless market: Lessons from history. Competitiveness Review, 6(1): 59-67.
  115. Wojtyna, A. (2008). O badaniach nad głębszymi przyczynami wzrostu gospodarczego. In: R. Rapacki (ed.), Wzrost gospodarczy w krajach transformacji. Konwergencja czy dywergencja? Warszawa: PWE.
  116. Wysokińska, Z. (2012). Konkurencyjność w międzynarodowym i globalnym handlu towarami technologicznie intensywnymi (hightech). Studia Europejskie, 1: 127-146.
  117. Zahra, S.A. (1999). The changing rules of global competitiveness in the 21st century. The Academy of Management Executive, 13(1): 36-42.
  118. Żmuda, M. (2016a). Evaluating sustainability and transferability of the 'Singaporean Competitiveness Model': Lessons for the catchingup European states. Research Papers of Wroclaw University of Economics, 447: 111-123.
  119. Żmuda, M. (2016b). Strategie pobudzania konkurencyjności Singapuru i Irlandii w świetle koncepcji państwa rozwojowego - wnioski dla gospodarek doganiających. Studia i Materiały. Miscellaena Oeconomicae, 3.
  120. Żmuda, M. and Molendowski, E. (2016). W poszukiwaniu istoty konkurencyjności gospodarki narodowej: studium interdyscyplinarne. Finanse, rynki Finansowe, ubezpieczenia, 81(3): 323-333.
  121. Zorzi, M.C. and Schnatz, B. (2010). Explaining and Forecasting Euro Area Exports: Which Competitiveness Indicator Performs Best? In: Dimensions of Competitiveness. MIT Press.
Cytowane przez
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu