BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Burzyński Tomasz (University of Silesia, Poland)
Tytuł
Public concern and the collaborative public management of technological risks
Źródło
Prace Naukowe / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach. Public risk management. T. 2, Wybrane zagadnienia, 2016, s. 85-94, rys., tab., wykr.
Słowa kluczowe
Analiza ryzyka, Zarządzanie ryzykiem, Organizacje publiczne
Risk analysis, Risk management, Public organisations
Abstrakt
This article aims to discuss the intrinsic significance of risk communication, societal perception of risk and wider public participation for processes of collaborative public risk management of technological hazards. The text, furthermore, offers a more sociologically oriented perspective on the idea of collaborative public management of technological risks as it focuses primarily upon societal mechanisms of consensus seeking as epitomized by risk communication, social capital accumulation and social conflict resolution. Methodologically speaking, the argumentation is based upon sociological theories - such as cultural theories of risk perception and acceptance and Ulrich Beck's theory of "risk society" - which aim to subsume processes of risk communication, mass scale social mobilization and public perception of technological hazards within an interpretative horizon of socio-economic changes affecting contemporary post-industrial societies, leading to the dissolution of certitudes typical of the industrial model of modernity. (fragment of text)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Agranoff R., McGuire M. (2003): Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Georgetown University Press, Washington D.C.
  2. Beck U. (1992): Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. Sage Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi.
  3. Beck U. (1999): World Risk Society. Polity Press, Cambridge.
  4. Bingham L.B. (2008): Legal Frameworks for Governance and Public Management. In: Big Ideas in Collaborative Public Management. ME Sharpe, New York.
  5. Burzyński J., Burzyński T. (2013): Ryzyko zachowań korupcyjnych w instytucjach państwowych na przykładzie Służby Celnej RP. "Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny", nr 2.
  6. Burzyński J., Burzyński T. (2014): Taming Risk. Uncertainty, Trust and the Sociological Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne.
  7. Burzyński T. (2014): Ryzyko z perspektywy badań kulturowych. Wybrane problemy metodologiczne. "ER(R)GO", nr 28.
  8. Douglas M. (1994): Risk and Blame. Essays in Cultural Theory. Routledge, London, New York.
  9. Douglas M., Wildavsky A. (1982): Risk and Culture. An Essay on the Selection of Environmental and Technological Dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles.
  10. Ewald F. (1991): Insurance and Risks. In: The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Eds. G. Burchell, C. Gordon, P. Miller. Harvester/Wheatsheaf, London.
  11. Giddens A. (1990): The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  12. Giddens A. (1991): Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  13. Granovetter M. (1983): The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. "Sociological Theory", Vol. 1.
  14. Henton D. et al. (2005): Collaborative Governance: A Guide for Grant Makers. William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, Menlo Park, CA.
  15. Kasperson R.E. (2005): Six Propositions on Public Participation and Their Relevance for Risk Communication. In: The Social Contours of Risk. Volume 1: Publics, Risk Communication & the Social Amplification of Risk. Eds. J.X. Kasperson, R.E. Kasperson. Earthscan Publications, London.
  16. Kuhn T. (1962): The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
  17. Lupton D. (2006): Risk. Routledge, New York.
  18. Putnam R.D. (2000): Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York.
  19. Rayner S. (1992): Cultural Theoty and Risk Analysis. In: Social Theories of Risk. Eds. S. Krimsky, D. Golding. Praeger, Westport.
  20. Regulski J. (2005): Samorządna Polska. Wydawnictwo Rosner i Wspólnicy, Warszawa.
  21. Renn O. (1992): Concepts of Risk. A Classification. In: Social Theories of Risk. Eds. S. Krimsky, D. Golding. Praeger, Westport.
  22. Renn O. (1992): The Social Arena Concpet of Risk Debates. In: Social Theories of Risk. Eds. S. Krimsky, D. Golding. Praeger, Westport.
  23. Savadori L., Savio S., Nicotra E., Rumiati R., Finucane M.L., Slovic P. (2010): Expert and Public Perception of Risk from Biotechnology. In: The Feeling of Risk. Ed. P. Slovic. Eathscan Publications, London - Washington D.C.
  24. Slovic P. (2011): The Perception of Risk. In: The Perception of Risk. Ed. P. Slovic. Eathscan Publications, London and Washington D.C.
  25. Sztompka P. (2004): The Trauma of Social Change. A Case of Postcommunist Societies. In: Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity. Eds. J.C. Alexander et al. University of California Press, Berkeley - Los Angeles.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu