BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Wójcik-Bubała Joanna (i3D S.A, Poland), Jacenko Martyna (Florida Atlantic University, USA), Wójcik-Jurkiewicz Magdalena (University of Economics in Katowice, Poland)
Tytuł
The Importance of Accountability for Innovation Development Viewed Through the Mediating Role of Intellectual Capital
Źródło
Business and Non-profit Organizations Facing Increased Competition and Growing Customers' Demands, 2017, vol. 16, s. 319-331, rys., bibliogr. 34 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Kapitał intelektualny, Wartość przedsiębiorstwa, Pomiary, Odpowiedzialność
Intellectual capital, Enterprise value, Measurement, Responsibility
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
Although the concept of accountability itself is not new and in the literature, it appeared about 40 years ago, business has started to realize its importance only recently. Accountability can be understood differently in English or non-English languages. The examples of the most innovative companies demonstrate the culture with the characteristics of accountable organizations. Their innovation is in their culture and employees. Accountability as the important element of intellectual capital has the linkage to the innovation. Time will show if market and business are interested in the evaluation of accountability and its presentation in financial statements. The aim of the paper is to present the importance of accountability for innovation development as mediated by organizational culture and intellectual capital. It presents the theoretical concept of accountability as success factor of the innovation. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. AMA Enterprise, a division of the American Management Association® (2013). Survey Many Employees Seen Trying to "Pass the Buck". Retrieved from http://www.amanet.org/news/8636.aspx
  2. Beattie, V., & Smith, S.J. (2013). Value creation and business models: Refocusing the intellectual capital debate. The British Accounting Review, 45(4), 243-254.
  3. Brands, R.F. (2014). Accountability Supports Sustainable Innovation. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-f-brands/accountability-supports-s_b_4766441.html
  4. Connors, R., Hickman, C., Smith, T., (2010). The Oz Principle: Getting Results Through Individual and Organizational Accountability. USA: Portfolio.
  5. Dubnick, M.J. (2014). Accountability as cultural keyword. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.). Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (23-38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Forbes. (2017). The World's Most Innovative Growth Companies 2017. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/growth-companies/list/#tab:rank
  7. Fragouli, E. (2010). Intellectual capital and organizational advantage: an economic approach to its valuation and measurement. Paper presented at 9th Annual Meeting of the EEFS International Conference, Athens, Greece, 3/06/10 - 6/06/10.
  8. Gancarczyk, M., & Gancarczyk, J. (2016). SME supplier upgrading during the cooperation life cycle-Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of East European Management Studies, 21(3), 318-351.
  9. Gancarczyk, M., & Gancarczyk, J. (2017). Proactive international strategies of cluster SMEs. European Management Journal. doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.03.002 (Forthcoming).
  10. Gonzalez-Loureiro, M., & Figueroa Dorrego, P. (2012). Intellectual capital and system of innovation: What really matters at innovative SMEs. Intangible Capital, 8(2), 239-274.
  11. Gregersen, H., & Dyer J. (2017). Behind Rightmove's Extraorinary Growth. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/halgregersen/2017/05/17/behind-rightmoves-extraordinary-growth/#d4f409f7d743
  12. Hall, A.T., Fring, D.D., & Buckley, M.R. (2015). An accountability account: A review and synthesis of the theoretical and empirical research on felt accountability. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 38(2), 204-224.
  13. Hartnell, C., Yi Ou A., & Kinicki, A. (2011). Organizational culture and organizational effectiveness: A meta-analytic investigation of the competing values framework's theoretical suppositions. Journal of Applied Psychology 96(4), 677-694.
  14. Hiroyuki, I., & Roehl, T.W. (1991). Mobilizing Invisible Assets. England: Harvard University Press.
  15. IIRC, (2011). Discussion Paper: Towards Integrated Reporting- Communicating Value in the 21st Century. Retrieved from http://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/IR-Discussion-Paper-2011_spreads.pdf
  16. Inkinen, H., (2015). Review of empirical research on intellectual capital and firm performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(3), 518-565.
  17. Lank, E. (1997). Leveraging invisible assets: The human factor. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 406-412.
  18. Lindsay, T. (2017). Accountability vs. Responsibility -- What's the Difference? Retrieved from http://www.investorguide.com/article/15946/accountability-vs-responsibility-d1502/
  19. Martins, E., & Martins, N. (2002). An organisational culture model to promote creativity and innovation. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 28(4), 58-65.
  20. Merriam-Webster dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/accountability
  21. OECD/Eurostat. (2015). Oslo Manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/oslo-manual_9789264013100-en
  22. Osinski, M., Selig, P.M., Matos, F., & Roman, D.J. (2017). Methods of evaluation of intangible assets and intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(3), 470-485.
  23. Shearer, C. (2015). Accountability and Innovation. Retrieved from http://www.hewlett.org/accountability-and-innovation/
  24. Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M.A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. The Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450-463.
  25. Tellis, G.J, Prabhu, J.C, & Chandy, R.K. (2009). Radical innovation across nations: The preeminence of corporate culture. Journal of Marketing 73, 3-23.
  26. The Boston Consulting Group. (2016). The Most Innovative Companies 2016: Getting Past "Not Invented Here". Retrieved from https://www.bcgperspectives.com/most-innovative-companies-2016/
  27. The Partners In Leadership. (2014). Workplace Accountability Study. Accountability: The Low-Hanging Fruit for Optimizing Individual and Organizational Performance. Retrieved from http://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/1821898/Resource_Downloads/Workplace_Accountability_Study-Exec_Summary.pdf?submissionGuid=39116769-b3ef-47bf-afdc-2b677523a94e
  28. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Accountability Can Have Positive Results. Retrieved from https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/performance-management/reference-materials/more-topics/accountability-can-have-positive-results/
  29. Ujwary-Gil, A. (2017). The business model and intellectual capital in the value creation of firms: A literature review. Baltic Journal of Management, 12(3), 368-386.
  30. Ujwary-Gil, A. (2010) Kapitał intelektualny - problem interpretacji kluczowych terminów. Organizacja i Kierowanie, 2(14), 87-104.
  31. Veltri, S., & Bronzetti, G. (2014). Intellectual capital reporting in the Italian non-profit sector. An image-building or an accountability tool? In E. Costa, L. D. Parker & M. Andreaus (Eds.), Accountability and Social Accounting for Social and Non-profit Organizations (pp. 251-278). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
  32. Williams, R.(1983). Keywords. A vocabulary of culture and society. Oxford University Press, New York. Retrieved from https://tavaana.org/sites/default/files/raymond-williams-keywords.pdf
  33. Wójcik-Bubała, J. (2015). Importance of accountability in supporting management innovation. In A. Nalepka & A. Ujwary-Gil (Eds.), Business and Non-Profit Organizations Facing Increased Competition and Growing Customers' Demands. Vol 14 (pp. 123-131). Nowy Sącz: Wyższa Szkoła Biznesu-National-Louis University.
  34. Wójcik-Jurkiewicz, M. (2011). Kapitał intelektualny w teorii i praktyce rachunkowości. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, 668, Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 41, 321-329.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2543-540X
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu