BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Kowalczyk-Rolczyńska Patrycja (Wrocław University of Economics, Poland), Grishchenko Natalia (Novosibirsk State University of Management and Economics, Russia), Borda Marta (Wrocław University of Economics, Poland)
Tytuł
Pension Reforms in Poland and Russia : Mid-term Experiences from the Participants'Perspective
Źródło
Rozprawy Ubezpieczeniowe, 2017, nr 3(25), s. 48-63, rys., tab., bibliogr. 39 poz.
Journal of Insurance, Financial Markets & Consumer Protection
Słowa kluczowe
Ubezpieczenia społeczne, System emerytalny, Reforma systemu emerytalnego
Social insurance, Pension schemes, Pension system reform
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: P21, H55, J32
summ.
Kraj/Region
Polska, Rosja
Poland, Russia
Abstrakt
Poland and Russia, as the states that were the first to introduce social insurance programmes, have come a long way from a centrally planned budget for social security to an insurance-type model in the social sphere. The authors focused on pension systems, which are the most important components of social insurance systems. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview, comparison and evaluation of the pension reforms conducted in Poland and Russia taking into account a participant perspective. To achieve the purpose of this paper, the monographic method, a comparative analysis as well as document research were used. The varied experiences of Poland and Russia after nearly 20 years provide midterm lessons that could be useful to other countries. The study results suggest, inter alia, that despite the need for long-term stability, persistent volatility can be observed in the pension systems employed in Poland and Russia, reflected mostly in changes in the legal regulations and the principles of calculation and obtaining pension benefits; this has the deleterious effect of limiting participants' confidence in the system. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Szkoły Głównej Handlowej w Warszawie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Antia F., Lanzara A. P., 2011, Multi-pillared social insurance systems: The post-reform picture in Chile, Uruguay and Brazil, "International Social Security Review", 64(1), pp. 53-71.
  2. Barr N., Diamond P., 2009, Reforming pensions: Principles, analytical errors and policy direction, "International Social Security Review", 62(2), pp. 5-29.
  3. Bielawska K., 2014, Sustainability of structural pension reforms in the CEE countries - experiences and lessons, "Insurance Review", 4, pp. 111-122.
  4. Boeri T., Tabellini G., 2012, Does information increase political support for pension reform?, "Public Choice", 150(1), pp. 327-362.
  5. Brodmann S., Jilloson I., Hassan N., 2014, Social Insurance Reform in Jordan. Awareness and Perceptions of Employment Opportunities for Women, Social Protection & Labor, 1402.
  6. Cai Y., Cheng Y., 2014, Pension reform in China: challenges and opportunities, "Journal of Economic Surveys", 28(4), pp. 636-651.
  7. Chybalski F., 2012, Skuteczność i efektywność system emerytalnego. Koncepcja analizy i próba pomiaru, Scientific Bulletin of the Technical University of Lodz 1111, Politechnika Łódzka.
  8. Federal State Statistics Service of Russian Federation, www.gks.ru.
  9. Fornero E., 2015, Economic-financial literacy and (sustainable) pension reforms: why the former is a key ingredient for the latter, "Bankers, Markets & Investors", 134, pp. 6-16.
  10. Fultz E., 2002, Social security reforms in Central and Eastern Europe: How effective, equitable and secure?, ISSA.
  11. Fultz E., 2012, The retrenchment of second-tier pensions in Hungary and Poland: a precautionary tale, "International Social Security Review", 65(3), pp.1-25.
  12. Góra M., Rohozynsky O., Sinyavskaya O., 2010, Pension reform options for Russia and Ukraine: a critical analysis of available options and their expected outcomes, ESCIRRU Working Papers, 25, pp. 1-66.
  13. Grishchenko, N., 2007, Peut-on réformer l'assurance sociale dans les pays en transition ? L'exemple de la Pologne, de la Russie et du Kazakhstan, "Les Cahiers du CEDIMES", 1(1), pp. 87-99.
  14. Grishchenko N., 2016, Pensions after pension reforms: a comparative analysis of Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Russia, "Procedia Economics and Finance", 39, pp. 3-9.
  15. Guardiancich I., 2013, Pension Reform in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe. From post-socialist transition to the global financial crisis, Routledge, New York.
  16. Kowalczyk-Rólczyńska P., Pisarewicz P., 2015, Unit-linked life insurance in view of the new Act on insurance and reinsurance activities, "Insurance Review", 4, pp. 39-51.
  17. Maśniak D., Lados D.J., 2014, Pension Reforms in Poland and Hungary from the Legal Perspective - similarities and differences, "Insurance Review", 4, pp. 123-142.
  18. Mesa-Lago C., Bertranou F., 2016, Pension reforms in Chile and social security principles, 1981-2015, "International Social Security Review", 69(1), pp. 25-45.
  19. Müller K., 2014, Pension Privatization and Economic Development in Central Eastern European Pension Reform, [in:] Hujo K. (Ed.), 2014, Reforming Pension in Developing and Transition Countries, Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 41-68.
  20. OECD, 2009, Pensions at a Glance 2009: Retirement-income systems in OECD countries, OECD Publishing.
  21. OECD, 2011, Pensions at a Glance 2011: Retirement-income Systems in OECD and G20 Countries, OECD Publishing.
  22. OECD, 2013, Pensions at a Glance 2013: OECD and G20 Indicators, OECD Publishing.
  23. OECD, 2015, Pensions at a Glance 2015: OECD and G20 indicators, OECD Publishing.
  24. OECD, 2016a, Gross pension replacement rates (indicator). doi: 10.1787/3d1afeb1-en.
  25. OECD, 2016b, Net pension replacement rates (indicator). doi: 10.1787/4b03f028-en.
  26. OECD, www.data.oecd.org.
  27. Owczarek J., 2011, Druga fala reform emerytalnych w świetle zmodyfikowanej wielofilarowej koncepcji Banku Światowego, "Rozprawy Ubezpieczeniowe", 10(1), pp. 34-55.
  28. Pallares-Miralles M., Romero C., Whitehouse E., 2012, International Patterns of Pension Provision II: a Worldwide Overview of Facts and Figures. Social Protection Discussion Paper 70319, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
  29. Polish Financial Supervision Authority, 2014, Open Pension Funds Market in second quarter 2014, Warszawa.
  30. Polish Financial Supervision Authority, 2016a, Individual Retirement Accounts and Individual Pension Security Accounts in 2015, Warszawa.
  31. Polish Financial Supervision Authority, 2016b, Occupational Pension Programmes in 2015, Warszawa.
  32. Remington T. F., 2015, Pension Reform in Authoritarian Regimes: Russia and China Compared, Retrieved from: http://polisci.emory.edu/home/documents/papers/pensionreform-%20authoritarian-regimes.pdf.
  33. Sanchez Martin A.R., 2010, Endogenous retirement and public pension system reform in Spain, "Economic Modelling", 27, pp. 336-349.
  34. Social Insurance Institution, 2013, Social Insurance in Poland, Warszawa.
  35. Social Insurance Institution, 2015, Social Security in Poland, Warszawa.
  36. Social Insurance Institution, www.zus.pl.
  37. Schmähl W., Horstmann S. (Eds.), 2002, Transformation of Pension Systems in Central and Eastern Europe, Edward Elgar Publishing Inc., USA.
  38. Wagner H., 2005, Pension Reform in the New EU Member States. Will a Three-Pillar Pension System Work?, "Eastern European Economics", 43(4), pp. 27-51.
  39. Williamson B. J., 2006, Political Economy of Pension Reform in Russia: Why Partial Privatization?, "Journal of Aging Studies", 20(2), pp. 165-175.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1896-3641
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu